English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51673453      Online Users : 532
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/64319
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/64319


    Title: 法人說明會與董監事連結之關聯
    Conference Calls and Board Interlocks
    Authors: 譚寧
    Contributors: 詹凌菁
    譚寧
    Keywords: 董監事連結
    法人說明會
    社會網絡
    自願性揭露
    Board interlock
    Conference call
    Social network
    Voluntary disclosure
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-03-03 15:30:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 董監事連結為社交網絡的一種型態,扮演董監事相互溝通與交流的管道。兼職於不同公司的董監事有許多機會獲取企業內部的可靠資訊,透過彼此互相交流與溝通,企業的資訊可藉由此種社交網絡傳遞散播於公司之間並影響各公司的企業行為與策略,本研究主要在探討此種溝通平台是否會影響公司自願性的召開法人說明會。本研究選取了2000年至2009年間的上市櫃公司作為樣本,研究結果顯示公司的董監事連結和法人說明會之召開有正向的關係,顯示當公司透過董監事的兼職而與其他有召開法說會的公司建立連結時,該公司更傾向召開法人說明會,且召開之次數更為頻繁。此外,當公司透過獨立董事和其他有召開法說會的公司建立連結時,此現象更為顯著。透過本文之額外測試,我們亦發現董監事連結的影響很可能公司在法說會揭露的資訊。
    In the field of social network, board interlock is a reliable communication channel for board of directors to transfer corporate information, which further influences the strategies or practices adopted by the firms. Conference calls have become a widely used medium for Taiwanese managers to communicate corporate information to the public in the past two decades. This study investigates whether board interlock as a social network affects corporate disclosure policies in terms of their decision to hold conference calls. By using the data from listed companies in Taiwan during 2000 to 2009, the results indicate that firms tied to other call firms through interlocked directors are more likely to hold conference calls. Moreover, I find that interlocking independent directors are positively associated with the decision of holding conference calls by the focal company. These findings are robust to changes in the measures of board interlocks and conference calls. Our additional analysis also indicates that the information disclosed in conference calls may be influenced by board interlocks. The findings in this study generally support the argument that board interlocks are associated with the spread of corporate practices.
    Reference: 李建然、廖秀梅、賴柏錚,2005,法人說明會之資訊內涵及公平性,中華管理評論國際學報,第8卷第3期: 1-17。
    金成隆、林美鳳、梁嘉紋,2008,公司治理結構和法人說明會之關聯性研究,管理學報,第25卷第2期: 221-243。
    金成隆、紀信義、林裕凱,2005,強制性財務預測與法人說明會關聯性之研究,管理學報,第22卷第5期:629-651。
    Ajinkya, B., S. Bhojraj, and P. Sengupta. 2005. The association between outside directors, institutional investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 43(3): 343-376
    Armstrong, C. S., J. E. Core, and W. R. Guay. 2012. Do Independent Directors Cause Improvements in Firm Transparency? Working paper, University of Pennsylvania
    Barney J., 1991. Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120
    Bizjak,J., M. Lemmon, and R. Whitby, 2009. Option backdating and board interlocks. Review of Financial Studies 22(11): 4821-4847
    Bowen, R. M., A. K. Davis, and D. A. Matsumoto. 2002. Do conference calls affect analysts` forecasts? The Accounting Review 77(April): 285-316
    Brown, J. L. 2011. The spread of aggressive corporate tax reporting: A detailed examination of the corporate-owned life insurance shelter. The Accounting Review 86(1): 23-57
    Brown, S., S. A. Hillegeist, and K. Lo. 2004. Conference calls and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 343-366
    Brown, S. and S. A. Hillegeist. 2007. How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry. Review of Accounting Studies 12(2): 443-477
    Bushee, B.J., D. A. Matsumoto, and G.S. Miller. 2003. Open versus closed conference calls: the determinants and effects of broadening access to disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34: 149-180
    Cai, Y. and M. Sevilir. 2012. Board connection and M&A transactions. Journal of Financial Economics 103: 327-349
    Cheng, E. C. M. and S. M. Courtenay. 2006. Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting 41: 262–89.
    Chin, C-L. and A, L-C Chan. 2012. Board interlock and auditor choice: Firm and partner level. Working paper, National Chengchi University
    Chin, C-L., P. Lee, P-W. Wang, and G. Kleinman, 2007. Does innovation matter to conference calls? IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management 54(4): 669-715
    Chiu, P-C., S. H. Teoh, and F. Tian. 2012. Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. The Accounting Review 88(3): 915-944
    Davis, G. F. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(4): 583-613
    Daivs, G. F. and H. R. Greve. 1997. Corporate elite network and governance change in the 1980s. The American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 1-37
    Davis, G. F. and W. W. Powell. 1992. Organization-environment relations. In Marvin D. Dunette and Leaetta M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 315-376. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press
    Davison, A. G., B. W. Stening, and W. T. Wai. 1984. Auditor concentration and the impact of interlocking directors. Journal of Accounting Research 22(1): 313-317
    Diamond, D.W. and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and cost of capital. Journal of Finance 46(4): 1325-1359
    Donnelly, R. and M. Mulcahy. 2008. Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance 16(5): 416-429
    Duchin, R., J. G. Matsusake, and O. Ozbas. 2010. When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics 96: 195-214
    Easley, D. and M. O`hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 59(4): 1553-1583
    Eng, L. L. and Y. T. Mak. 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 325-345
    Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M.C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301-325
    Ferreira, D., M. A. Ferreira, and C. C. Raposo. 2011. Board structure and price informativeness. Journal of Financial Economics 99: 523-545
    Fracassi, C. 2012. Corporate finance policies and social networks. AFA 2011 Denver Meetings Paper
    Francis, J. R., I. K. Khurana, and R. Pereira, R. 2005. Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world. The Accounting Review 80(4): 1125-1162
    Francis, J., D. Nanda, and P. Olsson. 2007. Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 46(1): 53-99
    Frankel, R., M. Johnson, and D. J. Skinner. 1999. An empirical examination of conference calls as a voluntary disclosure medium. Journal of Accounting Research 37(1): 133-150
    Frankel, R. and X. Li. 2004. Characteristics of a firm`s information environment and the information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 229-259
    Frankel, R., M. J. Mayew, and Y. Sun. 2010. Do pennies matter? Investor relations consequences of small negative earnings surprise. Review of Accounting Studies 15: 220-242
    Frankel, R., M. McNichols, and P. Wilson. 1995. Discretionary disclosure and external financing. The Accounting Review 70(1): 135-150
    Galaskiewicz, J. and S. Wasserman. 1989. Mimetic processes within interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly 34(3): 454-479
    Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510
    Goh, B. W., J. Ng, and K. O. Young. 2012. The effect of board independence on the information environment and information asymmetry. Working paper, Singapore Management University.
    Guedj, I. and A. Barnea. 2009. Director Networks. EFA 2007 Ljubijana Meeting Paper
    Haunschild, P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(4): 564-592
    Haunschild, P. R. and C. M. Beckman. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(4): 815-844
    Haunschild, P. R. and A. S. Miner. 1997. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2): 472-500
    Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 1993. The effect of firms` financial disclosure strategies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons 7(1): 1-11
    Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 405-440
    Hochberg, Y. V., A. Ljungqvist, and Y. Lu. 2007. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance 62(1): 251-301
    Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach. 2007. Transparency and corporate governance. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
    Ho, S. S. M and K. S. Wong. 2001. A study of relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 10: 139-156
    Hollander, S., M. Pronk, and E. Roelofsen. 2010. Dose silence speak? An empirical analysis of disclosure choices during conference calls. Journal of Accounting Research 48(3): 531-563
    Khanna, T. and C. Thomas. 2009. Synchronicity and firm interlocks in an emerging market. Journal of Financial Economics 92: 182-204
    Kimbrough, M. D. 2005. The effect of conference calls on analyst and market underreaction to earnings announcements. The Accounting Review 80(1): 189-219
    Kimbrough, M. D . and H. Louis. 2011. Voluntary disclosure to influence investor reactions to merger announcements: An examination of conference calls. The Accounting Review 86(2): 637-667
    Lang, M. H. and R. J. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst rating of corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 31(2): 246-271
    Lang, M. H. and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71(4): 467-492
    Lang, M. 1998. Discussion of "Bridging the information gap: quarterly conference calls as a medium for voluntary disclosure". Review of Accounting Studies 3: 169-173
    Lang, M. H. and Lundholm, R. J. 2000. Voluntary disclosure and equity offering: Reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock? Contemporary Accounting Research 17(4): 623-6620
    Lim, S., Z. Matolcsy. and D. Chow. 2007. The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review 16(3): 555-583
    Linck, J. S., J. M. Netter, T. and Yang. 2008. The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics 87: 308-325
    Matsumoto, D., M. Pronk, and E. Roelofsen. 2011. What makes conference calls useful? The information content of managers` presentation and analysts` discussion sessions. The Accounting Review 86(4): 1383-1414
    Mayew, W. J. and M. Venkatachalam. 2012. The power of voice: Managerial affective states and future firm performance. The Journal of Finance 67(1): 1-44
    Mizruch, M. S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22(1): 271-298
    Patelli, L., and A. Prencipe. 2007. The relationship between voluntary disclosure and independent directors in the presence of a dominant shareholder. European Accounting Review 16(1): 5-33
    Price, S. M., J. S. Doran, D. R. Peterson, and B. A .Bliss. 2012. Earnings conference calls and stock returns: The incremental informativeness of textual tone. Journal of Banking and Finance 36(4): 992-1011
    Rao, H., G. F. Davis, and A. Ward. 2000. Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(2): 268-292
    Robinson, D .T. and T. E. Stuart. 2006. Network effects in the governance of strategic alliances. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 23(1): 242-273
    Stuart, T. E. and S. Yim. 2010. Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. Journal of Financial Economics 97: 174-189
    Ruland, W., S. Tung, and N. E. George. 1990. Factors associated with the disclosure of managers` forecasts. The Accounting Review 65(3): 710-721
    Tasker, S. C. 1998. Bridging the information gap: quarterly conference calls as a medium for voluntary disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies 3: 137-167
    Useem, M. 1984. The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press
    Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 179-194
    Yang, B., J. F. Wang, J. Zhang, P. Wang, and W. Shu. 2012. Does the interlocking directorship hamper earnings quality? Working Paper, American Accounting Association Annual Meeting
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    100353044
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100353044
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    304401.pdf1554KbAdobe PDF2667View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback