政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/59702
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51245852      線上人數 : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/59702


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59702


    題名: 台灣血液透析患者的個人化生活品質：以SEIQoL-DW為測量工具
    Taiwan hemodialysis patients’ individual quality of life：assessed by SEIQoL-DW
    作者: 羅一哲
    Luo, Yi Jhe
    貢獻者: 許文耀
    Hsu, Wen Yau
    羅一哲
    Luo, Yi Jhe
    關鍵詞: 血液透析
    個人化生活品質
    權重程序
    Hemodialysis
    Individual Quality of Life
    Weighting Procedure
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2013-09-03 13:26:51 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究目的為使用個人化生活品質評量表直接權重版(SEIQoL-DW)，評估國內血液透析患者的個人化生活品質，探討對其特別重要的生活品質向度與相關影響因素，此外，並以Locke(1969, 1976)(引自Wu & Yao,2006b)的「情感間距假設」、Calman(1984)的期望理論與Wu(2009)提出的移轉傾向指標為基礎，探討SEIQoL-DW重要性評估程序的應用價值與潛在臨床應用指標。研究對象以立意取樣，自台北市松山區某私人洗腎中心募集57名血液透析患者、以及台北市文山區一般社區成人60名，研究工具包含SEIQoL-DW、生活滿意度量表、焦慮與憂鬱評量表、自編人口背景/疾病變項問卷，統計方法含描述性統計、卡方檢定、相關分析、平均數差異檢定與迴歸分析。研究結果發現，血液透析患者最常列舉的重要生活向度為健康(77%)，其次依序為家庭(72%)、經濟(65%)、人際關係(53%)、休閒活動(49%)、因應/正向態度(23%)、工作/學業(21%)、心理健康(16%)、生活條件(16%)、靈性/信仰(9%)、角色功能(9%)、其他(9%)，血液透析患者在各向度提名百分比與一般成人組未有顯著差異，但血液透析患者對健康向度的現況評比顯著較低，對健康的現況-期望落差也顯著較高，共病數與血液透析患者個人化生活品質指標有顯著負相關；而SEIQoL-DW項目重要性對項目現況分數與整體滿意度之間的關係不具調節效果，SEIQoL-DW的權重程序未能提升對整體滿意度的解釋力，此外，自項目重要性與現況-想望落差所得移轉傾向指標，和整體生活滿意度、SEIQoL-DW現況平均數亦未有一致的相關性或獨特解釋力。儘管本研究不支持SEIQoL-DW權重程序或衍生指標的助益，但若從個人脈絡來看，向度重要性仍可協助探索個案生活目標重要順序，有其臨床醫療應用價值；最後，SEIQoL-DW個人現況-想望落差分數、現況平均數、以及整體生活滿意度、負向情緒彼此有顯著關聯性與解釋力，在個案生活滿意度、負向情緒評估或介入方案中，具有成為臨床應用指標的潛力。
    The primary purpose of this thesis was using the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) to explore hemodialysis patients’ Individual Quality of Life and relative determinants. And further using affect-range hypothesis (Locke, 1969, 1976), expection theory (Calman,1984) and shifting tendency Index(Wu, 2009) as framework to evaluate SEIQoL-DW weighting procedure’s efficiency and potential clinical application variables. 57 hemodialysis patients and 60 counterparts was recruited from Taipei city, IQoL was assessed by SEIQoL-DW, the general life satisfaction and anxiety /depression statement was chosen as criterian variables. In the analysis, twelve quality of life domains were identified. Health(77%), family(72%), finance(65%), relations(53%) and leisure time(49%) were the most prominent quality of life domains of hemodialysis patients, although the domains nominated percentage and importance rating didn’t differ between groups, hemodialysis patients’ health domain status and have-want discrepancy were worse than the counterparts. Among the investgated variables, only the comorbidity had negative correlation with hemodialysis patients’ IQoL. The result didn’t support the SEIQoL-DW’s weighting procedure and shifting tendency Index had significant efficiency, but the weighing information could still be useful in personal profile context. Finally, the personal have-want discrepancy, satus average, general life satisfaction and anxiety/depression statement have significant relations with each other, thus could be the potential clinical application variables in negative emotion or life satisfaction intervention programs.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王麗玲、楊麗芬（2004）。末期腎病患者選擇透析模式的影響因素。腎臟與透析：第 16 卷，第 4 期，241-246。
    中華民國腎臟基金會（2009）。台灣地區2007洗腎人口統計圖。2009年5月14日，取自http://www.kidney.org.tw/a96.gif
    台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組（2000）。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華衛誌，19 (4)，315-324。
    台灣腎臟醫學會(2005)。血液透析臨床診療指引。台北市：台灣腎臟醫學會。
    邢占軍（2005)。對主觀幸福感測量的反思。本土心理學研究，第24期，第301 ~ 323頁。
    李文欽、張舜智、黃忠餘（2006）。慢性腎臟病防治的共識與準則。腎臟與透析，第18卷，第2期，93-98。
    行政院衛生署（2008）。民國96年衛生統計系列(一)死因統計。2009年3月22日，取自http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/english/2/2007/2007.rar。
    行政院衛生署（2010）。積極掌控造成糖尿病患腎病變危險因子有效降低台灣洗腎人口。2009 年 3 月 22 日，取自http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_p01.aspx?class_no=25&now_fod_list_no=10978&level_no=2&doc_no=75620
    周學智（2002）。長期血液透析病患壓力源與調適方法之探討。未發表碩士的論文。高雄：國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
    林杰樑（2002）。透析治療患者保健手冊。宏欣文化，台北市。
    胡文郁（2004）。台灣文化脈絡下癌末患者之生活品質。台灣醫學，第8卷，第5期，688~697。
    胡智棻、陳志剛、朱柏齡、林石化、曹殿萍、洪國峻、葉啟斌（2007）。冠心病患與慢性腎臟衰竭病患的憂鬱、焦慮程度及生活品質。台灣精神醫學 Vol.21，No.1，53-61。
    姚開屏（2000）。簡介與評論常用的一般性健康相關生活品質量表兼談未來研究的建議。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，47（2），111-138。
    姚開屏（2002）。台灣版世界衛生組織生品質問卷之發展與應用。台灣醫學，6（3），193－200。
    陳美玲、顧乃平（1998）。血液透析病思生活品質及其相關因素之探討。護理研究，6卷5期，393-404。
    陳佩英，史麗珠，王正旭，賴裕和，張獻崑，陳美伶（1999）。疼痛對癌症病患焦慮與憂鬱之影響。台灣醫學 Vol.3，No.4，373-382。
    陳佩英、郭素青、張惠甄、劉亞君、徐子英（2007）。血液透析病患其控握信念、心理困擾與健康促進行為之初探。臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌，第6卷，第2期，27~41。
    翁嘉英，吳振能，吳英璋(2003)。『病人角色』的抗拒與接受：接受血液透析。治療患者的心理調適歷程。中華心理衛生學刊，第十六卷，第四期，頁49-82。
    馬麗卿、孫嘉玲、謝湘俐（2010）。血液透析病患之憂鬱狀態及生活品質滿意度相關性研究。臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌，第9卷，第1期，1-16頁。
    程淑媛（2009）。血液透析患者生活品質相關因素探討。澄清醫護管理雜誌，第五卷，第二期，31-40。
    鈕淑芬（2002）。不同腎臟替代療法之生活品質及其相關因素探討。未發表碩士論文，台北：國立陽明大學。
    鈕淑芬（2004）。透析病患之生活品質及其相關因素探討。台灣腎臟護理學會雜誌，3（2），88-101。
    楊樹昌、王榮德、吳麥斯、郭佩雯、蘇喜（2007）。長期血液透析病患的生活品質。台灣醫學，11，140-152。
    劉乃誌（2011）。SEIQoL_cancer_version時間修正版.exe。台北：未出版。
    劉乃誌、羅一哲（2011）。個人化生活品質評量表：直接權重版(SEIQoL-DW)中文指導手冊。台北：未出版。
    盧素真、陳世宜、黃淑珍、蘇玲華（2010）。血液透析病患睡眠障礙、憂鬱程度及其生活品質的分析探討。護理暨健康照護研究，6卷，1期，33-43頁。
    羅淑芬、胡文郁（2008)。癌症病人健康相關生活品質之概念與測量工具之評析。安寧療護雜誌，第13 卷，第1 期，42~57。
    英文部分
    Abdel-Kader K., Myaskovsky, L., Karpov, I., Shah, J., Hess, R,. Dew, M. A.,and Unruh, M.(2009). Individual Quality of Life in Chronic Kidney Disease:Influence of Age and Dialysis Modality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 4, 711–718.
    Browne, J. P., O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H.M., McDonald, N.J., Joyce, C. R. B. (1997). Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains. Quality of Life Research, 6, pp.301–309.
    Calman, K. C (1984). Quality of life in cancer patients-an hypothesis. Journal of medical ethics, 10, 124-127.
    Campbell, S. & Whyte, F. (1999). The quality of life of cancer patients participating in phase I clinical trials using SEIQoL-DW. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2), 335~343.
    Carr, A. J., Gibson, B., Robinson, P. G. (2001). Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? BMJ. 322, 1240–1243.
    Carr, A. J., Higginson, I. J (2001). Measuring quality of life: Are quality of life measures patient centred?. BMJ, 322, 1357-1360.
    Carlson, L. E., Bultz, B. D., and Morris, D. G. (2005). Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 7-17.
    Dijkers, M. (2007).“What’s in a name?”The indiscriminate use of the “Quality of life”label, and the need to bring about clarity in conceptualizations. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 153–155.
    Echteld, M. A., Deliens, L., Ooms, M. E., Ribbe, M. W., Wal, G. van der. (2005). Quality of life change and response shift in patients admitted to palliative care units: a pilot study. Palliative Medicine, 19, 381-388.
    Echteld, M. A., Zuylen, L. van., Bannink, M., Witkamp, E., Rijt C.CD.V.(2007). Changes in and correlates of individual quality of life in advanced cancer patients admitted to an academic unit for palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 21, 199–205.
    Fallowfield, L. (2009). What is quality of life？ What is...? series. Hayward Medical Communications: UK.
    Frick, E., Borasio, G.D., Zehentner, H., Fischer, N. and Bumeder, I. (2004). Individual Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 116–124.
    Hickey, A.M., Bury, G., O’Boyle, C.A., Bradley, F., O’Kelly, F.D., Shannon, W. (1996). A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ; 313: 29–33.
    Higginson, I. J., Carr, A. J. (2001). Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ, 322, 1297-1300.
    Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting Importance: The Case of Life Satisfaction and Relative Domain Importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.
    Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To Weight or Not to Weight: The Role of Domain Importance in Quality of Life Measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.
    Joyce, C.R.B., Hickey, A., McGee, H.M. & O’Boyle, C.A. (2003). A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life：The SEIQoL. Quality of Life Research, 12, 275-280.
    Kaasa, S. and Loge, J. H. (2003). Quality of life in palliative care: principles and practice. Palliative Medicine, 17, 11-20.
    Kao, Tze-Wah., Lai, Mei-Shu., Tsai, Tun-Jun., Jan, Chyi-Feng., Chie, Wei-Chu., Chen, Wan-Yu. (2009). Economic, Social, and Psychological Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients in Northern Taiwan: A Multicenter Study. Artificial Organs, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p61-68.
    Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., Muller, K.E., and Nizam, A. (1998) . Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxberry Press.
    Levack, P., Graham, J., Kidd J. (2004). Listen to the patient: quality of life of patients with recently diagnosed malignant cord compression in relation to their disability. Palliative Medicine, 18, 594-601.
    LeVasseur, S. A., Green, S., & Talman, P. (2005). The SEIQoL-DW is a valid method for measuring individual quality of life in stroke survivors attending a secondary prevention clinic. Quality of Life Research,14, 779–788.
    Lhussier, M., Watson, B., Reed, Jan., and Clarke, C. L. (2005). The SEIQoL and functional status: how do they relate? Scand J Caring Sci, 19, 403–409.
    Lindblad A. K., Ring, L., Glimelius, B., and Hansson, M. G. (2002). Focus on the Individual Quality of Life Assessments in Oncology. Oncologica Vol. 41, No. 6, pp.507–516.
    Lintern, T. C., Beaumont, J. G., Kenealy, P. M. & Murrell R. C. (2001). Quality of Life (QoL) in severely disabled multiple sclerosis patients: Comparison of three QoL measures using multidimensional scaling. Quality of Life Research, 10, 371-378.
    Lohr, K. N. & Zebrack B. J. (2008). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice:challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18, 99–107.
    Maasoumeh, R., Forough R. (2010). Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life in Iranian Hemodialysis Patients. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol.42, Issue 3, p242-249.
    Macduff, C. (2000). Respondent-generated quality of life measures: useful tools for nursing or more fool`s gold?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 375-382.
    Molsted S, Aadahl M, Schou L, Eidemak I. (2004). Self-rated health and employment status in chronic hemodialysis patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 38, 174–178.
    Montgomery, C., Pocock, M., Titley, K., and Lloyd, K. (2002). Individual Quality Of Life In Patients With Leukaemia And Lymphoma. Psycho-Oncology,11, 239-243.
    Moons, P., Marquet, K., Budts, W. and Geest S. De. (2004). Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the "Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life – Direct Weighting" (SEIQoL-DW) in congenital heart disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 27-34.
    Moons, P., Deyk, K. V., Marquet, K., Raes, E., Bleser, L. D., Budts, W. and Geest S. De. (2005). Individual quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease: a paradigm shift. European Heart Journal, 26, 298–307.
    Moons, P., Budts, W., Geest, S. D. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 891–901.
    Moore, M. Höfer, S. McGee, H. and Ring, L. (2005). Can the concepts of depression and quality of life be integrated using a time perspective? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3:1, Page 1 - 10.
    Morris, D. B., Wilson, K. G., Clinch, J. J., Ammerman, D. J.,Fergusson, D., Graham, I. D. (2006). Identification of domains relevant to health-related quality of life in patients undergoing major surgery. Quality of Life Research, 15, 841–854.
    Mountain , L.A., Campbell, S.E., Seymour, D.G., Primrose, W.R. and Whyte, M.I. (2004). Assessment of individual quality of life using the SEIQoL-DW in older medical patients. Q J Med, 97, 519–524.
    Neudert, C., Wasner, M., Borasio, G. D. (2001). Patients’ assessment of quality of life instruments: a randomised study of SIP, SF-36 and SEIQoL-DW in patients with amyotrophiclateral sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 191, 103-109.
    Neudert, C., Wasner, M., Borasio, G. D. (2004). Individual Quality of Life is not Correlated with Health-Related Quality of Life or Physical Function inPatients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Journal of Palliative Medicine, Volume 7, Number 4, 551-557.
    O’Boyle, C.A., McGee, H.M., Hickey, A., Joyce, C.R.B., Browne, J.P., O’Malley, K. (1993). The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL): Administration Manual. Dublin:Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.
    Patel, K.K., Veenstra, D.L., Patrick, D.L. (2003). A Review of Selected Patient-Generated Outcome Measures and Their Application in Clinical Trials. Value in Health, Volume 6, 595-603.
    Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction, Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol.3 Issue 2, p137-152.
    Prince, P. N., Gerber, G. J. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life in people with serious mental illness using the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 10, 117-122.
    Phillips, L., Davies, S. J., and White, E. (2001). Health-related quality of life assessment in end-stage renal failure. Nursing Times Research. Vol.6, No.3, 658-670.
    Ring, L., Hofer, S., Mcgee, H., Hickey, A. and O’Boyle, C.A. (2007). Individual Quality of Life: Can It be Accounted for by Psychological or Subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 82, 443–461.
    Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does Weighting Capture What`s Important? Revisiting Subjective Importance Weighting with a Quality of Life Measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 141–167.
    Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality of life research movement:Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76, 343–466.
    Snaith R.P. (2003). The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1:29。
    Stiggelbout, A. M., Vogel-Voogt, E. de., Noordijk, E. M., Vlieland, T. P. M. V. (2008). Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting? Quality of Life Research, 17, 641–649.
    Taminiau-Bloem, E. F., Visser, M. R., Tishelman, C., Koeneman, M. A., van Zuuren, F. J., Sprangers, M. A. (2010). Somatically ill persons` self-nominated quality of life domains: review of the literature and guidelines for future studies. Quality of Life Research, 19(2), 253-91.
    Tovbin, D., Gidron,Y., Jean, T., Granovsky, R. & Schnieder, Alla. (2003). Relative importance and interrelations between psychosocial factors and individualized quality of life of hemodialysis patients. Quality of Life Research, 12, 709-717.
    Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.
    US Renal Data System. (2009). USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report：CH12 International Comparisons. Retrieved March 10, 2009, from http://www.usrds.org/2008/exe/V2_12_2008.exe
    Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction With Life Scale: an RG study. Social Indicator Research, 86, 47–57.
    Wagner, J. (2004). Acceptability of the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weight (SEIQoL-DW) in youth with type 1 diabetes. Quality of Life Research, 13, 1279–1285.
    Waldron D., O’Boyle, C.A., Kearney M., Moriarty M., and Carney D.(1999). Quality-of-Life Measurement in Advanced Cancer：Assessing the Individual. Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, No 11, pp 3603-3611.
    Wettergren, L., Bjo¨rkholm, M., and Langius-Eklo¨f, A. (2005). Validation of an extended version of the SEIQoL-DW in a cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma’ survivors. Quality of Life Research, 14: 2329–2333.

    Wettergren, L., Sprangers, M., Bjo¨rkholm, M., and Langius-Eklo¨f, A. (2008). Quality of life before and one year following stem cell transplantation using an individualized and a standardized instrument. Psycho-Oncology, 17: 338–346.
    Wettergren, L., Lindblad, A. K., Sprangers, M., Ring, L. (2009). The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 18, 737–746.
    Wu, C.H. and Yao, G. (2006a). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259–1268.
    Wu, C.H. and Yao, G. (2006b). Do We Need to Weight Satisfaction Scores with Importance Ratings in Measuring Quality of Life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.
    Wu, C.H. and Yao, G. (2006c). Do We Need to Weight Item Satisfaction By Item Importance? A Perspective From Locke’s Range-of-Affect Hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.
    Wu, C.H. and Yao, G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: an experimental examination of locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.
    Wu, C.H. (2009). Enhancing quality of life by shifting importance perception among life domains. Journal of Happiness Study, 10, 37–47.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    96752020
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096752020
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[心理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    202001.pdf3312KbAdobe PDF2884檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋