政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/55016
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51001801      Online Users : 929
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Advanced MBA, NCCU > Theses >  Item 140.119/55016


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55016


    Title: 產品協同設計流程與管理之探討-以手機大廠與台灣ODM公司協同設計為例
    A study of collaboration product development process and management
    Authors: 許曉嵐
    Hsu, Hsiao Lan
    Contributors: 吳豐祥
    許曉嵐
    Hsu, Hsiao Lan
    Keywords: 協同開發
    新產品開發
    關卡
    階段流程
    溝通媒介
    Collaboration
    NPD
    ODM
    Stage Gate
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 15:20:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國外大廠下單、台灣公司ODM設計製造這樣的模式在近十幾年在不同的消費性電子產包含手機、電視機上盒及筆記型電腦等等為台灣創造了驚人的產值。過去比較常見的方式是由國外大廠定規格，而由台灣公司設計產品，但因為上市時機 ( Time to Market ) 的壓力，國外大廠愈來愈願意分享客戶及技術上的資訊與台灣公司建立伙伴關係，利用協同設計的方式來加速產品的設計開發。
    本研究即透過個案研究的方式去了解國外的手機品牌大廠如何與台灣ODM公司協同開發新產品及如何去進行跨公司的專案管理。本研究發現包含：
    一、在協同設計方面
    1. 技術開發的不確定性會影響協同設計合作模式選擇及國外大廠所投入的資源多寡，當技術開發的不確定性愈高，則雙方協同設計合作會愈加密切；若技術不確定性低，則國外大廠在協同合作上所需投入的資源會較少。
    2. 在進行協同合作前，企業會有完整的前置動作進行伙伴評估及選擇。
    二、在新產品開發流程及管理上
    1. 架構性的開發流程有助於協同開發伙伴雙方彼此了解開發現況及完成協同開發工作。
    2. 企業內部雖講求以市場需求為導向的專案開發，但其新產品開發流程設計上，消費者對產品的回饋常未能在設計早期被納入評估。
    3. 完整的新產品開發流程會考量保持適度的彈性而不致於僵化。
    4. DFSS流程與既有流程的整合有利於DFSS的推行。
    三、在上下游溝通模式及媒介上
    5. 在協同開發模式下，上下游溝通模式的選擇同時考慮內部技術的保護與外部資訊分享。
    6. 有效的資訊及溝通科技是達成成功協同開發的重要因素。
    Due to the decrease of market price of cell phones and reduction of product life cycle, more and more branded cell phone companies seek ODM vendors to develop new products. In order to speed up the develop time of new product and leverage experiences from branded companies to ODM vendors, product development collaboration present a common way in this industry. However, product development collaboration cross companies bring more challenges over in-house design.
    The object of this research is to introduce how a global branded company to collaborate with ODM companies. The paper cites the different kinds of collaboration and new product development (NPD) process cross companies from case study.
    In order to integrate ODM companies into NPD, the global branded company should overcome the barriers as the unmatched NPD process of counterparts and the limitation of communication due to the far locations of companies. The following aspects were analysed to understand the collaboration: the NPD process under collaboration condition, the project management over companies, and the communication medium used for inside and outside communication.
    The result of the study shows global branded companies effectively use internal resources by implementing flexible NPD process for different kind of collaborations Various information and communication technology (ICT) can reduce the barriers of communication cross companies.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1. Dorothy B. L.著，王美音譯 (1998)，知識創新之泉，遠流出版社。
    2. Subir Chowdhury 著，胡瑋珊譯 (2002)，六標準差設計，經濟新潮社。
    3. Cooper G. R. 著，巫宗融譯 (2000)，新產品完全開發手冊，遠流出版社。
    4. Frankfort-Nachmias C. & Nachmias D. 著，潘明宏、陳志瑋合譯 (2001)，社會科學研究方法，韋伯文化出版社。
    5. George M. L. 著，丁惠民譯 (2002)，精實六標準差，麥格羅 希爾。
    6. Liker K.J. & Meier D. 著，李芳齡譯 (2006)，實踐豐田模式：第一本教你打造精實學習型組織的實戰指南，麥格 羅希爾。
    7. McGrath, M. E. 著，陳儀譯 (2004)，產品研發管理 (Next Generation Product Deveplopmemt)，麥格羅 希爾。
    8. Robert J.T. 著，鄭三峽譯 (1995)，新產品研發，智勝出版社。
    9. Yin K.R. 著，尚榮安譯 (1994)，Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.)，Beverly Hills: Sage。
    10. 司徒達賢著 (1985)，企業概論，教育部空中大學教育委員會。
    11. 朱承先 (2003)，「剖析DFSS的內涵、應用範疇及成效」，能力雜誌，頁38-45。
    12. 吳炘庭 (2000)，新產品開發流程資訊自動化研究，國立台北科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
    13. 林柏齊 (2009)，2009年第一季台灣智慧型行動電話裝置產業產銷暨重要趨勢分析，資策會產業情報研究所。
    14. 席汝楫 (1997)，社會與行為科學研究方法，五南出版社。
    15. 張紹勳 (2001)，研究方法，滄海書局。
    16. 張寶康 (1996)，影像掃描器新產品發展成功因素之研究，國立中興大學企業管理系。
    17. 郭崑謨 (1984)，行銷管理，三民出版社。
    18. 黃靖萱 (2007)，「開放力：革命性的企業獲利新模式」，天下雜誌(382)。
    19. 資策會產業情報研究所 (2005)，全球資通訊產業聚落暨大廠研發策略研究，TRI產業專題報告。
    20. 廖志德 (2003)，「DFSS 開啟產品設計新境界」，能力雜誌(568)，頁30-37。
    21. 劉常勇 (2002)，「第四代研發管理」，能力雜誌，2003年1月份，頁82-89。
    22. 蔡淑敏 (2001)，企業內溝通媒介、員工溝通滿足及組織承諾關係之研究－以台灣電子資訊產業為例，長榮管理學院經營管理研究所。
    23. 戴久永 (2001)，「六個希格瑪與 D-M-A-I-C 循環」，管理雜誌(326)，頁70-72。

    英文文獻
    1. Banuelas, R., & Antony, F. (2004). “Six Sigma or Design for Six Sigma” The TQM Magazine (16), pp. 250-263.
    2. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems” MIS Quarterly , 11 (3), pp. 369-386.
    3. Chiu, M.-L. (2002). “An Organizational View of Design Communication in Design Collaboration” Design Syudies (23), pp. 187-210.
    4. Cooper, R. G. (2000). “Doing it Right: Winning with New Products” Ivey Business Journal , pp. 1-10.
    5. Cooper, R. G. (1983). “Process Model for Industrial New Product Development” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , EM-30 (1), pp. 2-11.
    6. Cooper, R. G. (2009). Product Innovation Process. Retrieved from www.stage-gate.com: http://www.stage-gate.com/knowledge_pipwhat.php
    7. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1986). “An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact” The Journal of Product Innovation Management , 3, pp. 71-85.
    8. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). “Benchmarking firms New Product Performance and Practices” IEEE Engineering Management Review , pp. 112-120.
    9. Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2002). “Optimizing the Stage-gate Process: What Best-practice Companies Do” Research-technology Management , 45 (5), pp. 21-27.
    10. Fraser, P., Farrukh, C., & Gregory, M. (2003). “Managing Product Development Collaborations—A Process Maturity Approach” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture , 217 (11).
    11. Grosof, M. S., & Sardy, H. (1985). A Research Primer for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Orlando: Academic Press.
    12. Hall, J. M., & Johnson, M. E. (2009, March). “When Should a Process Be Art, Not Science” Harvard Business Review .
    13. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
    14. Harry, M. J., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: the Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World`s Top Corporations. New York: Currency.
    15. Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1998). “An Examination of Collaboration in High-Technology New Product Development Processes” Journal of Product Innovation Management (15), pp. 237-254.
    16. Jin, Y. & Hong, P. (2007). “Coordinating Global Inter-firm Product Development” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20 (5), pp. 544-561.
    17. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). “The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork” Academy of Management Review (23), pp. 531-546.
    18. Kern, E.-M., & Kersten, W. (2007). “Framework for Internet-supported Inter-organizational Product Development Collaboration” Journal of Enterprise Information Management , 20 (5), pp. 562-577.
    19. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management : analysis, planning, implementation, and control (8th ed. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    20. Kuczmarski, T. D. (1992). Managing New Products: The Power of Innovation: Second Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc..
    21. Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Bruce M. (1995). “Factors Affecting the Process of Collaborative Product Development: A Study of UK Manufacturers of Information and Communications Technology Products” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, pp. 16-23.
    22. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: CA , Sage.
    23. McGrath M. E., & Romeri M. N. (1994). “The R&D Effectiveness Index: A Metric for Product Development Performance” Journal of Product Innovation Management, pp. 213-220.
    24. Muller, A., & Valikangas, L. (2002). “Extending the Boundary of Corporate Innovation” Strategy & Leadership , 3 (30), pp. 4-9.
    25. Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma way : How GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. New York: McGraw Hill.
    26. Parker, H. (2000). “Interfirm Collaboration and the New Product Development Process” Industrial Management & Data Systems , 100 (6), pp. 255-260.
    27. Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1997). “Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development” Journal of Product Innovation Management (14), pp. 190-202.
    28. Roussel, P. A., Saad, K. N., & Erickson, T. J. (1991). Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
    29. Sahin, F. (2000). “Manufacturing Competitiveness: Different Systems to Achieve the Same” Production and Inventory Management Journal (41), pp. 56-65.
    30. Sampson, P. (1970). “Can Consumers Create New Products” Journal of the Market Research Society , 12 (1), pp. 40-52.
    31. Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). “Critical Development Activities for Really New versus Incremental Products” The Journal of Product Innovation Management (15), pp. 123-135.
    32. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing New Product Innovation. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
    33. Tabrizi, B., & Walleigh, R. (1997, November-December). “Defining Next-Generation Products: An Inside Look” Harvard Business Review .
    34. Tang, C. L., Goh, N. T., & Lam, W. S. (2007). “Fortification of Six Sigma: Expanding the DMAIC Toolset” Quality and Reliability Engineering International (23), pp. 3-18.
    35. Ulrich, D., & Lake, D. (1990). Organization Capability: Competing from Inside Out. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    36. Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1994). “Accelerating the Design-build-test Cycle for Effective Product Development” International Marketing Review , 11, pp. 32-46.
    37. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production. New York: Rawson Associates.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    管理碩士學程(AMBA)
    94362005
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094362005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Advanced MBA, NCCU] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200501.pdf651KbAdobe PDF2479View/Open
    200502.pdf651KbAdobe PDF2657View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback