English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50925809      線上人數 : 940
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61277


    題名: 陳水扁政府與馬英九政府的中國戰略之比較與檢討
    其他題名: Comparison and Review on the China Strategies of the Chen Shui-bian administration and the Ma Ying-jeou Administration
    作者: 邱垂正;童振源
    貢獻者: 政大國發所
    日期: 2008-09
    上傳時間: 2013-10-08 14:47:04 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 進入 21 世紀後，台灣藍綠兩大政治陣營最大差異在於對中國的戰略與政策；2008 年5 月政黨輪替，也象徵台灣的中國戰略之「典範轉移」。執政八年的陳水扁政府無論從戰略觀與政策取向，已發展出清晰的脈絡架構，並有具體的實踐成果與挑戰。相較之下，雖然剛上台兩個月多，馬英九政府已經迅速構建其中國戰略與政策。透過比較與檢討，本文希望對照出台灣兩任政府在中國政策的戰略差異以及政策實踐。相對於陳水扁政府的中國戰略可用「主權清晰、政經平衡」來概括，馬英九政府的中國戰略則可用「主權模糊、經濟優先」來形容。本文總結，現階段兩岸關係發展有三項發展趨勢以及台灣未來所必須面對的兩項風險。三項發展趨勢：一、兩岸關係將趨向緩和；二、兩岸互動節奏由中國主導；三、台灣對中國將快速開放。兩項風險：一、台灣主體性弱化，二、潛藏的兩岸主權衝突。
    In the wake of the 21th century, the most significant difference between the Blue Camp and the Green Camp of two major political forces in Taiwan lies in their strategies and policies toward China. The power alternation in May, 2008, signified a “paradigm shift” of Taiwan’s China strategy. In the past eight years of ruling, the Chen Shui-bian administration had developed a clear policy framework as well as concrete results and challenges of its implementation. In comparison, although in power for only more than two months, the Ma Ying-jeou administration has rapidly articulated its strategy and policies toward China. Through comparison and review, this paper is to make it clear the differences between the Chen Shui-bian administration and the Ma Ying-jeou administration in terms of their strategies and policy implementation results toward China. The China strategy of the Chen Shui-bian administration can be characterized as “Strategic Clarity on Sovereignty, Balance of Politics and Economy,” while the China strategy of the Ma Ying-jeou administration can be described as “Strategic Ambiguity on Sovereignty, Economy First.” This paper concludes three trends of current Cross-strait relations and two risks that Taiwan faces in the future. Three trends: approaching détente of the Cross-strait relation; the tempo of Cross-strait interaction being dominated by China; the acceleration of Taiwan’s social and economic opening to China.Two risks: the weakening of Taiwan consciousness; latent Cross-strait conflicts over sovereignty.
    關聯: 戰略：台灣國家安全政策評論, 1, 78-99
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[國家發展研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    17899.pdf328KbAdobe PDF21490檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋