政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/55789
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51593909      Online Users : 894
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Law > Department of Law > NSC Projects  >  Item 140.119/55789


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55789


    Title: 證明度之研究
    Other Titles: Beweismass
    Authors: 姜世明
    Contributors: 國立政治大學法律學系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 證明度;自由心證;蓋然性;優越蓋然性;確信;舉證責任
    Level of proof;probability;superior probability;know for sure;burden of proof
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2012-11-26 09:32:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The Court』s main activities in Civil Procedure are to determine facts and to apply the laws, in which the former is prerequisite to the latter. Thus, there is no doubt about the importance of fact-determining in Civil Procedure. Although the Law of Civil Procedure has already provided some methods and procedure to determine facts, how exactly should the Court decide on the truthfulness of fact, i.e., what level of proof is required to reach a verdict, still remains in dispute. Theories such as 「almost confirmed truthfulness」, 「superior probability and 「high probability beyond common doubt」 are provided to solve this issue. But because these theories are still very abstract, the risk of judges』 arbitrariness still remain. The uncertainty and the difficulty to review any verdict even cause the distrust on the court among the public. To solve this problem, the theory of 「reliable level of proof」 has been brought up. This research project will review articles from Germany, Austria, and the Switzland. It will analyze the function, standard, and exceptions to the requirment of proof. By linking the jurisprudence practice of the Court, we hope to clarify this issue and build up a reasonable standard.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9408~ 9507
    研究經費:543仟元
    行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC94-2414-H004-062
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] NSC Projects

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    94-2414-H004-062.pdf539KbAdobe PDF2802View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback