政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/57593
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51127835      Online Users : 855
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57593


    Title: 布丹主權概念發展之研究
    On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereignty
    Authors: 蔣馥朵
    Contributors: 蕭高彥
    蔣馥朵
    Keywords: 布丹
    主權
    憲政主義
    絕對主義
    立法權
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-04-01 14:40:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚，是布丹留名於政治思想史之作，其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論；部分學者認為兩書間理路一致，細節差異微不足道，但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統，《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現，其脈絡下的君主，不但受到神法與自然法的限制，更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律，無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面，布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞，令王國既有法律成為一實在限制，但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上，可以視情形廢除、修訂，甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中，則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾，並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論：主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制，但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向，與其說是前後期理論斷裂，毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。
    Reference: 一、布丹著作

    1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.
    1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.
    1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著，朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編，李衛海，錢俊文譯，北京：北京大學出版社。

    二、西文書目

    Allen
    1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of
    the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.
    Arendt, Hannah
    1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.
    Aristotle
    1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of
    Chicago Press.
    Beaud, Olivier
    1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
    Berns, Thomas
    2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque
    d`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.
    Church, William Farr
    1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the
    Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Eulau, Heinz H. F.
    1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of
    Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
    Franklin, Julian
    1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three
    Treatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.
    1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge
    University Press.
    2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in
    Anthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.
    Gilmore, Myron Piper
    1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York:
    Russell& Russell.
    Holmes, Stephen
    1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and
    Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Holt, Mack P.
    1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Hutton, Ronald
    2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.
    Jacobsen, Mogens Chrom
    2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne.
    København : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
    Keohane, Nannerl O.
    1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    King, Preston
    1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and
    Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.
    Lewis, J. U.
    1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.
    Mesnard, Pierre
    1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.
    Mousnier, Roland
    1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789.
    Chicago: The University of Chicago.
    Neumann, Franz
    1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern
    Society. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher.
    Reynolds, Beatrice
    1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis
    Hotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.
    Schmitt, Carl
    1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.
    Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Shepard, Max Adams
    1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science
    Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.
    Seyssel, Claude de
    1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and
    London: Yale University Press.
    Skinner, Quentin
    2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Spitz, Jean-Fabien
    1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
    Strauss, Leo
    1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago:
    University of Chicago Press.
    Owen Ulph,
    1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian
    Franklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
    Veogelin, Eric
    1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The
    Collected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press

    三、中文書目

    史金納 (Quentin Skinner)
    2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二)：宗教改革》，台北：左岸文化。
    施密特 (Carl Schmitt)
    2004 《憲法學說》，劉楓譯，台北：聯經。
    2005 《政治的概念》，劉宗坤譯，上海：上海人民。
    2006 《論斷與概念》，朱雁冰譯，上海：上海人民。
    陳秀鳳
    2005 政權“神聖化”?－以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討，新史學16卷
    4期。
    2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”－中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探
    討，新史學18卷3期。
    2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38
    期。
    薩孟武
    1993 《西洋政治思想史》，台北：三民書局。
    賽班
    1991《西洋政治思想史》，台北：桂冠。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    96252015
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Political Science] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    201501.pdf1154KbAdobe PDF21536View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback