English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50829491      Online Users : 798
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55954


    Title: 論僱用人保護照顧義務之具體內容
    Other Titles: Research on the Actual Content of the Employer$S Duty to Care for Employee Safety and Health
    Authors: 徐婉寧
    Contributors: 國立政治大學法律學系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 保護照顧義務;安全配慮義務;民事損害賠償責任;債務不履行;民法第483條之1;勞工安全衛生法;職業災害
    employer‘s duty to care for employee safety and health;liability for non-performance of an obligation in a contract relationship;responsibility for damages under the Civil Code;Civil Code §483-1;personal injury;Labor Safety and Health Act
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 09:38:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 民法債編自1999年修正以來，增訂了民法第483條之1，將僱用人之保護照顧義務明文化。然而由於民法第483條之1乃係一抽象規定，對於保護照顧義務之具體內容並未加以規定，因此如何特定保護照顧義務之內容，據以主張僱用人之債務不履行損害賠償責任，對受僱人而言即為一棘手的課題。 綜觀我國司法實務，事實上對於保護照顧義務之具體內容加以闡明或判斷者實如鳳毛麟角，學界對此亦未多所著墨。本研究擬先透過日本法上安全配慮義務之法理論與司法實務之研究分析，建立安全配慮義務完整的概念體系，並進而從理論與實務之雙重面向上，彌補國內對保護照顧義務未為有系統的研究且未深入探討其具體內容，亦未全面性的整理相關法院判決之缺憾，並進而分析台日間之制度差異，試圖提出適用於台灣實務運用的參考。
    Civil Code §483-1 was enacted and promulgated in 1999,and the employer`s duty to care for employee safety and health becomes a statutory one. However, when the employee pursues the employer`s responsibility for damages in the legal context of an exploration of liability for non-performance of an obligation in a contract relationship under the Civil Code, it is very difficult for the employee to specify the content of the violation of the duty to care for safety because Civil Code §483-1 is very abstract. In praxis of Jurisdiction in Taiwan it seems not usually to specify the actual content of the employer`s such duty, neither do scholarly opinions. From the both theoretical and practical aspects, through an analysis of the Japan experiences and the reflection on jurisdiction in Taiwan, this research will construct a framework of the actual content of the employer`s duty to care for safety.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:10008~ 10107
    研究經費:253仟元
    行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC100-2410-H004-037
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100-2410-H004-037.pdf699KbAdobe PDF2943View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback