政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/61174

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/61174

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61174

Title:	開放取用系統與商業資料庫之書目計量比較研究-以諾貝爾生物醫學獎為例 A Bibliometric Study on Open Access Systems and Commercialized databases: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Literature Approach
Authors:	潘梓其 Pan, Tzu Chi
Contributors:	蔡明月 Tsay, Ming Yueh 潘梓其 Pan, Tzu Chi
Keywords:	開放取用系統商業資料庫重複性諾貝爾生物醫學獎 SCIE Scopus Pubmed Highwire Google Scholar Open Access System Commercialized Databases Overlap The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Literature SCIE Scopus Pubmed Highwire Google Scholar
Date:	2012
Issue Date:	2013-10-01 11:53:57 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	自2003年布達佩斯宣言公佈起，國際間學術文獻開始開放取用的趨勢。於此背景下，本研究以諾貝爾生物醫學獎近十年23位得主為研究樣本，評比在商業資料庫(SCIE、Scopus)及開放取用系統(生物醫學類：Pubmed、Highwire；綜合類：Google Scholar)的文獻收錄狀況，除了比較其內部重複性與完整性，並交叉比對五個資料庫與系統的重複性、獨特性及完整性，同時也觀看能否取得全文的比率，來了解現今開放取用文獻的狀況，進而觀察開放取用系統和商業資料庫兩者是否可以互補，或是開放取用系統有代替商業資料庫的可能性。研究結果顯示五個資料庫及系統的檢索形式多元。針對作者檢索而言，Scopus最完善，資料收錄也較齊全；SCIE及Pubmed兩者則是檢索結果最為相似。如果以學術出版收錄而言，則是Highwire較完整；至於Google Scholar的獨特性較高。整體而言，開放取用系統比商業資料庫的全文收錄比例高，但Scopus是收錄最多全文的資料庫。本研究同時也發現PNAS是五個資料庫與系統之重複來源及獨特來源。另外，使用PubMed及Highwire檢索生物醫學文獻會比Google Scholar來得專業。根據研究結果建議，商業資料庫可考慮將網路開放資源納入收錄範圍，以便妥善整理及應用網路資源的書目及全文。開放取用系統則應改善索引書目之正確性及著錄完整性。另外，針對圖書館的服務宜採取以下之因應措施：(1)加強推廣商業資料庫之正確檢索方式及使用時機；(2)教導如何正確使用開放取用系統的檢索模式；(3)平衡商業資料庫和開放取用系統的使用，以達成圖書館經費的合理運用。本研究後續可延伸至生物醫學領域的臨床及實證醫學上，以了解生物醫學中兩個最具時效性的學術文獻系統是否達到開放取用的立即性及實用性。再者，使用者對開放取用的滿意度研究是學術出版界急欲了解的課題，也是後續研究可加強努力的方向。 The International Scholarly Communication has gradually forwarded open access system since the publication of Budapest Declaration in 2003. Under this research background, this study uses biomedical Nobel Prize winners in recent years for the study of 23 samples of appraisal in the commercial database (SCIE, Scopus) and open access systems (biomedical categories: Pubmed, Highwire ; Comprehensive: Google Scholar) literature collection status, in addition to comparing repeatability and integrity of its internal and cross-comparison of the five databases and system repeatability, uniqueness and integrity, while also viewing the ability to obtain the ratio of text to understand current status of open access literature, and then observe the open access systems and commercial databases whether the two can complement each other, or open access database system instead of commercial possibilities. The results showed that five databases have different retrieval systems in many different forms. For the purposes of retrieval, Scopus collections are more complete; SCIE and Pubmed are the most similar two databases in the search results. Inclusion academic publishing purposes, Highwire is the most complete one. For Google Scholar, the collection’s uniqueness is the highest. Overall, comparing the open access system with commercial database, open access system contains a high proportion of full text. Scopus is the most one of full text collections. The PNAS study also found that five of the duplicate database and system sources and unique source. In addition, the use of PubMed and Highwire retrieved biomedical literature is more professional than Google Scholar. According to the study results suggest that commercial databases can be considered included in the scope of network resources into the open, in order to properly organize network resources and application of bibliographic and full-text. Open access system should improve the accuracy and bibliographic indexing bibliographic completeness. In addition, for the library service should take the following measures in response to: (a) enhance the promotion of commercial database retrieval methods and the use of proper timing; (2) to teach the proper use of open access system retrieval mode; (3) Balance Business open access database and use of the system, in order to achieve rational use of library funds. The follow-up research of this study can be extended to the field of clinical and biomedical evidence-based medicine research. The follow-up research results can be used to understand the biomedical literature’ timeliness, whether the system reaches an open access immediate or practicality. Furthermore, users` satisfaction with open access scholarly publishing research is also an anxious subject to know, and the follow-up study will strengthen efforts.
Reference:	中文「Web of Science 資料庫新介面介紹-- 臺大醫圖電子報021 期」。臺大醫學院圖書分館、臺大醫院圖書室，2008.01.09 <http://epaper.ntu.edu.tw/view.php?id=4739> (檢索於2013年6月3日)。 CONCERT電子期刊聯合查詢系統,<http://ulej.stic.gov.tw/wIndex.asp> (檢索於2012年10月20日)。 DOAJ 開放存取期刊目錄<http://www.oalib.com/Html/OAziyuan1/OAqikan_488_10.html > (檢索於 2012年10月26日)。 Ringertz ,N. & A. W. Levinovitz；新加坡世界科技出版社譯。百年榮耀—諾貝爾獎世紀回顧。台北：遠流出版社，民91年。 Ulrich’s期刊指南和期刊分析系統資料庫。<http://202.114.89.91/sysjk/929.jhtml>(檢索於2013年1月2日.)。 Web of Science 簡介- CONCERT <http://www.stpi.narl.org.tw/fdb/wos/index.html>(檢索於2012年12月23日)。中央研究院計算中心圖書組，「Highwire查詢說明」。中央研究院計算機中心(民 92年)，頁1。王丹。「比較PubMed， Scopus， Web of Science 和Google Scholar 的優點和缺點」。農業圖書情報學刊22(2)(2010)：頁109-112。王梅玲。「開放近用期刊對圖書資訊學者研究的影響」。圖書與資訊學刊4(1)(第 80期) (2012)：頁37-58。石秋霞、黃鴻珠。「學術論文被引用次數之分析研究：以Science Citation Index Expanded及Scopus為例」。教育資料與圖書館學44( 1) (2006)：頁15-34。全國圖書書目資訊網(NBINet), <http://cdnete.lib.ncku.edu.tw/93cdnet/chinese/talk/nbinet.htm l> (檢索於2012年12月28日)。何謂 Excel？，<http://office.microsoft.com/zh-tw/novice/HA010265948.aspx> (檢索於2013年1月7日)。吳孟瑾。「系列6：引用文獻索引資料庫-Google Scholar」。 <http://www.lib.nctu.edu.tw/html/categoryid-34/id-165/ > (檢索於2012年12月27日)。李治安、林懿萱。「從傳統到開放的學術期刊出版：開放近用出版相關問題初探」。圖書館學與資訊科學33(1) (2007)：頁39-52。李波。「PubMed的高級檢索」。科技信息(2008)34：頁587。林偉翔，林雯瑤。「北市醫學雜誌之書目計量分析」。北市醫學雜誌9(1) (2012)：頁45-60。邱炯友。學術傳播與其刊出版。台北：遠流出版，民95年。侯躍芳、趙玉虹、龔黛琛。「Google Scholar、Scirus及PubMed檢索功能對比研醫學信息學雜誌07(2009)：頁12-16。思金華、楊木銳、王怡。「Google學術搜尋與Pubmed在醫學原文傳遞工作中的應用」。信息科技，(上) (2010)：頁208。洪朝貴撰。「學者抗議, 期刊產業醞釀變天: 英美的 Open Access 趨勢」。 <http://ckhung0.blogspot.tw/2012/05/open-access.html > (檢索於2012年12月20日)。徐華玉，林奇秀。「生物醫學領域研究人員投稿開放近用期刊經驗之研究」。教育資料與圖書館學49(2) (2011)：頁241-264。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心，「Web of Science」，<http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/Systems/Details/31> (檢索於2013年2月28日)。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心主編。開放近用的機會與展望。台北：財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心，民98年。崑山科技大學圖書資訊館。「一、何謂SCIE、SSCI、AHCI」。<http://www.lib.ksu.edu.tw/document/%E5%BC%95%E6%96%87%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99%E5%BA%AB.pdf > (檢索於2012年12月19日)。崔雷。「運用引文分析法評價醫療網站」。資訊傳播與圖書館學9(1)(2002)：頁17-26。張慧銖。「醫學期刊核心選目之研究」。中國圖書館學會會報53(1994)：頁61。張曉燕、余曉捷。「SCI與Pubmed收錄藥理學和藥學期刊的比較」。科技情報開發與經濟17(12)(2007)：頁59~60。陳和琴。「電子資源管理系統初探」。在國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所編。數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集。台中市：編著，民85年。頁298-315。陳薇竹。「引用文獻索引資料庫之比較硏究」。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，碩士論文，民96年。馮玉。「Scopus文摘數據庫及其檢索利用」。情報科學25(3) (2007)：頁401~403，下接頁413。劉金銘。「Highwire出版社評介—一個最好的學術期刊線上出版平臺」。中國科技期刊研究20(6) (2009)：頁1012~1016。劉琼。「美國25名諾貝爾獎得主致國會公開信_支持學術論文的開放訪問」。圖書館雜誌24(6) (2005)：頁63-64,內容下接頁20。歐盟執行委員會,聯合國教科文組織德國委員會編；毛慶禎譯。開放近用：機會及挑戰手册。台北：碩亞數碼科技，民99。蔡明月。「學術傳播與書目計量學」。教育資料與圖書館學 35：1(民86年9月)：頁39。蔡明月。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北：國立編譯館主編，民89年。諾貝爾生理學或醫學獎，有健康網(UUUWELL.COM) <http://www.uuuwell.com/mytag.php?id=89467> (檢索於2012年10月24日)。諾貝爾獎--MLB Lib智庫百科 <http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E8%AF%BA%E8%B4%9D%E5%B0%94%E5%A5%96> (檢索於2012年10月27日)。賴施雯，「Medline醫學資料庫之好用性評估」。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民100年。英文 “Highwire”:< http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/>(檢索於2013年2月27日)。 About PNAS,” PNAS.”,July 2013. , < http://www.pnas.org/site/aboutpnas/index.xhtml>(檢索於2013年6月28日). Access to Government Information--MLA Statement on Open Access <http://www.mlanet.org/government/info_access/openaccess_statement.html> (檢索於2012年12月27日)。 Adriaanse , Leslie S. & Chris Rensleigh “Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an Environmental Sciences perspective.”South African Journal of Libraries & Information Science77(2)(2011)：p169-178. Albanese, A.. Honorable mentions: The LJAN top stories of 2008 4-10 (2009) <http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6626581.html.> (檢索於2012年12月27日)。 Andreas Strotmann; Dangzhi Zhao,” Combining commercial and open access citation databases to delimithighly interdisciplinary research fields for citation analysis” <http://www.sois.uwm.edu/MetricsPreCon/documentation/Strotmann_Zhao_Combining_Commercial.pdf>。 arXiv < http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXiv> (檢索於2012年12月27日)。 Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities【柏林宣言—開放取用科學與人文學知識】，<http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/BerlinDeclaration_dt.pdf>2008年10月,已有255個學術機構簽屬。 Borgman , Christine L.,,ed., “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometics” (Newbury Park, CA:SAGE Publication ) (1990)：p13-14. Borgman , Christine L.”Editor’s Introduction,” Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (Newbury Park, Sage ,1990 )：p13-16.。 Bourne ,Charles P” Characteristics of Coverage by the Bibliography of agriculture of the literature relating to agricultural research and development.” in Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, Va.22151(1969). Bradford ,Samuel C ”The Extent to which scientific and technical literature is covered by present abstracting and indexing periodicals.”Chemistry and Industry, 23(1937)：p947-951. Budapest Open Access Initiative. “Budapest Open Access Initiative.” <http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess/> . ( 檢索於2012年10月27日)。 DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) <http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=subject&uiLanguage=en> (檢索於2013年07月25日)。 Doszkocs , Tamas ” Estimating citation overlap in a milti-file retrieval system.” in Information Management in the 1980’s: Proceedings of 40th ASIS Annual Meeting Chicago, vol.14(White Plains,N. Y. :Knowledge Industry Publications for American Society for Information Science,x) (1977). Esmaeil, Sedigheh Mohammad, Robabeh Mansour Kiaie ,& Faslname-Ye Ketab ”A Comparison between Search Engines and Meta-Search Engines in Retrieving Information Related to Physics and the Extent of Their Overlap.”Library and Information Studies22(3) (2011)：p130-140. Falagas ,Matthew E, Eleni I Pitsouni, ,George A Malietzis , & Georgios Pappas“Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.”FASEB Journal22(2)(2008)：p338-342. Gluck , Myke ” A Review of Journal Coverage Overlop with an Extension to the Definition of Overlap.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(1) (1990)：p43-60. Google 企業資訊—Google 簡介<http://www.google.com.tw/about/company/> (檢索於2013年1月3日)。 Hood , William W. & Concepci S Wilson. ”The Relationship of Records in Multiple Database to Their Usage or Citeness.”Journal of the American society for information science and technology59(9) (2005)：p1004-1007. Hood ,William W. & Concepci S Wilson ”An informetrics study of the distribution of bibliographic records in online database: A case study using the literature of Fuzzy Set Theory(1965~1993).”(Sydney, Australia: Ph.D. dissertation, The University of New South Wales)(1998). How the Open WorldCat program works,<http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/open/how/default.htm> (檢索於2012年10月20日)。 Ismond , K. P. & A. Shiri “The medical digital library landscape.”Online Information Review31(6) (2007)：p744-758. Julian R , Larson. etc. “Comparison of printed bibliographic descriptions distributed by BIOSIS, CAS, EI.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science27 (1976)：p46-52. La Borie , Tim etc.“Library and information science abstracting and index service: coverage, overlap, and context .” Library and Information Science Research7(1) (1985)：p183-195. Levine-Clark ,Michael & Esther L Gil,.”A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.”Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship14(1)(2009)：p32-46. Martyn ,James“Tests on abstracts journals: Coverage overlap and indexing.” Journal of Documentation23(1967)：p45-70. Mikhailov ,A.I., A.I. Chernyi, and R.S. Giliarevskii,. Scientific Communication and Informatics, trans. R. H. Burger (Arlington, Va.：Information Resources Press, 1984),p39-40. Mychko-Megin , Alexander Y. ”A Comparison of biomedical databases.”Bulletin of the Medical Library Association79(1991)：p302-308. Nicholls, Pauls T. “Bibliometrics of the laserdiscs applications literature.”,Laserdisk Professional2(1989)：p106-109. “Nobelprize.org”< http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/> (檢索於2013年2月27日)。 Open Access Direstory. Timeline of the open access movement(2008b). <http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/timeline.> (檢索於2012年12月27日)。 Poyer , Robert K. ”Journal Article Overlap Among Index Medicus, Science Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, and Chemical Abstracts.”Bulletin of the Medical Library Association72(4) (1984)：p353-357. Rather , Rafiq Ahmad,,Fayaz Ahmad Lone , & Gulam Jeelani Shah ”overlap in Web Search Results: A Study of Five Search Engines.” Library Philosophy and Practice(2008). Read , Eleanor & Craig Smith ”Searching for library and information science literature: a comparison of coverage in three database.”Library Computing 19(2000)：p118-126. SCHRIVER , B.,From print to electric. InformationTonday26(9) (2009)：16. Rerrieved Feb 29, 2011, from Academic search complete. SCOPUS資料庫 - Elsevier網站<Taiwan.elsevier.com<http://taiwan.elsevier.com/ElsevierDNN/%E7%94%A2%E5%93%81/%E7%B7%9A%E4%B8%8A%E7%94%A2%E5%93%81/Scopus/tabid/448/Default.aspx> (檢索於2013年3月3日)。 Sievert , Maryellen C. , & Mark J. Andrew ”Indexing consistency in Information Science Abstracts.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(1991)：p1-6. Slater , Linda G.“ Mapping the literature of speech-language pathology.”Bulletin of the Medical Library Association85(1997)：p297-302. Strotmann ,Andreas & Dangzhi Zhao ”Combining commercial citation indexes and open-access bibliographic databases to delimit highly interdisciplinary research fields for citation analysis.”Journal of Informetrics4(2)(2010)：P194-200. Ulrichsweb.com。<http://www.csa.com/e products/ulrichs.php> (檢索於2012年10月27日)。 Walters ,William H. , & Esther I. Wilder ”Bibliographic Index Coverage of a Multidisciplinary Field.”Journal of the American society for information science and technology54(14) (2003)：p1305-1312. Wang, Liupu , Juexin Wang, Michael,Li Wang, Yanchun Yong,Liang, & Dong Xu” Using Internet Search Engines to Obtain Medical Information: A Comparative Study.”Journal of Medical Internet Research14(3)(2012 May). Wood ,James L., Carolyn Flanagan, & H. E Kennedy“Overlap among the Journal articles selected for coverage by BIOSIS, CAS, EI.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science24(1973)：p25-28. Wood, James L. ,Carolyn Flanagan , & H. E. Kennedy “Overlap in the List of Journals monitored by BIOSIS, CAS,Ei.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science23(1972)：p36-38. WorldCat 概況 <http://www.oclc.org/asiapacific/zhtw/worldcat/about/default.htm> (檢索於2012年12月28日)。 WorldCat, <http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/default.html> (檢索於2012年10月20日)。 Yerkey , Neil , & Maryruth Glogowski“Scatter of library and information science topics among bibliographic data bases.”Journal of American Society for Information Science 41(4) (1990)：p245-253. Youngkin , Mary E. ”Access Marries Archive:BioMed Central /PubMed Central .“An Open Access PartnershipJournal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries1(4)(2004)：p1~16. Zimmerman, D.& D. B. Paschal“ An exploratory usability evaluation of Colorado State University Libraries digital collections and the Western Waters Digital Library Web sites.“ The Journal of Academic Librarianship35(3)(2009)：p227-240. 國家衛生研究院圖書館--PubMed使用說明<http://w3.nhri.org.tw/nhri_org/rl/lib/NewWeb/nhri/.../PubMed2009.pdf> (檢索於2012年10月26日)。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 100155006 101
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100155006
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
500601.pdf	6033Kb	Adobe PDF2	383	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...