English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51596225      Online Users : 783
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59626


    Title: 教師自我效能感研究:以桃園縣本地國小英語教師為例
    Sense of Self-efficacy: A Study of Nonnative Public Primary Teachers in Taoyuan
    Authors: 黃曉君
    Huang, Hsiao Chun
    Contributors: 余明忠
    Yu, Ming Chung
    黃曉君
    Huang, Hsiao Chun
    Keywords: 國小英語教師
    自我效能感
    英語能力
    教學法
    primary NNETs
    self-efficacy
    language proficiency
    pedagogic strategies
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-09-02 17:44:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在調查桃園地區英語教師之教學效能感,且探究英語教師本身英語能力、面對的環境、學校、學生等因素對其教學效能感和英語教學策略的影響。
    本研究以問卷調查法進行,對象為桃園縣188所公立小學的542名英語教師為主。依層級抽樣法,正式問卷發出460份,收回有效問卷384份,收回率達83.5%。問卷回收後資料以統計軟體SPSS 18.0進行敘述性統計、多元迴歸、皮爾生相關係數分析、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析及薛費事後法分析,獲得結果簡述如下:
    1.桃園縣英語教師之教學效能感普遍呈現中上趨勢。
    2.英語教師之英語能力以英語閱讀能力最好,口說與聽的能力較弱。
    3.教學上,教師偏向溝通式教學法。
    4.所有影響教師效能感的因素中,教師過去的成功經驗最具正面影響力。
    5.負面的情緒(例如:過多的壓力、有違意願的課堂安排)有損教師效能感。
    6.教師教學效能、英語教學法運用因本身英語能力的影響,呈現正向的關係。
    根據問卷調查結果,本研究最後提供教學上相關建議以供參考。
    This study aims to explore self-efficacy, English language proficiency, the proclivity of their pedagogical strategies and their relationships among the elementary school EFL teachers in Taoyuan. The questionnaire survey method has been employed, and based on stratified sampling method, there were 384 teachers involved in this research (response rate 83.5%).
    The results show:
    1. The EFL teachers rated their self-efficacy in teaching English at a moderate level, their teachers’ self-reported language proficiency best in receptive skill—reading, proclivity of pedagogical strategy in language class toward CLT approach.
    2. Among the 13 antecedents checked, Master experience was found to be the most powerful factor to influence teachers’ efficacy formation. Students’ learning motivation plays a significantly reciprocal impact on teachers’ efficacy beliefs in general, efficacy for student engagement, and teachers’ aptitude to employ CLT approach in their classroom.
    3. Finally, the higher proficient the teachers rated themselves the more efficacious they felt in teaching English and in employing communicative language teaching approach.
    The suggestions were provided in the end of the study with an aim to help the teachers understand better about their self-efficacy beliefs and the concerned trainers design more suitable teacher training programs for the elementary EFL teachers.
    Reference: Adedoyin, O. O. (2010). Factor analytic study of teachers’ perceptions on self-efficacy in Botswana junior secondary schools: Implications for educational quality. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(2), 139-155.
    Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
    Akbari, R., & Allvar, N. K. (2010). L2 teacher characteristics as predictors of students’ academic achievement. TESL-EJ,13(4). Retrieved from http:// tesl-ej.org/
    Al-Sharafi, A. H. (1998). An investigation of the beliefs and practice of foreign language teacher: A case study of five American high school foreign language teachers in Leon County (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Education of Florida State University, Florida.
    Ashton, P. (1985). Motivation and Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Bagheri, A. (2011). Teachers’ and students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Implication for effective teaching practice. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 517-527.
    Bandura, A. (1980). Gauging the relationship between self-efficacy and action. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 263-268.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
    Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agential perspective. Annual Review Psychology, 52, 1-26.
    Bayraktar, S. (2011). Turkish preservice primary school teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward science: The effect of a primary teacher education program. School Science and Mathematics, 111(3), 83-92.
    Berry, R. (1990). The role of language improvement in in-service teacher training programs: Killing two birds with one stone. System, 18(1), 97-105.
    Betoret, F. D. (2009). Self-efficacy, school resources, job stressors and burnout among Spanish primary and secondary school teachers: A structural equation approach. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 45–68.
    Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation, Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.
    Butler, Y. G. (2004). What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245-278.
    Bosma, T., Hessels, M.G.P., & Resing, W.C.M. (2012). Teachers’ preference for educational planning: Dynamic testing, teaching experience and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Teacher and Teacher Education, 28, 1024-1036. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com
    Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (1998). Student disruptive behavior, perceived self-efficacy in classroom management and teacher burnout. Paper presented at the ninth European Conference on Personality, University of Surrey: England.
    Brown, H. D. (2007), Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education.
    Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
    Chacón, C. (2005). Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 257-272.
    Chan, K.W., Tan, J., & Khoo, A. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning: A closer look at Singapore cultural context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (2), 181-195.
    Chang, W. C. (2009). ELT policies in Taiwan. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., LTD.
    Chang, M. W. & Chen, S. H. (2006). Primary education internationalization—with international education policy of Taoyuan County as an illustration. Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 71, 24-32.
    Chang, C.S. (2006). Internationalization of education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 71, 4-12.
    Chang, F. Y. (2010). A study on college EFL teachers` self-efficacy: its causal relationship with antecedents and teaching Behaviors (Unpublished master thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
    Chang, J. F. (2010). An investigation on teaching difficulties encountered by uncertified elementary school English teacher in Yunlin county (Unpublished master Thesis). National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan, ROC.
    Chang, S. J.(1998). Difficulties of primary English education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Data and Research ,23, 16-20.
    Chen, M. J. (2006). The practical approach of teacher education from the influence of classroom management strategies to teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 2(1), 50-58.
    Chester, M. & Beaudin, B. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 233-257.
    Cheung, H. Y. (2006). The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32 (4), 433-451.
    Chu, C. H. S. (2002). Primary school teachers’ self-efficacy and professional knowledge (Unpublished master Thesis). National Taichun University of Education, Taichun, Taiwan, ROC.
    Chu, H. M. (1998). A look at primary English education from the perspective of EFL teachers training. Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 23, 2-4.
    Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-337.
    Egel, I. P.(2009). The prospective English language teacher’s reflections of self efficacy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1561-1567. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect.com
    Ellis, E. M. (2006). Language learning experience as a contributor to ESOL teacher cognition. TESL-EJ, 10(1).
    Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of NNEST candidates. TESOL NNEST Newsletter, 7(1), 4-7.
    Eslami-Rasekh, Z., & Valizadeh, K. (2004). Classroom activities viewed from different perspectives: Learners’ voice vs. teachers’ voice. TESL EJ, 8(3), 1-13. Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej31/a2.html
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Free, B. F. (1995). Second language acquisition in a study abroad context. NJ: Studies in Bilingualism, ISSN 0928-1533: V.9.
    Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997a). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 451-458.
    Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997b). Effect of experience and program time frame on the perception of teaching concerns. Unpublished manuscript, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.
    Gibbs, C. (2002). Effective teaching: Exercising self-efficacy and thought control of action. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, 12-14 September, University of Exeter, England.
    Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
    Gist, M.E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinations and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
    Grossman, P. L., Reynolds, J. A., Ringstaff, C., & Sykes, G. (1985). From English major to English teacher: New approaches to an old problem. CA: Stanford University School of Education.
    Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63-69.
    Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63-69.
    Guskey, T. R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the effective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 245-259.
    Ho, I. T., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Australian and Chinese teacher efficacy: Similarities and differences in personal instruction, discipline, guidance efficacy and beliefs in external determinants. Teacher and Teacher Education, 20(3), 313-323.
    Houtte, M.V. (2012). The role of teacher and faculty trust in forming teachers’ job satisfaction: Do years of experience make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 879-889. Retrieved from http:// www.elsevier.com
    Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. H. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 279-300.
    Huang, Y. P.(1998). Cross 21st century-the ideal and strategy of primary English education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 23,1-2.
    Jia, Y., Eslami, Z. R., & Burlbaw, L. (2006). ESL teachers’ perceptions and factors influencing their use of classroom-based reading assessment. Bilingual Research Journal, 29 (2), 459-482.
    Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10 (4), 439-452.
    Kagan, D. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, (27) 1, 65-90.
    Kamhi-Stein, L., & Mahboob, A. (2005). Language proficiency and NNES professionals: Findings from TIRF-Funded research initiatives. Paper presented at the 39th Annual TESOL Convention, San Antonio, Texas.
    Kamhi-Stein, L., & Mahboob. A. (2006). Teachers’ language proficiency in English language teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Inc.
    Karimvand, P. N. (2011). The nexus between Iranian EFL teachers’ self-efficacy, teaching experience and gender. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 4(3). Retrieved from http:// www.ccsenet.org/elt
    Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 114-129. Retrieved from http:// www.elsevier.com
    Kwon, O.-R. (2000). Korea’s English education policy changes in the 1990s: Innovations to gear the nation for the 21st century. English Teaching, 55(1), 47-91.
    Lee, I. (2004). Preparing nonnative English speakers for EFL teaching in Hong Kong. Ann Arbor. MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Lee, J. A. (2009). Perceived English language proficiency, and attitudes toward the English language: A case of Korean public elementary school teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
    Li, D. (1998). “It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the Communicative Approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677-703.
    Lin, K. T. (2008). Education of teacher in the primary school in Taiwan: An analysis. Educational Data, 37, 27-31.
    Liu, R.S. (2008). Elementary school English teachers’ job-related stress and burnout: A case study in Taoyuan Area (Unpublished master thesis). Tainan Technology University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
    Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. New York: Plenum.
    Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
    Moore, W. & Esselman, M. (1992). Teacher efficacy, power, school climate, and achievement: A desegregating district’s experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
    Morris, B. K. & Brassard, M. R. (2006). Teachers’ conflict management styles: The role of attachment styles and classroom management efficacy. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 105-121.
    Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4).
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
    Pasternak, M., & Bailey, K. (2004). Preparing nonnative and native English-speaking teachers: Issues of professionalism and proficiency. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Puchta, H. (1999). Creating a learning culture to which students want to belong: The application of neuro-linguistic programming to language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Quinn, T. (1984). Functional approaches in language pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 60-80.
    Reves, T. & Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native English speaking EFL/ESL teacher’s self-image: An international survey. System, 22(3), 353-367.
    Richards, J. & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education,12, 385-400.
    Samimy, K. & Brutt-Griffler, J. (1999). To be a native or nonnative speaker: Perceptions of nonnative speaking students in a graduate TESOL program. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Demir, S. (2009). Teacher perceptions of classroom management and problematic behaviors in primary schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1,584-589. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect.com
    Shavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455-498.
    Siwatu, K. O. (2011). Preservice teachers’ sense of preparedness and self-efficacy to teach in America’s urban and suburban schools: Does context matter? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 357-365.
    Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25 (1), 1-30.
    Soodak, L.C., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Efficacy and experience: Perceptions of efficacy among pre-service and practicing teachers. Journal and Research and Development in Education, 30, 214-221.
    Spratt, M. (1999). How good are we at knowing what learners like? System, 27, 141-155.
    Tillema, H. H. (2000). Belief change towards self-directed learning in student teachers: Immersion in practice or reflection on action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 575-591.
    Tschannen-Moran, M., & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 751-761.
    Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect.com
    Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
    Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure, Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
    Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A Social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Woolfolk, A. (1995). Educational psychology. Boston: Alleyn and Bacon.
    Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.
    Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke-Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356.
    Wyatt, M. (2010). An English teacher’s developing self-efficacy beliefs in using group-work. ELSEVIER, 38, 603-613. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect.com
    Zaidatol, A. L. P., & Afsaneh, B. (2011). Teachers’ and students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Implication for effective teaching practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 29, 1071-1080. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect.com
    Yang, H. C. (2007). A study of relationship between teachers’ mathematical beliefs and teaching efficacy at elementary school in Kaohsiung. School Administration Journal, 48, 113-132.
    Yang, Y. H. (2012). A study on elementary school students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective English teaching (Unpublished master thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
    Yavuz, S. (2007). Socio-demographic predictors of EFL teacher efficacy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(2).
    Yigit, B. (2006). Discipline in classroom and management of behaviors. Turkey: Erciyes University.
    Yu, M. C. (2008). Teaching and learning sociolinguistic skills in university EFL classes in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英語教學碩士在職專班
    98951009
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098951009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100901.pdf1095KbAdobe PDF2924View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback