English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51580742      Online Users : 1004
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55835


    Title: 自由心證之研究 (II)
    Other Titles: Freie Beweiswuerdigung
    Authors: 姜世明
    Contributors: 國立政治大學法律學系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 自由心證;蓋然性;經驗法則;事實認定;證據評價;證明度
    the free evaluation of the evidence;indiz;burden of Proof;experience principal;standard of Proof
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 09:35:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自由心證主義係民事證據法中關於法官認定事實之核心原則，其對於法官認定事實給予一定程度彈性空間，而得避免因僵化法定證據原則，造成具體個案上難以實現真實發現之訴訟法理想。但因此一原則有較為不明確之內涵，容易造成誤解，若操作不慎，其對於法治國原則所要求之法律安定性及法官依法裁判之原則，極易形成威脅，司法公信力經常因此而受到挑戰。我國學者對自由心證主義已有所注意，其研究成果甚值重視。本研究擬在國內既有研究成果之基礎下，引介德國、奧國及瑞士等國之法學者思想及其實務操作成果，並對於我國實務上判決及實務家之思考背景與方式，進行本土性實證研究及比對，用以尋得自由心證主義在我國被濫用或污名化之原因，並探求解決之途徑。
    In civil evidence law, the doctrine of free evaluation of the evidence is the key principal, which provides some flexibility for judges to affirm facts and can avoid the rigid legal evidence principal to block the purpose of civil procedure law in discovering the objective truth. However, this principal is easily caused misunderstanding because of its ambiguous contents. If judges abuse this principal, it may threaten the essential foundations of the legal stability under rule-of-law principal and the principal of judge by law and therefore make the judicial faith be challenged. The scholars in Taiwan have paid attention to 「the doctrine of free evaluation of the evidence」 and delivered some valuable research articles. This article not only introduces relevant theories in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and the judicial practical results of those countries, but also compares our domestic legal research with domestic judicial verdicts and relevant ways of thoughts of the judges. Through the legal research, this article hopes to find out the reasons why the free evaluation of the evidence principal is abused and notorious in our country, and figure out the solution as well.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9708~ 9807
    研究經費:566仟元
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2458View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback