English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51047362      Online Users : 939
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61246


    Title: 我國政府人權指標建構模式之探討：從Freedom House人權指標評比分析
    Other Titles: On Formulation of Official Human Rights Indicators in Taiwan: An Analysis Based on Freedom House Human Rights Indicators and Evaluation
    Authors: 李酉潭;翁栢萱
    Contributors: 政大國發所
    Keywords: 人權;人權指標;自由之家;世界人權宣言
    Human Rights;Human Rights Indicators;Freedom House;Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Date: 2009-03
    Issue Date: 2013-10-08 13:58:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 當人權保障正以全球化(globalization)的方式在國際間積極進行之際，台灣雖已進入自由民主國家之列，惟因歷次修憲偏重於政府體制的增修，除了基本國策部分條款外，對於憲法人權條款並未多所著墨；相較於國際社會中許多國家不斷調整其人民權利保障的清單，顯得我國人權保障之不足。尤其政府行政部門與人民權益關係最爲密切，因此，若能訂定出具體人權指標並定期做出執行評估，確能有效衡量人權政策內容是否具體落實，積極建構一套符合大家期待的人權保障體系實乃必要。本文以國際上具公信力之非政府人權組織「自由之家」(Freedom House)人權指標內容與評比方式做爲分析基礎，再探討我國政府部門如何逐步建立人權指標內涵與執行評估模式，期望透過國際化與本土化的聯結方式，提出一套適用於我國政府的人權指標體系，及具體可操作的執行評估模式，做爲我國在發展人權保障體系的重要參考。
    The human rights protection is actively practiced in the international society as a result of globalization. In the meantime, Taiwan has been ranked as one of the liberal democracies. During the past decades, Taiwan went through several constitutional amendments, emphasizing more on reforms of government structure than on contents of human rights. In comparison with many other countries that continuously renew their bills of human rights, Taiwan`s protection of human rights obviously lags behind in this respect. As the operation of government is closely linked to human rights and people`s interests, it`s necessary to formulate a concrete system of human rights indicators and evaluation, in order to evaluate regularly if policies of human rights protection are fully implemented, and to assess the achievements in building a satisfactory system of human rights protection. The article bases its analysis on existing system of human rights indicators and evaluation, which are constructed by Freedom House and widely accepted as one of the most authoritative NGOs working in the field of human rights. Having combined global experiences and local adaptation, the author wishes to answer how the government can gradually formulate a viable system of human rights indicators and evaluation, with the aim to establish a comprehensive system of human rights indicators, and a fully practicable system for regular government evaluation. A system as such will serve as an important benchmark for the development of human rights protection systems in Taiwan.
    Relation: 臺灣國際法季刊, 6(1), 75-133
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國家發展研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    75-133.pdf3069KbAdobe PDF2817View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback