政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/62496
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造访人次 : 51230499      在线人数 : 906
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62496


    题名: Robert Jackson的「全球共約」理論與柏林的價值多元主義：兼論國際關係英倫學派的古典途徑
    其它题名: Robert Jackson`s `Global Covenant` and Isaiah Berlin`s Value Pluralism: A Study on the English School`s Classical Approach to International Relations Theory
    作者: 葉浩
    Yeh,Hao
    贡献者: 政治系
    关键词: 英倫學派;多元主義;團合主義;國際社會;人道干預;詮釋性規範理論
    English School;pluralism;solidarism;international society;humanitarian intervention;interpretative normative theory
    日期: 2013.06
    上传时间: 2013-12-13 17:27:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 強調國際社會的英倫學派近年來成為國際關係理論的主流學派之一，向來有「多元主義」與「團合主義」路線之爭。Robert Jackson的《全球共約》（The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States）乃多元主義路線近年來的公認鉅著，不僅旨在捍衛英倫學派的古典方法論，同時也藉由援引伯林的後設倫理學主張「價值多元主義」來深化該路線的哲學基礎。本文將指出，Jackson實際上並未準確掌握價值多元主義與英倫學派多元主義路線的理論親近性，因此，所提出的全球共約理論不僅違背伯林的思想精神，同時也偏離了英倫學派的方法論。藉由分析Hedley Bull關於方法論的著作，本文首先闡釋英倫學派古典途徑的「詮釋性規範理論」特色，以及「國際社會」基本概念，並且指出該學派在理論傳承上所具有的創造性轉化特色。以此理解為基礎，本文將解釋Jackson如何運用歐克秀與伯林的思想，一方面實踐英倫學派的方法論，另一方面對於「國際社會」和「多元主義」兩個概念進行改造。隨後，本文將聚焦於《全球共約》一書如何介入英倫學派的路線之爭，捍衛多元主義路線，並且指出當前兩條路線正在朝向處方性政治哲學理論發展的趨勢。最後則進一步指出全球共約理論如何同時背離英倫學派的古典途徑方法論及伯林的價值多元主義之精神，也會提出Jackson尚未注意到所存在於Bull與伯林之間的親近性。
    The English School of international relations has recently become a mainstream theory in the field. It is characterized by an emphasis on international society, as well as the debates between the school`s solidarist and pluralist members. Robert Jackson`s "Global Covenant" is generally considered to be a major contribution to the pluralist strand, in that it not only defends the school`s classic approach to theorizing but also grounds the pluralist vision of international society on a philosophically sophisticated foundation derived from Isaiah Berlin`s meta-ethical value pluralism. This article argues that Jackson does not fully grasp the affinities between value pluralism and English School, and therefore his theory of global covenant deviates from both the spirit of Berlin`s political thought and the school`s methodology. By analyzing Hedley Bull`s writings, it will first explicate the "interpretative-normative" nature of the English School`s Classical Approach, as well as the fundamental idea of "international society", and it will indicate the tendency for creative transformation in the way members of the school implement thisapproach. With this understanding in place, this article will explain how Jackson employs the thoughts of Michael Oakeshott and Isaiah Berlin to, on the one hand, practices the School`s methodology, and on the other hand transforms the idea of "international society" and "pluralism". Thereafter, it focuses on how "The Global Covenant" enters the School`s internal debates and defends its pluralism. Also will be indicated is a trend towards prescriptive political philosophy in both the solidarist and the pluralist camp. In the end, this article will spell out how the theory of global covenant deviates from both the School`s Classical Approach and the spirit of Berlin`s value-pluralism. And in doing so, some affinities between Bull and Berlin will also be identified.
    關聯: 政治與社會哲學評論, 45,111-173
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    111173.pdf4248KbAdobe PDF21420检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈