政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/61509
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造访人次 : 50826044      在线人数 : 638
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61509


    题名: 探究教師於程度差異大班級教學的認知與實務：一位英語教師之個案研究
    Exploring Teacher Cognitions and Practices in Teaching Large Multilevel English Classes: A Case Study
    作者: 莊雯婷
    Jhuang, Wun Ting
    贡献者: 招靜琪
    Chao, Chin Chi
    莊雯婷
    Jhuang, Wun Ting
    关键词: 教師認知
    程度差異大班級
    學習英語為外語
    質化個案研究
    teacher cognition
    large multilevel classes
    EFL
    qualitative case study
    日期: 2013
    上传时间: 2013-11-01 11:47:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 現有文獻指出在程度差異大班級中的英語教學相關研究傾向將研究重點置於教師遇到的困難以及他們發現可有效解決問題的教學實務方法。少有研究會進一步研究教師的心理層面以解釋這些教學實務方法是如何以及為何被使用在特定教學時機與場域，也因此使他們的研究討論僅流於教學的表層。
    為了呈現一個對程度差異大班級中的英語教學較為全面且深入的理解，本研究採用教師敘事、訪談、觀察以及文件分析來研究一教師如何在程度差異大班級中教英語、她在這樣的班級中教英語時抱有什麼教學認知以及她如何發展出這樣的認知。
    研究結果顯示此研究對象之教師持有四大教學認知與實務，包括（一）瞭解並同理其學生、（二）使其教學實務多樣化以容納學生的多樣性、（三）將學習標準層級化以照顧學生的多樣性，以及（四）接納有些事情乃是其力所不逮。經分析後，研究者發現這四大教學認知與實務乃是研究對象之教師基於她所持有的廣泛經驗，不論其發生於教室內或外，所進行省思後，構成並再次構成的教學認知與實務。然而，儘管懷有這四大教學認知，研究對象之教師並非總能落實符合其認知的教學實務。事實上，研究者發現研究對象之教師能實施符合其認知之教學實務的程度乃是她個人落實其教學認知的能力與外在教學場域願意提供多大空間予其落實其認知於實務之互動下的結果。
    試圖促進在程度差異大班級中的英語教學與研究，本研究向在此種班級中的四大主要族群，包括教師、教師培育者、研究者以及此班級下的其他相關人士提出相關建議。
    A review showed that existing literature on teaching English in multilevel classrooms tends to focus on the difficulties teachers encounter and practices they find to be effective in addressing the problems in teaching such classes (Chen, 2009; Chiang, 2003; Liu, 2004; Maddalena, 2002; Xanthou & Pavlou, 2008). Few studies have probed further to investigate the mental dimension of teaching that accounts for how and why certain practices are adopted in particular periods of class time and specific teaching contexts (Lu, 2011; Teng, 2009), hence rendering the discussions rather superficial touching only the surface of teaching.
    To present a more holistic and in-depth understanding of teaching large multilevel English classes, the present study drew on a teacher narrative, interviews, observations and document analyses to investigate how the teacher participant taught large multilevel English classes, what cognitions she held in teaching such classes and how she developed such cognitions.
    The findings revealed that the teacher held four major cognitions and practices in teaching large multilevel English classes, including (1) knowing and empathizing with her students; (2) building variety into teaching practices to accommodate the diversity of students; (3) adding differentiation into criteria to attend to the diversity of students and (4) admitting that things can be beyond her control. The four major cognitions and practices were found to have structured and restructured through the reflection that the teacher undertook on the vast experiences that she had accumulated both inside and outside the classroom. However, despite holding these cognitions, the teacher could not always implemented practices that conformed to her cognitions. In fact, it was found that the extent to which the teacher could implement practices congruent with her cognitions was the interactive result of her internal capacity to find spaces to realize her cognitions and the surrounding teaching contexts’ willingness to allow room for her to put her cognitions into practices.
    In an attempt to facilitate instruction and research in large multilevel English classrooms, the study yielded implications for four parties working in the relevant contexts, including teachers, teacher educators, stakeholders of teaching contexts other than teachers, and researchers.
    參考文獻: 張玉芳（Chang, Y. F.）（2009）。「常態編班」政策實施的探討：以國中英語科為例。中等教育，60（3），110-127。
    張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌、許月貴 （Chang, W. C., Chou, C. T., Chen, C. Y., Yeh, H. N., Lin, C. C., & Hsu, Y. K.）（2003）。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語雙峰現象暨改進措施。教育部，未出版。
    蔡玉慧（Tsai, Y. H.）（2008）。雙峰現象？國小中年級英語學習成效評估實證。台灣教育，652，58-63。
    Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137.
    Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.
    Ariogul, S. (2007). Understanding foreign language teachers’ practical knowledge: What’s the role of prior language learning experience? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 168-181.
    Attia, M. M. (2011). Teacher cognition and the use of technology in teaching Arabic to speakers of other languages. Unpublished doctor’s thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
    Bailey, K. M., Bergthold, B., Braunstein, B., Fleischman, N. J., Holbrook, M. P., Tuman, J., Waissbluth, X., & Zambo, L. J. (1996). The language learners’ autobiography: Examing the “apprenticeship of observation”. In Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching. (pp. 11-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Baurain, B., & Phan, L. H. (2010). Multilevel and diverse classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
    Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative Inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 207-213.
    Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259-275.
    Borg, S. (1999). Teachers’ theories in grammar teaching. ELT Journal, 53(3), 157-167.
    Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
    Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
    Borg, S. (2009). Introducing language teacher cognition. Retrieved from http://www.education.leeds.ac.uk/research/files/145.pdf
    Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39(3), 370-380.
    Calderhead, J. (1988). Teachers’ professional learning. London: The Falmer Press.
    Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
    Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In Houston, W. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. (pp. 291-310). New York: Macmillan.
    Chang, C., & Su, Y. (2010). Educational reform in Taiwan: Beliefs about EFL teaching and learning. The International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 265-276.
    Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
    Chen, C. (2005). Teachers as change agents: A study of in-service teachers’ practical knowledge. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 10-19.
    Chen, Y. J. (2009). Elementary school English teachers` teaching difficulties in and remedies for the bimodal distribution of students` English abilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Chiang, Y. Z. (2003). A case study of English classroom management in relation to children`s individual proficiency difference issues in Taipei primary schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Chou, C. H. (2008). Exploring elementary English teachers’ practical knowledge: A case study of EFL teachers in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 529-541.
    Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1987). Teachers’ personal knowledge: What counts as personal in studies of the personal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6), 487-500.
    Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 665-674.
    Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative Inquiry. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (3rd ed., pp. 477-487). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Crookes, G., & L. Arakari (1999). Teaching idea sources and work conditions in an ESL program. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 15-19.
    Eisenhart, M. A., Shrum, J.L., Harding, J. R., & Cuthbert, A. M. (1988). Teacher beliefs: definitions, findings and directions. Educational Policy, 2(1), 51-70.
    Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher’s “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 43-71.
    Ellis, E. M. (2004). The invisible multilingual teacher: The contribution of language background to Australian ESL teachers’ professional knowledge and beliefs. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(2), 90-108.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (1999). Reflective practice in an EFL teacher development group. System, 27(2), 157-172.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (2003). Learning to teach English language during the first year: Personal influences and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 95-111.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (2006). The first year of language teaching: Imposing order. System, 34(2), 211-221.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (2007a). Narrowing the gap between expectations and reality with reflective practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 193-201.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (2007b). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Continuum Press.
    Freedman, S. W., Delp, V., & Crawford, S. M. (2005). Teaching English in Untracked Classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(1), 62-126.
    Freeman, D. (1993). Renaming experience/Reconstructing practice: Developing new understandings of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5/6), 485-497.
    Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach: A perspective from north American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, 35(1), 1-13.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
    Glense, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). NY: Longman.
    Golombek, P. R. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 447-464.
    Golombek, P. R., & Johnson, K. E. (2004). Narrative inquiry as a mediational space: examining emotional and cognitive dissonance in second language teachers’ development. Teachers and Teaching: theory and Practice, 10(3), 307-327.
    Gunn, C. L. (2010). Exploring MATESOL student ‘resistance’ to reflection. Language Teaching Research, 14(2), 208-223.
    Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
    Hess, N. (2001). Teaching large multilevel classes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Hood, M. (2009). Case study. In Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (Ed.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics. (pp. 66-87). NY: Palgrave.
    Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85.
    Johnson, K. E. (1992). Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 507-535.
    Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452.
    Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second Language Teacher Education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
    Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Kabilan, M. K. (2007). English language teachers reflecting on reflections: A Malaysian experience. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 681-705.
    King-Shaver, B., & Hunter, A. (2003). Differentiated Instruction in the English Classroom: Content, process, product, and assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Lamie, J. M. (2004). Presenting a model of change. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 115-142.
    Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen, M. P. (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research. (pp. 141-158). New York: Pearson Education.
    Lamb, T. E. (2000). Finding a voice: Learner autonomy and teacher education in an urban context. In Sinclair, B., McGrath, I., & Lamb, T. (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. (pp. 118-127). Harlow: Pearson Education.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC. System, 29(2), 197-208.
    Liu, S. F. (2004). Teaching difficulty and effective teaching strategies in junior high school normal class grouping: A case study of eight effective teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    LoCastro, V. (2001). Large classes and student learning. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 493-496.
    Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-43.
    Lu, Y. C. (2011). Effective teaching towards large mixed-ability classes: A qualitative study of EFL junior high school English teachers` teaching beliefs and practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Pingtung Institute of Commerce, Pingtung, Taiwan.
    MacDonald, M. G., & Smith, I. L. (2010). Every student wins: Using “team English” with large multilevel classes in Thailand. In Baurain, B., & Phan, L. H. (2010). (Eds.), Multilevel and diverse classrooms. (pp.51-65). Alexandria, Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
    Maddalena, S. (2002). Using high level students as teaching assistants in a mixed ability classroom. TESL-EJ, 6(1).
    Martinez, A. L. (2011). The development of beliefs and practices of foreign language teaching assistants. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, U.S..
    Mathews-Aydinli, J., & Horne, R. V. (2006). Promoting success of multilevel ESL classes: What teachers and administrators can do. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Mok, W. E. (1994). Reflecting on reflections: A case study of experienced and inexperienced ESL teachers. System, 22(1), 93-111.
    Mori, R. (2011). Teacher cognition in corrective feedback in Japan. System, 39(4), 451-467.
    Nishino, T. (2009). Communicative language teaching in Japanese high schools: Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation, Temple University, Pennsylvania, U.S..
    Nishino, T. (2012). Modeling teacher beliefs and practices in context: A multimethods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 380-399.
    Norton, B. (1995). Social identity, investment and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31.
    Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 131-153.
    Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. London: Longman.
    Orland-Barak, L., & Yinon, H. (2007). When theory meets practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 957-969.
    Osam, U.V., & Balbay, S. (2004). Investigating the decision-making skills of cooperating teachers and student teachers of English in a Turkish context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(7), 745-758.
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
    Quiocho, A. L., & Ulanoff, S. H. (2009). Differentiated literacy instruction for English language learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Richards, J. C. What’s the use of lesson plans? In Richards, J. C. (Ed.), Beyond training. (pp. 103-121). Cambridge: CUP.
    Richards, J. C., & Pennington, M. (1998). The first year of teaching. In Richards, J. C. (Ed.), Beyond training. (pp. 173-190). Cambridge: CUP.
    Rothenberg, C., & Fisher, D. (2007). Teaching English language learners: A differentiated approach. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
    Roberts, M. (2007). Teaching in the multilevel classroom. Pearson Education.
    Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2006). Teacher expectations and student self-perceptions: Exploring relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 537-552.
    Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2011). Constructing practical knowledge of teaching: Eleven newly qualified language teachers’ discursive agency. The Language Learning Journal, 39(3), 365-379.
    Sasajima, S. (2012). Language teacher cognition in the case of Japanese teachers of English at secondary schools in Japan: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctor’s thesis, University of Stirling, Stirling, England.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
    Shank, C. C., & Terrill, L. R. (1995). Teaching multilevel adult ESL classes. Washington D. C.: ERIC Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education.
    Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Shih, S. H. (2011). A case study of two English teachers’ cognition and practices in a remedial program. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
    Smith, D. B. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. In Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching. (pp. 197-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Stanley, C. (1998). A framework for teacher reflectivity. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 584-591.
    Sun, D. (2012). “Everything goes smoothly”: A case study of an immigrant Chinese language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 760-767.
    Teng, M. H. (2009). Effective teaching in large multilevel classes: A qualitative study on the beliefs and practices of experienced EFL elementary school teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In Grouws, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
    Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. (2nd. Ed.) Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Tsang, W. K. (2004). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge and interactive decisions. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 163-198.
    Ulichny, P. (1996). What’s in a methodology? In Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching. (pp. 178-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ur, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    van Lier, L. (2005). Case study. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. (pp. 195-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawarence Erlbaum.
    van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163-186). London: Equinox Pub.
    Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York : Routledge.
    Werbinska, D. (2011). The first year in the classroom: Crossing the borderland from being a student to being a teacher. In Pawlak, M. (Ed.), Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching. (pp. 181-196). New York: Springer.
    Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wyatt, M. (2010). On teacher’s development as a reflective practitioner. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 235-261.
    Xanthou, M., & Pavlou, P. (2008, Feb.). Strategies of accommodating mixed ability classes in EFL settings: Teachers’ armour in an ongoing battle. Humanising Language Teaching, 10(1). Retrieved from http://hltmag.co.uk/jan08/mart04.htm
    Yang, L. (2010) A study of ethnic Mongolian university EFL teachers’ beliefs and decision making. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics. 33(2), 60-75.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學研究所
    99551014
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099551014
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    101401.pdf985KbAdobe PDF2687检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈