政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/58648

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/58648

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51318421 線上人數 : 848

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/58648

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58648

題名:	大學生Facebook涉入、社會資本與心理幸福感之相關研究 The Relationships among Facebook Involvement, Social Capital, and Psychological Well-Being of College Students
作者:	許薇欣 Hsu, Wei Hsin
貢獻者:	余民寧 Yu, Min Ning 許薇欣 Hsu, Wei Hsin
關鍵詞:	社群網站 Facebook涉入心理幸福感社會資本 social network sites Facebook involvement social capital psychological well-being
日期:	2012
上傳時間:	2013-07-01 14:06:39 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究旨在探討大學生Facebook涉入、社會資本與心理幸福感之間的關連性。本研究比較Facebook涉入是否比傳統的Facebook使用測量（Facebook使用時間、朋友數）對於社會資本、心理幸福感更具預測力。此外，本研究並探討社會資本是否為Facebook涉入、心理幸福感之間的中介變項。本研究以便利取樣抽取臺灣地區十七所大專院校，回收有效問卷數為1135份。本研究採用「Facebook現況調查」、「大學生Facebook涉入量表」、「心理幸福感量表」、以及「社會資本量表」為研究工具。收集的資料以迴歸分析、驗證性因素分析、結構方程式模型進行分析。統計分析結果發現，相較於Facebook使用時間與朋友數，Facebook涉入對於社會資本更具預測力。此外，Facebook涉入對心理幸福感的預測力也遠高於Facebook使用時間與朋友數。結構方程式模型的分析結果顯示，Facebook涉入對心理幸福感以及社會資本都顯著的正向效果；且社會資本的中介效果也達顯著。最後，本研究根據研究發現，對教育輔導實務以及未來研究提出建議。 The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationships among Facebook involvement (FI), social capital (SC), and psychological well-being (PWB) of college students. This study compared the predictive capacity of FI, Facebook usage time (FUT) and number of Facebook friends (NFF) with regard to SC and PWB. Besides, we also investigated whether SC mediate between FI and PWB. We recruited 1135 university students based on convenient sampling from 17 colleges of Taiwan. Facebook usage survey, Facebook Involvement Scale, Social Capital Scale, and Psychological Well-Being Scale were used as measurements in this study. We analysed the collected data using regression analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). The analytical results showed that the standardized regression coefficients between FI and SC were significantly stronger than those of FUT and NFF. Likewise, the standardized regression coefficients between FI and PWB were also significantly stronger than those of FUT and NFF. These results indicated that FI predicted the psychological consequences of Facebook usage more effectively than FUT and NFF. The results of SEM revealed that FI had positive effect both on SC and PWB. Moreover, SC mediated between FI and PWB significantly. Some recommends for education/guidance practice and future research were given based on research findings.
參考文獻:	壹、中文文獻王中天（2003）。社會資本：概念、源起、及現況。問題與研究，42（5），139-163。王曉玫、游輝斌（2011）。Facebook涉入程度與消費行為之相關分析—以嶺東科技大學為例。嶺東學報，30，3-21。石佳音（2011）。原住民與非原住民青少年情緒智力與心理幸福感之比較研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。何明修（2007）。公民社會的限制：台灣環境政治中的結社藝術。台灣民主季刊，4（2），33-65。余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。余民寧、陳柏霖、許嘉家、鍾珮純、趙珮晴（2012）。教師心理健康狀態類型之初探。學校衛生，60，31-60。余民寧、謝進昌、林士郁、陳柏霖、曾筱婕（2011）。教師主觀幸福感模式建構與驗證之研究。測驗學刊，58（1），55-85。吳淑鶯、陳瑞和（2005）。網路涉入影響因素、涉入程度與上網態度及行為之研究—以台灣大專學生為例。中華管理評論國際學報，8（4），1-37。巫雅菁（2001）。大學生幸福感之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。李金桂（2008）。運用社會資本自組都市更新會實施更新之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。李宥萱（2006）。通勤家庭未通勤婦女的生活目標、依附風格與幸福感關係之研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。李新民、陳密桃（2009）。緣分信念與心理幸福感的關係─聚合構念為因與果的結構方程模式分析初探。測驗學刊，56（4），457-489。邢占軍（2005）。對主觀幸福感測量的反思。本土心理學研究，9（24），301-323。林沂瑩（2011）。大專校院圖書館社群網站經營分析—以Facebook為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1（1），1-32。林盈廷（2011）。社交網路遊戲對使用者社會網絡及線上人際互動之影響—以Facebook為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市：雙葉。侯正裕、陳靜枝、陳鴻基（2010）。為何人們使用社交網站？認知專注的觀點。資訊管理學報，17，97-114。侯明玉（2011）。大學生身心困擾與心理健康之關係研究—以師大學生為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。洪睿聆（2012）。亞里士多德論德行與幸福（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園縣。修慧蘭、鄭玄藏、余振民、王淳弘、楊旻鑫、彭瑞祥（譯）（2009）。諮商與心理治療：理論與實務（原作者：G. Corey）。臺北市：雙葉。（原著出版年：2008）夏鑄九、王志弘、殷寶寧、黃麗玲、溫蓓章、魏慶嘉（譯）（1998）。網絡社會之崛起（原作者：M. Castells）。臺北市：唐山。（原著出版年：1996）翁若雲（2011）。大學生生涯自我效能、生涯成熟與心理幸福感之結構方程模式分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。郭宜婷（2011）。「朋友」、「噗友」，你選誰？從微網誌使用行為探討網路社會資本（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。陳亭羽、康志偉（2004）。網路商品之涉入程度與消費行為間之關連分析—以線上教學、線上遊戲、線上下單為例。玄奘管理學報，1（2），50-88。陳奕陵、洪培馨、盧貞伶、梁鳳琄、梁宗鎏、韓豐年（2011）。Facebook社群網站的涉入程度與人際關係研究。圖文傳播藝術學報，5，97-103。陳恆鈞（2003）。社會資本對政策執行之影響。行政管理論文選集，17，147-176。陳國龍（2007）。涉入理論及其衡量。取自http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E6% B6% 89%E5%85%A5%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA 陸洛、楊國樞（2005）。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀：概念分析與實徵初探。本土心理學研究，23，3-69。黃芳銘（2007）。社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式。臺北市：五南。黃國庭（2009）。大學生的社會網絡網站使用行為與社會資本之關聯性研究—以無名小站為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素珍（2011）。社區社會資本的促成、阻礙因素及其發展策略：社區領導者觀點之分析。行政暨政策學報，52，87-129。黃聖夫（2012）。以正向心理學觀點進行大學生有意義的生活量表編製之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。黃鈺婷（2010）。虛擬社群中的人際關係與寂寞感之研究—以Facebook為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。黃德祥（2000）。青少年發展與輔導。臺北市：五南。黃毅志（1998）。社會階層、社會網絡與心理幸福。臺灣社會學刊，21，171-210。鄒姝瑜（2010）。社交網站Facebook使用現況與人際關係問題初探。網路社會學通訊期刊，86，取自http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/86/index.htm 廖美淑（2012年01月04日）。白玫瑰運動。取自： http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=100107 維基百科（2012）。Facebook。取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook 劉慧俐（2002）。健康促進—成功老化之匙。高雄醫學大學通訊，1（15）。劉靜怡（2012）。社群網路時代的隱私困境：以Facebook為討論對象。臺大法學論叢，41（1），3-72。蔡雅婷（2010）。社會網絡網站的使用行為與人機互動級主觀幸福感研究—以Facebook為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。蔣昕（2010）。臉書上的一張臉譜：社交網站上的劃界與展演（未出版之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹市。鄭光庭、徐士傑、林東清（2012）。影響使用者持續使用Web 2.0傳遞與分享知識之研究。資訊管理學報，19（2），38-63。盧一伶（2010）。內外向人格特質與Facebook使用動機與行為之探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。謝易庭、謝亞恆（2009）。社會網絡、重視身材與心理幸福因果模型之建構與檢證：以臺灣地區大學生為例。教育與社會研究，19，83-110。籃文彬（2012）。大學生完美主義、心流傾向與心理幸福感之結構方程模式分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。貳、英文文獻 Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E. J., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(76), 1-16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-76 Abram, S. (2005). Web 2.0 - Huh?! Library 2.0, Librarian 2.0. Information Outlook, 9(12), 44-46. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 573-590. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922 Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 46-58). New York, NY: Greenwood. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Burt, S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CheckFacebook.com (2012, December 6). Retrieved from http://www.checkfacebook.com/ Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Diener, E. D. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Diener, E. D., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x Fisher, C. (2011). Social networking’s good and bad impacts on kids. Retrieved from http://www.bmedreport.com/archives/30729 George, L. (2002). E-communities in distance learning. Library Mosaics, 13, 14-16. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Grohol, J. (1999). Too much time online: Internet addiction or healthy social interactions. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2(5), 395-402. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.395 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Hew, F. K. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662-676. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020 Howard, P. E. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 382-404. doi: 10.1177/0002764201045003003 Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. Basingstoke, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Kaipidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 183-189. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0061 Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment (pp. 411-425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007 Kim, J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359-364. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0374 Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Kraut, P., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00248 Lee, G., Lee, J., & Kwon, S. (2011). Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being: A study in South Korea. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 151-155. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0382 Michaelidou, N., & Dibb, S. (2008). Consumer involvement: A new perspective. The Marketing Review, 8(1), 83-99. doi: 10.1362/146934708X290403 Miyata, K., & Kobayashi, T. (2008). Causal relationship between internet use and social capital in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 42-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00242.x Nie, N. H., & Erbring. L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford institution for the Quantitative Study of Society. Norris, P., & Jones, P. (1998). Virtual democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(2), 1-4. Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Extraverts have larger social network layers but do not feel emotionally closer to individuals at any layer. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 161-169. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000048 Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Richmond, S. (2011, June 17). Facebook users have higher levels of social well-being: Survey. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/ 8580029/Facebook-users-have-a-higher-level-of-well-being.html Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 521, 141-166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 Ryff, C.D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0 Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162. Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scale of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1080-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004 Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1985). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 Tim O’Reilly (2005, September 30). What is Web2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html UCLA Center for Communication Policy. (2001). The UCLA internet report 2001: Surveying the digital future. Retrieved from http://worldinternetproject.com/?pg=reports&inHamtadId=385 Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957286 Williams, D. (2006). On and off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593-628. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x Wilson, K., Fornasier, S., & White, K. M.(2010). Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13, 173-177. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0094 Young, B. (2006). A study on the effect of internet use and social capital on theacademic performance. Development And Society, 35(1), 107-123. Yu, S. C., Hsu, W. H., Yu, M. N., & Hsu, H. Y. (2012, August). Is the use of social networking sites correlated with internet addiction? Facebook use among Taiwanese college students. Poster session presented at International Conference on Information and Computer Applications (ICICA 2012), Paris, France. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學教育研究所 100152002 101
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1001520021
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[教育學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
002101.pdf	2144Kb	Adobe PDF2	337	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋