政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/56523

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/56523

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51317657 Online Users : 847

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Department of Philosophy > Theses > Item 140.119/56523

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56523

Title:	巴塔耶的普遍經濟論:耗費與聖性 The Theory of General Economy of Georges Bataille: Expenditure and the Sacred
Authors:	蔡翔任
Contributors:	蔡錚雲蔡翔任
Keywords:	普遍經濟耗費聖性越度至尊性獻祭 general economy expenditure sacred transgression sovereignty sacrifice
Date:	2011
Issue Date:	2013-01-02 13:25:33 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本論文研究的是巴塔耶的普遍經濟論，它主要分四部分來探討。它首先從時間的瞬間性和能量的耗費兩個原理出發來說明什麼是普遍經濟。接著說明的是聖世界與俗世界二分的原理，這又可分兩部分來討論。從勞動與消盡的第一組對立可以產生聖俗的區分判隼，一者是勞動的超越性世界，一者是獻祭暴力的內在性世界。從禁忌與越度的第二組對立可以導出聖俗的再次區分，一者是禁忌所管轄的俗世界，一者是人性逾越的歡慶狀態。此外，普遍經濟論可以充分說明各種笑的型態，最終導向對超越的虛無性的笑。最末，本論文從死亡共同體的角度提出一種普遍經濟的友情論。 This study is to discuss the theory of general economy of Georges Bataille. The argument falls into four parts. First, it accounts for what general economy means by inspecting two principles: that of instant and that of expenditure. Next, the discussion goes to what separates the sacred from the profane world. On the one hand, the profane world is dominated by work and labor which make it transcendent while the sacred immanent world is liberated from within by the representation of sacrificial violence. On the other hand, while the taboo has a command of the profane, human beings achieve and celebrate their sovereignty by transgressing the interdiction. Then, the discussion shows that general economy can have sufficient and satisfactory explanation of the morphology of laughter. Finally, it proposes a new meaning of friendship from the economic view.
Reference:	參考書目一、外文原著與譯著 Georges Bataille, OEUVRES COMPLÈTES, Paris: Gallimard, Georges Bataille, The Unfinished System of Nonknowledge, edited and with an Introduction by Stuart Kendall, translated by Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall, London: University of Minnesota Press, 2001. Georges Bataille, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, edited and with an Introduction by Allan Stoekl, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, p. 144. Georges Bataille, Theory of Religion, New York: Zone Books, 2001 Georges Bataille, Guilty, translated by Bruce Boone with introduction by Denis Hollier, The Lapis Press, 1988 Georges Bataille, The Accursed Share, Volume I-III, New York: Zone Books, 1988. Georges Bataille, Inner Experience, translated by Leslie Anne Boldt, New York: State University Press, 1988. Georges Bataille, On Nietzsche, translated by Bruce Boone, New York: Paragon House, 1994. Georges Bataille, Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo, New York: Walker and Company, 1962. Georges Bataille, The Tears of Eros, translated by Peter Connor, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1989. Georges Bataille, The Cradle of Humanity: Prehistoric Art and Culture, edited and introduced by Stuart Kendall, translated by Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall, New York: Zone Books, 2005. Georges Bataille, The Impossible: A Story of Rats followed by Dianus and by The Oresteia, translated by Robert Hurley, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1991. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 244 The College of Sociology(1937-39),edited by Denis Hollier, translated by Betsy Wing, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988. The Bataille Reader, edited by Fred Boting and Scott Wilson, Blackwell Publishers, 1998. 二、外文引用資料 Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995. Ames, Kenneth M. ‘The Evolution of Social Ranking on the Northwest Coast of North America’in American Antiquity, Vol. 46, No. 4 ( Oct., 1981), p. 795. Ames, Kenneth M. ‘Slaves, Chiefs and Labour on the Northern Northwest Coast’in World Archaeology, Vol. 33, No. 1, The Archaeology of Slavery (Jun., 2001), pp. 1-17. Anthony, Ross ‘”This is Not an Exit”: The Sacred in the Age of Consumer Capitalism’. Arnould, Elisabeth, ‘ The Impoosible Sacrifice of Poetry: Bataille and the Nancian Critique of Sacrifice’, Diacritics, 26.2 (1996), pp. 86-96. Arnsperger, Christian. ‘Methodological altruism as an alternative foundation for individual optimization’ in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Volume 3, Number 2, 2000. Avni, Ora. ‘The Semiotics of Transactions: Mauss, Lacan and the three Musketeers’in Modern Language Notes, Vol. 100, No. 4, French Issue ( Sep., 1985), p. 744. Benardete, Seth. The Tragedy and Comedy of Life: Plato’s Philebus, translated and with Commentary by Seth Benardete, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1993, p. 83. Besnard, Philippe.’La formation de l’équipe de l’Anée sociologique’, Revue Française de sociologie. 1979, 20-1. pp. 7-31. Blanchot, Maurice. The Infinite Conversation, translation and foreword by Susan Hanson, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 245 Blanchot, Maurice.‘The Birth of Art’, Friendship, translated by Elizabeth Rottenberg, California: Stanford University Press, 1997 Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel .‘The Laughter of Being’, Modern Language Notes, Vol. 102, No. 4, French Issue (Sep., 1987), pp. 737-760. Borgeaud, Philippe. ‘Le couple sacré/profane. Genèse et fortune d’un concept 《opé ratoire》en histoire des religions’,in Revue de l’histoire des religions, tome 211 n˚ 4. pp. 387-418. Borgerson, Janet and Alf Rehn, ‘ General Economy and Productive Dualisms’. Gender, Work and Organization, volume 11, issue4, July 2004. pp. 455-474. Bras, Gabriel Le.’Note sur la sociologie religieuse dans l’Année Sociologique’, Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 21, 1966. p, 50. Burkert, Walter, René Girard, and Jonathan Smith, Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation, edited by Robert Hamerton, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. Caillé, Alain. ‘Apologie et critique du don. Le don entre science sociale et psychanalyse : L`héritage de Mauss jusqu`à Lacan’, Revue du MAUSS 1/2006(n˚ 27), p. 14. Caillé, Alain. ‘Don et symbolisme’, La revue du MAUSS semestrielle n˚12, Plus réel que le réel, le symbolisme, MAUSS/La Découverte, 1998. Caillé, Alain. ‘Du don comme réponse à l`énigme du don’, L’Homme, 1997, tome 37 n˚142. Caillé, Alain. ‘Nouvelle thèse sur la religion’Revue du MAUSS semestrielle, 2003 (n˚ 22), p. 318-327. Caillé, Alain. ’Anti-utilitarianism, economics and the gift-paradigm’ Caillé, Alain.‘Marcel Mauss et le parardigme du don’ in Sociologie et sociétés, vol. 36, n° 2, 2004, p. 145. Caillé, Alain.’Ce qu’on appelle si mal le don...Que le don est de l’ordre du don malgré tout’： http://www.cairn.info/revue-du-mauss-2007-2-page-393.htm，pp. 396-97. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 246 Caillois, Roger, Man, Play, and Games, translated by Meyer Barash, New York: The Free Press, 1961. Conklin, Alice L.’Civil Society, Science, and Empire in Late Republican France: The Foundation of Paris’s Museum of Man’, Osiris, Vol. 17, Science and Civil Society (2002), pp. 255-290. Clifford, James.’On Ethnographic Surrealism’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 23, No.4 ( Oct., 1981), pp. 539-564. Comay, Rebecca .‘Gifts Without Presents: Economies of “Experience” in Bataille and Heidegger’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), p. 89. Couture, André.’De l’abus de sacré dans l’édude des religions de l’Inde: De l’utilisation de l’opposition sacré/profane en context hindou et bouddhique’ Crémoux, Françoise. ‘Du sacré aux sacralités’Pandora: revue d`etudes hispaniques, Nº. 4, 2004, págs. 9-16. Csordas, Thomas J. ‘Asymptote of the Ineffable: Embodiment, Alterity, and the Theory of Religion’, Current Anthropology, Vol. 45, No. 2 (April 2004), pp. 163-185. Derlon, Brigitte and Marie Mauz é , ‘“Sacred”or“sensitive“ objects’Projet ECHO – Atelier « Objets et société », sous la dir. De Maurice Godelier - Non-European Components of European Patrimony –http://www.necep.net Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass, London and Henley: Routledge, 1978. Derrida, Jacques .‘ Economimesis’, Diacritics, Vol. 11 (1981), translated by R. Klein, p. 3-25. Descombes, Vincent.’L` Équivoque du symbolique’ Modern Language Notes, Vol. 94, No. 4 (May, 1979) Detienne, Marcel.’Culinary Practice and the Spirit of Sacrifice’. The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks, ed by Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant. Trans. Paula Wissing, Chicago, 1989, pp. 14-20. Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, London: Duckworth, 1977. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 247 Direk, Zeynep, ‘Bataille on Immanent and Transcendent Violence’, Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française, Volume 14, Issue 2, Fall 2004, pp. 29-49. Direk, Zeynep, ‘ On the Sources and the Structure of Derrida’s Radical Notion of Experience’, http://www.usc.edu/dept/comp-lit/tympanum/4/direk.html Doroszewski, Witold.’Quelques remarques sur les rapports de la sociologie et la linguistique: Durkheim et F. de Saussure’. Journal de Psychologie normale et pathologique. Vol. 30, p. 82-91. Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger, London and New York: Routledge, 2003. Drury, Shadia. Alexandre Kojéve: the Roots of Postmodern Politics, Palgrave MacMillan, 1994. Dubar, Claude.‘La méthode de Marcel Mauss’, in Revue française de sociologie. 1969, pp. 515-521. Durkheim, Emil, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse : le système totémique en austraile, Paris: Presses Universitires de France, 1960. Filloux, Jean-Claude. ‘Personne et sacré chez Durkheim’, Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 69, 1990. pp. 41-53. Foucault, Michel .‘A Preface to Transgression’, in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. With an introduction by Donald F. Bouchard, trans. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon, Ithaca: Cornel Univesrity Press, 1977. Foucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977. Foucault, Michel, Religion and Culture, selected and edited by Jeremy R. Carrette. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999. Fournier, Marcel Marcel Mauss, l’ethnologie et la politique: le don, 1995. Gans, Eric. Signs of Paradox: Irony, Resentment, and Other Mimetic Structures.Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997. Giesen, Bernhard.‘Performing Transcendence in Politics: Sovereignty, Deviance, and the Void of Meaning’, Sociological Theory, Vol. 23, No. 3( Sep., 2005),. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 248 Goody, Jack. ‘Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem’, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Jun., 1961) Gousgounis, Nikos. ‘Transgressing Character of the Sacred in the Double Ritual of Anastenaria’, Studies of Tribes and Tribals, Vol, 1. num, 2003. p, 127-140. Goux, Jean-Joseph and Kathryn Ascheim, Rhonda Garelick, ‘General Economics and Postmodern Capitalism’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 206-224. Guerlac, Suzanne, ‘ Bataille in Theory: Afterimages (Lascaux)’, Diacritics, Vol. 26, No. 2, Georges Bataille: An Occasion for Misunderstanding (Summer, 1996), pp. 9-17. Guerlac, Suzanne, ‘”Recognition”by a Woman!: A Reading of Bataille’s L’Erotisme’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp.90-105. Habermas, Jürgen . The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, translated by Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987. Harrison, Jane Ellen. Ancient Art and Ritual, London: Oxford University Press, 1951. Heimonet, Jean-Michel and Joaniko Kohchi, ‘ Recoil in Order to Leap Forward: Two Values of Sade in Bataille’s Text’, in Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990). Hollier, Denis . Against Architecture: The Writings of Georges Bataille. The MIT Press, 1992. Hollier, Denis and Hilari Allred, ‘The Dualist Materialism of Georges Bataille’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 124-139. Didi-Huberman, Georges. Survivance des lucioles, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 2009. Igrek, Apple ‘Concrete Containment in Late Capitalism, Mysticism, the Marquis de Sade, and Phenomenological Anthropology’, Colloquy Text Theory Critique, No. 15 (2008), pp. 96-114. Irwin, Jones. ‘Heterodox Religion and Post-Atheism: Bataille/Klossowski/Foucault’, in Minerva-An Internet Journal of Philosophy 10 (2006): 215-244. Isambert, François-Andr é . ‘L’Elaboration de la notion de sacr é dans l’ é cole durkheimienne cas’, Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 42, 1976. pp, 35-56. Jamin, Jean. ‘Le savant et le politique: Paul Rivet( 1876-1958)’, Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris, Nouvelle Série, tome 1, 1989. p, 282. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 249 Jones, Robert Alun. ‘Durkheim, Frazer, and Smith: The Role of Analogies and Exemplars in the Development of Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion’, pp.596-627. Jones, Robert Alun Emile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works, Beverly Hills, CA; Sage Publications, 1986, pp.136-37，以及 Jones, Robert Alun. ’On Understanding a Sociological Classic’, in The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Sep., 1977), pp. 308-09. Karady, Victor. ‘Le probl ème de la l é gitimit é dans l’organisation historique de l’ethnologie française’, Revue française de sociologie. 1982, 23-1. pp.17-35. Karady, Victor. ‘Stratégies de réussite et modes de faire-valoir de la sociologie chez les durkheimiens’, Revue française de sociologie. 1979, 20-1. p, 72. Karady, Victor. ‘Durkheim, les sciences sociales et l’Université: bilan d’un semiéchec’. Revue française de sociologie. 1976, 17-2 Karady, Victor. ‘Durkheim et les débuts de l’ethnologie universitaire’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 74, 1988. Klossowski, Pierre .‘ A propos du simulacre dans la communication de Georges Bataille’ , in Critique , Août-septembre 1963, p. 742. Klossowski, Pierre, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, translated by Daniel W. Smith, The University of Chicago Press, 1997. Kristeva, Julia Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, translated by Leon S. Roudiez, New York: Columbia University Press, 1982, Kuper, Adam. ‘Durkheim’s theory of Primitive Kinship’. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Jun., 1985), p. 231. Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Heidegger, Art and Politics: The Fiction of the Political, translated by Chris Turner, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990. Lassègue, Jean and Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti, ‘Économie symbolique et phylogenèse du langage’. L`HOMME 192/2009 Lassègue, Jean. ‘Archéologie de la fonction symbolique: quelques pistes récentes’(expos é au séminaire’ Formes Symboliques’18 octobre 2005) Lawtoo, Nidesh .‘Bataille and the Suspension of Being’, Lingua Romana: a journal of ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 250 French, Italian and Romanian culture, volume 4, issue 1/fall 2005. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss’,in Marcel Mauss, Sociologie et Anthropologie, précédé d’une Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss par Claude Lévi-Strauss, Paris: P.U.F., 1950. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘ L’efficacité symbolique’, Revue de l’histoire des religions, 1949, vol. 135, pp. 5-27. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘La sexualité féminine et l`origine de la société’, Temps Modernes, n˚ 598, mars-avril 1998, p.66-84. Libertson, Joseph ‘ Excess and Imminence: Transgression in Bataille’, in MLN, Vol. 92, No. 5, Compartive Literature (Dec., 1977), p. 1005. Libertson, Joseph. ‘Bataille and Communication: Savoir, Non-Savoir, Glissement, Rire’ in Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons (ed.) On Bataille: Critical Essays, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995, p. 209. Marcel, Jean-Christophe. ‘Bataille et Mauss: un dialogue de sourds?’. Temps modernes, no. 602, 1999 Marshall, Douglas A. ‘Durkheimian Dualism Redux: Homo Duplex and the Origins of Religion’ Masuzawa, Tomoko. ‘The Sacred Difference in the Elementary Forms: On Durkheim’s Last Quest’. Representations, No. 23 (Summer, 1988), pp. 25-50. Mauss, Marcel. Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. In Sociologie et anthropologie, Presses Universitaires de France, 1995. Mehlman, Jeffrey. ‘The “Floating Signifier”: From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan’, Yale French Studies, No. 48, French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis (1972) Meltzer, Françoise .‘On the Question of Aufhebung: Baudelaire, Bataille and Sartre’, RCCS, no. 75 (October 2006), p. 9. Moebius, Stephan.’Über die kollektive Repräsentation des Lebens und des Sakralen: Die Verknüpfung von Durkheim und Nietzsche in Geschichte und Gegenwart der Soziologie und Kulturanthropologie’, p. 3. Nietzsche, Friedrich . Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Zur Genealogie der Moral, Kritische Studienausgabe Herausgegeben von Giorgio Colli und Mazzino Montinari, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag de Gruyter, 1988. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 251 Noys, Benjamin .Georges Bataille: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press, 2000, pp. Panoff, Michel.‘ Marcel Mauss’s “The Gift” Revisited’, in Man, New Series, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Mar., 1970), p. 61. Paoletti, Giovanni .’Durkheim et le problème de l’objectivité: une lecture des Formes él émentaires de la vie religieuse’, Revue française de sociologie. 2002, 43-3. pp. 437-459. Parsons, Talcott Essays in Sociological Action. New York: Glencoe, 1954 Pettit, Philip. ‘Agency-freedom and Option-freedom’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(4), pp. 387-403. Pickering, W. S. F. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984 Pickering, W. S. F. ‘The Eternality of the Sacred: Durkheim’s Error?’. Archives des sciences socials des religions. N. 69, 1990. Pizzorno, Akssandro.‘Politics Unbound.’ In Changing Boundaries of the Political. edited by Charles Maier, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987. Poulet, Régis. ‘Les réponses érotiques de l’art préhistorique: un éclairage bataillien’, dimanche 12 septembre 2010. 網址： http://www.larevuedesressources.org/les-reponses-erotiques-de-l-art-prehistorique-un-eclair age-bataillien,605.html Prades, José . ‘La Religion de l’humanité: Notes sur l’anthropo-centrisme durkheimien’. Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 69, 1990. pp.55-68. Ramel, Fréd é ric. ‘Lévi-Strauss et les relations etrangeres des tribus primitives’. Klesis-Revue philosophique/ Hommage a Claude Lévi-Strauss, 10, 2008. Raschke, Carl. “Bataille’s Gift.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory vol. 5 no. 1 (December 2003): pp. 1-8. Rauch, Leo and David Sherman, Phenomenology of Self-Consciousness: Text and Commentary, New York: State University of New York Press, 1999. Renfrew, Colin. ‘Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: the factuality of value and of the sacred’ in The Sapient Mind: Archaeology Meets Neuroscience, Oxford ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 252 University Press, 2009, pp. 165-176. Richardson, Michael Georges Bataille, London and New York: Routledge, 1994 Richman, Michèle. ‘The sacred group: A Durkeimian perspective on the Collège de sociologie’, Bataille: Writing the sacred, edited by Carolyn Bailey Gill, London and New York: Routledge, 1995 Riley, Alexander T. ‘Renegade Durkheimianism” and the Transgressive/Left Sacred’, p. 2. in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim , Edited by: Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip Smith, 2005. Riley, Alexander T. ‘The Institutional ‘Missing Links’ in the Genealogical Tree Connecting Durkheim to Foucault: A Micro-Sociology of the Journals and Personal Relationships that Made Poststructuralism Durkheimian ‘Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug 10, 2006 Riley, Alexander T. ‘Renegade Durkheimianism” and the Transgressive/Left Sacred’, p.12. in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim , Edited by: Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip Smith, 2005. Riley, Alexander T. ‘The Sacred Calling of Intellectual Labor in Mystic and Ascetic Durkheimianism’European Journal of Sociology (2002), 43: 354-385 Riley, Alexander T. ‘The Intellectural and Political Project of Robert Hertz: The Making of a Peculiar Durkheimian Intellectual, as seen through Selected Correspondence with Pierre Roussel’ Durkheimian Studies, vol. 5, n.s., 1999:29-59. Riley, Alexander T.’Durkheim vs. Bergson? The Hidden Roots of Postmodern Theory and The Postmodern ‘Return’ of the Sacred’. Sociological Perspectives. Vol 45, 2002, pp.257. Riley, Alexander T.’Whence Durkheim’s Nietzschean Grandchildren ?: A Closer Look at Robert Hertz’s Place in the Durkheimian Geneaolgy’in Archives européenes de sociologie/European Journal of Sociology, 40:2, 1999:110-137. Robertson, Fabien’Durkheim: Entre religion et morale’,p. 127-132. Ross, Marina Davila and Michael Owren, Elke Zimmermann, ‘ Reconstructing the Evolution of Laughter in Great Apes and Humans’, Current Biology, Vol19, No 13, 2009, pp. 1-6. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 253 Staum, Martin. ‘Nature and Nuture in French Ethnography and Anthropology, 1859-1914’, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 65, No. 3(2004), pp. 475-495. Steiner, Philippe. ‘Religion et économie. Mauss, Simiand et le programme durkheimien’, in Revue française de sociologie. 2001, 42-4. pp. 695-718. Stoekl, Allan. ‘Truman’s Apotheosis: Bataille, “Planisme,” and Headlessness’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 181-205. Sumpf, Joseph. ‘Durkheim et le problème de l’étude sociologique de la religion’, Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 20m 1965, p.63. Sumpf, Joseph. ‘Linguistique et sociologie’, in Languages, 3e année, n11, 1968 Surkis, Judith, ‘No Fun and Games Until Someone Loses an Eye: Transgression and Masculinity in Bataille and Foucault’, Diacritics, 26.2 (1996), pp. 18-30. Szlezák, Thomas A. Reading Plato, translated by Graham Zanker, London and New York: Routledge, 1993 Tarot, Camille Le symbolisme et le sacré: théorie de la religion ÉDITIONS LA DÉCOUVERTE/M.A.U.S.S. Paris, 2008. Tarot, Camille. ‘Religion, faut-il avoir peur de qui et de quoi?’ In Revue du MAUSS, 2008，網路連結見：http://www.journaldumauss.net/spip.php?article424 Tarot, Camille. ‘Don et grâce, une famille à recomposer?’in Gifts and Interest, Louvain, Peeters, Teixeira, Vincent. Georges Bataille, La part de l’art (la peinture du non-savoir), Paris: l’Harmattan, Ouverture Philosophique, 1997 Testart , Alain and Amy Jacobs, ‘The extent and significance of debt slavery’in Revue française de sociologie. 2002, 43-1. pp. 173-204. Ungar, Steven, ‘Phantom Lascaux: Origin of the Work of Art’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990)< pp. 246-262. Uricoechea, Fernando. ‘Durkheim’s Conception of the Religious Life: a Critique’, in Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 79, 1992. ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 254 Vogt, W. Paul. ‘The Uses of Studying Primitives: A Note on the Durkheimans, 1890-1940’in History and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 1(1976), pp. 33-44. Weiner, Annette B. ‘Inalienable Wealth’in American Ethnologist, Vol. 12, No. 2( May, 1985), pp. 210-227. Weiss, Allen S. ‘Impossible Sovereignty: Between “The Will to Power” and “The Will to Chance”’, October, Vol. 36, Georges Bataille: Writings on Laughter, Sacrifice, Nietzsche, Un-Knowing. (Spring, 1986), White, Richard ‘Bataille on Lascaux and the Origin of Art’, in Janus Head, pp. 319-331. 網址見：http://www.janushead.org/11-2/White.pdf Wilde, Oscar, De Profundis and Other Writings, London: Penguin Books, 1986. Zerilli, Filippo M. ‘Du déménagement comme coupure épistémologique. Durkheim and ethnographical sources’in Revue européenne des sciences sociales, Numéro 129 (2004): La sociologie durkheimienne: tradition et actualité. 三、中文參考資料 1. 巴塔耶的著作中譯《情色論》，賴守正譯，台北：聯經，2012。《色情史》，劉暉譯，北京：商務，2003。《色情、耗費與普遍經濟：喬志․巴塔耶文選》。汪民安編，吉林人民出版社， 2003。 2. 其他中文參考資料三劃子安宣邦《國家與祭祀》，董炳月譯，北京：三聯，2007。四劃 ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 255 毛斯（Marcel Mauss）《禮物》，汲喆譯，上海：人民出版社，2002。毛斯（Marcel Mauss）《社會學與人類學》，余碧平譯，上海：上海譯文出版社， 2003。布勒東（André Breton）《超現實主義宣言》，袁俊生譯，重慶：重慶大學出版社， 2010。巴特（Roland Barthes）《符號禪意東洋風》，孫乃修譯，台北：台灣商務印書館，民國82 年。五劃尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）《扎拉圖斯特拉如是說》，黃明嘉、樓林譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社，2009。尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）《朝霞》，田立年譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社，2007。布朗（Norman Oliver Brown）《生與死的對抗》，馮川、伍厚愷譯，貴陽：貴州人民出版社，1994。古德利爾（Maurice Godelier）《禮物之謎》，王毅譯，上海：上海人民出版社，2007 年。卡西勒（Ernst Cassirer）《語言與神話》，于曉等譯，台北：桂冠，2002。卡西爾（Ernst Cassirer）《神話思維》，黃龍保、周振選譯，北京：中國社會科學出版社，1992。加藤秀俊《餘暇社會學》，彭德中譯，台北：遠流，1989。古迪（Jack Goody）《烹飪、菜餚與階級》，王榮欣、沈南山譯，浙江：浙江大學出版社，2010。皮柏（Josef Pieper）《閒暇：文化的基礎》，劉森堯譯，台北：立緒，2003。六劃伊森˙克萊茵伯格（Ethan Kleinberg）《存在的一代：海德格爾哲學在法國 ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 256 1927-1961》，陳穎譯，北京：新星出版社，2010。七劃克里斯蒂娃（Julia Kristeva）《恐怖的權力：論卑賤》，北京：三聯，2001。佛洛依德（Sigmund Freud）《圖騰與禁忌》，台北：志文出版社，1989。克羅絲（Rosalind E. Krauss）《前衛的原創性》，連德誠譯，台北：遠流，1995。克萊蒙（Catherine B.-Clement）、布律諾（Pierre Bruno）、賽弗（Lucien Seve）《馬克思主義與心理分析》，徐更高譯，台北：南方，民國77 年。余德慧《生命夢屋》，台北：張老師，2010 年。余德慧《生死學十四講》，台北：心靈工坊，2003。余德慧〈探討癌末處境「聖世界」的形成〉，《生死學研究》第三卷，嘉義：南華大學，2006，頁1-58。牟宗三《才性與玄理》，台北：學生書局，2002。牟斯（Marcel Mauss）《禮物：舊社會中交換的形式與功能》汪珍宜、何翠萍譯，台北：遠流（新橋譯叢17），2001。李維史陀（Claude Lévi-Strauss）《廣闊的視野》，肖津等譯，台北：桂冠，2004。杜蒙（Louis Dumont）《階序人》，王志明譯，台北：遠流，2007。李區（Edmund Leach）《上緬甸諸政治體制》，張恭啟、黃道琳譯，台北：唐山，民國92。李基（Richard Leakey）《人類傳奇》，楊玉齡譯，台北：天下文化，1995。李建漳〈「大政治」及「未來哲學」的同一性：對尼采整體哲學的一個詮釋〉《台大文史哲學報》，第七十三期，2010 年11 月。芮克里夫-布朗（A. R. Radcliife-Brown）《社會人類學方法》，夏建中，台北：桂冠， 1991。伊利亞德（Mircea Eliade）《聖與俗—宗教的本質》，楊素娥譯，台北：桂冠，2000。 ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 257 八劃阿岡本（Giorgio Agamben）《例外狀態》，薛熙平譯，台北：麥田，2010。阿倫特，漢娜（Hannah Arendt）《精神生活˙意志》，姜志輝譯，南京：江蘇教育出版社，2006。阿姆斯壯（Karen Armstrong）《神的歷史》，蔡昌雄譯，台北：立緒，2000。拉德克立夫-布朗（A. R. Radcliife-Brown）《原始社會的結構與功能》，潘蛟、王賢海、劉文遠、知寒譯，北京：中央民族大學出版社，1999。果德里耶（Maurice Godelier），〈李維史陀：馬克思及馬克思之後？重新估價結構主義和馬克思主義方法論：一個社會邏輯分析〉，張寧譯，《當代》，第57 期，1991，一月。佩爾尼奧拉（Mario Perniola）《儀式思維》，呂捷譯，北京：商務，2006。佩迪特（Philip Pettit）《共和主義》，南京：江蘇人民出版社，2006。昆德拉，米蘭（Milan Kundera）《被背叛的遺囑》，香港：牛津大學出版社，1993。昆德拉，米蘭《笑忘書》，尉遲秀譯，台北：皇冠，2002。帕茲（Octavio Paz）《雙重火焰》，台北：邊城，2004。帕斯（Octavio Paz）《帕斯選集》，北京：作家出版社，2006。九劃柏拉圖《巴曼尼德斯篇》陳康譯，北京：商務出版社，1997。珍古德（Jane Goodall）《與牠為伴：非洲叢林三十年》，台北：格林，1996。胡蘭成《今日何日兮》，台北：三三書坊，民79 年。十劃涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《宗教生活的基本形式》，芮傳明、趙學元譯，台北：桂冠，1992。涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《宗教生活的基本形式》，渠東、汲喆譯，上海：人民出版社，2010。 ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 258 涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《亂倫禁忌及其起源》，汲喆、付德根、渠東譯，渠東、梅非校，上海：人民出版社，2003。莫斯（Marcel Mauss）《人類學與社會學五講》，桂林：廣西師範大學，2008。馬林諾斯基（B. Malinowski）《南海舡人》，于嘉雲譯，台北：遠流（新橋譯叢）， 1991。馬林諾斯基（B. Malinowski）《神聖的性生活》，何勇譯，北京：知識出版社，1998。馬累德（R. R. Marett）《心理學與民俗學》，曾召銘譯，台北：結構群，1990。莎蒂亞˙德魯里（Shadia Drury）《亞歷山大˙科耶夫：後現代政治的根源》，趙琦譯，北京：新星出版社，2007。倫弗瑞（Colin Renfrew）《史前：文明記憶拼圖》，張明玲譯，台北：貓頭鷹，2010。海德（Lewis Hyde）《禮物的美學：藝術經濟理論的新主張》，台北：商周，2008。十一劃韋伯（Max Weber）《宗教社會學》，康樂、簡惠美譯，台北：遠流，1993 年。韋伯（Max Weber）《支配社會學II》，康樂、簡惠美譯，台北：遠流，1993 年。韋納（Annette Weiner）〈不可異化的財富〉，收錄在童元昭主編《群島之洋：人類學的大洋洲研究》，台北：商務，2009，頁115-148。朗佩特（Laurence Lampert）《尼采的使命：善惡的彼岸解讀》，李致遠、李小均譯，北京：華夏出版社，2009。埃文斯-普李查德（E. E. Evans-Pritchard）《原始宗教理論》，孫尚揚譯，北京：商務印書館，2001。菲立普，亞當（Adam Phillips）《吻、搔癢與煩悶》，陳信宏譯，台北：究竟，2000。袁瓊瓊〈我一直懷疑〉，《壹週刊》，No. 571, 2012, 5/3, pp. 138-39. 十二劃納斯鮑姆（Martha Nussbaum）《善的脆弱性》，徐向東、陸萌譯，上海：譯林出版社，2007。 ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 259 斯勒扎克（Thomas Szlezak）《讀柏拉圖》，程煒譯，上海：譯林出版社，2009。湯淺博雄，《巴塔耶：消盡》，趙漢英譯，河北：河北教育出版社，2001 年。勞思光《新編中國哲學史》，台北：三民，民國80 年。黃胤毓〈滲透太陽（身體）的攝影機介質—論三島由紀夫影像肉體論的內攝與官能燔〉，《文化研究月報》，109 期，Oct. 2010，頁1-29。喜戒禪師《佛陀親授四正念的四個練習》，賴隆彥譯，台北：橡樹林，2005。彭羅斯（Roger Penrose）《皇帝新腦》，許明賢、吳忠超譯，台北：藝文印書館，民國82 年。十四劃蔡錚雲《從現象學到後現代》，台北：三民，1995。蔡淑玲〈巴岱儀的否定與逾越〉，《中外文學》，第24 卷，第2 期，1995 年7 月，頁116-127。赫爾茲，羅伯特（Robert Hertz）《死亡與右手》，吳鳳玲譯，上海：上海人民出版社，2011。十五劃蔣年豐《與西洋哲學對話》，台北：桂冠，2005。德貢布，文森特（Vincent Descombes）《當代法國哲學》，北京：新星出版社，2007。諾齊克（Robert Nozick）《經過省查的人生—哲學沈思錄》，嚴忠志、歐陽雅麗譯，北京：商務印書館，2007。十六劃劉小楓《柏拉圖的會飲》，北京：華夏出版社，2003。劉小楓〈尼采的微言大義〉，《尼采與神學》，《道風：基督教文化評論》，第十三期，2000，頁13-64。 ‧ 國立政治大學 ‧ N at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y 260 賴俊雄編《他者哲學：回歸列維納斯》，台北：麥田，2009 年。賴軍維〈薩德侯爵的神學關：「惡魔化」的上帝與「情色」書寫〉，《中外文學》 33 卷，第10 期（2005/3 月）。賴軍維〈薩德侯爵的情色理論〉，《中外文學》34 卷，第2 期（2005/7 月）。十七劃薩林斯（Marshall Sahlins）《石器時代經濟學》，張經緯、鄭少雄、張帆譯，北京：三聯，2009。十九劃譚家哲《形上史論》，台北：唐山，2006 年。魏德驥《形上學中的存有問題—柏拉圖形上學的存有問題》，台灣大學哲學研究所博士論文，2004。二十劃顧迪（Jack Goody）《飲食與愛情》，楊惠君譯，台北：聯經，2004。
Description:	博士國立政治大學哲學研究所 90154503 100
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901545031
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Philosophy] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
503101.pdf		20049Kb	Adobe PDF2	4664	View/Open
503102.pdf		40Kb	Adobe PDF2	952	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback