Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54848
|
Title: | Investor sentiment and the return-implied volatility relation |
Authors: | 張純菁 Chang, Chung Ching |
Contributors: | 周冠男 Chou, Robin K. 張純菁 Chang, Chung Ching |
Keywords: | 投資人情緒 隱含波動度 investor sentiment implied volatility |
Date: | 2011 |
Issue Date: | 2012-10-30 13:59:35 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | We examine how investor sentiment affects the changes in implied volatility, and discover investor sentiment has impact on the size of the changes in implied volatility through returns, especially when returns are negative. We examine the short-tern relation between the S&P 500 index returns and the changes of VIX from January 1990 to January 2011, and between the NASDAQ-100 index returns and the changes of VXN from February 2001 to January 2011 with proxy for beginning-of-period investor sentiment at both the daily and weekly level. We find that during high sentiment periods, the negative and asymmetric relation of return to changes in implied volatility can be mitigated significantly. When returns are segregated into positive and negative returns, investor sentiment has different impact on the size of changes in implied volatility. In negative returns, investors are more panic than in positive returns, but the panic can be mitigated significantly when investors are in high sentiment. Thus, sentiment can alter the risk attitude of investors and reduce their panic in the future, especially when market has negative performance. |
Reference: | 1.Baker, M. and J. Wurgler, 2006. Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance 61, 1645-1680. 2.Baker, M., and J. Wurgler, 2007. Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, 129-151. 3.Black, F., 1976. Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes. Proceeding of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section, 177 -181. 4.Brandt, M.W., and Q. Kang, 2004. On the relationship between the conditional mean and volatility of stock returns: a latent VAR approach. Journal of Financial Economics 72, 217-257. 5.Brown, 1999. Volatility, sentiment, and noise traders. Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 82-90. 6.Campbell, J. Y., and L. Hentschel, 1992. No news is good news: An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics 31, no. 3: 281-318. 7.DeLong, J. B., A. Shleifer, L. H. Summers, and R. J. Waldmann, 1990. Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy 98, 703-738. 8.Dennis, P., S. Mayhew, and C. Stivers, 2006. Stock Returns, Implied Volatility Innovations, and the Asymmetric Volatility Phenomenon. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41, 381-406. 9.Fleming, J., B. Ostdiek, R. Whaley, 1995. Predicting stock market volatility: A new measure. The Journal of Futures Markets 15, 265-302. 10.Giot, P., 2005. Relationships between implied volatility indexes and stock index returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management 31, No. 3: 92-100. 11.Glosten, L. R., R. Jagannathan, and D. Runkle, 1993. On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance 48, 1779-1801. 12.Hibbert A. M., R. T. Daigler, and B. Dupoyet, 2008. A behavioral explanation for the negative asymmetric return-volatility relation, Journal of Banking & Finance 32, 2254-2266. 13.Lee, W. Y., C. X. Jiang, and D. C. Indro, 2002. Stock market volatility, excess returns, and the role of investor sentiment. Journal of Banking & Finance 26, 2277-2299. 14.Low, C., 2004. The fear and exuberance from implied volatility of S&P 100 index options. Journal of Business 77, 527-546. 15.Nelson, D.B., 1991. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59, 347-370. 16.Wang, Y. H., A. Keswani, and J. S. J. Taylor, 2006. The relationships between sentiment, returns and volatility. International Journal of Forecasting 22, 109- 123. 17.Whitelaw, R.F., 1994. Time variations and covariations in the expectation and volatility of stock market returns. Journal of Finance 49, 515-541. 18.Yu J., and Y. Yuan, 2011. Investor sentiment and the mean–variance relation. Journal of Financial Economics 100, 367-381 |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財務管理研究所 99357009 100 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099357009 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
700901.pdf | 905Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 416 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|