English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50924618      Online Users : 921
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63338


    Title: 康德的〈何謂「在思考中定向」？〉及其宗教哲學意涵
    Other Titles: Kant’s Essay “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking” and Its Meaning for the Philosophy of Religion
    Authors: 李明輝
    LEE, Ming-Huei
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 康德;上帝論證;理性信仰;理性底需求;啟蒙;狂熱
    Kant;Proof of God`s existence;Rational faith;Demand of reason;Enlightenment;Enthusiasm
    Date: 2013-01
    Issue Date: 2014-01-07 17:16:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 康德在《純粹理性批判》(1781) 中否定「上帝存在」之思辨論證，在《實踐理性批判》(1788) 中則轉而提出其道德論證。他於 1786 年發表的〈何謂「在思考中定向」？〉一文介乎此二書之間，集中呈現出這項思想上的轉折，而構成康德宗教哲學發展中的一個關鍵環節。康德在此文中為理性之超經驗運用揭示一項主觀根據，即「理性底需求」。本文首先闡述康德撰寫此文的思想史背景，接著詳細說明「理性底需求」在其理論性運用與實踐性運用中的功能，最後歸結到康德的「啟蒙」原則。總而言之，康德在此文中完整地闡述了其「道德宗教」的構想，並試圖藉此在「啟蒙」與「狂熱」之間畫出明確的界限。在這個意義下，他實不愧為「啟蒙之子」。
    In his Critique of Pure Reason (1781) Kant invalidated all forms of speculative proof of God’s existence, but then in his Critique of Practical Reason (1788) he put forward a moral argument for it. Between the publications of these two books, in 1786 he wrote an essay entitled “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking,” which thematizes this transition and hence constitutes a key link in the development of his philosophy of religion. Here Kant exposes a subjective ground for the trans-empirical use of reason, namely the “demand of reason.” In this paper I first expound the background for Kant’s writing that essay. Then I explain the functions of the “demand of reason” in its theoretical and practical uses. This paper concludes with a discussion of Kant’s con- ception of “enlightenment.” In sum, Kant here articulates his conception of “moral religion” and attempts thereby to draw a clear boundary be- tween “enlightenment” and “enthusiasm.” In this sense, he is truly a “son of enlightenment.”
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 29, 155-186
    The national Chengchi university philosophical, 29, 155-186
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[NCCU Philosophical Journal] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    155186.pdf457KbAdobe PDF21814View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback