English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50827853      Online Users : 501
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55905


    Title: 以美國聯邦最高法院KSR案為借鏡再建構我國專利法下專利進步性要件之合理詮釋
    Other Titles: Reconstruction of Legal Interpretation of Non-Obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Law through Examining KSR Case of U.S. Supreme Court
    Authors: 沈宗倫
    Contributors: 國立政治大學法律學系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 進步性;教示因果關係;先前技術;組合專利;發明;專利;專利審查;專利侵害;技術創新;技術實效
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 09:37:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 專利進步性不僅是專利的適格要件，亦為專利法下控制專利授予品質的重要條件。向來，專利進步性一直為行政爭訟案件的爭議中心，現今，智慧財案件審理法已公布實施，專利進步性更進一步成為專利侵權訴訟的侵權抗辯事由。由此顯見專利進步性於專利法下的重要性。雖然我國關於專利進步性的判決累積一定龐大的數量，但似無明確地建立專利「進步性」的法理基礎與解釋判斷原則。再加之，美國聯邦最高法院KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.的判決，就組合發明與先前技術的教示因果關係，於專利進步性的詮釋上，提出新的法理，該法理對於專利進步性判斷原則的發展，有相當的影響。基於上述的理由，本研究計畫將以比較法的觀點，藉由對於美國專利法與歐洲專利法的借鏡與檢討，嘗試建構我國專利法體系下的專利進步性判斷原則與合理詮釋。
    Not only is non-obviousness the patentable requirement, but also a significant condition for controlling patent quality. Non-obviousness has been being the focus of the disputes on patentability under administrative law. Currently, it also has reached out to become a defense against patent infringement since Taiwanese Trial Law on Intellectual Property Cases came into effect. Although many judicial cases on the issue of non-obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Act have been made, it seems that the fundamental jurisprudence and the object test on non-obviousness have not been completely established. Additionally, KSR case under U.S. Supreme Court brought new patent jurisprudence into interpretation of non-obviousness, especially on the causation between prior arts and combined inventions. In view of reasons above-mentioned, this research project would attempt to construct the object test and the interpretation principle for non-obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Law, through the comparative view of U.S. and European experiences.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9908~ 10007
    研究經費:490仟元
    行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC99-2410-H004-222
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    99-2410-H004-222.pdf680KbAdobe PDF2547View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback