政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/63162
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51269209      線上人數 : 872
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63162


    題名: 消費者生活型態、生活風格與智慧型手機品牌形象關聯性研究
    A Study on Relationship among Consumer Life Style and the Brand Image of Smartphone
    作者: 王彥荏
    Wang, Yen-Jen
    貢獻者: 郭貞
    蔡美瑛

    Kuo, Cheng
    Tsai, Mei Ying

    王彥荏
    Wang, Yen-Jen
    關鍵詞: 生活型態
    生活風格
    品牌形象
    智慧型手機
    Lifestyle
    lifestyles
    brand image
    smartphone
    日期: 2013
    上傳時間: 2014-01-02 13:27:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要:  近年來隨著通訊費率調降、無線網路發展進步及平價化等因素,智慧型手機已融入民眾生活,不僅是通訊工具,也同時反映著使用者的生活風格與型態,並具有形象傳達的功能;透過文獻回顧,本研究以「生活型態」、「生活風格」和「品牌形象」等相關論述作為理論依據,研究目的旨在探討並建構台灣地區智慧型手機使用者的生活風格樣貌,以期對智慧型手機採用現象有進一步了解,並且根據所得結論,提出智慧型手機銷售廠商未來行銷策略上的相關建議。
      本研究針對台灣地區消費者以網路問卷的形式調查,共得到有效問卷1085份,以因素分析將生活型態量表萃取出「流行時髦」、「樂活主義」、「積極進取」、「傾慕他國」、「挑戰創新」和「資訊需求」等六大因素;智慧型手機使用者的生活風格量表則可區分出:「擁有手機的渴望」、「設計美感的愉悅」、「享樂主義的體驗」、「特定品牌的偏好」、「個人風格的彰顯」及「流行廣告的吸引」等六大因素;品牌形象量表則有三大因素:「功能型」、「象徵型」和「經驗型」。
      本研究經由集群分析將受訪者分為四大集群,依據該集群在生活型態因素、生活風格因素、品牌形象因素及人口變項上的差異與特徵命名,有獨鍾iPhone體驗娛樂的「風格玩樂學生族」、務實堪用不追時髦的「保守穩健踏實族」、愛用國貨排斥韓流的「支持國產創新族」和趕搭熱潮喜愛洋牌的「追求時髦熟女族」,並發現不同生活風格樣貌的消費者間,所偏好的手機品牌有顯著差異。
      此外研究亦發現智慧型手機各品牌之間的品牌形象,與不同智慧型手機品牌偏好消費者,在本國中心主義傾向上均有顯著差異。最後,本研究針對不同集群下的智慧型手機消費者,根據本研究所論述之生活型態、生活風格和品牌形象等因素,提出相關行銷建議與策略。
      Smartphone have gained considerable popularity in daily life because of the cheap cell phone plans and the Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) convenience. While many people use smartphone to make and receive calls, a great segment of society has view smartphone as a stylish device conveying the their own lifestyles and personal image. Previous studies show that the lifestyle and the lifestyles of users as well as the brand image of smartphone are the three reasons that guide the consumer choice of smartphone. To understand consumer buying decision process and the factors affecting consumer choice, this study conducted a questionnaire survey to investigate Taiwan mobile users’ habits and preferences.
      The survey asked respondents for their smartphone usage behaviors by online questionnaires. One thousand and eighty-five questionnaires were returned. Six factors of the lifestyle scale are extracted by the factor analysis, including pursuing fashion trends, demanding for health and sustainability, proactive for new products, having challenges and creations, and searching for information. Six factors of the lifestyles scale include the desire to own a smartphone, the attraction of the best design smartphone, the experience of pleasures, the preference of brand, and the attraction of commercial. Brand image scales include three factors: Functional, Symbolic, and Experiential.
     The respondents are divided into four clusters by the three reasons and the population characteristics, including stylish teenagers, function-orientated consumers, domestic products embracers, and fashion-orientated women. The results showed that four clusters of respondents have significant different preferences between the mobile phone brands.
      In addition, the brand images and consumers with different preferences of smartphone brands have significant difference in ethnocentrism tendencies. This study would conclude consumer buying decision process and the factors affecting consumer choice to address the marketing strategies of smartphone.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    王杰毅(2011)。《品牌形象、涉入程度、生活型態與購買意願關係之研究-以宏碁電腦產品為例》。成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班論文。
    白宇恆(2008)。《生活風格轉向:台灣7-ELEVEN的消費社會學研究》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    邱皓政(2010)。《量化研究與統計分析第五版─SPSS資料分析範例解析》。台北:五南出版社。
    杜瑞澤(2004)。《生活型態設計—文化、生活、消費與產品設計》。台北:亞太圖書。
    吳思佳 (2009)。《科技產品內外部屬性消費價值之聯合分析-以智慧型手機為例》。國國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳昌憲、陳仕弦(2012)。〈品牌形象、服務品質、滿意度、忠誠度對再購買意願之影響─以智慧型手機為例〉。2012彰雲嘉大學校院聯盟學術研討會論文。
    別蓮蒂(2009)。E-ICP 2009年台灣消費者生活型態族群白皮書。東方線上
    (Eastern Online) 專業生活型態及消費市場研究顧問公司 (東方廣告公
    司)。
    林建煌(2007)。《消費者行為》。台北:華泰文化。
    孫國棋(2008)。《個人化的社會分類:iPod族之生活風格與使用文化》。元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文。
    陳志銘等譯(2005)《消費者行為》。台北:全華科技。(原書Solomon, M. R. (2004).Consumer behavior buying, having, and being, 6th ed, New Jersey:Prentice Hall. )
    陳亭羽、施麗琴(2010)。〈以直覺模糊評估函數與計分函數界定品牌形象-以手機為例〉。管理科學研究第六期,6(2) :1-29。
    陳燕珩(2012)。〈手機新聞崛起-初探台灣手機新聞 App 之使用現況〉。2011年中華傳播學會年會論文。
    陳建彣 (2010)。《生活型態與品牌形象對於消費者購買意願影響之研究–以HTC為例》。國立台北科技大學創新設計研究所碩士論文。
    黃志文、羅吉榜、周希炯 (2002)。〈行動電話消費者生活形態之研究〉。環境管理期刊。
    黃曉蘋 (2010)。《產品功能、品牌形象、知覺品質及購買意願關係之研究以台灣智慧型手機市場為例》。成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    高偉峻 (2010)。《智慧型手機品牌形象對品牌忠誠度影響之研究》。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    莊雅涵 (2012)。《人格特質與智慧型手機品牌個性之關係》。元智大學經營管理碩士班企業管理與服務科學學程碩士論文。
    張惠涵 (2006)《品牌人格與自我一致性及消費幻想對於消費者品牌偏好度影響之研究》。國立政治大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    張君玫譯 (2001)。文化消費與日常生活。台北:巨流出版(原書John, S.(1996). Cultural Consumption in Everyday Life. London:Bloomsbury Academic)
    湯紹廣 (2007)。《生活風格與美學消費之關聯性研究-以筆記型電腦使用者為例》。中國文大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    博誌文化編譯 (2009)。《會設計也要會行銷─視覺行銷的法則》。台北:博誌文化發行。(原書Uji Tomoko(2008年)視覚マーケティングのススメ。東京都:インプレスコミュニケーションズ)
    廖淑伶(2007)。《消費者行為—理論與應用》。台北縣:前程文化。
    楊世瑩(2005)。《SPSS統計分析實務》。台北:旗標出版股份有限公司。
    樓永堅、方世榮譯 (2006)。《行銷管理學》。台北:臺灣培生教育出版(原書Kotler, P., Keller, K. L.(2006). Marketing Management, 12th ed. New Jersey:Prentice Hall
    劉倚帆 (2011)。〈初探智慧型手機如何改變社會時空經驗〉。2011年中華傳播學會年會論文。
    劉維公(2006)。《風格社會》。台北:天下。
    劉維公(2011)。〈當代消費文化社會理論的分析架構:文化經濟學、生活風格、與生活美學〉,東吳社會學報。11:113-136。台北:東吳大學社會學系。
    蕭新煌、劉維公(2001)。《迎接美感社會的來臨:現代社會生活與美感》,台北:國立台灣藝術教育館。
    譚大純、陳正男、賴孟寬(1999)。〈ICP生活型態量表之信效度檢驗、因素重組與趨勢比較-行銷領域之應用〉。中華管理評論。2:69-80 。香港:中文大學工商管理學院。
    龔俊霖(2001)。〈我國網路族群分析〉。資訊工業透析:電子商務。3: 2-19,財團法人資訊工業策進會。

    二、英文文獻
    Aaker, J. L.(1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality.Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347-356.
    Assael, H. (1992). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Actions, 4th Ed. MA:PWS-KENT.
    Campbell, H.(2007). Texting the faith:Religious users and cell phone culture. In A.Kavoori & H. Arceneaux, The cell phone reader: Essays in social.
    Clifton, R. & Simmons, J .(2004). Brands and Branding . Princeton, New Jersey: Bloomberg Press.
    Chaney, D. (1996). Lifestyle. New York : Routledge.
    Chang ,C.C.(2001). The Impacts of Personality Differences on Product Evaluations, Association for Consumer Research, 28, 26-33.
    Dobers, P. & Strannegard, L.(2005). Design, Lifestyles and sustainability. Aesthetic Consumption in the World of Abundance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 324-336.
    Dichter, E. (1964). Handbook of Consumer Motivations, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Engel, J. F. , Kollat, D.T. & Blackwell, R. D. (1984). Consumer Behavior, 3rd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Farquhar, D. (1990). Managing Brand Equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 30, 7-12.
    Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, London: Sage.
    Featherstone, M. (1992). Postmodernism and the Aestheticization of Everyday Life. Modernity and Identity, 65-290.
    Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955).The product and the brand. Harvard Business Review, 33(2), 33-39.
    Grubb, E, L.& Grathwohl, H, L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism, and market behavior:A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31, 22-27
    Gordon, J. (2007). The cell phone: An artifact of popular culture and a tool of the public sphere. In A.Kavoori & H. Arceneaux, The cell phone reader: Essays in social transformation, 45-60
    Hawkins, D. I., Best ,R., & Coney, K. (1992). ConsumerBehavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy, Homewood:BPI/Irwin.
    Juhlin, O. & Zhang, Y. (2011).Unpacking social interaction that make us adore: on the aesthetics of mobile phones as fashion items. MobileHCI `11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 41-250.
    Kassarjian, H.H.(1971). Personality and consumer behavior:A review ,Journal of Marketing Research, 409-455
    Keller, K. L.(1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
    Keller, K. L.(2001). Building customer-based brand equity. Marketing Management, 10(2), 15-19.
    Kotler, P., & Armstrong.(1994).Principles of Marketing.(6th Ed), Annotated Instructor’s Edition, Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Inc. , 143.
    Klein, J.G., Ettenson, R. & Morris,M.D.(1998).The Animosity Model of Foreign Product Purchase: An Emprical Test in the People`s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62, 89-100.
    Lazer, W.(1963). Life Style Concepts and Marketing in Stephen Greyserm,ed. Toward Scientific Marketing(Chicago:AMA), 140-151.
    Lasser, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A (1995) . Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19
    Levy, S. J.(1959).Symbols for Sale. Harvard Business Review, 117-124.
    Maffesoli, M. (1996). The Time of the Tribes. London: Sage.
    Maycroft, N. (2004). Cultural consumption and the myth of life-style. Capital & Class, 84, 61-75.
    Mohamed ,S. C. and Nizar ,S.(2010) .Rethinking the TAM model: time to consider fun. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 336–344.
    Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept image
    management. Journal of Marketing, 50, 135-145.
    Parul, N., Jeff, B. , Kramer, K,L., & Catharine ,H., Jennifer, I.(2008). Effect of smartphone aesthetic design on users` emotional reaction: An empirical study. The TQM Journal, 20(4), 348-355
    Plummer, J. T.(1974) . The concept and application of life style segmentation. Journal of Marketing, 38, 33-37.
    Roussou, N. (2002) . Research note: Television, culture identity and youth lifestyle in cyprus, European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 355-367.
    Shimp, T.A., & Sharma, S.(1987).Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 280-289.
    Sharma, S., Shimp T. A., & Shin J.(1995), Consumer Ethnocentrism: A Test ofAntecedents and Moderators, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 26-37.
    Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self concept in consumer behavior: A critical review.Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287-300.
    Solomon, M. R. (1983). The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 319-329.
    Sobel, M. R. (1981). Lifestyle and social structure. New York:Academic Press.
    Strauss, J. & Frost, R . (1999). Online Research. Marketing on the Internet, 80-103.
    Wilburn, L., Chris, M. (2011). The Impact of Personality Traits on Smartphone Ownership and Use. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 17.
    Wind, Y. & Green, P. E. (1974). Some conceptual measurement and analytical problems in life style research. In W. D. Wells (Ed.). Life Style and psychographics, 97-126.
    Zablocki, B.D. & Kanter, R.M. (1976) .The Differentiation of Life-Styles,Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 269-298.


    三、網路資料
    市場研究暨分析機構國際數據資訊(2012),國際數據資訊研究顯示:2012年第一季台灣手機市場–智慧型手機再下一城,突破七成市佔。
    http://www.idc.com.tw/about/399.html
    鄭彙翰(2011),威寶:手機採購已買不到一般功能性手機
    http://www.beephone.com.tw/shownews.php?id=10298
    資策會MIC(2012),2013兩大成長動能:平板電腦、Smartphone
    http://www.iii.org.tw/service/3_1_4_c.aspx?id=587
    資策會FIND(2012)創新講堂:用科技創造S.I.M.P.L.E.經濟 體驗快樂生活http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=331
    張里歐(2013)。三星S2榮登2012「人氣手機王」 HTC Butterfly異軍突起。
    取自手機王http://www.sogi.com.tw/newforum/article_list.aspx?topic_id=6207022
    楊又肇(2012),InMobi:台灣智慧型手機品牌 HTC封王、蘋果下滑
    取自聯合新聞網http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=383835
    EOLembrain東方快線研究部(2012)HTC使用率領先群機。
    http://www.eolembrain.com.tw/Latest_View.aspx?SelectID=292
    財經智慧知識庫(2012),智慧型手機smart phone。http://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/wiki/wikiviewer.aspx?keyid=cf745714-3942-4786-86b1-15e117c5dc01。
    王尹軒(2004)。什麼是智慧手機?
    取自iThome Online http://www.7headlines.com/article/show/169026554
    Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2013.(http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=2209615)
    Wayne Lam(2012),Samsung Displaces Nokia as Top Cellphone Brand in 2012 and Takes Decisive Smartphone Lead Over Apple.(http://www.isuppli.com/Mobile-and-Wireless-Communications/News/Pages/Samsung-Displaces-Nokia-as-Top-CellphoneBrand-in-2012-and-Takes-Decisive-Smartphone-Lead-Over-Apple.aspx)
    Peter Kastberg(2010),What`s in a Brand? Notes on the History and Main Functions of Branding (http://www.languageatwork.eu/readarticle.php?article_id=35)
    Riley, A. and Boome, A. (2011),Superbrands` success fuelled by sex, religion and gossip(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13416598)
    Entner, R. (2010) Smartphones to overtake feature phones in u.s. by 2011.
    (http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2010/smartphones-to-overtake-feature-phones-in-u-s-by-2011.html)
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣播電視學研究所
    99453016
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0994530162
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[廣播電視學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    016201.pdf3124KbAdobe PDF24261檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋