English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51036242      Online Users : 925
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60553


    Title: 審議過後:從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結
    Other Titles: After Deliberation: Exploring the Policy Connection of Consensus Conference from Public Sectors` Perspectives
    Authors: 黃東益
    Huang,Tong-Yi
    Contributors: 政大公行系
    Keywords: 審議民主;公民會議;公民參與;公共管理
    deliberative democracy;citizen conference;consensus conference;citizen participation;public management
    Date: 2008-12
    Issue Date: 2013-09-06 11:49:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 審議式民主模式經過將近二十年的發展,影響了學界及實務界對於治理過程中政府與民眾之間關係的思維,促成了「以公民為中心的公共管理(citizen-centered public management)」的興起。在理論的充分發展之後,於實際的運作上,審議式民主模式只是紙上談兵的烏托邦?或者是一套可以落實民主續階的策略藍圖?本文透過訪談過去幾年我國委辦公民會議的中央及地方政府相關官員,探索公民會議的參與模式與現行決策模式的磨合,呈現行政官員對於公民會議的態度,以及了解行政機關如何處理公民會議的共識結論,嘗試補充該領域研究的空缺,為理論上的爭議提供部分解答,並為實務界未來推動審議式民主提供建言。
    After more than twenty years of development, deliberative democracy has reshaped the thinking regarding the relationship between the state and its citizens. It has also facilitated the rise of citizen-centered public management. As theories of deliberative democracy have gradually become better developed, scholars and practitioners wonder whether the theory is itself an unrealistic utopia or a feasible blueprint for the sustainability of democracy. At issue is how deliberative democracy collaborates with representative democracy. Drawing from transcripts of in-depth interviews with public administrators who took charge of the citizen conferences held between 2003 and 2006, this article attempts to demonstrate the attitudes of political appointees and bureaucrats towards consensus conference and explores the policy impact of the conclusions reached from these conferences. This article would further provide suggestions for practitioners and scholars as well.
    Relation: 東吳政治學報, 26(4), 59-96
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    59-96-a.pdf939KbAdobe PDF2944View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback