政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/60569
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51194364      Online Users : 973
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60569


    Title: 應用模糊層級分析法比較專家判斷之差異-以台灣業界科技專案為例
    Other Titles: Applying Fuzzy AHP to Comparison of Expert Judgments: An Empirical Study of Technology Projects in Taiwan
    Authors: 黃啟誠;朱斌妤
    Huang,Chi-Cheng;Chu,Pin-Yu
    Contributors: 政大公行系
    Keywords: 科技專案;模糊層級分析;模擬
    government-sponsored technology project;fuzzy analytic hierarchy process;simulation
    Date: 2008-09
    Issue Date: 2013-09-09 10:48:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國經濟部自1979年積極推動科技專案，透過專家學者審查以經費補助企業從事研究發展。然而，不同產業領域的申請計畫由不同領域的專家群體審查，不同領域的專家群體在審查決策過程中可能產生決策衝突。本研究從專家群體決策角度出發，運用模糊層級分析法分析不同領域業界科技專案評審委員對於該模式的判斷，同時使用模擬來分析不同領域業界科技專案評審委員面臨不確定下對該模式的判斷變動。研究結果顯示：(1)不同領域評審委員最重視的決策準則有差異，(2)不確定性程度會影響不同領域評審委員對決策準則之重要性判斷。依據研究結果建議業界科專審查應建立決策衝突的解決機制，使得評審過程更有效率以及更透明化與公開化。
    Taiwan has launched various government-sponsored technology development programs since 1979 and has provided funding for firms to do R&D. The decision of government-sponsored technology development projects is normally made by a review committee with experts from academia, industry, and the government. It is important for project selection decision to analyze different expert judgments. In this study, we applied a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach to comparing judgments of experts from four committees and completed a simulation to analyze changes of criteria weights under different degree of uncertainty. Our results indicated that: (1) the ranking of evaluated criteria in this study shows different among four technical committees; and (2) the relative importance of evaluated criteria is changed when experts of technical committees face different degree of uncertainty. Based on results of this study, we suggest an approach to solve conflict of expert judgments in government-sponsored R&D project selection.
    Relation: 中山管理評論, 16(3), 2421-2458
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Administration] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    429-463.pdf5480KbAdobe PDF2788View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback