政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/59573
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51252816      線上人數 : 891
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59573


    題名: 幼兒園園長與教師工作塑造之研究
    A Study of Job Crafting at Preschools
    作者: 劉怡萱
    Liu, Yi Syuan
    貢獻者: 徐聯恩
    Hsu, Lien An
    劉怡萱
    Liu, Yi Syuan
    關鍵詞: 工作塑造
    幼兒園
    園長
    教師
    Job Crafting
    Preschool
    Principal
    Teacher
    日期: 2012
    上傳時間: 2013-09-02 17:28:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 以前如果你討厭你的工作，可能只有辭職或忍耐這兩種選擇，但是最近學者開始鼓吹第三條路：從事「工作塑造」，想辦法給你討厭的工作一個新樣子，讓你覺得工作其實也可以是一件很有意思的事情。

    本研究的目的在於：(一)歸納幼兒園園長與教師工作塑造之樣貌；(二)探討幼兒園園長與教師工作塑造之歷程；(三)比較幼兒園園長與教師工作塑造之異同。本研究主要採取質性研究方法，從臺北市、新北市91~95年幼兒園教育評鑑績優名單中，立意取樣選取公、私立各25位園長和教師進行個別訪談，所有訪談錄音在轉換成逐字稿後，再以MAXQDA質性分析軟體進行資料的編碼分類。

    本研究獲致之結論歸納如下：
    一、幼教工作者的工作內涵多元，因此，其所從事的工作塑造樣貌非常豐富。
    二、幼教工作者的工作塑造歷程，可分為：動機、學習歷程、工作疆界改變、挑戰、及調適行動五大部分。
    三、幼兒園園長與教師所從事的工作塑造有許多異同處。
    (一)相同處：由於園長與教師的背景與工作環境相似，在從事工作塑造的動機、學習歷程、改變的工作疆界、遭遇的挑戰、及採取的調適行動，皆有大範圍的重疊。
    (二)相異處：
    1.園長─工作疆界改變主要聚焦在全園園務上，然受限僵固的園所文化、害怕干擾他人，而減少從事工作塑造的頻率，故採取調適行動幫助自己創造更多的工作塑造機會。
    2.教師─工作疆界改變主要聚焦在班級課程與教學上，然受限缺乏權力，而減少從事工作塑造的頻率，故採取調適行動幫助自己尋找更多支援以獲得工作塑造機會。
    Once upon a time, if you hated your job, maybe you only can choose to quit or to endure it. Recently, a group of researchers is trumpeting a third option：Doing “Job Crafting“ to make a new shape for your disagreeable job. Then, you will think that work is very interesting.

    This research aims to：(a) sum up the forms of Job Crafting at preschools；(b) probe into the course of Job Crafting at preschools；(c) compare the similarities and differences between principal and teacher at preschools. This study adopts qualitative research way in the main. We are in the light of “The list of outstanding performance educational evaluation in Taipei City and New Taipei City at 91 - 95” and using the purposeful sampling method to select each 25 of principal and teacher in public and private preschools to have an individual interview. And all the sound recordings are converting to verbatim recordings. Than we put data into the MAXQDA for coding and classification.

    Results show as follows:
    I. Due to principal and teacher at preschools has multiple contents of work, the forms of Job Crafting they engaged are rich.
    II. Principal and teacher at preschools have the same course of Job Crafting, including:motivation, learning, change of working boundary, challenge, and adaptive move.
    III. There are a lot of similarities and differences between principal and teacher at preschools, when they are engaged in the Job Crafting.
    A. The similarities：Due to principal and teacher at preschools has the same background and working environment, they have a lot of similarities on motivation, learning method, change of working boundaries, challenge, and adaptive move for Job Crafting.
    B. The differences：
    1. Principals ─ The change of working boundaries is focused on affairs about program. They limited by the rigid culture of program and not encroaching on others. They take adaptive moves to create more opportunities of Job Crafting.
    2. Teachers ─ The change of working boundaries is focused on affairs about curriculum and teaching. They limited by lacking formal power. They take adaptive moves to find support to get more opportunities of Job Crafting.
    參考文獻: 壹、中文部分
    EMBA 編輯部(2010)。如果你討厭你的工作。EMBA 雜誌，第281 期。
    孔方正(2008)。研究方法─質性與量化研究。高雄：宏冠出版社。
    朱柔若譯(2000)。社會研究方法─質化與量化取向。臺北：揚智文化。
    吳昭怡(2009)。從工作塑造看工作創新─以台灣大車隊為例。國立政治大學商管專業學院碩士學位論文。
    邱皓政(2002)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析：SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北：五南文化。
    侯秀琴譯(2010)。我愛，故我工作。哈佛商業評論─全球繁體中文版。
    信誼奇蜜親子網(2006)。幼兒園hunting，停、看、聽！
    徐聯恩、郭靜怡(2010)。雕塑工作，提升創造力。政大創新與創造力中心電子報。
    郭芳辰(2005)。幼稚園園長課程領導與教師教學效能之研究。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育學系碩士學位論文。
    郭碧唫、呂錘卿、尤淑純(1996)。幼稚園教師專業知覺、教學信念、與工作動機之探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC84-2421-H142-001)，未出版。
    許玉齡(2005)。如何幫孩子選擇適當的幼兒園。小朋友幼幼版巧連智親子魔法書，2-9。
    許逸柔(2005)。幼稚園園長專業能力及其培育制度之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育所碩士學位論文。
    陳俊龍(2010)。教師專業發展評鑑下的教師專業成長之研究。學校行政雙月刊，第66期，188-207。
    黃淑嫆(2004)。幼稚園教師工作壓力及其因應策略之研究。國立臺南教育大學幼兒教育學系碩士學位論文。
    張耐(2007)。親師之間─雙向溝通、三贏效果。幼教簡訊，第24期。
    張奕華、許正妹(2010)。質化資料分析─MAXQDA 軟體的應用。臺北：心理出版社。
    張淑敏(2006)。公立幼稚園園長任用形式與行政效能之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政學系碩士學位論文。
    楊于萱、周淑惠(2010)。台灣幼兒園園長課程領導之個案研究。教育資料集刊，第45 輯，27-57。
    楊秋仁(2002)。21世紀幼教人的壓力管理。蒙特梭利雙月刊，第39期，32-35。
    鄭平鍠(2008)。97 年度統計分析─高雄市公私立幼稚園各項資源比較分析。
    蕭瑞麟(2006)。不用數字的研究─鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究。臺北：臺灣培生教育。

    貳、西文部分
    Amabile, T., Hill, K., Hennessey, B., & Tighe, E. 1994. The work preference inventory：Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66:95–967.
    Anderson, N. R. & West, M. A. 1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation：Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19:235-258.
    Argote, L. 1982. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27:420-434.
    Barley, S. R. & Kunda, G. 2006. Contracting: A new form of professional practice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1):45-66.
    Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. 1985. Habits of the heart：Individualism and commitment in American life. New York：Harper & Row.
    Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E. & Wrzesniewski, A.：Center for Positive Organizational Scholarship.
    Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E. & Wrzesniewski, A. 2008. What is Job Crafting and Why Does It Matter? The center for Positive Organizational Scholarship. Michigan Ross School of Business.
    Caldwell, D. F., & O’Reilly, C. A. 2003. The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations：The role of social influence. Small Group Research,34: 497-517.
    Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A.C. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness：Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46 (4): 823-850.
    Cohen, S., & Bailey, D. 1997. What makes teams work：Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23:239–290.
    Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York：Plenum.
    Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. 1989. Self determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74:580-590.
    Edmondson, A. C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44:350–383.
    Florentin, S. 2011. Can job crafting be crafted?：A research into job crafting and job resources. Master thesis, University of Tilburg.
    Galbraith, J. 1973. Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Ghitulescu, B. E. 2006. Shaping tasks and relationships at work：Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
    Gilson, L. L. & Shalley, C. E. 2004. A little creativity goes a long way：An examination of team’s engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30:453-470.
    Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. 2007. A new model of work role performance：Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50:327–347.
    Guzzo, R., & Dickson, M. 1996. Teams in organizations：Recent research on performance and effectiveness. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 47: 307–338. Palo Alto, CA:Annual Reviews.
    Jeremy Caplan. 2009. Hate Your Job? Here`s How to Reshape It. Time Magazine.
    Justin M. Berg, Amy Wrzesniewski, Jane E. Dutton 2010. Perceiving and Responding to Challenges in Job Crafting at Different Ranks：When Proactivity Requires Adaptivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 158–186.
    Leana, C., Appelbaum, E., & Shevchuk, I. 2009. Work process and quality of care in early childhood education：The role of job crafting. Academy of Management Journa,, Vol. 52, No. 6, 1169–1192.
    Matthew J. Grawitch, & Larissa K. Barber. 2009. Crafting a Job, a Career, or a Calling Motivational Caveats to Autonomy. Organizational Health Initiative.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 22:242–266.
    Perrow, C. 1967. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32:194-208.
    Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. 2000. Adaptability in the workplace：Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85:612–624.
    Schein, E. H. & Bennis, W. 1965. Personal and organizational change via group methods. New York:Wiley.
    Spreitzer, G. M. & Sonenshein, S. 2003. Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing.
    Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York:McGraw-Hill.
    Wageman, R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40:145-180.
    Weick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
    West, M. A. 1990. The social psychology of innovation in groups.
    Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. 1997. Jobs, careers, and callings：People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31:21–33.
    Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. 2001. Crafting a job Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26:179–201.
    Wrzesniewski, A., Berg, J.M., & Dutton, J. E. 2010. Managing Yourself：Turn the job you have into the job you want. Harvard Business Review, 26, 114-117.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    幼兒教育所
    98157018
    101
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098157018
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    701801.pdf3581KbAdobe PDF22116檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋