政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/55067
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51082101      線上人數 : 914
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55067


    題名: 從議題所有權看競選廣告-以2012總統大選為例
    Political advertising in the 2012 presidential campaign:from a view of issue ownership
    作者: 許倍甄
    Hsu, Pei Chen
    貢獻者: 俞振華
    Yu, Eric Chen Hua
    許倍甄
    Hsu, Pei Chen
    關鍵詞: 議題所有權
    議題聚合
    議題入侵
    政黨認同
    廣告策略
    日期: 2012
    上傳時間: 2012-10-30 15:24:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文主旨乃透過議題所有權的角度，探討政黨競選廣告的策略。民眾認知構成議題所有權的形成，而台灣民主化時程尚短，本文觀察台灣民眾是否可以基於過去觀察政黨競爭的經驗，建立議題所有權認知。而如果民眾確實對於政黨具有議題所有權認知，則該認知是長期穩定的，還是短期浮動的？此外，本研究透過議題所有權、議題聚合、及議題入侵等三項概念分析國民兩黨在2012年的總統大選電視競選廣告，並藉以探討政黨是否善用其議題所有權。

    筆者透過t檢定以及相關統計圖表，分析台灣民眾2006-2012年的議題所有權認知，以及透過內容分析法，分析2012年總統大選中，政黨電視廣告議題策略運用。研究結果發現，台灣民眾具有長期而穩定的議題所有權認知，且民眾的政黨支持和議題所有權認知有其關聯性。大部分民眾還會偏向認為他們所支持的政黨，處理各項議題的能力較好，這樣的認知在政黨認同上有明顯的差異性。而在2012年國民兩黨的電視競選廣告策略方面，這次無論是在位者或是挑戰者，所採用的都是議題聚合策略，把主力放在民眾所關心的議題上，不過由於候選人角色不同，廣告的表現形式也有所不同。在位者（馬陣營）的廣告策略為議題聚合形式搭配正面廣告或攻守俱備的廣告，著重在自身政績的傳達；而挑戰者（蔡陣營）的廣告策略為議題聚合形式搭配負面廣告或攻守俱備的手法，著重在傳達馬政府執政不佳以及自身領導形象，台灣此次的競選中強調議題聚合現象的比例十分的高。
    參考文獻:  中文資料
    張卿卿，2000，〈美國政治競選廣告效果研究的回顧〉，《廣告學研究》，14：1-29。
    張卿卿，2002，〈競選媒體使用對競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響-以兩千年總統大選為例〉，《選舉研究》，9(1)：1-39。
    張卿卿，2009，〈競選廣告之效果探討：以議題所有權策略為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，16：94-128。
    張卿卿，2010，〈競選廣告與議題/特質所有權任知〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，11(1)：31-70。
    鈕則勳，2001，〈以語意觀點解析公元2000年總統大選扁陣營之電視競選廣告〉，《人文學報》，5(25)：83-104。
    鈕則勳，2003，〈政黨輪替後國民黨之廣告策略：以2001年選舉之攻擊廣告為例〉，《理論與政策》，17(1)：53-86
    鈕則勳，2004，〈2002年選舉馬英九的競選廣告策略：領導品牌之政治行銷〉，《華岡社科學報》，18：61-86
    鈕則勳，2007，〈競選廣告初探：以2004年總統大選陳呂陣營為例〉，《台灣民主季刊》，4(1)：141-178
    陳靜芬，1997，〈一九九六年總統大選期間之議題探析-議題設定理論的觀點〉，政治大學碩士論文。
    劉正山，2009，〈2008總統大選競選期間政黨支持者選擇性接觸媒體傾向的分析〉，《選舉研究》，16(2)：51-70。
    倪炎元，2009，《公關政治學》，台北，商周出版。
    陳兆熙，1984，《美國民意、大眾傳播與政治》，台北，文中。
    鈕則勳，2002，《競選傳播策略：理論與實務》，台北，韋伯文化。
    鄭自隆，1992，《競選文宣策略廣告、傳播與政治行銷》，台北，遠流。
    鄭自隆，1995，《競選廣告 -- 理論、策略、研究案例》，台北：正中。
     英文資料
    Abbe, O. G., Goodliffe, J., Herrnson, P. S., and Patterson, K. D. 2003. “Agenda Setting in Congressional Elections: The impact of Issues and Campaigns on Voting behavior”. Political Research Quarterly 56: 419-430.
    Aldrich, John H., and John D. Griffin. 2003. “The Presidency and the Campaign: Creating Voter Priorities in the 2000 Election” In Michael Nelson, ed., The Presidency and the Political System, 7th ed.Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly.
    Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claming the Ownership over issue”. Public opinion Quarterly 58(3): 335-337.
    Ansolabehere, S, Iyengar S. 1997. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Divides and Shrinks the American Electorate., New York: Free Press.
    Baker, et al. 2010. “Research Synthesis: AAPOR Report on Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(4): 711-81.
    Belanger, E. 2003. “Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties 1953-2001”. Canadian Journal of Political sxience 36: 539-558
    Benoit, W. L. 2004. “Political Party Affiliation and Presidential Campaign discourse.” Communication Quarterly 52(2): 81-97.
    Budge, Ian and Farlie, Dennis. 1983. Explaining and predicting elections : issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
    Campbell, M. C. 1995. “When Attention-getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent: The Important of Balancing Benefit and Investments.” Journal of Consumer Research 4(3): 225-255.
    Chang, C. 2003. “Party Bias in Political Advertising Processing: Results From an Experiment Involving the 1998 Taipei Mayor Election.” Journal of Advertising 32(2): 55-67.
    Chang, C. 2007. “The Interplay of Candidate-Initiated and Journalist-Initiated Agendas in the 1996 and 2004 Taiwan Presidential Elections.”Asian Journal of Communication 17(1): 1-23.
    Cohen, G. L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5): 808-822.
    Damore, D. F. 2004. “The Dynamics of Issue Qwnership in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 391-397.
    Damore, D. F. 2005. “Issue Convergence in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Behavior 27(1): 71-97.
    Denton, Robert E. jr. & Woodward, Gary C. 1990. “Political Communication in America”. New York, Westport, London: Praeger.
    Dewey, J. 1954. “The Public And Its Problems.” Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
    Hayes, D. 2005. “Candidate Qualities Through a Partisan Lens: A theory of trait ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908-923.
    Iyengar, S., McGrady, J. 2007. “Media politics: A citizen’s guide.” New York: W. W. Norton.
    Johnson-Cartee, K. S., Copeland, G. A. 1991. Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Johnson-Cartee, K. S., Copeland, G. A. 1997. “The Manipulation of the American Voter.” London: Praeger.
    Kaid, L. L., Johnston, A. 1993. “Negative Versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960-1988.” Journal of Communication 41(3): 53-64.
    Kaid, L. L. 1997. “Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton.” American Behavioral Scientist 40(8): 1085-1094.
    Kaplan, N., Park, D. K., Ridout, T. N. 2006. “Dialogue in American Political Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 724-436.
    King, P., McCombs, M. 1994. “The Party Agenda in the 1992 Taiwan Legislative Election: A Content Analysis of the Television Political Party Advertisements.” Asian Journal of Communication 4(1): 77-98.
    Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., Gaudet, H. 1948. The People’s Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Norpoth, Helmut, and Bruce Buchanan. 1992. “Wanted: The Education President, Issue Trepassing by Political Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 87-99.
    Petrocick, J. R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, With a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825-850.
    Petrocick, J. R., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J. 2003-4. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952-2000.” Political Science Quarterly 118(4): 599-626.
    Pfau, Michael, and H. C. Kenski 1990. “Attack Politics: Strategy and Defense.New York: Prager.
    Rich, Roland. 2007. Pacific Asia in Quest for Democracy. Co, Bouder: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
    Riker, William H. 1993. “The Specification of Issues.” In William H. Riker, ed., Agenda Formation. Ann Anbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Sellers, P. J. 1998. “Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns.” The American Political Science Review 92(1): 159-171
    Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-1996.” American Political Science Review 93:345-362.
    Sigelman, L., Buell, Jr, E. H. 2004. “Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960-2000.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 650-661.
    Thorson, E., Christ, W. G. 1991. “Effects of Issue-Image Strategies, Attack and Support Appeals, Music, and Visual Content in Political Commercials.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 35(4): 465-486.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    98252015
    101
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098252015
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    201501.pdf750KbAdobe PDF2738檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋