Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58731
|
Title: | 智財服務業者在臺灣上市櫃可行性與規劃之研究 The IPO Feasibility Study and Planning for A Intellectual Property Service Company in Taiwan |
Authors: | 陳裕禎 Chen, Yu Chen |
Contributors: | 馮震宇 Fong, Jerry G. 陳裕禎 Chen, Yu Chen |
Keywords: | 智財服務 智財權 專利 上市櫃 可行性分析 |
Date: | 2010 |
Issue Date: | 2013-07-01 17:55:28 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 隨著知識經濟的發展,智慧財產權儼然成為企業競爭的利基,近年來公司也紛紛設立智財權管理部門或法務部門,引發智財服務業者的商機。企業經營需資金以支應其創業之目的,企業追求成長及營運規模,需至證券市場掛牌上市籌獲資金以擴充業務規模。目前臺灣公司申請股票上市是由臺灣證券交易所負責實質審查,企業須符合投資績效及公司管理規定之條件後,可申請上市作業。而上櫃作業則由財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心(OTC)審查後,報請財政部證券暨期貨管理委員會核定,而上市或上櫃差別之處是兩者在設立年限、獲利能力及承銷商輔導期限等規定有不同條件限制外,申請作業流程大致相同。 本研究希望透過整理文獻回顧及科技服務業者上市、上櫃之經驗,採用質性研究之個案研究方法,依據上市(櫃)法源探討申請上市櫃可能遭遇的問題,再經團體專家審查並提供建議。最後以個案公司上市(櫃)申請之規劃案例,透過成本與技術可行性分析法(feasibility analysis)來確認智財服務業之上市、上櫃的具體方案,達到智財服務業者順利籌資的目標。最後舉一個智財服務業者上市(櫃)的實例,說明申請規劃及研究成果。 With the development of the knowledge economy, intellectual property rights (IPR) has ostensibly become a niche for corporate competition; companies one after another have established IPR management departments or legal departments in recent years, leading to business opportunities in the IP service industry. Corporate operations require funds to support the purpose of their establishment. Corporations pursue growth and scale of operation, and need become a listed company in the securities market to raise capital for the expansion of their operations. Currently, applications for the listing of stocks by Taiwan companies are examined by the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Corporations must meet listing requirements in trading performance and corporate governance rules before applying for public listing. On the other hand, over-the-counter (OTC) applications are examined by GreTai Securities Market and then submitted to Securities and Futures Commission for approval. Except for the differences in listing requirements such as year of trading, profitability and length of having had consultancy contract with underwriters, the filing procedures for public trading and OTC are mostly the same. This research hopes to investigate the potential difficulties in filing applications for public listing and OTC trading based on their legal origins, through reviewing the literature and the public listing/OTC experiences of corporations in the technology industry using case study research from qualitative research, and will then reviewed by a group of experts for recommendations. Finally, to demonstrate a concrete plan for listing/OCT from the IP service industry to fulfill the purpose of raising capital successfully, feasibility analysis on cost and technology will be performed on a case study of a company’s strategy for filing public listing/OTC applications. Specifically, an actual example of the listing/OTC experiences of a company from the IP service industry will be given to illustrate application strategy and the research findings. |
Reference: | [1]麥克.波特,國家競爭優勢,李明軒,邱如美譯,天下文化,1996年初版。 [2]財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心, http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/analysis/pat_A053.htm [3]連穎科技,“智慧財產權管理與企業專利管理平臺簡報”,企業簡報資料,2005。 [4]經濟部智慧財產局 http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ [5]國家知識產權局規劃發展司:《知識產權服務現狀、發展思路與措施建議》,2009年10月26日。 [6]曹星星、羅淩雲:《依據專業特色選購Dialog與STN系統》,載《現代情報》2005年第9期。 [7]《深入實施知識產權戰略 有力支撐創新型國家建設》,國家知識產權局局長田力普在2012年全國知識產權局局長會議上的講話,2012年1月5日。 [8]袁娟:《日本知識產權管理工程師職業資格制度研究》,載《科技與法律》2009年第4期,第44~47頁。 [9]Intellectual Ventures - http://www.intellectualventures.com/ [10]Allied Security Trust - http://www.alliedsecuritytrust.com/ [11] RPX - http://www.rpxcorp.com/ [12]A comprehensive listing of many IPR Holders - http://naipblog.blogspot.com/ 2008/10/index-of-ipr-holders-part-i.html [13]Transcript: Myhrvold of Intellectual Ventures - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122 142717791833671.html [14]Intellectual Ventures turns its attention to India - http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=ddfbe681-4599-4ea3-b329-a7b63e1fdd44 [15]New report lifts the lid on Intellectual Ventures - or at least opens it a long way - http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=b16aa35f-d559-4ba5-a928-6dfc7b2981ce [16]http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122161127802345821.html [17]http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=19318b74-e29f-44d3-a020-1da3492a38b1 [18]行政院經濟建設委員會 研發服務業發展綱領及行動方案 揭秘亞洲專利基金 http://www.chinaipmagazine.com/journal-show.asp?id=1532 [19]經濟部工業局,中華民國100年工業發展年鑒。 [20]朱敬一,如何做好臺灣的智財佈局,第九次全國科學技術會議於智財政策 http://www.nsc.gov.tw/9th2012/pdf/north_topic_2.pdf [21]經濟部技術處- 2011 科技專案執行年報 [22]張惠婷、蔡千姿、曾欽正 (2009) ,以服務品質觀點建構智慧財產技術服務業之專業能量評估指標。 [23]臺灣證券交易所 http://www.tse.com.tw/ [24]證券櫃檯買賣中心,上(興)櫃申請標準及流程, http://www.gretai.org.tw/ch/regular_emerging/apply_way/standard/standard.php [25]陳威廷、許牧彥,人力仲介網站之突破性創新發展模式探討-以104 人力銀行為例,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,2008。 [26]104人力銀行網站available at http://www.104.com.tw/ [27]耕興股份有限公司網站 available at Http://www.sporton.com.tw [29]站狗小鄭, 耕興(6146)–無線產品和EMC檢測大廠 (1)(2)(3), 06/03 2012 available at http://statementdog.com/blog/archives/4199 [30]Gartner:智慧型手機、平板電腦讓行動數據流量激增23%,數位時代網站,http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/cid/0/id/19613.許凱玲編譯,日期:2011-08-05,[31]MBA智庫百科 http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/,2013。 [32]宏景智權國際股份有限公司,http://www.actionip.com/ [33]楊起全、呂力之. 《美國知識產權戰略研究及其啟示》. 中國科技論壇. 2004 (2): 102-105,126. [34]鄭成思. 《知識產權論》. (第三版). 法律出版社. 2003. ISBN 7-5036-2298-9 [35]張楚. 《知識產權法教程》. 高等教育出版社. 2007. ISBN 978-7-04-0202740-8 [36]張曉玲,鄭友德.政府科技投入專案成果知識產權歸屬的原則[J].科技與法律.2001,(1):15-16. [37]鄭友德,焦洪濤.面向知識經濟的知識產權管理[J].知識經濟與管理,陝西人民出版社,1999.7.581-582. [38]鄭友德,李向陽.德國國家資助專案的成果歸屬與管理[J].中國科技論壇,2000,(2)L76-80. [39]Ullrich,H.,MehrInitiative,mehrInnova-tion,MitteilungenderdeutschenPatentan-waelte,1997,88.Jg.S.80~86. [40]焦洪濤,田慧.論國家知識產權介入權[J].湖北省法學會(民商法專業委員會)2001年優秀論文(一等獎). [41]王玉.介入權之法律性質探討[J].輔仁法學,(12):155-161. [42]袁志剛.論知識的生產和消費[J].經濟研究,1999,(6):61. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 企業管理研究所 100932427 99 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100932427 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
242701.pdf | 1817Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 712 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|