| Reference: | Aljaafreh, A. (1992). Negative feedback in second language learning and the zone of proximal development. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
Aljaafeh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78, 465-483.
Anton, M., & F. DiCamilla. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), 314-342.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). (Y. McGee, Translator). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Beasley, C. (1997). Students as teachers: The benefits of peer tutoring. In R. Pospisil and L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Learning Through Teaching (pp. 21-30). Proceedings of the 6th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University. Perth: Murdoch University. Retrieved from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlfi1997/beasley.html
Bentz, J. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (1996). Improving peers’ helping behavior to students with learning disabilities during mathematics peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Qaurterly, 19, 202-215.
Bergen, Timothy J. and Mi, Han-fu. (2002). Peer tutoring and the self-instructional module. Educational Research Quarterly, 25(4), 28-35.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Borkan, J. M., Miller, W. L., Neher, J. O., Cushman, R., & Crabtree, B. F.(1997). Evaluating family practice residencies: A new method for qualitative assessment. Family Medicine, 29(9), 640-647.
Chang, V. (2002, May 4). English goals too high for children. Taipei Times, pp.8.
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
Chen, F. M., Huang, Y. L., Liu, L. (Eds.). (2003). Happy Baby Flashcards for Phonics. Taiwan Mac Educational Co., Ltd.
Chou, C. T. (2002, July 8). Closing the English proficiency gap. Taipei Times, pp.8.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Journal, 64 (1), 1-35.
Cohen, J. (1986). Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychology in the Schools, 23(2), 175-186.
Cohen, P., Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1982). Educational Outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. New Jersey: Erlbaum Press.
Donato, R. (1994). ‘Collective scaffolding in second language learning’ in Lantolf and Appel 1994b.
Duff, P. A. (2008). Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dupaul, G. J., Ervin, R. A., & Hook, C. L. (1998). Peer tutoring for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on classroom behavior and academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 579-592.
Fantuzzo, J.W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Mathematics and School Adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psuchology, 84(3), 331-339.
Fantuzzo, J.W., Polite, K., & Grayson, K. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. The Journal of School Psychology, 28, 309-323.
Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 157-169.
Frasier, P. Y., Slatt, L., Kowlowitz, V., Kollisch, D. O., & Mintzer, M. (1997). Focus groups: A useful tool for curriculum evaluation. Family Medicine, 29(7), 500-507.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N. B., & Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 75-103.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhance students’ helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual methematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97(3).
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Kazdan, S., & Allen, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading with and without training in elaborated help giving. The Elementary School Journal, 99(3), 201-219.
Garton, A. F., Harvey, R., & Pratt, C. (2003). The role of language in collaborative problem solving. Unpublished manuscript.
Garton, A. F., & Pratt, C. (2001). Peer assistance in children’s problem solving. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 307-318.
Greenwood, C. R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Utley, C. A. (2001). Class-wide peer tutoring learning management system: Applications with elementary-level English language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1).
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Working with ESL Children in the Mainstream Elementary Classroom. Heinemann.
Hall, J. K., & Verplaetse, L. S. (2000). Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hammond, J. (ed.) (2001). Scaffolding: Teaching and Learning in Language and Literacy Education. Newtown, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
Hogan, D. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (1999). Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell and A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Holuga, S. (1994). The effect of metacognitive strategy training with verbalization on the oral accuracy of adult second language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (OISE), Toronto, Canada.
Kalkowski, P. (1995). Peer and cross-age tutoring. School Improvement Research Series. North West Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/9/co18.html
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 338-368.
King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-115). New Jersey: Erlbaum Press.
King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 134-152.
Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote metalinguistic awareness in the French immersion classroom? In R. K. Johnson and M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion Education: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological Tools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kruger, A. C. (1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Qaurterly, 38, 191-211.
Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research 23: 619-632.
Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.) (1994b). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
Levin, I., & Druyan, S. (1993). When sociocognitive transaction among peers fails: The case of misconception in science. Child Development, 64, 1571-1591.
Light, P. L., & Littleton, K. (1994). Cognitive approaches to group work. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools (pp. 87-103). London: Cassell.
Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Steirer, B. (1992). Scaffolding’ Learning in the Classroom. In Norman, K. (Ed.), Thinking Voices: The Work of the National Curriculum Project. Hodder & Stoughton for the National Curriculum Council, London.
Morgan, D. L. (1998). Focus group kit: The focus group guidebook (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moshman, D., & Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective reality. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 231-248.
Nevi, C. N. (1983). Cross-age tutoring: Why does it help tutors? The Reading Teacher, 36, 829-898.
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of leaner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93-121.
Pugh, K. H. (2005). Peer Tutoring Do’s and Don’ts. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 528.
Puchner, Laurel D. (2003). Children teaching for learning: What happens when children teach each other in the classroom? Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Rafoth, M. A. (1998). Sharing the secret: Peer tutoring and independent learning. Teaching and Change 5(3-4), 245-60.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J. V. (ed.) (1984). The Zone of Proximal Development: Some Conceptual Issues. Children’s Learning in the ‘Zone of Proximal Development’. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64 (4), 479-530.
Samaha, N. V., & De Lisi, R. (2000). Peer collaboration on a nonverbal reasoning task by urban minority students. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 5-14.
Schattner, P., Shmerling, A., & Murphy, B. (1993). Focus groups: A useful research method in general practice. Medical Journal of Australia, 158(9), 622-625.
Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 71-82.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
Strough, J., Berg, C. A., & Meegan, S. P. (2001). Friendship and gender differences in task and social interpretations of peer collaborative problem solving. Social Development, 10(1), 1-22.
Swain, M. and S. Lapkin. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 320-38.
Talyzina, N. (1981). The Psychology of Learning. Moscow: Progress Press.
Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children’s peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 207-220.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Tudge, J. R. H. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: a Vygotsky analysis. Child Development, 63, 1364-79.
Tudge, J. R. H., & P. Winterhoff. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget and Bandura: perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61-81.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. Longman, London.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 102-119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. (1986). The Meaning Makers: Children Learning Language and Using Language to Learn. Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). The regulation of human interaction and the given-new organization of private speech. In G. Ziven (Ed.), The Development of Self-Regulation Through Private Speech. New York, NY: Wiley.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., & Hickmann, M. (1987). Problem-solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
鄒文莉 (Tsou, W.L.) (2002)。國小篇：大班教學面面觀。敦煌英語教學雜誌，35，10-12。
林素娥、謝靜惠 (Lin, S. O., & Hsieh, C. H.) (2001)。Phonics 創意教學字母的發音。台北市：東西出版事業有限公司。
林靜宜 (Lin, C.Y.) (2003)。「國小英語教學現況民意調查」分析報告。台北：中華民國全國教師會。
劉芳伶 (Liu, F. L.) (2001)。國小英語教師教育專業能力與專門學科素養之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院，屏東。
盧貞穎 (Lu, C. Y.) (1999)。國小英語教師的成長和國小教學。人文及社會學科教學通訊，10(4)，154-166。
詹餘靜、蔣月美 (Chan, Y. C., & Chiang, Y. M.) (2002)。彈性能力分班在國小英語教學之實施：北市龍安國小個案研究。第九屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集 (頁 634-643)。台北：文鶴。
張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌、許月貴 (Chan, W. C., Chou, C. T., Chen, C. Y., Yeh, H. N., Lin, C. C., & Hsu, Y. K. ) (2003)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語雙峰現象暨改進措施。台北：國立台灣師範大學英語系 (教育部委託研究)。
張愈敏 (Chang, Y. M.) (1997)。不再放牛吃草！高市篇—國中適性教育班。師說，102，36。
張新仁 (Chang, S. J.) (2001)。實施補救教學之課程設計與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。
陳瓊如、李維揚 (Chen, C. J. & Li, W. Y.) (2004, May)。點燃台北縣教育局「引進大學資源、活絡英語學習」活動：以銘傳大學與中湖國小的合作模式為例。英語教育電子月刊，7。取自http://ejee.ncu.edu.tw/teacherarticle/teacherarticle.asp
賈惠文 (Jia, H. W.) (2004)。同儕個別教學對國小英語低成就學生字母拼讀學習成就及學習態度影響之研究。國立台北師範學院，台北市。
游麗卿 (You, L. C.) (1992)。Vygotsky社會文化歷史理論：搜集和分析教室社會溝通活動的對話及其脈絡探究概念發展。國教學報，11，230-258。 |
