政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/63238
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51059329      Online Users : 931
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63238


    Title: 新北市國民小學校長道德領導、教師組織承諾與 教師組織公民行為關係之研究
    A Study on the Relationship among Moral Leadership, Teachers’ Organizational Commitment, and Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Public Elementary Schools in New Taipei City
    Authors: 陳浩
    Contributors: 秦夢群
    陳浩
    Keywords: 道德領導
    教師組織承諾
    教師組織公民行為
    Moral Leadership
    Teachers’ Organizational Commitment
    Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-01-02 14:44:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究旨在瞭解新北市國民小學校長道德領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為關係之現況,並分析不同背景變項之教師在知覺校長道德領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為之差異情形,以及探討三者間的關係,最後則藉由校長道德領導與教師組織承諾對教師組織公民行為進行預測。
      本研究採問卷調查法,以新北市之公立國民小學教師為母群體,共計抽樣42所學校,發出600份問卷,回收426份有效問卷,回收率達71%,可用問卷比率達94.60%。問卷調查結果採用描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Games-Howell法、相關分析及多元迴歸等統計方法加以分析。
      本研究獲致以下結論:
    一、新北市國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導之現況屬中上程度。
    二、新北市國民小學教師知覺教師組織承諾之現況屬中等程度。
    三、新北市國民小學教師表現教師組織公民行為之現況屬中上程度。
    四、新北市國民小學教師,因現任職務與學校規模的不同,對校長道德領導的知覺有顯著差異,以兼任主任之教師知覺程度較高,而學校規模在49班以上之教師知覺程度較低。
    五、新北市國民小學教師,因年齡、本校服務年資與學校規模的不同,在教師組織承諾上有顯著差異,以41至50歲、本校服務年資21年以上與學校歷史30至60年以上之教師表現程度較高。
    六、新北市國民小學教師,因現任職務與學校規模不同,在教師組織公民上有顯著差異,以兼任主任與學校規模30至60年以上之教師表現程度較高。
    七、新北市國民小學校長道德領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為,彼此之間呈現正向關係。
    八、新北市國民小學校長道德領導、教師組織承諾對教師組織公民行為具有預測作用,以「持續性承諾」的預測力最佳。
      最後,依據本研究之統計分析結果,提出具體建議,供教育行政機關、學校行政與未來研究參考。
    This study aims to investigate the status of moral leadership (ML), teachers’ organizational commitment (OC), and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in public elementary schools in New Taipei City, furthermore, to analyze the differences of perceptions from different background teachers about ML, OC, and OCB, and to explore the relationship among these three variables. At last, to predict OCB by ML and OC.

    Questionnaire survey method was adopted, the population are teachers of public elementary schools in New Taipei City, the samples include 42 schools and 600 questionnaires were distributed. There were 426 valid questionnaires used finally in the statistic analysis, overall response rate is 71%, and effective response rate is 94.60%. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Games-Howell test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression.
    The conclusions are as follows:
    1. Perceptions about ML from public elementary school teachers in New Taipei City is mid-high level.
    2. Perceptions about OC from public elementary school teachers in New Taipei City is mid level.
    3. Performance of OCB of public elementary school teachers in New Taipei City is mid-high level.
    4. Two background variables, position and scale of school, show significant differences in ML. Teachers work as the chief of department show higher perception about ML, and teachers from school which has 49 or more classes show lower perception about ML.
    5. Three background variables, age, serving years in school, and history of school, show significant differences in OC. Teachers are 41 to 50 years old, serving more than 21 years in school, and from 30 to 60 years school show higher perception about OC.
    6. Two background variables, position and history of school, show significant differences in OCB. Teachers work as the chief of department and from 30 to 60 years school show better performance of OCB.
    7. There is positive correlation among ML, OC, and OCB of public elementary school teachers in New Taipei City.
    8. Both of ML and OC of public elementary school teachers in New Taipei City have predictive effect on OCB, and continuance commitment has the highest predictive effect.
    Based on the results of the research, suggestions for the education administrative organizations, school administration, and future related research are proposed.
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    中華百科全書(2005)。道德。取自http://ap6.pccu.edu.tw/Encyclopedia_media/main-philosophy.asp?id=3476
    尹衍樑(1988)。組織變革策略對組織承諾之影響研究-以潤泰工業股份有限公司電腦化為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    方啟陽(2007)。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
    王昭人(2011)。臺北市國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    江志軒(2011)。苗栗縣國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    何宜康(2008)。國民小學校長道德領導行為與教師組織認同及工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    何懷宏(2002)。倫理學是什麼。臺北市:揚智。
    吳政達(2009)。學校組織中領導者與部屬交換關係、組織公平、組織自尊與工作滿意度對組織公民行為影響之研究。教育政策論壇,12(1),141-161。
    吳清山、林天祐(2002)。道德領導。教育研究月刊,98,144。
    吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
    吳清山、黃旭鈞(1999)。「教育行政人員專業倫理準則」初步建構。理論與政策,50,37-54。
    吳翎綺(2006)。國民小學校長變革領導與教師組織承諾之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    吳毅然(2012)。國民中學校長領導風格、教師組織信任與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    呂旺澤(2008)。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究-以組織承諾為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。亞洲大學,臺中市。
    李自勇(2008)。屏東縣國民小學組織文化、教師組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
    李佳穎(2011)。新竹市國民小學校長多元領導策略與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
    李宜璇(2008)。國民小學校長倫理領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    李明昭(2011)。高職校長轉型領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    李柏蓉(2006)。高雄縣市國民小學行政人員溝通行為與教師工作投入及組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    卓正欽(2007)。人力資源效能知覺對組織承諾之影響(未出版之博士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園縣。
    周中琪(2007)。國民小學校長道德領導之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
    周式瀅(2009)。倫理領導知覺信任與組織公民行為相關性之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。未出版碩士論文,國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
    周宛蓉(2008)。國小校長轉型領導、組織倫理氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
    周怡君(2006)。國小校長家長式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    周崇儒(1997)。國民小學教師專業成長、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
    林火旺(1999)。倫理學。臺北市:五南。
    林加惠(2008)。花蓮縣國民小學校長道德領導、學校建設性文化與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
    林志興(2007)。臺中縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
    林邦傑、陳美娟(2006)。學校組織與教職人員心理契約量表的建構。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),39-68。
    林侑瑋(2010)。高級中等學校體育組長道德領導、組織信任與組織公民行為關連性之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立體育大學,桃園縣。
    林侑瑋、牟鍾福(2009)。學校體育組長道德領導理論與應用。大專體育,104,23-30。
    林竺諼(2009)。國民中學校長道德領導與品德教育推展策略之研究-以臺北市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    林俊傑(2005)。國民中學校長道德領導行為與教師組織承諾及工作投入關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    林衍伸(2009)。屏東縣國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    林純雯(2001)。國民中學校長道德領導之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    林淑姬(1992)。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢(1994)。薪酬公平、程序公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為。管理評論,13(2),87-107。
    林鉦棽(1999)。組織承諾、工作滿足與組織公民行為之研究:各種不同理論模式之比較。中山管理評論,7,1049-1073。
    林鉦棽、陳心怡(2006),組織公正對動機與信任及組織公民行為之影響。亞太經濟管理評論,9(2),23-42。
    邱春堂(2010)。國民小學校長社會資本、教導型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    邱國隆(2007)。新竹縣、市國民小學學校組織氣候、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
    邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
    姜定宇、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,19,175-209。
    胡雅棠(2008)。教師覺知校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為的關係研究-以臺南市國民中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    范熾文、林加惠(2009)。校長道德領導:意涵、理論與實施策略。研習資訊,26(3),103-108。
    范熾文、林加惠(2010)。國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。市北教育學刊,36,23-50。
    徐宗盛(2010)。校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    國家教育研究院(2012)。教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/779818/
    馮丰儀(2007)。學校行政倫理理論內涵及實踐之探究。教育研究與發展期刊,3(3),219-248。
    秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
    高俊卿(2008)。校長魅力領導與教師組織公民行為之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    張惠英(2002)。國民小學教師工作價值觀、工作生活品質與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    張樵益(2004)。國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
    張瓊云(2000)。托兒所所長領導型式、托兒所組織氣氛、保育人員組織承諾與服務機構組織績效關係之研究--以臺北市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。
    梁淑娟(2008)。國民小學校長道德領導與教師工作投入關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    許文敏(2005)。高職教師之校長領導風格知覺、組織承諾知覺及公民行為知覺相關之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    許順興(2006)。臺北市國中校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    許道然(2001)。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    郭雅玲(2008)。高雄市國小教師內部行銷知覺與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    郭博安(2006)。內部行銷知覺、組織承諾與教師背景三者之關係研究─以高雄縣市國民小學教師為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    郭雅玲(2008)。高雄市國小教師內部行銷知覺與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    陳芬蘭(2006)。國小校長策略領導、人力資源管理與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
    陳威良(2008)。國民小學校長道德領導、學校組織文化與學生學習表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
    陳昱騰(2009)。高雄市國民小學校長道德領導行為與教師組織承諾及工作投入關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    陳茂盛(2005)。臺南市國小教師組織政治知覺與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    陳啟東(2005)。高級職業學校校長領導型態對教師組織公民行為與學校組織績效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    陳隆進(2006)。高屏地區國民小學校長道德領導行為現況調查及其發展策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    陳學賢(2004)。高雄市國小校長轉型領導、學校願景發展與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    彭詩雯(2005)。華人企業主管之德行領導對部屬之組織承諾、工作滿意及離職傾向的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
    黃文三(2003)。建構主義的教育思想及其在二十一世紀道德領導上的啟示。「第一屆德行教育與軍事專業倫理學術研討會」發表之論文,海軍軍官學校。
    黃政彬(2007)。桃園縣國民小學組織創新氛圍與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
    黃柏勳(2004)。國民中小學校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    黃馨儀(2007)。國民中學校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究-以臺灣省北區五縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    詹萬廷(2002)。彰化縣國民小學校長行政決定方式對教師組織承諾影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
    廖大偉(2005)。桃園縣國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
    廖俊淵(2011)。國民小學校長家長式領導、教師組織承諾與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。康寧大學,臺南市。
    蔡文輝(1984)。社會學理論。臺北市:三民。
    蔡文輝(2002)。社會學。臺北市:三民。
    鄭燿男(2002)。國中小教師的組織公民行為及其影響因素之研究-學校組織公民行為模型初構(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    謝文全(1998)。道德領導-學校行政領導的另一扇窗。載於林玉体(主編),跨世紀的教育演變。臺北市:文景。
    謝文全(2007)。教育行政學(第三版)。臺北市:高等教育。
    謝朝宗(2007)。臺北縣國民小學校長道德領導之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    顏童文(2002)。中部四縣市國民小學校長道德領導之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
    蘇美珍(2004)。國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,未出版,臺北市。
    鐘秀雪(2008)。校長道德領導與教師專業倫理之相關研究-以臺中縣國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中市。

    貳、西文部分
    Leung, A. S. M. (2007). Matching ethical work climate to in-role and extra-role behaviors in a collectivist work setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1-13.
    Ab. Samad, R. S., & Mohamed Nor, M. (2007). Do school leaders need moral leadership to create effective schools? Masalah Pendidikan, 30(2), 137-148.
    Anello, E. (1992). Values, institutions, and leadership for a sustainable future: Towards a framework for developing moral leadership. Retrieved from http://wp.item.org.uy/?p=53
    Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
    Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40.
    Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers` organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching & Teacher Education, 20(3), 277.
    Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725
    Brooks, L. (1999). Organizational behavior. London: Pitman Publishing.
    Brown, M., Treviño, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.
    Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizational. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
    Chen, Z. X., & Francesco, A. M. (2003). The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 490–510.
    Cheng, Y., & Stockdale, M. S. (2003). The validity of the three-component model of organizational commitment in a Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 465–489.
    Christ, O., Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extramile: Foci of organizational identification as determinants of different forms of organizational citizenship behaviour Among schoolteachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73,329-341.
    Ciulla, J. B. (2005). Is good leadership contrary to human nature? In J. Doh & S. Strumpf (Eds.), Handbook on Responsible Leadership and Governance in Global Business (pp. 114-134). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
    Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(11), 25-44.
    Coppola, D. L. (1998). Moral leadership: A proposed theory illustrated by select Catholic secondary school principals (Unpublished master dissertation). University of Fordham, New York.
    Dan S. C., & Sophia, V. M. (2006). Employee role enlargement: Interactions of trust and organizational fairness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(3), 168-186.
    Deckop, J. R., & Cirka, C. C. (1999). Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 420-428.
    Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress. Vol. 2 (pp.38-57). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
    Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress. Vol. 2 (pp. 58-87). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
    Emler, N., & Cook, T. (2001). Moral integrity in leadership: Why it matters and why it may be difficult to achieve. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace, Decade of behavior (pp. 277-298). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science, 42(3), 88-103.
    Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 78-95.
    Greenfield, W. D. (1999). Moral leadership in schools: Fact or fancy? Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
    Hamilton, M. G. (1999). An investigation of the multiple commitments of middle school teachers: Their antecedents and consequence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fordham University, New York.
    Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
    Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative science quarterly, 17(4), 555-573.
    Hudson, J. (1997). Ethical leadership: The soul of policy making. Journal of School Leadership, 7(5), 506-520.
    Hulshult, N. K. (2005). Moral leadership in alternative education: Theory and practice in school administration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Miami, Ohio.
    Inkeles, A. (1969). Making man modern: On the causes and consequences of individual change in six developing countries. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 208–225.
    Katz, D. (1964). Motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
    Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
    Koch, J. T., & Steers, R. M. (1978). Job attachment, satisfaction and turnover among public sector employees. Journal of vocational behavior, 12, 119-128.
    Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215–224.
    Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal,37(3), 656-669.
    MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1993). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of sales performance. Journal of Marketing, 57, 70–80
    McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
    McCann, J., & Holt, R. (2009). Ethical leadership and organizations: An analysis of leadership in the manufacturing industry based on the perceived leadership integrity scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 211-220.
    McGrevin, C. Z. (1984). Teacher participation in the decision making process and its relationship to organizational commitment and morale. Dissertation Abstracts International, 5, 367-371.
    Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Human Resources Management Review, 1, 61-89.
    Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
    Moon, M. J. (2000). Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(2), 177-194.
    Moorhead, G., & Griffin, R. W. (1998). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Moorman, R. H. (1991). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
    Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee`s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
    Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1982). Employee-organization linkage the psychology of commitment absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
    Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
    Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K.M., Roberts, J. S., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157 - 170.
    Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
    Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Noddings, N. (2005). Global citizenship: Promises and problems. In N. Noddings (Ed.), Educating citizens for global awareness (pp. 1-21). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Norwood, D. R. (1998). A study of the relationship between teacher organizational commitment and the level of implementation of professional development school principles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
    Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: Toward an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385-423.
    Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.
    Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995), A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.
    Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18(2), 262-270.
    Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
    Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M. Mowday, R. T., & Boulion, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
    Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and organization: The organizational man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 10, 460-475.
    Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). Cross cultural examination of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 345-359.
    Reyes, P. (1990). Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance, and productivity. California: Sage publication.
    Robbins, S. T. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289-298.
    Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B.W. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Florida: Krieger.
    Sama, L. M., & Shoaf, V. (2008). Ethical leadership for the professions: Fostering a moral community. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 39-46.
    Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in school. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 110-142.
    Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organization citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
    Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers` extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649.
    Stamper, C. L., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 517-536.
    Starratt, R. J. (2004). Ethical leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
    Thompson, F. L. (1989). The Relationship between Leadership Style and Organizational Commitment in Selected Wisconsin Elementary Schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison Wisconsin.
    Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. ( 2003 ). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.
    Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
    Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428.
    Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
    Wilson, E. M. (2008). A qualitative investigation of how ethics influence urban principal`s practice in school improvement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
    Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育行政與政策研究所
    97171005
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097171005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Educational Administration and Policy] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100501.pdf2169KbAdobe PDF2352View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback