 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
全文笔数/总笔数 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50922504
在线人数 : 967
|
|
|
数据加载中.....
|
请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63339
|
| 题名: | 真理與意識：從佛性論爭到朱陸異同的二種哲學類型 |
| 其它题名: | Truth and Mind:The Polemics in the Philosophical Trajectories from Chinese Buddhism to Neo-Confucianism |
| 作者: | 林鎮國
LIN, Chen-Kou |
| 贡献者: | 哲學系 |
| 关键词: | 理;性;佛性;唯識;如來藏;慧沼;法寶;朱熹;陸象山;現象學
Tathāgatagarbha;Yogācāra;Buddha nature;Phenomenology;Husserl;Heidegger |
| 日期: | 2012-07 |
| 上传时间: | 2014-01-07 17:17:01 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 如來藏思想與唯識學之間的爭論，特別是在漢傳佛教傳統的脈絡，其哲學意涵如何？擴大言之，該爭論在整體東亞哲學的發展上有何影響？我們又該如何評估該爭論的影響？關於這些問題，本文的回應主要選取七世紀末法寶和慧沼的爭論作為考察的起點，指出如來藏思想與唯識學的對立在漢語語境下確立了新的哲學論述方向，關連到十一世紀以降宋明新儒學的問題意識，特別是心學與理學的對立發展。此論爭的哲學問題首度被法寶和慧沼表述為心與理之同一或差異的問題，也就是後來宋明理學中「心理二分」或「心即理」二種形上學之爭的問題。從結論上來說，奘傳唯識學（慧沼）和程朱理學主張心理二分，而如來藏思想（法寶）和陸王心學則主張心即理，彼此之間既有歷史的連續性，也顯示出哲學類型的普遍性。本文結論時，將試圖從現象學的視角，特別是從胡賽爾到海德格的發展，重新照明主導千年東亞哲學的二種哲學類型義蘊。
This article attempts to demonstrate the universality of philosophical significance in both the Vijñaptimātra-Tathāgatagarbha controversy between Huizao (648-714) and Fabao (627-705) in the late 7th century, on the one hand, and the Neo-Confucian debate between Zhu Xi (1130-1200) and Lu Xiangshan (1139-1193) in the 12th century, on the other hand. More surprisingly, the same pattern of hermeneutic conflict continued in East Asia from the 7th century down to the early 20th century. The debate between Lü Cheng (1896-1989) and Xiong Shili (1885-1968), which was centered upon the criticism of the Awakening of Faith ignited by Ouyang Jingwu and his school, is one of the most significance. In the beginning, the philosophical problem in the polemic is raised to spell out the conditions for attaining the Buddhahood. Two theories are developed in both the Buddhist and the Neo-Confucian to answer this problem. (1) The first theory, which takes a cognitive approach, contends that the condition for attaining the Buddhahood or sagehood is found in the mind which is capable of cognizing the truth. Truth is taken as the object of cognition, while mind is the subject of cognition. Truth is transcendent. Both Yogācāra and Zhu Xi hold this theory. (2) The second theory, which takes an ontological approach, holds that the condition for attaining the Buddhahoodor sagehood is found in the subjectivity which is transcendentally grounded in truth. Truth is both transcendent and immanent. This theory even goes further to claim that mind is truth. This theory is held by both the Tathāgatagarbha School and Lu Xianshan. In the conclusion, I take an excursion to exercise a phenomenological reflection on the debate. The insight we obtain from phenomenology is that truth in formal logic should be also evidenced in eidetic intuition. That is, truth should not be separated from the experience of truth, which is possible only in the activity of mind. |
| 關聯: | 政治大學哲學學報, 28, 1-46
The national Chengchi university philosophical, 28, 1-46 |
| 数据类型: | article |
| 显示于类别: | [政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文
|
文件中的档案:
| 档案 |
大小 | 格式 | 浏览次数 |
|---|
| 146.pdf | 680Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1446 | 检视/开启 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
