English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51105719      Online Users : 900
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62019


    Title: 體驗經濟下台灣稻米產業之商業模式創新
    Business model innovation of the rice industry in Taiwan under experience economy
    Authors: 李烈圩
    Contributors: 溫肇東
    李烈圩
    Keywords: 稻米產業
    體驗經濟
    商業模式
    商業模式創新
    rice industry
    experience economy
    business model
    business model innovation
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2013-12-02 17:50:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 體驗經濟思維已成為未來企業經營的重心,體驗為主的企業,紛紛利用不同的體驗活動增加產品、服務的附加價值。綜觀台灣稻米產業,在加入世界貿易組織後,面臨稻米開放進口及削減農業補貼之壓力,加上國人飲食習慣受西式文化影響,飲食選擇多樣化及家庭外食比例提高,造成稻米耕作面積縮減及稻米供應量降低,使稻米產業的經營不免落入產量與價格的競爭。
    研究從商業模式創新的角度出發,針對掌生穀粒糧商號、行健有機夢想村、穀東俱樂部與南澳自然田,四間台灣稻米產業中成功轉換到體驗經濟思維下經營的個案公司,根據深入訪談與直接觀察分析,了解並評估個案公司在體驗經濟下的商業模式創新。而研究成果一方面可提供四間個案公司作為未來發展的參考,另一方面也可成為未來台灣稻米產業在體驗經濟下創新經營的參考典範。

    本研究之研究結論如下:
    1.傳統稻米產業應積極尋求外部資源的投入,以求產業的成長轉型,加強與消費者間體驗的互動,勿停留在提供初級產品的經營思維。
    2.企業經營者應秉持自己的中心思想,尋找具相同理念的消費者,營造具特色的體驗活動,勿一味追求市場佔有率。
    3.稻米產業中企業商業模式的創新應善用新科技與體驗活動設計,並納入舊有元素,在傳統與創新中找到平衡點。
    4.稻米產業中企業進行商業模式創新時,除考量可行性與創造財富的潛力,亦應思考永續經營與移轉複製的能性。
    5.企業進行商業模式創新時,需一併考慮自身的社會責任,透過體驗行銷與體驗媒介傳達有益社會的經營理念,以服務大眾為己任。

    個案研究顯示,四間個案公司的商業模式創新都和創新機會與創新因素息息相關,更與體驗經濟思維有非常深厚的連結,而商業模式的創新,確實能為台灣稻米產業帶來創造財富的潛力與提升永續經營的可能性。
    In recent years, experience economic viewpoint has been an important role in business. Some companies raise their products’ or services’ value by holding different experiential activities. In addition, the rice industry in Taiwan faces many challenges recently. First of all, imported liberalization and reduction of agricultural subsidies owing to joining WTO make more stress. And then people change their eating habits because of Western cultures. Moreover, many kinds of eating choices and higher proportion of eating outside are harmful for entire rice industry. Therefore, rice farming areas and provisions are decreased as well as the rice industry in Taiwan falls into aggressive competitions of price and yield.
    According to business model innovation structure, this study analyzes four Taiwanese successful companies which use experience economic viewpoint. This study gains information from in-depth interviews. This study also hopes to provide case companies some advances which might improve their future development. Furthermore, a referenced model is built by this research result.

    This study comes to the following conclusions:
    1.The traditional rice industry should actively seek external resources, increase interactions and experiences between consumers and companies and avoid only selling rice goods. These methods could improve the growth and transformation of the rice industry.
    2.Business managers need to insist their own central ideals, look for consumers who have the same ideals, create unique experiences and avoid blindly pursuing market share.
    3.Business model innovation in the rice industry in Taiwan have to use new technology correctly, create experiences and redesign old elements to find a well balance of convention and innovation.
    4.Business model innovation in the rice industry in Taiwan ought to pay more attention to not only wealth potential but also the possibilities of replication and sustainable development.
    5.Business model innovation in the rice industry in Taiwan must think of social duty, their own ideals which are spread by experience marketing and media and take responsibility for serving the public.

    From these case studies, it is shown that four companies have strongly relationships among innovation opportunities, innovation factors and experience economic viewpoints. In fact, the rice industry in Taiwan can produce wealth potential and increase the possibility of sustainable development by using business model innovation.
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景 1
    第二節 研究動機 2
    第三節 研究目的 2
    第四節 研究問題 3
    第五節 研究流程 3
    第二章 文獻探討 5
    第一節 台灣稻米產業概況 5
    第二節 體驗經濟 15
    第三節 體驗行銷 21
    第四節 商業模式創新 28
    第三章 研究架構與研究設計 38
    第一節 研究架構 38
    第二節 研究變數定義 39
    第三節 研究設計 40
    第四章 個案簡介與分析 43
    第一節 掌生穀粒糧商號 43
    一、個案簡介 43
    二、發展歷程 44
    三、經營概況 47
    四、個案分析 58
    第二節 行健有機夢想村 61
    一、個案簡介 61
    二、發展歷程 62
    三、經營概況 65
    四、個案分析 71
    第三節 穀東俱樂部 74
    一、個案簡介 74
    二、發展歷程 75
    三、經營概況 77
    四、個案分析 84
    第四節 南澳自然田 87
    一、個案簡介 87
    二、發展歷程 88
    三、經營概況 89
    四、個案分析 96
    第五章 個案彙整與研究發現 99
    第一節個案彙整與分析 99
    第二節研究發現 104
    第六章 結論與建議 108
    第一節 研究結論 108
    第二節 研究建議 109
    第三節 研究限制 110
    第四節 後續研究方向 111
    參考文獻 112
    Reference: 一、中文部分

    期刊
    1.吳明峰、段兆麟(2004),「休閒農漁園區體驗活動類型與體驗行銷策略之研究-體驗活動觀點」,管理思維與實務學術研討會論文集,131-156頁
    2.李信興(2008),「系統性商業模式之觀念架構」,創業管理研究,第三卷第三期,119-145頁
    3.林美華、蘇宗振(2010),「96至98年水旱田利用調整後續計畫執行成果」,農政與農情,第219期,行政院農委會
    4.陳明輝、胡哲生、高明瑞、侯勝宗、蔡依倫(2010),「社會企業與創業:建構互利共生的創新商業模式」,創業管理研究,第五卷第二期,83-110頁
    5.劉元安、謝益銘、陳育彗(2006),「探索餐飲業之體驗行銷─星巴克咖啡公司之個案研究」,人類發展與家庭學報,第九卷,60-87頁

    書籍
    1.B. Joseph Pine II,James H. Gilmore著,夏業良、魯煒譯,體驗經濟時代,台北:經濟新潮社
    2.Bernd H. Schmitt著,王育英、梁曉鶯譯,體驗行銷:電子商務時代的大霹靂行銷法則,台北:經濟新潮社
    3.Joan Magretta著,李田樹譯,管理是什麼?,台北:天下遠見
    4.Peter F. Drucker著,蕭富峰、李田樹譯,創新與創新精神,台北:臉譜
    5.農業委員會台灣農家要覽增修訂三版策劃委員會。2005。台灣農家要覽-農作篇(一)。行政院農業委員會。台北市
    6.程昀儀、李建德,掌生穀粒來自土地的呼喚,台北:天下
    7.賴青松,青松e種田筆記:榖東俱樂部,台北:心靈工坊

    碩博士論文
    1.王櫻芳(2010),價值網絡與商業模式再創新之研究─以2002年至2009年P公司為例,國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文
    2.白紀齡(2006),台灣線上音樂營運模式之探索,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程學位論文
    3.吳志忠(2006),泡沫經濟後日本金融業經營模式創新變革:瑞穗金融集團與新生銀行之個案探討,國立政治大學管理碩士學程學位論文
    4.李宛靜(2006),產業價值網路重構與價值創造之研究—以稻米產業為例,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
    5.李蕙玲(2007),地方產業創新系統與網絡的建構—以台中縣霧峰鄉稻米產業為例,逢甲大學公共政策所碩士論文
    6.施百俊(2003),事業模式創新之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文
    7.徐火旺(2011),連鎖加盟型態之創新商業模式探討—以國內A皮膚科診所為例,國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班碩士論文
    8.莊晛英(2010),風土條件的風格競爭力—以掌生穀粒、在欉紅、七三茶堂為例,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文
    9.黃頻儀(2002),稻米貿易自由化對要素需求與環境品質之影響,中國文化大學經濟研究所博士論文
    10.楊書綺(2006),台灣稻米政策對稻農經營規模之影響,國立台灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文
    11.鄒貴懿(2010),旅館產業創新商業模式研究,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    12.饒美菊(2010),活化休耕田政策下連續休耕農民之農地出租態度探討,國立中興大學生物產業暨城鄉資源管理研究所碩士論文

    網站與其他
    1.蘇宗振(2010),「農糧政策與稻米產業發展」簡報,行政院農業委員會農糧署糧食產業組
    2.行健有機命想村網誌,http://eatricetw.blogspot.com/
    3.行政院農業委員會,http://www.coa.gov.tw/show_index.php?screen_size=2
    4.掌生穀粒網站,http://www.greeninhand.com/index.php
    5.掌生穀粒樂多網路日誌,http://blog.roodo.com/greeninhand
    6.掌生穀粒糧商號Facebook粉絲專頁,http://www.facebook.com/grreninhand
    7.行健有機夢想村網站,http://xn--nyqx78h6oh.tw/
    8.行健有機夢想村網誌,http://eatricetw.blogspot.tw/
    9.行健有機誌Facebook粉絲專頁,http://www.facebook.com/pages/%E8%A1%8C%E5%81%A5%E6%9C%89%E6%A9%9F%E8%AA%8C/155112007877582
    10.青松米‧榖東俱樂部樂多網路日誌,http://blog.roodo.com/sioong
    11.穀東俱樂部賴青松Facebook粉絲專頁,http://www.facebook.com/asioongclub
    12.南澳自然田網站,https://sites.google.com/site/nanaozirantian/
    13.南澳自然田Facebook粉絲專頁,http://www.facebook.com/pages/%E5%8D%97%E6%BE%B3%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E7%94%B0/149807391727189
    14.阿江的自然農耕筆記,http://ajnaturefarming.blogspot.tw/

    二、英文部分
    1.Beus, C. E. and Dunlap,R. E. (1990), “Conventional versus alternative agriculture: the paradigmaticroots of the debate”,Rural Sociology, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp.590-616.
    2.Betz, F. (2002), “Strategic Business Models”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 14, No.1, pp.21-27.
    3.Carliner, S. (2004), “Business Models for Training and Performance Improvement Departments”, Human Resources Development Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.275-294.
    4.Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002), “The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology Spin-Off Companies”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No.3, pp.529-555
    5.Drucker, P. F. (1950), The New Society, London: William Heinemann.
    6.Drucker, P. F. (1985), Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles, London: Heinemann.
    7.Gardner, M. P.(1985), “Mood states and consumer behavior: A critical review”,Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, pp.281-300.
    8.Hamel, G. (2002), Leading the Revolution, New York: HighBridge Company.
    9.Hamel, G. and Skarzynski, P. (2001), “Innovation: The new route to wealth.”Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 192, No. 5, pp.65-70.
    10.Holbrook, M. B. (2000), “The millennial consumer in the texts of our times: Experience and entertainment”, Journal ofMacromarketing, Vol. 20, No.2, pp.178-192.
    11.Holbrook, M. B. and Hirschman, E. C. (1982), “The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp.132-140.
    12.Joanson, M. W. (2002), “Why Business Models Matter”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, pp.86-87.
    13.Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M. and Kagermann, H.(2008), “Reinventing Your Business Model”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, No. 12, pp.55-59.
    14.Magretta, J. (2002), ”Why Business Models Matter”,Harvard Business Review, May, pp.86-92.
    15.McLuhan, R. (2000).Go live with a big brand experience. Marketing,. London, Oct 26. 2000, pp.45-46.
    16.Olshavsky, R. W. and Granbois, D. H. (1979), “Consumer decision making-fact or fiction”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp.93-100.
    17.Pine, B. J. and Gilmore, H. J., (1999), The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    18.Pine, B. J. and Gilmore, H. J., (1998), “Welcome to Experience Economy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, pp.97-105
    19.Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C. and Arroniz, I. (2006),“The 12 different ways for companies to innovate”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp.75-81.
    20.Schmitt, B. H. (1999), “Experiential Marketing”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 15, pp.53-67.
    21.Schmitt, B. H. (1999), Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, Relate to Your Company and Brands, New York: The Free Press.
    22.Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The theory of economic development, Boston, MA: Harvard.
    23.Sheth, J. N. (1979), “Psychobiology and consumer research: A problem of construct validity”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp.414-427.
    24.Timmers, P. (1998), “Business Models for Electronic Markets”,Electronic Markets, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.3-8.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    99359025
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099359025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2586View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback