English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51146412      Online Users : 907
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59466


    Title: 最高限額保證之確定與保證責任之消滅—以適用於民法第七五三條之一的問題為中心—
    The determination of Line of Credit Guaranty and the extinguishment of Guarantee Liabilities
    Authors: 鄞煌倚
    Yin, Huang I
    Contributors: 陳洸岳
    Chen, Kuang Yueh
    鄞煌倚
    Yin, Huang I
    Keywords: 最高限額保證
    最高限額保證之確定事由
    最高限額保證責任之消滅事由
    董監連保
    其他有代表權之人
    Line of Credit Guaranty
    events for the determination of Line of Credit Guaranty
    events for the extinguishment of the responsibilities of Line of Credit Guaranty
    the jointly and severally guarantee of directors and supervisors
    other representatives
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-09-02 17:00:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 最高限額保證已長期且普遍地為我國民間經濟活動所運用,並經最高法院以77年台上字第943號民事判例確立其實務地位,惟攸關債權人、債務人及保證人權益至鉅的最高限額保證之確定與保證責任之消滅等議題,國內相關研究卻寥寥可數。本文以最高限額保證之確定與保證責任之消滅為研究為主軸,並藉由與最高限額保證運作概念極為類似的最高限額抵押權之法理,以及主要參酌日本民法最高限額保證之規定,就最高限額保證之特殊確定事由與消滅事由逐一剖析,並以最高限額保證適用在民法第753條之1的諸多疑點加以探討。
    依據本文研究結果,最高限額保證之確定事由,包括保證人行使任意終止權、定有期間之最高限額保證其存續期間屆至、最高限額保證所擔保之不特定債務不繼續發生、債務人或債權人為法人有合併或分割且保證人不願續保、保證人死亡、主債務人死亡,以及民法第753條之1基於職務關係而為法人保證之保證人卸任其職務等;最高限額保證之消滅事由,包括人保、物保併存時債權人拋棄擔保物權、債權人片面允許主債務延期清償、債權人逾期未對主債務人為審判上請求、主債務經第三人承擔、債權人免除其他共同保證人之責任、最高限額保證確定後主債務喪失同一性等。
    實質上具備最高限額保證法定確定事由地位的民法第753條之1,係以未定期間之最高限額保證為其適用客體、以具備該條所定職務身分之自然人保證人為其適用主體,且最高限額保證契約當事人不得事先以個別商議方式,約定排除此項確定事由之適用。由於法人之董、監事或經理人等卸任事實與債權人知悉該事實之時間,極可能產生落差,導致債權人於該資訊落差期間內仍與法人發生債權債務關係,此時原則上應由保證人負擔債權人知悉其事之舉證責任,例外當債權人係銀行等金融機構時,則應將舉證責任倒置,方能合理衡平債權人與保證人之間的權益保護。
    〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞 has been long and generally for the use of economic activities in our country, and been firmly established the practical position with Case No.: Taishentzu 943, 77adjusted by the Supreme Court.However, the relevant issues of the rights and interests, which is significantly effective for the creditor, the debtor and the guarantor in relation to the determination of〝 Line of Credit Guaranty〞 and the extinguishment of 〝Guarantee Liabilities〞, is still rare in the domestic relevant research.Hence, in this thesis, the main scheme of the research, which is basd on the determination of〝 Line of Credit Guaranty〞 and the extinguishment of 〝Guarantee Liabilities〞by means of the similar legal concept of 〝Line of Credit Mortgage〞as well as the same legal concept in Civil Code of Japan, analyze detailed the specific events in relation to the determination and the extinguishment of〝 Line of Credit Guaranty〞, and discuss several issues on 〝 Line of Credit Guaranty〞applied in Section 753 of Civil Code in R.O.C.
    Based on the results of this study, the events on the determination of〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞, are including the right of termination which is exercised at will by the guarantor , the duration of 〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞which is stipulated with the certain period is at maturity, non-occurrence in relation to the non-specific debt which is guaranteed by 〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞, the merger or the split of the debtor or the creditor , as the corporate body, with the condition of the facet that the guarantee is unwilling to provide the guarantee, the death of the guarantor, the death of the principal creditor, and the relief of the tenure of office for the guarantor who is guaranteed for the debt incurred by the corporate and based on the relationship of the tenure of office which is stipulated in Section 753 of Civil Code, etc .The events on the extinguishment of〝Guarantee Liabilities〞,is including of the disclaimer for the creditor to the right in rem on which the real right is secured in the condition of the coexistence of personal guarantee and real security、the unilaterally grant from the creditor for the principal debt to be discharged with an extension of time、the waiver for the creditor to enter judicial proceedings against the principal debtor within the specific period、the principal debt is transferred to the third party、 the discharge of other co-guarantors’ liabilities by the creditor,and the forfeit of the identity for the principal debit after the determination of 〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞,and so on.
    Essentially with the legal status which is provided with the legal events for the determination of 〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞, Section 753-1 of Civil code is stipulated with the applicable object of 〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞 with non-specific period of time ,and the applicable subject of the nature person with the appointment which is stipulated in this section , and that the exclusive of the applicability of events for the determination on this Section with the pre-commitment in advance for the counter parties of 〝Line of Credit Guaranty〞is not allowable.
    As the time between the resignation of the directors, supervisors or other representatives of the corporate body and the acknowledgement of the fact as aforesaid for the creditor is most likely to incur the difference, which would results in the legal relationship of rights and obligations between the creditor and the debtor during the time of the gap for information. At this time, in general, the guarantor shall be responsible for the burden of proof for the acknowledgement the fact, exceptionally in the condition of the fact that the creditors, which are banks and other financial institutions, should be reversed the burden of proof, in order to be reasonably equitable on the protection of the rights and obligations between the creditor and the guarantor.
    Reference: 壹、書籍

    一、王文宇,公司法論,2版,2005。
    二、王澤鑑,民法學說與判例研究(第四冊),修訂版,1994。
    三、王澤鑑,民法學說與判例研究(第八冊),修訂版,1996。
    四、王澤鑑,民法總則,修訂版,2008。
    五、王澤鑑,法律思維與民法實例─請求權基礎理論體系,修訂版,2003。
    六、王澤鑑,債法原理(第一冊),增訂版,2001。
    七、朱柏松,論不同抵押權之效力,民事法問題研究─物權法論,初版,2010。
    八、朱柏松,民事法問題研究─物權法論,初版,2010。
    九、杜怡靜,(黃立主編)民法債編各論(下),初版,2002
    一〇、杜景林、盧諶譯,德國民法典評注:總則‧債法‧物權(簡體書),初版,2011。
    一一、杜景林、盧諶譯,德國債法分論(簡體書),初版,2007。
    一二、林誠二,民法債編各論(下),初版,2002。
    一三、邱聰智,新訂債法各論(下),再版,2008。
    一四、孫鵬,擔保法精要與依據指引(簡體書),2版,2011。
    一五、陳自強,代理權與經理權之間—民商合一與民商分立,初版,2006。
    一六、陳自強,民法講義I—契約之成立與生效,初版,2002。
    一七、渠濤,最新日本民法(簡體書),初版,2006。
    一八、黃立,民法總則,2版,1999。
    一九、黃茂榮,法學方法與現代民法,增訂再版,1987。
    二〇、楊淑文,民事實體法與程序法爭議問題,初版,2006。
    二一、劉春堂,民法債編各論(下),初版,2005。
    二二、謝在全,民法物權論(下),5版,2010。

    貳、期刊論文

    一、王文宇,公司保證之權限與規章之對世效力,臺灣本土法學雜誌,47期,2003,頁144~148。
    二、王文宇,公司經理人之代理權限與表見代理,臺灣本土法學雜誌,50期,2003,頁157~166。
    三、王文宇,揭開公司經理人規範的多層面紗,實用月刊,329期,2001,頁69~73。
    四、王水雲,最高額保證研究,重慶大學學報(社會科學版),2004年10卷6期,頁141~142。
    五、王志誠,公司負責人之概念與地位,月旦法學教室,24期,2004,頁82~94。
    六、朱柏松,論保證人預先拋棄權利之效力—評最高法院九十二年台上字第一三六八號民事判決,月旦法學雜誌,125期,2005年10月,頁202~213。
    七、吳啟賓,保證之特性與種類,法令月刊,40卷2期,1989年2月,頁9~13。
    八、吳煜宗,遺產中保證契約債務的地位,月旦法學教室,80期,2009年6月,頁10~11。
    九、林國全,公司經理人之概念,臺灣本土法學雜誌,48期,2003,頁131~135。
    一〇、林誠二,最高限額保證,台灣本土法學雜誌,25期,2001年8月,頁93~100。
    一一、梁宇賢,公司法上公司經理人之職權,月旦法學教室,18期,2004,頁26~27。
    一二、陳洸岳,保證之規定對物上保證人之類推適用-以時效之相關問題與抵銷為例,月旦法學教室,52期,2007年2月,頁14~15。
    一三、陳聰富,最高限額保證人之權利,月旦法學雜誌,74期,2001年7月,頁10~11。
    一四、曾品傑,連帶保證人為被保證人對第三人之保證債務負責—九十八年台上字第一六五二號民事判決評釋,月旦裁判時報,9期,2011年6月,頁18~25。
    一五、黃宏全,定型化契約條款顯失公平之再探討─最高法院97年度台上字第1680號最高限額保證契約判決解析,法學叢刊,225期,2012年1月,頁105~126。
    一六、黃茂榮,保證,植根雜誌,20卷8期,2004年8月,頁1~40。
    一七、黃茂榮,保證契約之成立上的獨立性與保證債務之履行上的從屬性及候補性,植根雜誌,21卷4期,2005年4月,頁36~40。
    一八、黃國偉,董監事連帶保證責任範圍增訂之評析(一),法務通訊,2589期,2012。
    一九、黃國偉,董監事連帶保證責任範圍增訂之評析(二),法務通訊,2590期,2012。
    二〇、楊淑文,主債權範圍擴充條款之無效與異常—最高法院九十一年台上字第二三三六號判決評析,月旦法學雜誌,122期,2005年7月,頁226~239。
    二一、楊淑文,消費者保護法關於定型化契約在實務上之適用與評析,政大法學評論,60期,1998年12月,頁231~270。
    二二、詹森林,不完全給付─最高法院決議與判決之發展,台灣本土法學雜誌,34期,2002年5月,頁23-50頁。
    二三、詹森林,最高法院與定型化契約法之發展─民法第二四七條之一裁判之研究,政大法學評論,94期,2006年12月,頁83~172。
    二四、劉昭辰,銀行定型化保證契約類推適用消費者保護法─最高法院九八年度台上字第一六五二號判決,台灣法學雜誌,151期,2010年5月,頁197~202。
    二五、劉連煜,經理人之認定與經理人之職權,月旦法學教室,44期,2006年6月,頁26~27。

    參、學位論文

    一、陳家暄,銀行定型化保證契約條款與相關判決之研究,國立政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文,指導教授楊淑文,2005年。
    二、張進鈺,董監連保相關法律問題之研究,東吳大學法學院法律學系碩士班碩士論文,指導教授林誠二,2003年。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法學院碩士在職專班
    99961025
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099961025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[法學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    102501.pdf1618KbAdobe PDF24328View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback