政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/57233
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51204380      線上人數 : 969
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/57233


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57233


    題名: 從「政治實踐」到「心性體證」：朱熹注《孟子》的歷史脈絡
    From Politics to Mental Character-The Context of Zhu Xi`s Commentary for Mencius
    作者: 陳逢源
    Chen, Feng-Yuan
    貢獻者: 政大中文系
    關鍵詞: 孟子;朱熹;道統;理學;經學
    Mencius;Zhu Xi;The Succession to the Way daotong;The Philosophy of Principle lixue;The Philosophy of Classics jingxue
    日期: 2010-11
    上傳時間: 2013-03-21 10:03:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 《孟子》乃是極富爭議之典籍，從「子」而及「經」，乃是地位的提昇，其中涉及「官學化」與「經典化」兩項過程，前人於唐、宋之際《孟子》升格運動，多有討論，但對於朱熹匯聚聖賢相傳歷史意象，回應宋儒有關孟子爭議問題，卻是缺乏檢討，筆者撮舉《孟子集注》徵引材料，一窺朱熹思索所在，遂能得見在「儒學傳承」與「政治反叛」辨證當中，回歸於心性，以「道統」形塑孔、孟之傳，思索《孟子》經典地位的過程。足證理學並非為政治服務的工具，「內聖」工夫更非「外王」事業的捨離，朱熹吸納諸儒意見，反省儒學之傳，確定《孟子》價值，乃是回應北宋儒學實踐的結果，用心所在，於茲可見。
    The Mencius, a disputable canon, promoted from a section of the schools of philosophers (zi) to the classics (jing) through being officialized and canonized. While former scholars have focused on discussing the promotion of the Mencius in the Tang and Song Dynasties, there were, however, few criticisms on the Song savants` arguments about Mencius, which was left by Zhu Xi through the historical notion of "sagely transmission." As a result, I will take theＭengzi jizhu (Collected Commentaries of Mencius) as quotation to investigate Zhu Xi`s contemplation, which will manifest the dialectic of the spread of Confucianism and political rebellion. Within this investigation, we can speculate about the process of the Mencius being canonized, for Confucius and Mencius` analects which were molded through the succession to the Way (daotong) by reverting to mental character. Zhu Xi confirmed the merit of the Mencius and then used it to prove that the philosophy of principle (lixue) is not the instrument for politics, and philosophers, moreover, work hard for interior sageness which cannot be affected by their exterior achievement, according to imbibing various savants` points of view as well as rethinking the spread of Confucianism. To be sure, this is the meticulous and fruitful result of Zhu Xi`s response to the practice of Confucianism in the North Song Dynasty.
    關聯: 東吳中文學報, 20, 133-163
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    10271163-201011-201012060099-201012060099-133-163.pdf3321KbAdobe PDF21003檢視/開啟


    檢視Licence

    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋