Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58315
|
| Title: | 公務機關人事人員角色定義幅度對組織公民行為影響之研究
A Study of the Effect of Personnel Officer’s Role Definition on Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Public Sector |
| Authors: | 張芳琪 |
| Contributors: | 孫本初
張芳琪 |
| Keywords: | 角色定義幅度
組織公民行為
人事人員 |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-06-03 17:33:06 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究主要目的在於研究公務機關人事人員的角色定義幅度及組織公民行為，瞭解人事人員對自身工作角色界定的認知及組織公民行為的表現程度。藉由文獻探討及運用量化統計分析方法探討公務機關人事人員的角色定義幅度與其組織公民行為間之關聯性，瞭解其角色定義幅度影響組織公民行為的程度。
本研究以行政院所屬各機關暨地方政府人事機（關）構人員為研究對象，有效問卷413份，問卷回收後以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數、皮爾森積差相關等統計方法進行資料分析。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要研究發現如下：
一、公務機關人事人員能認同並表現出較傳統人事管理以外更多元的角色，並有逐漸轉向員工貢獻管理角色之趨勢。
二、公務機關人事人員在組織中能表現出良好的組織公民行為，尤其能致力於維持人際上的和諧。
三、性別、年齡、工作年資、婚姻狀況、現任職務、服務機關隸屬在角色定義幅度上有顯著差異。
四、年齡、工作年資、婚姻狀況、現任職務在組織公民行為上有顯著差異。
五、公務機關人事人員角色定義幅度與組織公民行為之間有中度至高度相關。
六、角色定義幅度「策略夥伴」對組織公民行為「敬業」、「樂群」並無顯著預測力。
七、角色定義幅度「行政管理專家」對組織公民行為「敬業」之預測力最大。
八、角色定義幅度「員工關懷者」對組織公民行為「樂群」、「守分」、「忠誠」、「熱心」之預測力最大。
九、角色定義幅度「變革推動者」對組織公民行為「敬業」、「忠誠」、「熱心」無顯著預測力；在「樂群」、「守分」具有顯著的負向預測力。
最後，根據研究結果，提出建議供人事主管機關及人事人員管理實務上之參考。
This study focuses on the topic of public personnel officers’ role definition and organizational citizen behavior in public sector. We use statistical methods to analyze the relationships between personnel staff’s role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior.
This study collects 413 samples from agencies of local government and central government: Executive Yuan. We use descriptive statistics, t test, oneway ANOVA and pearson correlation to analyze the raw data which this study collected. The main statistical results are below:
1.Public personnel staff could recognize and perform an extra role beyond traditional personnel management.
2. Those public personnel staffs who have more organizational citizenship behavior than the other ones in public sector committed highly to maintain interpersonal harmony.
3.There is significant difference among gender, age, years of service, marital status, current position, service agency on role definition.
4.There is significant difference among age, years of service, marital status, current position on organization citizenship behavior.
5.There is mid to highly correlationship between personnel officer’s role definition and organizational citizenship behavior in public sector.
6.The subconstruct strategic partnership of role definition does not predict significantly on those subconstructs of sportsmanship and interpersonal harmony .
7.The administrative expert has the greatest predictive ability on sportsmanship.
8.The employee advocate does significantly predict on sportsmanship , conscientiousnesss, loyalty and altruism.
9.The change agent has no obvious predictive ability on sportsmanship, loyalty, altruism, and has significantly negative effect on interpersonal harmony and conscientiousnesss.
Finally, the research conclusions will provide practical suggestions to personnel directors in public sector. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
王善睿（2011），〈人力資源最高主管角色之研究：分析層級法之運用〉，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
王寶章（2010），〈鐵路警察組織公民行為對工作滿意度之研究〉，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
李芳齡譯（2001），《人力資源最佳實務》，台北：商周出版。
李正綱、黃金印（2001），《人力資源管理-新世紀觀點》，台北：前程企業管理。
吳秉恩（1999），《分享式人力資源管理》。台北市：翰蘆出版。
吳明隆（2009），《SPSS問卷統計分析實務》，第二版。臺北：五南圖書公司。
吳奕慧、聞玲玲、甄立豪譯（2007），《人力資源管理》，臺北：台灣培生教育出版。
林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒賢達等（1994），〈薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究〉，《管理評論》，13(2)，87-108。
林鉦棽 (1996），〈組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究：社會交換理論之觀點〉，《管理科學學報》，13(3)，391-415。
林詩涵（2005），〈角色界定與組織公民行為之關聯性探討〉，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林佳潓（2005），〈知覺組織支持與組織公民行為：角色定義幅度之中介效果〉，私立中原大學心理研究所碩士論文。
孫本初（2000），〈轉換型領導對台北市政府行政績效影響之研究〉，台北市政府研究發展考核委員會委託研究。
───（2009），《新公共管理》，修訂二版，臺北市，一品文化出版社。
高雅曼（2009），〈國民中學教師角色定義幅度對組織公民行為影響之研究-質量混合方法之應用〉，國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士學程論文。
翁珮文（2006），〈人力資源專業人員角色、角色壓力與工作價值觀對工作投入之影響〉，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
張火燦（1988），《策略性人力資源管理》。台北市，智揚出版社。
陳瑞鈺 (1997)，〈外商公司駐台人員之人力資源實務認知與離職傾向關係之研究-心理契約之探討〉，私立淡江大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
陳淑榔（2010），〈國立臺灣大學職員工作價值觀對組織公民行為影響之研究〉，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
張秋元 (1996)，〈我國人事人員訓練體系之研究-一個發展觀點〉，私立中國文化大學政治研究所碩士論文。
張緯良（2006），《人力資源管理-本土觀點與實踐》，臺北，前程文化事業。
許道然 (2002)，〈公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究〉，國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
許孟眞（2003），〈角色定義幅度與組織公民行為：前置要素之探討〉，私立中原大學心理研究所碩士論文。
黃一峯 (2006)，〈人事人員角色與能力之探討上〉，《公務人員月刊》，125，16-22。
楊世瑩（2008），《SPSS問卷統計分析實務》，第二版，臺北：旗標公司。
劉靜如（2009），〈學校人事人員角色定位及衝突之研究-以桃園縣國中小專任人事人員為例〉，銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士論文。
蔡良文（1999），《人事行政學》。台北市，五南出版社。
───（2006），〈公務人員核心價值與行政倫理〉，《考銓季刊》，第47期，頁16-43。
盧婉君（2004），〈組織公民行為的角色定義對其互動公正間關係之影響探討-以中華電信為例〉，國立交通大學管理學院碩士論文。
蕭武桐（2002），《公務倫理》，臺北：智勝文化。
關 中（2010），〈公部門人力資源工作者的角色〉。兩岸四地人力資源發展論壇專題演講，國家文官學院主辦。
二、英文部分
Aderson,L.M,Batman,T.S.（1997）.Cynicism in the workplace:some causes and effects . Journal of Organizational behavior.18(5),449-469.
Armeil, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 288-297.
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 587-595.
Bettencourt, L. A., Meuter, M. L., & Gwinner, K. P. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 29-41.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley, & Sons.
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 82-98.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 710-725.
Coleman, V. L., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human resource Management, 10, 25-44.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, 16(3), 705-721.
Farh, J. L., Earley,P.C. & Lin,S.C.(1997). Impetus for action:A cultural analysis of Justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society.Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 42(3),421-444.
George, J. M.& Jones,G.R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in contex. Human Performance, 10(2), 153-171.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(3), 249-270.
Graen,G.,&Cashman,J.F.(1975). A role-makaing modle of leadership in formal organizations-a developmental approach.Organization and Administrative Sciences,6(2-3),143.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavior Science, 9(3), 131-146.
Katz, D., Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organization. New York: Willy &Sons,Inc.
Katz, D., Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-693.
Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(2), 370-390.
Lin, S., Farh, J., Wu, J., & Seetoo, D. (1994). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Management Review, 12(2), 87-108.(in Chinese)
Lin, W.,& Wan,W.,(2007). A demographic study on citizenship behavior as in-role orentation. Peresonality and Individual Differences, 42(2), 225-234.
Mcneely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 836- 844.
Meyer , J.P. & Allen, N.J.(1990).Affective and continuance commitment to the organization:Evaluaiton of measures and analysis of Concurrent and Time-Lagged Relations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6)，710-712.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 1543- 1567.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
O’Reilly,C,A.,&Chatman,J.(1986).Organizational commitment and psychological attachment:The effects of compliance,identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,71,224-247.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. Lexingtion, Massachusetts: Lexingtion Books.
Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior:Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 157-164.
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775-802.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (1997). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10(4), 133-151.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 637-643.
Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 653-663.
Staw, B. M. (1984). Organizational behavior: A review and performance of the fields outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(3), 627-666.
Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
94921070
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921070 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 107001.pdf | 8010Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1570 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
