政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/61231

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Graduate Institute of Development Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/61231

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61231

Title:	民主化對臺灣家庭決策的影響 The Influence of Democratization to Family Decision-Making in Taiwan
Authors:	殷瑞宏
Contributors:	李酉潭殷瑞宏
Keywords:	臺灣民主化夫妻權力關係家庭決策模式資源差異 Taiwan democratization the power of husbands and wives family decision-making resources differences
Date:	2012
Issue Date:	2013-10-01 15:42:02 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討隨著臺灣的民主化進程，不同年代間的夫妻權力關係所受影響之因素與改變情形，尤其是社會情境（文化脈絡）方面的影響。擬採用家庭決策模式為指標，並根據資源論、交換論與與文化規範的論點，討論個人特質與其所握有的資源對家庭決策模式的影響。焦點包括臺灣的民主化進程會否導致夫妻間共同決定的比例增加？以及夫妻所擁有的資源對影響夫妻權力分配的影響程度，是否隨著臺灣的民主化進程而增加？研究者採用「華人家庭動態調查」資料庫中第一年計畫（RI-1999）與第五年計畫（RI-2003）兩筆資料當中有關「家庭決策與支出」的部分進行分析。研究結果發現不論何者皆是以夫妻共同決定的情況為主，隨著時間的變化並未有顯著的增加，甚至略為減少。另外，研究結果顯示隨著臺灣的民主化進程，夫妻所擁有的資源對影響夫妻權力分配的影響程度的確有所增加。根據研究的結果而知，隨著臺灣的民主化進程，教育的普及與兩性平權概念的提升，的確造成夫妻權力間的變化受到相對社經資源影響增加，反而使得共同決策的情形略減。此外，過去一些認為會影響夫妻權力關係的個人特質因素，像是族群的部分，所呈現的結果反而和過去的研究不一致。究竟民主化對於影響夫妻權力關係的其他因素將會帶來何種變化，可做為將來研究的方向。 The purpose of this research is to understand the power relationship between husbands and wives, including the factors and the transition during 1999-2003 within the process of Taiwan’s democratization, especially the context of culture. Researcher adopts family decision-making as an important index. Base on the resources theory, the exchange theory and the theory of resources in culture context, the main questions of this research are: 1. Does the proportion of family decision-making change? 2. The situation that the more resources one has, the more power in making decision one has would increase. The results are as follows. The proportion of family decision-making does not change significantly, however, the situation that one has more resources would have more power in making decision does increase. Nevertheless, the research tells us that some personal characteristics like one’s ethnic group, do not have the same result as research in past. How will Taiwan’s democratization influence these factors, or change their nature in the process of decision-making? That could be a good research direction in the future.
Reference:	一、中文 Georg Sorensen著，李酉潭、陳志瑋譯（2003），《最新民主與民主化》，臺北：韋伯文化。王甫昌（2005），〈由「中國族群」到「臺灣族群」：戶口普查籍別類屬轉變之分析〉，《臺灣社會學》，9，頁59-117。田安里、黃財尉與楊素圓（2006），〈雙薪家庭夫妻間有一樣的婚姻滿意度嗎？從夫妻性別角色態度與角色承諾的觀點研究〉，《臺北教育大學學報》，19卷2期，頁255-280。伊慶春與蔡瑤玲（1989），〈臺北地區夫妻權力的分析：以家庭決策為例〉，收錄於《臺灣社會現象的分析──家庭、人口、政策與階層》，115-151，臺北：中央研究院三民主義研究所。呂玉瑕與伊慶春（2005），〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工：臺灣七Ｏ年代與九Ｏ年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉，《臺灣社會學》，10，41-94。李酉潭（2011），《自由人權與民主和平：臺灣民主化的核心價值》，臺北：五南。李美玲、楊亞潔與伊慶春（2000），〈家務分工：就業現實還是平等理念〉，《臺灣社會學刊》，24，59-88。林松齡（1990），《臺灣社會的婚姻與家庭：社會學的實證研究》，臺北：五南。林芳玫（2009），〈性別主流化在臺灣：從國際發展到在地化實踐〉，《新世紀智庫論壇》，45，32-38。林鶴玲、李香潔（1999），〈臺灣閩、客、外省族群家庭中之性別資源配置〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，11卷4期， 475-528。周碧娥（2006），〈人權、性別與民主化：女性公民權與臺灣政治民主化〉，「第二屆人權學術論文研討會」，臺北：東吳大學。吳慧瑛（2007），〈家庭背景與教育成就：五個出生世代的比較分析〉，《人口學刊》，34，109-143頁。若林正丈著，洪金珠、許佩賢譯（1994），《臺灣：分裂國家與民主化》，臺北：月旦出版社。唐先梅（1999），〈從家務工作的本質談雙薪家庭夫妻家事分工〉，《應用心理研究》，4，131-173。高淑貴（1991），《家庭社會學》，臺北：黎明文化。莊英章（1994），《家族與婚姻：臺灣北部兩個閩客村落之研究》，臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。張菊芬（1997），〈夫婦社會經濟資源與家庭決策：以臺中縣市職業婦女為例〉，臺中：東海大學社會學系碩士論文。許潔雯（2003），〈夫妻權力分析：以夫妻衝突處理模式與家庭決策模式為例〉，臺北：國立臺北大學社會學系碩士論文。郭振恭（2007），〈民法親屬編結規定修正之評述〉，《月旦法學》，147，35-40。陳玉華、伊慶春與呂玉瑕（2000），〈婦女家庭地位之研究：以家庭決策模式為例〉，《臺灣社會學刊》，24，1-58。陳惠馨（1993），〈從法律面談如何落實婚姻中之兩性平等〉，《政大法學評論》，49，85-98。黃述忱（2008），〈信仰對基督徒夫妻家庭決策轉變歷程之影響──以子女管教與家庭財政為例〉，臺北：國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。蔡文輝（1984），《社會學理論》，臺北：三民書局。蔡文輝（1987），《家庭社會學》，臺北：五南。蔡淑鈴（2004），〈高等教育的擴張對教育機會分配的影響〉，《臺灣社會學》，7，頁47-88。鄧學仁（2002），〈新法定財產制之抉擇〉，《月旦法學》，89，21-29。戴東雄（2007），〈論民法親屬編修正內容與檢討〉，《月旦法學》，147，5-34。盧惠芬（2005），〈家庭型態與夫妻決策權力〉，「華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會」。簡文吟（2008），〈臺灣婦女家庭地位研究──多維度家庭地位指標下的夫妻配對分析〉，臺北：國立臺灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。二、英文 Bearden, William O. and Michael J. Etzel(1982). “Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-194. Berk, Sarah F.(1985). The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households. New York: Plenum Press. Bielby, D. D. V. and Bielby W. T.(1984). “Work Commitment Sex Role Attitudes and Women’s Employment,” American Sociological Review, 49, 234-247. Blackwell, Roger D., Paul W. Miniard and James F. Engel(2001). Consumer Behavior(9th edition). Ohio: Mike Roche. Blood, Robert O. and Donald M. Wolfe(1960). Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press. Bova, Russell(1997). “Democracy and Liberty: The Cultural Connection. ” Journal of Democracy, 8(1), 112-126. Burr, Wesley R.(1973). Theory construction and the sociology of the family, New York: Wiley-Interscience. Centers, Richard, Bertram H. Raven and Aroldo Rodrigues(1971). “Conjugal Power Structure: A Reexamination.” American Sociological Review, 36(2), 264-278. Chen, Yu-Hua and Chin-Chun Yi(2006). “Wife’s Decision-Making Power in a Chinese Context: A Marital Dyadic Perspective.” Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 17(2), 110-123. Cromwell, R. E. and D. H. Olson(1975). Power in Families. New York: Halsted. Dahl, Robert A.(1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Dahl, Robert A.(1989). Democracy and it’s Critics. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Diamond, Larry(1996). “Is The Third Wave Over?” Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 20-37. Diamond, Larry(1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press. Eckland, Bruck K.(1968). “Theories of Mate Selection,” Eugenics Quarterly, 15(2), 71-84. Eshleman J. Ross(1981). The Family: An Introduction(3rd Editon). Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Haller, Max(1981). “Marriage, Women and Social Stratification: A Theoretical Critique,” American Journal of Sociology, 86, 766-795. Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael(1992). “The Rise of Social Movements and Civil Protests.” In Tun-Jen Cheng and Stephan Haggard(Eds). Political Change in Taiwan (57-72). Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Huntington, Samuel P.(1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press. Karl, Terry Lynn(1996). “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America. ” In Roderic Ai Camp(Ed), Democracy in Latin America: Patterns and Cycles(21-46). Delawre: A Scholarly Resources Inc. Linz, Juan J.(1990). "Transitions to Democracy.” Washington Quarterly, 13(3), 143‐164. Mainwaring, Scott(1992). “Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues.” In Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell and J. Samuel Valenzuela(Eds.). Issues in Democratic Consolidation(294-341). Indiana: Uuniversity of Notre Dame Press. McDonald, Gerald W.(1980). “Family Power: The Assessment of a Decade of Theory and Research.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 42(4), 841-854. Michielutte, Robert(1972). “Trends in Educational Homogamy,” Sociology of Education, 45, 288-302. Mirowsky, J.(1985). “Depression and Marital Power: An Equity Model.” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 557-592. Monshipouri, Mahmood(1995). Democratization, Liberalization & Human Rights in the Third World. London: Lynne rienner publishers. O’Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe C. Schmitter(1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Olson, D. and J. DeFrain(2003). Marriages and Families: Intimacy, Diversity and Strengths. New York: McGraw Hill. Pedhazur, E. J.(1982). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research(2nd ed.), Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Rodman, Hyman(1970). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context, Detroit: Merrill-Palmer Institute. Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina(1970). “The Study of Family Power Structure: A Review 1960-1969.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32(4), 539-552. Sorensen, Georg(1993). Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World. Oxford: Westview Press. Sprecher, S.(1998). “Social exchange theories and sexuality.” Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 32-44. Steil, J. M.(1997). Martial Equality: It’s Elationship to The Well-being of Husbands and Wives. Thousnad Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Warner, Rebecca L., Gary R. Lee and Janet Lee(1986). “Social Organization, Spousal Resources and Marital Power: A Cross-Cultural Study.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(1), 121-128. Whyte, Martin King(1995). “From Arranged Marriaged to Love Matches in Urban China,” in Family Formation and Dissolution: Perspectives from East and West, edited by Chin-Chun Yi. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 99261021 101
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099261021
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Development Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
102101.pdf		1883Kb	Adobe PDF2	669	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...