政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54998
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50984903      線上人數 : 943
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54998


    題名: 組織創新對企業新事業發展之核心能力的影響初探
    作者: 李佩樺
    Lee, Pei Hua
    貢獻者: 管康彥
    吳豐祥

    李佩樺
    Lee, Pei Hua
    關鍵詞: 組織創新
    技術創新
    管理創新
    核心能力
    新事業
    電子產業
    Organizational Innovation
    Technological Innovation
    Administrative Innovation
    Core Competencies
    New Business
    the Electronics Industry
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2012-10-30 14:36:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著全球經濟成長日漸趨緩,市場競爭越來越激烈,許多企業在面臨前所未有的環境劇變時,選擇透過建立新事業的方式找到企業持續向上成長的動力引擎。然而在建立新事業的過程中,企業往往會面對自身現有核心能力不足或是資源匱乏的經營窘境,導致新事業發展並不順遂。因此許多企業在發展新事業的過程當中,選擇透過組織創新的方式以獲得發展新事業的相關核心能力。
    本研究主軸為探討企業組織創新作為與企業組織創新後發展其新事業相關之核心能力變化此兩大構面。本研究先針對研究目的研擬出研究問題後,進行文獻回顧並推導出具有實證性的觀念架構。透過多重個案研究方法,選擇四間我國電子產業中致力於新事業發展的企業,以具有理論基礎的觀念架構為主軸,進行個案資料蒐集與訪談,透過深度訪談的方式了解四間個案公司在新事業建立的過程中,組織創新作為對於該企業之影響。
    本研究所獲得之研究結論如下:
    一、 組織創新能夠有效的協助企業新事業發展。
    二、 企業全面性的組織與制度改革有助於其提昇新事業發展的彈性空間。
    三、 企業在文化上的重新塑造,會對其發展新事業產生全方位性的影響。
    四、 技術創新與管理創新作為對於新事業開發過程中的核心技術能力有明顯且正向的影響。
    五、 企業藉由管理創新的作為,可以提昇其規劃與評估的能力。
    六、 企業之文化、組織、制度與系統等多方面的交互創新,會對其創新能力與執行能力產生明顯的正向效果。

    最後,本研究說明了研究結果對於學術上之貢獻,並且在最後對於實務上以及後續研究上提出建議。
    With the global economic growth rate slowing down, the market becomes more and more competitive. Many companies try to create new businesses to face the environmental change and to keep growing. However, these companies face a business predicament of lacking core competencies while establishing new business, thus, usually leading to unsuccessful expansions. Therefore, it is necessary for the companies to seriously take core competencies into consideration as they intend to develop new business through organizational innovations.
    This study aims to explore the issue of how industrial firms build up their core competencies as they develop new businesses through organizational innovations. A multi-case study approach is used and four companies from the electronics industry in Taiwan are selected as research subjects. The preliminary findings from the study are as follows:
    1. Organizational innovations are shown to be conducive to new business development.
    2. A reform of corporate managerial systems is indicated to be helpful for enhancing the flexibility of new business development.
    3. A re-structure of corporate culture shows a significant impact on the positioning of new business development.
    4. Both of technological innovations and administrative innovations indicate a positive relationship with the establishment of the core competencies during the process of new business development.
    5. The industrial firms are shown to enhance their methodological competencies through administrative innovations.
    6. A holistic innovation based on the culture, organization, institution and managerial systems indicates a positive relationship with the industrial firms’ innovative capabilities and implementation capabilities.
    Keywords:
    Organizational Innovation, Technological Innovation, Administrative Innovation, Core Competencies, New Business, the Electronics Industry
    參考文獻: abell, D. F. (1980). Defining The Business : The Starting Point Of Strategic Planning / Derek F. Abell. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. :: Prentice-Hall.
    Alfred Dupont Chandler, J. (1962). Strategy And Structure: Chapters In The History Of The Industrial Enterprise: Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model Of Creativity And Innovation In Organizations. Research In Organizational Behavior, 10, 123.
    Amit, R., And Livnat, J. (1988a). Diversification Strategies, Business Cycles And Economic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 99-110.
    Amit, R., And Livnat, J. (1988b). Diversification, Capital Structure, And Systematic Risk: An Empirical Investigation. Journal Of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 3(1), 19-43.
    Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach To Business Policy For Growth And Expansion: Mcgraw-Hill.
    Ansoff, H. I., And Mcdonnell, E. J. (1988). The New Corporate Strategy: Wiley.
    Blau, J. R., And Mckinley, W. (1979). Ideas, Complexity, And Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 200-219.
    Block, Z., And Macmillan, I. C. (1985). Milestones For Successful Venture Planning. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 184-196.
    Booz, A., And Hamilton. (1982). New Products Management For The 1980s: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
    Bossidy, L., And Charan, R. (2004). Execution: Sperling & Kupfer.
    Boussouara, M., And Deakins, D. (1999). Market-Based Learning, Entrepreneurship And The High Technology Small Firm. International Journal Of Entrepreneurial Behaviour And Research, 5(4), 204-223.
    Burgess, G. H. (1989). Industrial Organization: Prentice Hall.
    Burns, T., And Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management Of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
    Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator`s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms To Fail: Harvard Business School Press.
    Coates, D. (1996). Putting Core Competency Thinking Into Practice. International Journal Of Technology Management, 11(3/4), 441.
    Daft, R. L. (1978). A Dual-Core Model Of Organizational Innovation. Academy Of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210. Doi: 10.2307/255754
    Daft, R. L. (2001). Essentials Of Organization Theory And Design: South-Western College Pub.
    Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants And Moderators. Academy Of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. Doi: 10.2307/256406
    Damanpour, F., And Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational Innovation And Performance: The Problem Of "Organizational Lag". Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
    Deshpandé, R., And Farley, J. U. (1999). Executive Insights: Corporate Culture And Market Orientation: Comparing Indian And Japanese Firms. Journal Of International Marketing, 7(4), 111-127.
    Dewar, R. D., And Dutton, J. E. (1986). The Adoption Of Radical And Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
    Dollinger, M. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship: Strategies And Resources: Marsh Publications.
    Dougherty, D., And Bowman, E. H. (1995). The Effects Of Organizational Downsizing On Product Innovation. California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.
    Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation And Entrepreneurship: Practice And Principles: Harper & Row.
    Edosomwan, J. A. (1989). Integrating Innovation And Technology Management / Johnson A. Edosomwan. New York :: Wiley.
    Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories From Case Study Research. The Academy Of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Doi: Citeulike-Article-Id:2936493
    Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., And O`keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization Strategy And Structural Differences For Radical Versus Incremental Innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682-695.
    Frohm, C. (2002). Collective Competence In An Interdisciplinary Project Context: Department Of Management And Economics, Linköpings Universitet.
    Gallon, M. R., And Stillman, H. M. (1995). Putting Core Competency Thinking Into Practice. Research Technology Management, 38(3), 20.
    Ginsberg, A., And Hay, M. (1994). Confronting The Challenges Of Corporate Entrepreneurship: Guidelines For Venture Managers. European Management Journal, 12(4), 382-389. Doi: 10.1016/0263-2373(94)90024-8
    Hamel, G., And Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing For The Future. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 122.
    Hamel, G., And Prahalad, C. K. (1995). Competing For The Future. Success, 42(9), 36.
    Hartman, A. (2004). Ruthless Execution: What Business Leaders Do When Their Companies Hit The Wall: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
    Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovation: The Core Competence. Planning Review, 23(6), 32.
    Javidan, M. (1998). Core Competence: What Does It Mean In Practice? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 60-71.
    Jean-Paul, T., And Steffen, B. (2002). Development Of Management Competences In Growth-Oriented New Ventures. Zagreb International Review Of Economics And Business, 5(2), 49-65.
    Kanter, R. M. (1989). Swimming In Newstreams: Mastering Innovation Dilemmas. California Management Review, 31(4), 45-69.
    Kimberly, J. R., And Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational Innovation: The Influence Of Individual, Organizational, And Contextual Factors On Hospital Adoption Of Technological And Administrative Innovations. Academy Of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713. Doi: 10.2307/256170
    King, N., And Anderson, N. (1995). Innovation And Change In Organizations: Routledge.
    Kumar, N. (2001). Determinants Of Location Of Overseas R&D Activity Of Multinational Enterprises: The Case Of Us And Japanese Corporations. Research Policy, 30(1), 159.
    Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities And Core Rigidities: A Paradox In Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
    Long, C., And Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using Core Capabilities To Create Competitive Advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), 6-22.
    Low, M. B., And Macmillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past Research And Future Challenges. Journal Of Management, 14(2), 139-161.
    Lumpkin, G. T., And Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct And Linking It To Performance. Academy Of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. Doi: 10.5465/Amr.1996.9602161568
    Marino, K. E. (1982). Structural Correlates Of Affirmative Action Compliance. Journal Of Management, 8(1), 75-93.
    Nielsen, K. (2003). The Development Of Collective Competencies In The Context Of New High Tech Ventures. Paper Presented At The Organisational Learning And Knowledge: 5th International Conference.
    Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
    Nonaka, I., And Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics Of Innovation: Oxford University Press.
    Nord, W. R., And Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing Routine And Radical Innovations: Lexington Books.
    Pfeffer, J., And Salancik, G. R. (2003). The External Control Of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective: Stanford University Press.
    Pitts, R. A., And Hopkins, H. D. (1982). Firm Diversity: Conceptualization And Measurement. Academy Of Management Review, 7(4), 620-629. Doi: 10.5465/Amr.1982.4285261
    Prahalad, C. K., And Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence Of The Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
    Probst, G. J. B. (2000). Kompetenz-Management: Gabler.
    Ramanujam, V., And Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research On Corporate Diversification: A Synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), 523-551. Doi: 10.1002/Smj.4250100603
    Reed, R., And Luffman, G. A. (1986). Diversification: The Growing Confusion. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 29-35.
    Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications: Prentice Hall.
    Roberts, E. B. (1980). New Ventures For Corporate Growth. Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 134-142.
    Roberts, E. B., And Berry, C. A. (1985). Entering New Businesses: Selecting Strategies For Success. Sloan Management Review, 26(3), 3-17.
    Rumelt, R. (1987). Theory, Strategy, And Entrepreneurship
    Handbook Of Entrepreneurship Research. In S. A. Alvarez, R. Agarwal & O. Sorenson (Eds.), (Vol. 2, Pp. 11-32): Springer Us.
    Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, Structure, And Economic Performance: Division Of Research, Graduate School Of Business Administration, Harvard University.
    Schumann, P. A. (1994). Innovate!: Straight Path To Quality, Customer Delight, And Competitive Advantage: Mcgraw-Hill.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory Of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, And The Business Cycle: Transaction Books.
    Shames, W. H. (1974). Venture Management: The Business Of The Inventor, Entrepreneur, Venture Capitalist, And Established Company: Free Press.
    Strauss, A. L., And Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics Of Qualitative Research: Techniques And Procedures For Developing Grounded Theory: Sage Publications.
    Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards An Economic Theory Of The Multiproduct Firm. Journal Of Economic Behavior &Amp; Organization, 3(1), 39-63. Doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90003-8
    Teece, D. J. (1988). Capturing Value From Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering, And Licensing Decisions. Interfaces, 18(3), 46-61.
    Timmons, J. A., Smollen, L. E., And Dingee, A. L. M. (1985). New Venture Creation: A Guide To Entrepreneurship: R.D. Irwin.
    Tushman, M., And Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing For Innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
    Utterback, J. M., And Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A Dynamic Model Of Process And Product Innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656. Doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
    Von Zedtwitz, M., And Gassmann, O. (2002). Market Versus Technology Drive In R&Amp;D Internationalization: Four Different Patterns Of Managing Research And Development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569-588. Doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00125-1
    Wernerfelt, B., And Montgomery, C. A. (1988). Tobin`s Q And The Importance Of Focus In Firm Performance. American Economic Review, 78(1), 246.
    Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets And Hierarchies, Analysis And Antitrust Implications: A Study In The Economics Of Internal Organization: Free Press.
    Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique And Suggested Research Directions*. Journal Of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-431. Doi: 10.1111/J.1467-6486.1994.Tb00624.X

    Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design And Methods: Sage Publications.
    Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion Of Modern Software Practices: Influence Of Centralization And Formalization. Management Science, 28(12), 1421-1431.
    司徒達賢. (2001). 策略管理新論 (Vol. 初版): 智勝文化事業出版.
    林晉寬. (1993). 創業家特質與創業家行為對創業績效影響之研究 (pp. 第72-74、124-129頁). 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告.
    徐聯恩. (2002). 組織特徵與組織創新. Paper presented at the 輔大應心系三十週年系慶學術研討會.
    劉家瑜. (2012). 2012全球經濟復甦減緩. 貿易雜誌, 247, 4.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    99359005
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099359005
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    900501.pdf1890KbAdobe PDF2460檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋