政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/63343
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113484/144471 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51405951      線上人數 : 962
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63343


    題名: Pain Without Power
    其他題名: 無力量的痛
    作者: Lane, Timothy J.
    藍亭
    貢獻者: 心腦學中心
    關鍵詞: Pain;Consciousness;Episodic memory;Dennett;Super blindsight;Rewiring hypothesis
    痛;意識;場景記憶;單奈特;超級盲視;重鋪設電線假說
    日期: 2008-07
    上傳時間: 2014-01-07 17:17:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Some theories of consciousness emphasize its relationship to language, its emergent quality, and its causal role. Prominent among these theories is the one that Dennett has been developing for nearly four decades. According to Dennett’s most recent version, consciousness is a kind of cerebral clout. But consideration of examples of pain—arguably the best candidate on offer for a paradigm of consciousness—reveals that clout is neither necessary nor sufficient for consciousness. Moreover, pain doesn’t necessarily have the aftermath that is predicted by Dennett’s Clout Theory (CT); pain cannot always be accommodated by Dennett’s methodology; and, pain does not always conform to Dennett’s proposed ontology. Dennett might wish to substitute episodic memory as a preferred paradigm for consciousness, but episodic memory is shown to be non-essential. And, were it to be treated as a paradigm of consciousness, it would create new explanatory problems for CT. Rather than abandoning CT, because it does seem to help explain some pain phenomena and because it does comport well with certain views of language, I propose that some of its more intriguing proposals be retained and treated as hypotheses to guide further empirical inquiry. Finally, I recommend some specific empirical cases wherein relevant research might be pursued.
    一些有關意識的理論強調其與語言的關係、其突然冒出的性質、以及其做為原因的地位，其中最著名的是丹奈特（Daniel Dennett）發展了近四十年的理論。根據其最新的版本，意識是一種腦的「力量」。但是考慮疼痛──可說是意識的最佳典範──的情形，可知「力量」對意識而言既非必要亦非充分因素。此外，痛不一定產生丹奈特的「力量理論」（Clout Theory，CT）所預測的後果；痛並不總是適用於丹奈特的方法；痛也不見得與丹奈特提出的本體論相一致。丹奈特或許希望換用場景記憶做為意識的更佳典範，但研究顯示場景記憶並非必要，且若以其為意識的典範，將衍生出解釋CT時的新問題。我不擬捨棄CT，因其對解釋若干痛的現象似有幫助，且因其與某些語言觀點相當符合。我建議保留其中一些妙思，做為指引進一步經驗性研究的假說。最後，我推薦一些具體的經驗案例，也許值得做進一步的研究。
    關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 20, 123-182
    The national Chengchi university philosophical, 20, 123-182
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    123182.pdf395KbAdobe PDF21503檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋