政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/55031

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/55031

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51090296 在线人数 : 939

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/55031

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55031

题名:	海洛因成癮者的決策判斷與抑制控制缺損探討 The impairment of decision making and inhibitory control in heroin addicts
作者:	鍾昀蓁 Chung, Yun Chen
贡献者:	許文耀 Hsu, Wen Yau 鍾昀蓁 Chung, Yun Chen
关键词:	海洛因成癮決策判斷抑制控制 heroin addict decision making inhibition control
日期:	2011
上传时间:	2012-10-30 15:21:38 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究目的主要在探討海洛因成癮者是否具有決策判斷的問題與抑制控制能力缺損，利用數理認知模型的參數值檢驗受試者在新式Go/No-Go作業的表現，該作業結合IGT與原先Go/No-Go作業的特性，並將作業刺激改為中性與海洛因相關的圖片，探討海洛因成癮者在此作業的決策歷程與抑制反應功能，並與控制組作比較。另者，根據誘發─敏感化理論 ( Robinson & Berridge, 1993 ) 與誘發─習慣化模式 ( Di Chiara, 2000 ) 的預測，前者認為成癮越嚴重者的抑制缺損情形會越嚴重，對藥物相關刺激的注意力偏誤也越明顯；後者則認為藥物依賴階段的初期會發生較嚴重的注意力偏誤情形，但隨著依賴程度增加而對藥物相關刺激已習慣化，尋求藥物行為也已變成自動化反應，故注意力偏誤的情形反而會減少。因此，本研究試圖在加入藥物相關刺激的Go/No-Go作業中驗證這兩種理論的預測。本研究以48位一般控制組、88位海洛因受戒治人為樣本，利用Go/No-Go作業與線索依賴學習模式 ( CD model ) 分析受試者對酬賞或處罰的注意力 ( w參數 )、學習率 ( 參數 )、反應一致性 ( c參數 )、以及海洛因圖片價值的影響 ( I_Heroin參數 )，結果發現，比起控制組，海洛因成癮者對酬賞的注意力較低、受到藥物相關刺激影響較明顯。另外，將戒治組分為物質高依賴組與低依賴組時，比起控制組，高依賴組對酬賞的注意力較低；而低依賴組受到海洛因圖片價值影響較明顯。結果證實當面對同時具有中性與藥物相關刺激時的情況下，海洛因成癮者與過去古柯鹼成癮者在決策作業上的表現不同，不僅受到酬賞或處罰的影響，藥物相關刺激本身亦帶有某種價值，影響成癮者的決策與抑制能力；另外，結果部分支持誘發─習慣化的預測。 The purpose of present study was to investigate the decision making and inhibitory problem in heroin addicts, and to use the mathematics cognitive model parameters to examine performance in a new Go/No-Go Task of subjects. The task combined the characteristics of IGT and original Go/No-Go Task. We changed the task’s stimuli to neural and heroin related pictures, to explore the decision making and inhibitory reactive function in the task, and compared with control group. On the other hands, according to Incentive-sensitization theory (Robinson & Berridge, 1993) and ‘Incentive ─ habit’ model (Di Chiara, 2000), the incentive-sensitization thoery thought that people with increasing severity of addiction get more inhibitory problems and attentional bias toward drug related cues, but the incentive-habit model suggests that attentional bias for drug cues will be more severe in the early stage of drug dependence., but with the increase in dependence and habit to drug cues, drug-seeking behavior has become automatic reaction, so attentional bias will be attenuated when abusers get more dependence. Therefore, this study attempted to verify the prediction of two theories in the Go / No-Go Task with drug-related stimuli. This research was based on the data collected from the 48 normals and 88 heroin addicts, using Go/No-Go Task and Cue-dependence learning model ( CD model ) analysis their attention to reward or punishment ( parameter w ), learning rate ( ), reactive consistence ( c ), and valence of heroin pictures ( I_Heroin). The result revealed that compare to controls, heroin addicts had fewer attention to rewards, and more obvious influenced by drug related stimuli. Otherwise, to divided addicts group into high dependence group and low dependence group, compared to control group, the high dependence addicts had lower attention to reward, and the lower dependence addicts was higher influenced by drug related stimuli. It confirm that when heroin abusers faced to neural and drug related stimili, their performance in decision making task was different from cocaine abusers, it’s not only influenced from reward or punishment, but also from the valence of drug related cues. In addition, the result partially support the prediction of the incentive-habit model.
參考文獻:	參考文獻中文文獻中央警察大學犯罪防治學系(民97年8月)。毒品施用者替代療法之研究。執行單位：中央警察大學犯罪防治學系。委託單位：財團法人林心正教育基金會。孔繁鐘(編譯)(2009)。DSM-IV-TR精神疾病診斷準則手冊。台北市：合紀圖書出版社。行政院衛生署管制藥品管理局.(2008)。強化藥物濫用防治體系(四年計畫)。台北市，行政院衛生署。行政院衛生署管制藥品管理局 (2008)。藥物濫用案件暨檢驗統計資料【一 ○○年十一月】。台北市，行政院衛生署。行政院衛生署管制藥品管理局 (民92年6月)。物質濫用。台北市，行政院衛生署。林一真 (民89)。貝克焦慮量表中文版指導手冊。台北市：中國行為科學研究社。(BAI原著出版年：1993年)。俞筱鈞 (1994)。瑞文氏標準圖形推理測驗指導手冊。台北市：中國行為科學研究社。(原版出版年：1960年)。胡海國、林信男譯，ICD-10精神與行為障礙之分類：臨床描述與指引。中華民國精神醫學會，1996年初版。陳心怡譯 (民89)。貝克憂鬱量表 ( BDI-II )中文版第二版指導手冊。台北市：中國行為科學研究社。(原著出版年：1994年)。許文耀(2009)。海洛因藥癮者的抑制控制探討。台北市，政治大學。(國科會計畫)。黃華妮(2000)。利用神經心理作業初探台灣地區海洛因戒治者之認知功能研究。碩士, 國立政治大學, 台北市。傅雅懌(2009)。海洛因藥癮者的抑制歷程初探。碩士，國立中正大學，嘉義縣。英文文獻 Baker, T., Piper, M., McCarthy, D., Majeskie, M., & Fiore, M. (2004). Addiction motivation reformulated:an affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychological Review, 111, 33-51. Bartzokis, G., Lu, P.H., Beckson,M., Rapoport, R., Grant,S., Wiseman, E.J., et al.(2000). Abstinence from cocaine reduces high-risk responses on a gambling task. Neuropsychopharmacology, 22, 102-103. Bearre, L., Sturt, P., Bruce, G., Jones, B.T. (2007).Heroin- related attentional bias and monthly frequency of heroin use are positively associated in attenders of a harm reduction service. Addict. Behav. 32, 784-792. Bechara, Noel, X., & Crone, E. A. (2006). Loss of willpower: abnormal neural Mechanisms of impulse control and decision making in addiction. In R. W. S. Wiers, A. W. (Ed.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction (pp. 215-232).Thousand Oaks, Calif. :Sage Publications. Bechara, A.,&Damasio,H.(2002). Decision-making and addition (part Ι):Impaired Activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1675-1689. Bechara, A.,(2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from Neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain Cogn. 55, 30-40. Bechara, A., Dolan, S.,&Hindes,A.(2002). Decision-making and addiction(part II) : Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward ? Neuropsychologia, 40,1690- 1705. Bechara, A., Dolan, S.,Denberg, N., Hindes, A., Anderson, S.W., Nathan, P.E.,(2001).Decision-making defecits, linked to a dysfuncional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers. Neuropsychologia, 39, 376 -389. Beck, A.T., Brown, G, Epstein, N, Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56: 893-897. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory ,San Antonio,Tx. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archieve of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571. Berridge, K. C. (1996). Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. [doi: DOI : 10. 1016 / 0149 -7634 ( 95 ) 00033-B ]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 20 (1), 1-25. Bickel, W. K., Odum, A.L., &Madden, G.J.(1999).Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting current,never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 447--454. Brand M., Roth-Bauer M., Driessen M., & Markowistsch H. J. (2008). Executive function and risky decision-making in patients with opiate dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 64-72. Brandon, T.H., Tiffany, S. T., Obremski, K. M., & Baker, T. B.(1990).Postcessation cigarette use: The process of relapse. Addictive Behaviors,15, 105-114.1. Bruse, G., Jones, BT. (2004). A pictorial Stroop paradigm reveals an alcoholattentional bias in heavier compared to lighter social drinkers. J Psychopharmacol. 18, 527- 533. Bruce, G., Jones, B.T. (2006). Methods, and findings of attentional bias in substance use, abuse, and dependence. In Wiers, S. W. & Stacy, A.W. (ED.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction 135-150. Sage Publications. Busemeyer, J. R., & Myung, I. J. ( 1992 ) . An adaptive approach to human decision-making : Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 121, 177-194. Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Newman, D. L.,&Silva, P.A. (1996). Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adault psychiatric disorders. Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53,1033-1039. Chassin, L., Pitts, S. C., DeLucia, C., & Todd, M. (1999). A longitudinal study of chi- ldren of alcoholics: Predicting young adult substance abuse disorders, anxiety, and de- pression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,108, 106–119. Chen, C. H., Chen, H., Lin, T.Y., Chou, H. H., Lai, T, J., Ferri, C. P., Gossop. M.(2008 ). Severity of heroin dependence in Taiwan : Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Severity of Dependence Scale ( SDS [ Ch ] ). Addictive Behavior, 33, 1590-1593. Chen, Y. J., Ho, M. Y., Chem, K. J., Hsu, C. F., & Ryn, S. J. (2009). Estimation of premorbid general fluid intelligenceusing traditional Chinese reading performance in Taiwan samples. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 63, 500-507. Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S., & Pothos, E. M. (2006). The Addiction-Stroop Test : Theoretical Considerations and Procedural Recommendations. Psychological Buletin, 132, 443-476. Di Chiara G. (1998). A motivational learning hypothesis of the role of mesolimbic dopamine in compulsive drug use. J Psychopharmacol 12, 54-67. Di Chiara G. (2002). Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine : differential role in behavior and addiction. Beahior Brain Res 137, 75-114. Di Chiara, G. (2000). Role of dopamine in the behavioural actions of nicotine related to addiction. European Journal of Pharmacology, 393, 295-314. Di Chiara G. & Bassareo V. (2007). Reward System and addiction : what dopamine does and dosen’t do. Current Opinion in Pharmaclogy 7, 67-76. Dole VP, Nyswander ME, Kreek MJ: Narcotic blockade. Arch Intern Med 1966; 118: 304-9. Ferri Cleasa P., Marsden John, De Araujo Marcelo, Laranjeira Ronaldo R., & Gossop Michael. (2000). Validity and reliability of the severity of dependence scale(SDS) In a Brazilian sample of drug users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 19, 451-455. Flagel, S. B., Akil, H., & Robinson, T. E. (2009). Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.[doi: DOI:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.027]. Neuropharmacology, 56(Supplent 1), 139-148. Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of Its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence , 97 , 1-20. Field, M., Mogg,K., Bradley,B.P. (2006). Attention to drug- related cue in drug abuse and addiction : component processes. In Wiers, R.W. & Stacy, A.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction 215-232. Stage Publications. Field,M., Munafó M. R. & Franken I.H.A. (2009) A meta- analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 589-607. Field, M., & Powell, H. (2007). Stress increases attentional bias for alcohol cues in Social drinkers who drink to cope. Alcohol Alcohol., 42(6), 560-566. Fillmore, M. T. (2004). Environmental dependence of behavioral control mechanisms: effects of alcohol and information processing demands. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 216-223. Finn, P. R., Justus, A., Mazas, C., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1999). Working memory, Executive processes and the effects of alcohol on go/no-go learning: Testing a model of behavioral regulation and impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146,465-472. Finn, P. R., Kesller, D. N., & Hussong, A. M. (1994). Risk for alcoholism and classi- cal conditioning to signals for punishment: Evidence for a weak behavioral inhibition system. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,103, 293–301. Finn, P. R., Mazas, C., Justus, A., & Steinmetz, J. E. (2002).Early-onset alcoholism with conduct disorder: Go/no go learning defeicits, working memory capacity, and personality. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 86-206. Finn, P. R., Sharkansky, E. J., Brandt, K. M., & Turcotte, N.(2000). The effects of familial risk, personality, and expectancies on alcohol use and abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 122-123. Flagel, S. B., Akil, H., & Robinson, T. E. (2009). Individual differences in the attrubution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction. [doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.027]. Neuropharmacology, 56 (Supplement 1), 139-148. Fowels, D. C. (1987). Application of a behavioral theory of motivation to the concepts of anxiety and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 21,417-435. Franken, I. H. A., Hendriks, V. M., Stam, C. J., & Van den Brink, W. (2004). A role For dopamine in the processing of drug cues in heroin dependent patients. [doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.02.004]. European 14 ( 6 ), Neuropsycho pharmacology, 503-508. Franken, I. H. A., Hendriks, V. M., & van den Brink, W. (2002). Initial validation of Two opiate craving questionnaire : The obsessive compulsive drug use scale and the Desire for drug quesionaire. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 675-685. Franken, I. H. A., Stam, C. J., Hendriks, V. M., & van den Brink, W. (2003).Neurophysiological evidence for abnormal cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. Psychopharmacology, 170, 205. Gardini S, Caffarra P., Venneri A. (2006). Decreased drug- cue-induced attentional bias in individuals and untreated drug dependence. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 21(4), 179-185. Gerorge, O.,&Koob, G.F.(2010). Individual differences in prefrontal cortex function and the transition from drug use and drug dependence. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,35(2), 232-247. Goldstein, R. Z., Leskovjan, A. C., Hoff, A. L., Hitzemann, R., Bashan, F., Khalsa, S., et al. (2004). Severity of neuropsychological impairment in cocaine and alcohol addiction : Association with metabolism in the prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1447-1458. Gossop Michael, Darke Shane, Griffiths Paul, Hando Julie, Beverly Powis, Hall Wayne, & Strang John. (1995). Addiction, 90, 607-614. Grant Steven, Contoreggi C., & London E. D. (2000). Drug abusers show impaired p- erformance in a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1180- 1187. Gray, J. A. (1976). The behavioral inhibition system: A possible substrate for anxiety. In M.P. Feldman & A. Broadhurst ( Eds. ), Theoretical and experimental bases of the behavior therapies (pp. 3-41). London ; New York: Wiley. Helmers, K. F., Young, S. N., & Pihl, R. O. (1995). Assessment of measures of impulsivity in healthy male volunteers. Journal of Personality and Individual Difference , 6, 927–935. Jentsch, J. D., & Taylor, J. R. (1999). Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfun- ction in drug abuse : Implication for the control of behavior by reward related stim- uli. Psychopharmacology, 146, 373- 390. Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K.(1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78-87. Lejuez, C. W., Bornovalova, Marina A., Daughters, Stacey B., & Curtin, John J.(2005). Difference in impulsivity and sexual risk behavior among innercity crack/ cocaine users and heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77, 169-175. Logen, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327. London, E. D., Ernst, M., Grant, S., Bonson, K., & Weinstein, A. (2000). Orbitofrontal cortex and human drug abuse: Functional imaging. Cerebral Cortex,10, 334- 342. Madden, Gregory J., Bickel, Warren K., & Jacobs, Eric A. (1999). Discounting of de- layed rewards in opioid- dependent discounting functions? Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 284-293. Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1980). Determinants of relapse: Implication for the maintenance of behavioral change.In P. O. Davidson & S. M. Davidson (Eds.), Behavioral medicine : Changing health lifestyles (pp.410-452 ). New York :Brunner/Mazel. Mark K. Grennwald (2002). Heroin craving and drug use in opioid-maintained volunteers: effects of methadone dose variations. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 10, 1, 39-46. Masse, L. C., & Tremblay, R. E.(1997). Behavior of boys in kindergarten and the on- set of substance use during adolescence.Archives of General Psychiatry, 54,62- 68. Mazas, C., Finn, P. R., & Steinmetz, J. E.(2000). Decision- making biases, antisoial personality, and early-onset alcoholim. Alcoholism : Clinical and Experimental R- esearch,24, 1036-1040. Mintzer, Miriam Z., & Stitzer, Maxine L. (2002). Cognitive impairment in methadone Maintenance patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67, 41-51. Newman, J. P., Patterson, C. M., Howland, E. W., & Nichols, S. L. (1990). Passive avoidance in psychopaths: The effects of reward. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1101–1114.Newman, J. P., Widom, C. S., & Nathan, S. (1985). Passive avoidance in syndromes of disinhibition, psychopathy, and extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1316– 1327. Ostlund, S. B., & Balleine, B. W. (2008). On habits and addiction: an associative analysis of compulsive drug seeking. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.07.004]. Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models, 5(4), 235-245. Petry, N. M., Bickel, W. K., Arnett, M., (1998). Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in herion addicts. Addiction 93, 729-738. Redish, A.D., Jensen, S., & Johnson, A.(2008). A unified framwork for addiction:Vulnerabilities in the decision process. Behavioral and Brain Science, 31, 415-487. Robinson, T.E. & Berridge, K.C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving : An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001). Incentive- sensitization and addiction. Addiction,96, 103-114. Rogers, R. D., Everitt, B. J., Baldacchino, A., Blackshaw, A. J., Swainson, R., Wynne, K., et al.(1999). Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers,patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan- depleted normal volunteers: Evidence for monoaminergic mechanism. Neuropsychopharmacology, 20, 322-339. Rotheram-Fuller Erin, Shoptaw Steven, Berman, Steven M., & London, Edythe D. London. (2004). Impaired performance in a test of decision-making by opiate-dependence tobacco smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73, 79- 86. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing :Ex plorations in the microstructure of cognition, Volumes 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. Ryan, F.(2002). Attentional bias and alcohol dependence : a controlled study using the modified Stoop paradigm. Addic. Behav. 27, 471-482, Selzer, M. L.(1971). The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 1653-1658. Sinha, R., Fuse, T., Aubin, L. R., & O`Malley, S. S. (2000). Psychological stress, drug-related cues and cocaine craving. Psychopharmacology, 152, 140-148. Skinner, H. A., (1982). The Drug Abuse Screening Test. Addictive Behaviors, 7, 363-371. Stout, J. C., Busemeyer, J. R., Bechara, A., & Lin, A. (2002). Cognitive modeling of decision making in a simulated gambit task in frontal or somatosensory cortex damage[Abstract]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting Abstracts,41, 75. Stout, J. C., Busemeyer, J. R., Lin, A., Grant, S. J., & Bonson, K. R.(2004). Cognitive modeling analysis of the decision-making processes used by cocaine abusers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 742-747. Stout, J. C., Rock, S.L., Campell, M.C., Busemeyer, J.R., & Finn(2005). Psychological processes underlying risky decisions in drug abuses. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,19(2), 148-157. Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97(2), 147-168. Verdejo-Garcia, A.J., Rivas-Perez, C., Vilan-Lopez, R., & Perez-Garcia(2007). Strategic self-regulation, decision- making and emotion-processing in poly- substance abusers in their first year of abustinence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 139 -146. Verdejo-García, A., López-Torrecillas, F., Giménez, C. O., & Pérez-García, M. (2004). Clinical implications and methodological challenges in the stud of the neuropsychological correlates of cannabis, stimulant, and opioid abuse. Neuropsychology Review, 14, 1-14. Verdejo-Garcia, A.J., Perales, J.C., & Perez- Garcia, M. (2007). Cognitive impulsivity In cocaine and heroin polysubstance abusers. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 950-966. Verdejo-Garcia, A.J., & Perez- Garcia, M.(2007). Profile of executive deficits in cocaine and heroin polysubstance uses: common and differential effects on separate executive components. Psychopharmacology, 190, 517-530. Vogel-Sprott, M., Easdon, C., Fillmore, M., Finn, P. R., & Justus, A.(2001). Alcohol and behavioral control: Cognitive and neural mechanisms. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 117-121. Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S. & Wang, G.-J. (2002) Role of dopamine in drug reinfor- cement and addiction in humans: Results from imaging studies. Behavioral Pharmacology 13(5):355–66. Windle, M. (1990). A longitudinal study of antisocial behaviors in early adolescence as predictors of late adolescence substance abuse: Gender and ethnic group differences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99,86–91. Yechian, E., Goodnight, J., Bates, J. E., Busemeyer, J. R., Dodge, K. A., Petti, G. S.,et al.(2006). A formal cognitive model of the Go/No-Go discrimination task: Evaluation and implications. Psychological Assessment, 18, 239-249.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學心理學研究所 97752019 100
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097752019
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[心理學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
201901.pdf	969Kb	Adobe PDF2	881	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈