English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50828665      Online Users : 690
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55816


    Title: 公平交易法實務見解之體系化及爭議問題研析 (I)
    Other Titles: Systematization of the Practice of the Fair Trade Commission and the Study of Relating Controversial Problems
    Authors: 吳秀明
    Contributors: 國立政治大學法律學系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 公平交易法;競爭法;聯合行為;卡特爾;獨占;獨占性訂價;阻礙濫用;榨取濫用;比較市場;促進行為
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 09:33:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國公平交易法自民國八十一年二月四日施行至今,已有十四年多,各屆之委員會,從篳路藍縷,開創法制,到逐步穩定與展開我國競爭法制之規範,可謂貢獻有加。而公平法歷經十幾年之實務發展,也產生了豐富而複雜之實務見解與眾多之案例。雖然公平會不斷總結其執法經驗,持續公佈具有通案性質之處理原則與規範說明,明顯有助於闡釋法律之內容,穩定法律之適用。但在各個要件與相關問題上,實務見解之內容與理路脈絡如何,仍有諸多不明與疑義之處,有待予以檢視與檢討。公平法之發展可說已經到了一個應將實務見解予以進一步體系化、理論化的時候了。將實務體系化與理論化、從零碎之眾多案例產生有意義之原理原則,乃每一法律領域所必須從事之工作。因為法律要解決爭端、帶來秩序,其本身就不能沒有秩序。而本計畫所欲從事者,正是以三年時間進行此一基礎性之研究工作。本研究計畫擬將公平交易法之條文分為三大部分,每年進行一個部份,依次針對有關條文之實務案例與見解進行類型化、體系化與理論化之研究工作。此三大部分分別為:一、公平交易法第一條至第十七條;二、公平法第十八條至第二十四條;三、公平法第二十五條至第四十九條。申請人將依據競爭法上關於各種違法行為之相關學理,先就各違法行為類型設計違法判斷之基本理論架構,並以此一架構作為分析實務見解之初步依據。然後以現有之各項實務研究成果為根基,除對其所處理之舊有實務案例與見解重新檢視外,也進一步蒐集整理最新之相關實務案例及見解,以進行各條實務見解體系化與理論化之工作。
    The Taiwanese competition authority, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), has made over 2000 decisions in accordance with the Fair Trade Law(FTL) in the past 14 years. In addition to the Commission』s decisions, there are also hundreds of sentences made by the normal Courts and by the administrative Courts. Owing to the huge quantity of the decisions as well as of the sentences it is no more easy to attain a clear picture of the practice of the FTC and the Courts. Moreover, the FTC can sometimes handle the cases only according to very vague elements of the articles, such as the cases of §24 of the FTL. Therefore it is necessary to analyze the existing decisions and the sentences and to set up a framework or system which can clarify the contents of the FTL. To form such a system of the practices relating to the FTL, i.e. to systematize the practices of the Commission and the Courts, can not only help the Courts, FTC and the undertakings to comprehend the full context of the FTL, but also avoid the improperly extending application of it. Based on the theories of competition law on the one hand and the practical materials on the other hand, this 3-year-project attempts to construct a systematical framework of the practical opinions, in order to improve the transparency of the contents of the FTL. Besides, the main problems emerging from individual category of illegal practices are to be analyzed at the same time. The purpose of this project is to explore the fundamentals of the practice of the FTC, to research the developments and the methodological meanings of them and to solve the problems resulting from the application of the FTL. We believe, for a competition law with relatively short history, such basic study is not only needed, but also essential.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9608~ 9707
    研究經費:755仟元
    行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC96-2414-H004-006-MY3
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    96-2414-H004-006-MY3(I).PDF170KbAdobe PDF2616View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback