政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/55108
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113160/144130 (79%)
Visitors : 50753766      Online Users : 733
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/55108


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55108


    Title: 利用IT支援毒品防制政策推動之研究-現行毒品防制策略之困境與改善芻議
    The efficacy enhancement strategy of drug abuse prevention through information management approach----Key problems focusing of current drug policy and some suggestions
    Authors: 陳泉錫
    Chen, Chuan Hsi
    Contributors: 季延平
    詹中原
    Chi, Yan Pin
    Jan, Chung yuang
    陳泉錫
    Chen, Chuan Hsi
    Keywords: 美沙酮
    再犯率
    毒品危害防制中心
    毒癮者
    減害
    資料探勘
    Methadone Maintenance Treatment
    Recidivism
    Drug Abuse Prevention Center
    Addicts
    Harm Reduction
    Data Mining
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2012-11-01 13:48:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 毒品濫用問題乃世界各國共通之施政難題，我國政府於1993年宣布向毒品宣戰，並在2005年8月引進美沙酮替代療法（Methadone Maintenance Treatment，MMT），於全國各縣市推動毒品減害計畫。但歷經十餘年之努力，毒品人口與整體毒品再犯率截至2010年底並未明顯降低，足見毒品防制政策有全面檢視問題癥結，重新調整執行策略之必要。本研究就此現象探討三項議題：1.毒品防制領域，IT有無著力之空間？ 2.以美沙酮替代療法為主之毒品防制策略在台灣地區推行是否發揮預期的效果？現行做法有無改善空間？ 3.出監毒癮者復歸社會後再犯率高，其最需要政府的幫助為何，方能有效降低再犯毒品罪之誘因？。三項議題互為關聯。
    本研究探訪毒品防制第一線工作人員，並參考國內外毒品減害文獻，歸納目前毒品危害防制工作推動上的困境，探究IT可出力之空間，並提出“毒品成癮者資訊總歸戶”的概念。整合法務、警政、衛生醫療等毒品防制資訊，建立跨部會即時歸戶資料庫並建立部會間協同作業之標準作業程序（SOP），以提升毒品防制工作之效率。進而運用歸戶系統之客觀數據，評量毒品替代療法政策之推行成效，並實際訪問領域專家及調查毒品犯社會適應之困難與需求，以歸納具體、可行之解決方案。
    研究發現資訊系統可改善毒品危害防制中心效率，但不能單獨讓毒品防制工作之網絡有效運轉，現行毒品防制組織、制度問題之發現與解決更是關鍵。本文並依客觀數據之分析及實地訪問、調查結果，提出多項制度變革之建議，以供政府權責機關參採。
    Background:Drug abuse problems have been a global concern issue. Taiwan’s government introduced Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) in Aug. 2005, now it has become one of the major strategies in fighting drug abuse. Whereas, up to 2010 MMT strategy still not shows effectiveness in reduce drug population and recidivism. The aim of this study is to: Provide the value to the Drug Abuse Provention System in R.O.C.through IT approach,and to evaluate whether MMT is performed adequately in Taiwan.If not,what are the key factors? The study will provide objective evidence and suggestions to authorities for better decision making. Methods: This study used Prove of Concept (POC) and experiment approachs. Build software system and SOP to prove the concept of “National Drug Addicts Supporting and Monitoring System (NDASMS)” can enhance the efficiency of Information Intergration among government agencies of drug prevention effectively. The study also used the data of NDASMS to evaluate the efficacy of MMT implementation in Taiwan, and find the reasons why MMT dose not work as expected. Result: The IT approach have been proved that enhance the infromation integration effectively among agencies, but IT can,t make the Chain of National Drug Provention Mechanism improve alone.The adequacy of MMT implementation and its supporting measures in Taiwan need to be further examined.
    Reference: 中文文獻：
    1. 陳應禮（1999），《臺灣講古》，自印 ，1999
    2. 韋海浪（2005）， “海洛因成癮者接受美沙酮替代療法之短期戒癮”， 取自 http：//ir.ym.edu.tw/ir/bitstream/987654321/2556/1/59310012_abstract.pdf
    3. 徐森杰（2005），“香港美沙酮減害計畫年”，取自http：//www.lourdes.org.tw/Uploads
    4. 林長春（2006），《毒品防治法制之研究，中山大學碩士論文》，頁2、頁259
    5. 行政院研考會(2006)，《毒品防制政策整體規劃報告(95-97核定版) 》，2006年5月，頁4-7
    6. 行政院衛生署（2006），《毒品病患愛滋減害試辦計畫》，頁8， 取自：http：//www.cdc.gov.tw/ct.asp？xItem=11244&ctNode=1885&mp=1
    7. 許淑雲（2006）， 《靜脈注射藥癮者對減害計畫需求評估~以台中監獄、雲林及嘉義戒治所為例》， 亞洲大學碩士論文
    8. 黃營彬、汪志堅（2006），《研究方法》，華泰文化事業公司，頁251
    9. 李思賢（2006）。”藥癮再犯罪成因與心理治療介入的可行性：出監毒癮者之回溯性與前瞻性追蹤研究”。公共衛生學會聯合年會：暴力與傷害預防大會。
    10. 法務部矯正司（2007），”矯正司部務會報報告:監獄毒品犯矯正策略之檢視與展望”，2007年11月
    11. 陳泉錫（2008），“建立毒品成癮者單一窗口服務－毒品防制政策之策略規劃建議”，《研考雙月刊》，第32卷，第1期，66-76。
    12. 陳泉錫、林雪蓉等（2008），《行政院及所屬機關出國報告—澳洲香港減害計畫參訪》 2008.12.3，頁17
    URL： http：//www.moj.gov.tw/public/Attachment/1101912322771.pdf
    13. 陳泉錫、林雪蓉等（2008a）：“澳洲藥癮機關組織”。 《行政院及所屬機關出國報告—澳洲香港減害計畫參訪》，2008a; 頁39
    14. 法務部矯正司（2009），“建構毒品成癮者之本土戒治模式第一，二，三階段研討會會議紀錄彙整報告” 2009.02.04， 頁3-1、3-2
    15. 法務部統計處（2010），“執行毒品案件裁判確定有罪人數”。《法務統計摘要》2010年1月21日，頁12， 表3。
    16. 法務部統計處（2010a），“執行毒品案件裁判確定有罪人數即再累犯情形”， 《法務統計摘要》，2010年1月21日，頁12， 表4。
    17. 法務部統計處（2010）：“地方法院檢察署實施毒品減害計畫成效統計表”（99年檢察長會議報告資料，資料收集期間：99/1-99/10）。台北：法務部統計處。
    18. 法務部資訊處（2010），“各縣市毒品危害防治中心強制列管個案統計表” 2010.12 ; 頁6。
    19. 楊士隆，李寧（2010），“藥物法庭在台灣實施之可行性研究”，《中國藥物依賴性雜誌》，19（4）：290-296
    20. 行政院 （2010），“行政院回覆監察院函” 2010年4月29日院臺法字第0990023109號，取自http：//www.cy.gov.tw/AP_Home/Upload/eDoc_t02_document/586/98%E5%8F%B8%E6%AD%A34.doc
    21. 吳耀宗（2010），“論我國毒品管制之法政策走向從戡亂時期肅清煙毒條例至毒品危害防制條例”，《月旦法學雜誌》（第180期），，5
    22. 詹中原、陳泉錫，“台灣毒品防制政策成效未能彰顯之成因探究” 台灣衛誌 2011， Vol.30， No.6，604-616
    23. 戴伸峰，曾淑萍，楊士隆（2011）， “台灣地區非法藥物濫用高危險群青少年對現行毒品防治政策成效及戒毒成功因素評估之實證研究”，《青少年犯罪防治研究期刊》3卷2期
    24. 林俊宏（2011），《地方毒品危害防制中心的實際運作-政策網絡的分析》，政大公共行政學位論文，http：//nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51604）
    25. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2011)，《毒品減害措施之研究》 RDEC-RES-099-025，2011.8.
    26. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2009)：《毒品防制政策整體規劃報告（RDEC-RES-097-001）》，http：//www.rdec.gov.tw/public/PlanAttach/200906061627208001812.pdf。
    27. 法務部統計處（2012），“執行毒品案件裁判確定有罪人數”。《法務統計摘要》，2012年1月，頁3。
    28. MBA智庫百科， 取自 http：//wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5%E6%96%B9%E6%A0%BC%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B
     
    英文文獻：
    1. Albert L. Lederer and Vijay Sethi (1988), “The Implementation of Strategic Information Systems Planning Methodologies”, MIS Quarterly; 12( 3): 445-461, URL： http：//www.jstor.org/stable/249212
    2. Albert Sargent,Jr. (2006) “Outsourcing Relationship Literature: An Examination and Implication for Future Research”, ACM SIGMIS-CPR Apr.2006
    3. Ritter A., Cameron J. (2005), “A systematic review of harm reduction”, Drug Policy Modelling Projectmonograph 06,Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre. pp.3
    4. Ball and Ross (1991), The effectiveness of methodone maintenance treatment： patient programmes, service, and outcomes. New York： Springer-Verlag. 1991; pp.160-176
    5. Benjamin B.M. Shao, Julie Smith David, (2007). “The impact of offshore outsourcing on IT worker in developed countries” Communication of the ACM, 50(2): 89.
    6. Bin Jiang & Amer Qureshi (2006) “Research on outsourcing results: current literature and future opportunities”,Management Decision. London: 2006; 44(1): 44-55.
    7. Booth RE, Crowley T, Zhang Y. (1996), “Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and efectiveness： out-of-treatment opiate injection drug users”.Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 42:11–20.
    8. Bowen GA. “Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts”. Int J Qual Meth 2006; 5:1-9.
    9. Bowman、Davis 及Wetherbe http：//www.cs.nchu.edu.tw/~fileman/notepad/sa01.htm
    10. Drug Court of New South Wales (2010), Drug Court Program http：//www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/drug_court/ll_drugcourt.nsf/pages/adrgcrt_program, last accessed： Dec. 12, 2010
    11. David S. Metzger, et al. (1993), “Human Immunodeficiency Virus Seroconversion Among Intravenous Drug Users In- and Out-of-Treatment： An 18-Month Prospective Follow-Up”, Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes; 6(9) :969-976.
    12. David S. Metzger and Helen Navaline (2003),“Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention and the Potential of Drug Abuse Treatment”,Clinical Infectious Diseases；37：451–456
    13. David Wellbourne-Wood (1999),“Harm reduction in Australia： some problems putting policy into practice”,International Journal of Drug Policy;10：403–413
    14. Debbie Tesch & Timothy J Kloppenborg & Mark N Frolick (2007),“It Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Professionals Perspective”, The Journal of Computer Information Systems. 47(4): 61-69.
    15. Debdas Ganguly (2007),“Strategic Fit Of Mis Plan With Organisation Culture – A Milestone In Organisatioal Success” Vidyasagar University Journal of Commerce; 12：80-84
    16. Deflem Mathieu (2006). Sociological Theory and Criminological Research： Views from Europe and the United States. Elsevier. 2006, pp. 279. ISBN 0-7623-1322-6.
    17. De Leon, G. (1989),“Psychopathology and substance abuse: What is being learnedfrom research in therapeutic communities”. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs; 21:177-188
    18. Haden, Mark (2004), “Regulation of Illegal Drugs： An Exploration of Public Health Tools.” International Journal of Drug Policy; 15(4): 225- 230.
    19. Hendree E. Jones. (2004),“Practical Considerations for the Clinical Use of Buprenorphine”, Science& Practice perspectives; 2(2)：4–20.
    20. Jo Kimber et al (2010). Harm reduction： evidence, impacts and challenges EMCDDA MONOGRAPHS 2010, pp.116
    21. Joseph E. Schumacher, Gabriele Fischer, Han-Zhu Qian (2007),“Policy drives harm reduction for drug abuse and HIV/AIDS prevention in some developing countries¬_ CPDD News and views’, Drug and Alcohol Dependence;91: 300–305
    22. Kerlinger F, Lee HB (1999), Foundation of Behavioral Research. U.S： Wadsworth Publishing; pp.588.
    23. Kintz P., Marquet, P. ((2002), Buprenorphine Therapy of Opiate Addiction, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. pp.148
    24. Kreek, M.J. (1991), “Using methadone effectively： achieving goals by application of laboratory, clinical, and evaluation research and by development of innovative programs”, NIDA Research Monograph 106, pp. 245–266.
    25. McFarlan, McKenny, Cash, Applegate (1992),Corporate information strategy and management: Text and Cases, 3rd Edition Irwin, pp.628
    26. Midford R, Acres J, Lenton S, Loxley W, Boots K. (2002), “Cops,drugs and the community: establishing consultative harm reduction structures in two Western Australian locations” International Journal of Drug Policy ,2002; 13: 181-8
    27. NIDA, (1991),“Treatment Outcomes for Drug Abuse Clients” U.S. Department of Health and Humanservices, Research Monograph 106, pp. 93.
    28. Padgett DK. (1998), Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research： Challenges and Rewards. California: SAGE Publication, 1998; pp.126.
    29. Ralph H. Sprague, Jr. Barbara C. McNurlin (1993), Information Systems Management in Practice, pp.255
    30. Richard P Mattick, Courtney Breen (2009）, “Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence” Published Online： 8 JUL 2009, Assessed: 18 FEB. 2009, http：//onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002209.pub2/abstract
    31. Richard Midford , John Acres, Simon Lenton, Wendy Loxley, Kevin Boots (2002),“Cops, drugs and the community： establishing consultative harmreduction structures in two Western Australian locations”, International Journal of Drug Policy; 13 : 181-188
    32. Ritter, A. & Cameron, J. (2005). “A systematic review of harm reduction. Monograph No. 06, DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy:Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre; pp.3
    33. Robert Klepper, Wendell Jones (1998), Outsourcing Information Technology, System & Services , Prentice Hall p.79,
    34. Roy W. Pickens, Carl G. Leukefeld, D.S.W.,Charles R. Schuster (1991), “Overview of Treatment Issues”, U.S. Department Of Health And Humanservices, Research Monograph 106； pp.1-19.
    35. Schumacher JE, Fischer G, Qian HZ (2007), “Policy drives harm reduction for drug abuse and HIV/AIDS prevention in some developing countries.” Drug Alcohol Depend; 91: 300-304.
    36. Simpson DD, Sells SB (1982), “Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: an overview of the DARP research program”. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse; 2（1）：7-29.
    37. Stitzer, Maxine L., Iguchi, Martin Y., Felch, Linda J. (1992), “Contingent take-home incentive： Effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60（6）: 927-934
    38. Strauss AL. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. London： Cambridge University Press
    39. Tims FM, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL. (1991), “Treatment Outcomes for Drug Abuse Clients” NIDA, Research Monograph 106; pp.93-113.
    40. Tim Rhodes and Dagmar hedrich (2010), EMCDDA MONOGRAPHS 2010 “Harm Reduction: Evidence, impacts and challenges”, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction （EMCDDA）, Available at: http://europa.eu pp.48
    41. Wellbourne-Wood D. (1999), “Harm reduction in Australia: some problems putting policy into practice”. International Journal of Drug Policy; 10: 403-415
    42. Wikipedia (2011), Accessed May. 2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_concept#cite_ref-2
    43. World Health Organization（WHO） Western Pacific Region (2006), “Integration of Harm Reduction Into Abstinence-Based Therapeutic Communities—A case Study of We Help Ourselves ,Australia”, WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    96356506
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096356506
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    650601.pdf3227KbAdobe PDF21940View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback