Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60000
|
| Title: | 從智慧資本的觀點探討臨床試驗服務公司CRO之核心能耐
A study of the core competence of contract research organizations(CRO)- an intellectual capital perspective |
| Authors: | 鍾婉平 |
| Contributors: | 吳豐祥
鍾婉平 |
| Keywords: | 臨床試驗服務產業
臨床試驗服務機構
核心能耐
智慧資本
Clinical trial service industry
Contract research organization
Core competence
Intellectual capital |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-09-04 11:55:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在生技服務產業中，臨床試驗服務業(CRO)為收益最佳且最具發展價值的項目，2009年全球CRO總營收中，臨床試驗服務業營收就約占總營收的一半，加上近來全球各國開始加速醫藥產業的發展，國際藥廠也逐漸加重臨床試驗外包比例，整體全球臨床試驗服務產業需求大增。
台灣自1997年起，本土企業就開始努力耕耘於臨床試驗服務領域，直至今日，已累積許多成功的經驗與案例，然而在面對國際大廠寡占市場，以及亞洲新興國家CRO企業如雨後春筍般盛出的環境下，台灣CRO企業於發展上仍飽受壓力，不過，這些在多年的經營下，事實上也已累積了相當的能力，若能針對自身核心能耐進行統整分析、經營及拓展，相信仍將有辦法面對全球之競爭環境。此外，由於臨床試驗服務業屬知識密集之服務性產業，經驗累積、專業性及外部關係資產等智慧資本皆較有形資本更能代表企業所具之價值，因此，本研究主要從智慧資本的角度來探討臨床試驗服務企業所具有之核心能耐，並依不同經營時期比較核心能耐之變化，以了解企業所具有之競爭優勢及優勢變化。一方面期望透過本論文之架構，提供企業有關自身核心能耐之分析方式的參考，協助其進行自我核心能耐之統整分析，另一方面，也期望藉由本論文之CRO企業核心能耐之個案分析，提供企業在選擇經營或拓展核心能耐時作為參考。
本研究所得到的結論如下：
1. 運用外部關係資本-與其他企業進行聯盟合作，是臨床試驗服務公司用以提升服務能力、擴大服務範圍，及拓展核心能耐的重要方式。
2. 臨床試驗服務公司所具明確的企業價值與文化，有助於其營運上的發展以及獨有特色的創造。
3. 發展較成熟的臨床試驗服務公司會具備涵蓋人力資本、組織結構資本及顧客關係資本之核心能耐，所具備之核心能耐較不易再進行拓展，反之，較新進的臨床試驗服務公司則較易拓展其核心能耐。
4. 臨床試驗服務公司所擁有的「教育」及「品牌」智慧資本，有助於提升公司其他的智慧資本。
5. 我國本土臨床試驗服務公司較重視發展具差異性之核心能耐，而我國外商臨床試驗服務公司則較重視員工專案執行之能力。
關鍵詞：臨床試驗服務產業、CRO、核心能耐、智慧資本
In the Bio-service Industry, clinical trial service is the most profitable and valuable item. In 2009, the revenue of clinical trial service accounted for about half of the revenue of CRO Industry. Recently, since all the countries in the world are speeding up developing Pharmaceutical Industry and pharmaceutical companies are gradually raising the proportion of clinical trial outsourcing, the demand of clinical trial service are grately increasing.
From 1997, Taiwan local companies have been working so hard in the clinical trial service area. Till now, Taiwan local companies have accumulated lots of successful experience. But when facing the oligopoly market of CRO Industry and competition of Asia new CRO companies, Taiwan CRO companies still have big stress on operation. However, since Taiwan CRO companies have had great competence in clinical trial service, we believe that if Taiwan CRO companies can tidy up, analyze and expand their own core competence, the competitive strength of Taiwan CRO companies will get improved to face the global competition. Besides, intellectual capital of CRO companies which are knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) shows real value of the CRO companies. Hence, this study is trying to investigate the core competence of clinical trial service companies from intellectual capital aspect, and also trying to compare the differences of the core competence in the different timing. We hope this study can on the one hand provide CRO companies a way to analyze their core competence, and on the other hand can provide the successful core competence information of the study cases for CRO companies as a reference.
There are several conclusions from this study:
1. Using relationship capital-business collaboration is an important way for the clinical trial service companies to improve their service ability, broaden their service area, and develop their core competence.
2. The clear values and culture of clinical trial service companies can help the development and operation of the companies, and create the characteristic of the companies.
3. A mature clinical trial service company has accumulated plentiful core competence in human capital, organizational capital and customer capital, and it’s hard for the company to deepen and broaden its core competence. Relatively, it’s easier for a young clinical trial service company to develop its core competence.
4. The intellectual capital of “Education” and “Brands” of clinical trial service companies can upgrade other intellectual capital of the companies.
5. Taiwan local clinical trial service companies emphasize the core competence with differenciation while foreign clinical trial service companies in Taiwan emphasize good executive ability of the employee.
Keywords: Clinical trial services, CRO, Core competence, Intellectual capital |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
1. 石滋宜 (1993)，「訓練趨勢及人財哲學」，八十二年訓練行政人才研討會論文集，台灣省政府主辦，頁30-45。
2. 李孟訓、劉冠男、丁神梅、林俞君 (2007)，「我國生物科技產業關鍵成功因素之研究」，東吳經濟商學學報，第五十六期，頁27-51。
3. 吳思華 (2000)，策略九說，臉譜文化。
4. 吳安妮 (2003)，「智慧資本的類別與評價機制之探討」，智慧資本的創造與管理研討會，台北市。
5. 吳豐祥 (2004)，「企業的核心能耐」，五月二十九日，經濟日報。
6. 余祁暐 (2004)，「生命科學產業代工策略」，台經院生物科技產業研究中心。
7. 汪嘉林、傅偉祥、陳昭蓉、戴建丞、陳啟祥、王芸、楊志浩 (2010)，2010生技產業白皮書，經濟部工業局。
8. 林文修 (2000)，「演化式類神經網路為基底的企業危機診斷模型：智慧資本之應用」，國立中央大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
9. 周幸怡 (2007)，「新創國際企業的策略聯盟」，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
10. 洪錫娟 (2005)，「台灣發展醫藥研發服務產業之探討-以臨床試驗部分為例」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
11. 科技產業資訊室 (2005)，「生技製藥CRO所扮演之角色」，財團法人國家實驗室研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
12. 陳美純 (2001)，「資訊科技投資與智慧資本對企業績效影響之研究」，國立中央大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
13. 陳復霞 (2002)，「生技領域中的服務業-CRO」，生物科技，No.6。
14. 陳正威 (2003)，「生物技術產業新創事業創業策略之研究-組織意會活動與實質選擇權觀點之應用」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15. 陳嘉宏 (2006)，「生技製藥產業之分工與合作模式：以瑞士羅氏Roche藥廠為例」，台經院生物科技產業研究中心。
16. 陳麗敏 (2009)，「生技學名藥商機可觀 吸引藥廠紛紛投入搶攻市場」，生物技術開發中心。
17. 陳啟祥 (2010)，「台灣生技起飛鑽石行動方案」簡報，經濟部生物技術與醫藥工業發展推動小組。
18. 秦慶瑤 (2001)，「臨床試驗體系委外產業現況」，生物技術開發中心。
19. 秦慶瑤 (2004)，「生技產業委外代工的動向與機會」，經濟情勢評論，93:3，頁30-51。
20. 秦慶瑤 (2008)，「藥物委外研發與生產趨勢及亞太市場競爭分析」，財團法人生物技術開發中心。
21. 秦慶瑤 (2010)，「全球生技製藥產業市場概況」簡報，財團法人生物技術開發中心。
22. 秦慶瑤 (2010)，「CRO及CMO發展與管理」簡報，財團法人生物技術開發中心。
23. 許嘉伊 (2005)，「生技服務業分析」，台經院生物科技產業研究中心。
24. 曹亮、吳曉明 (2010)，「淺論藥學技術經紀人在CRO發展中的促進作用」，科技管理研究，第8期。
25. 國際精鼎科技股份有限公司 (2011)，九十二年度年報。
26. 曾倫崇、粘孝堉 (2006)，「生技藥品研發過程績效因素之研究」，遠東學報第二十三卷第三期，頁203-219。
27. 張進福 (2010)，「我國生技產業現況與發展策略」簡報，行政院。
28. 楊尊恩 (2004)，「訓練人員專業職能量表之建立」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
29. 蔡佩君 (2003)，「新創事業的智慧資本建構與管理-以某醫工公司參與BOO過程為例」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
30. 劉昱岑 (2004)，「台灣生物科技公司創新行為之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
31. 劉翠玲 (2010)，「前瞻醫藥生技未來發展趨勢」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第33卷第3期，頁21-28。
32. 蔣嘉俊 (2007)，「我國數位典藏廠商核心能耐之個案研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
33. 謝明玲 (2007)，「海歸學人開啟生技黃金年代」，天下雜誌，頁67-75。
英文文獻
1. Aaker, D. A. (1984), Developing Business Strategies, New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
2. Aaker, D. A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, New York: The Free Press.
3. Brooking, A. (1996), Intellectual Capital: Core Assets for the Third Millennium Enterprise, Thomson Business Press, London, United Kingdom.
4. Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models”, Management Decision, 36(2): 63-72.
5. Baranson, J. (1990), “Transnational strategic alliances: why, what, where and how”, Multinational Business, 2: 54-61.
6. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M. (1987), “The case research strategy in studies of information systems”, MIS Quarterly, 11(3): 369-386.
7. Collis, D. B. (1991), “A resource-based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 49-68.
8. Collis, D. J. and Montgomery, C. A. (1995), “Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
9. Collins, J. (2001), Good to Great, New York: Harper Business.
10. Collins, J.C. and Porras, J.I. (1994), Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, New York: Harper Business.
11. Chattell, A. (1998), Creating Value in the Digital Era, London: Macmillan Business.
12. Dzinkowski, R. (2000), “The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction”, International Management Accounting Study, 32-36.
13. Deleo, C. (1994), “Understanding the roots of your competitive advantage from product/market competition to competition as a multiple-layer games”, Competence-based Competition Review, 3(1): 35-55.
14. Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M. S. (1997), Intellectual Capitall: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, New York: HarperBusiness.
15. Eisenhardt, K. and Martin, J. (2000), “Dynamic capability: what are they”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(1): 1105-1121.
16. Hamel, G. and Heene, G. (1994), Competing for the Future, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17. Javidan, M. (1998), “Core competence: what does it mean in practice”, Long Range Planning, 31(1): 60-71.
18. Johnson, W. (1999), “An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital：measuring the stock and stock and flow of intellectual capital component in the firm”, International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5/6/7/8): 562-575.
19. Joia, L.A. (2000), “Measuring intangible corporate assets: linking business strategy with intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1): 68-84.
20. Klein, D.A. and Prusak, L. (1994), “Characterizing intellectual capital”, Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation.
21. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
22. Knight, K. J. (1999), “Performance measures for increasing intellectual capital”, Strategy & Leadership, 27(2): 10-15.
23. Long, C. and Vickers-koch, M. (1994), “Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage”, Organizational Dynamics Journal, 3: 7-22.
24. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
25. Lynn, B.E. (1998), “The management of intellectual capital: the issues and the practice”, Hamilton: The Society of Management Accountants of Canada.
26. Lin, Y.Y. and Edvinsson, L. (2008), “National intellectual capital: comparison of the nordic countries”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4): 525-545.
27. Masoulas, V. (1998), “Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capital management”, International Journal of Technology Management, 16(1/2/3): 126-143.
28. Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.
29. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
30. Purcell, K. J. and Gregory, M. J. (2000), “The role of learning agents in the process of building organizational competences”, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, S1, 14: 34-39.
31. Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc. (2010), 2010 Annual Report.
32. PAREXEL International Corp. (2010), 2010 Annual Report.
33. Quintiles Transnational Corp. (2004), 2004 Annual Report.
34. Roos, J., Roos, G., Edvinsson, L. and Dragonetti, N. C. (1998), Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York: New York University Press.
35. Schoemaker, J. H. P. (1992), “How to link strategy vision to core capability”, Sloan Management Review, 34(1): 67-81.
36. Stewart, T.A. (1994), “Your company’s most valuable asset: intellectual capital”, Fortune, 130(7): 68-74.
37. Stewart, T.A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Doubleday.
38. Saint-Onge, H. (1996), “Tacit knowledge: the key to strategic alignment of intellectual capital”, Strategy and Leadership, March-April, 10-14.
39. Sveiby, K.E. (1997), “Intellectual capital: thinking ahead”, Austalian CPA, 68(5): 18-22.
40. Sullivan, P. (1998), Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extraction Value from Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
41. Teece, David J., Pisano, Gary P., Shuen, Amy A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
42. Tampoe, M. (1994), “Exploiting the core competitive of your organization”, Long Range Planning of Management Journal, 27(4): 66-77.
43. Ulrich, D. (1998), “Intellectual capital = competence x commitment”, Sloan Management Review, 39(2): 15-26.
44. Wrigley, L. (1970), “Divisional autonomy and diversification”, Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Business School.
45. Watson, G.H. (1993), “How process benchmarking supports corporate strategy”, Strategy and Leadership, 21(1): 12-15.
46. Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, California: Sage publication.
網頁資料
1. M.A.R.C.O. GmbH & Co. KG, http://www.marco-institut.de/index.html
2. Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc., http://www.ppdi.com/
3. PAREXEL International Corp., http://www.parexel.com/
4. Protech Pharmaservices Corp., http://www.ppccro.com/index.htm
5. Quintiles Transnational Corp., http://www.quintiles.com/
6. Sveiby, K. E. (1998), “Measuring intangibles and intellectual capital- An emerging first standard”, Available online: http://intelegen.com/money/EmergingStandard.html |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
98359017
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098359017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 901701.pdf | | 2569Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 987 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
