政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54845
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114014/145046 (79%)
造訪人次 : 52051425      線上人數 : 262
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/54845


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54845


    題名: 企業社會責任對高階主管薪酬與績效關聯性影響之探討
    A study on the effect of corporate social responsibility on the relationship between top managements’ compensation and performance
    作者: 朱梓齊
    貢獻者: 林宛瑩
    Lin, Wan Ying
    朱梓齊
    關鍵詞: 企業社會責任
    高階主管薪酬
    Corporate social responsibility
    Top managements` compensation
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2012-10-30 13:58:33 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究係探討企業社會責任對高階主管薪酬、及對高階主管薪酬與績效關聯性之影響。以員工、社會和環境構面及此三構面之綜合表現來衡量企業社會責任。研究結果顯示，企業社會責任綜合表現、員工和社會構面表現愈好之公司，對高階主管薪酬有正向顯著影響。然而，在環境構面表現良好之公司，對高階主管薪酬則有負向顯著影響。
    對高階主管薪酬與績效關聯性而言，企業社會責任表現良好之公司，可有效降低代理成本，亦即減少對薪酬誘因契約之依賴；然而，亦存在企業社會責任表現良好之公司，其薪酬誘因契約之依賴程度增加之情況。本研究認為，若將企業社會責任視為提升公司競爭能力之策略，則增加薪酬誘因契約可以督促高階主管謹慎考量企業社會責任，將其與公司經營績效連結。
    This study examines the effect of corporate social responsibility on top managements’ compensation and on the relationship between top managements’ compensation and firm’s performance. Corporate social responsibility is measured by several dimensions, including employees、community、environment、and the combined performance of these three dimensions. The first empirical results show that the better the dimensions of combined performance、employees、and community are, the more the top managements’ compensation are. However, good performance in environment dimension will lead to less top managements’ compensation.
    The second empirical results show the effect of corporate social responsibility on the relationship between compensation and firm’s performance. If combined performance was better, agency cost would be decreased efficiently. That is, the dependence on the compensation contracts would be reduced. However, there still exists that better combined performance will cause the increase in the dependence on the compensation contracts. The reason might be if we considered corporate social responsibility a strategy reinforcing firm’s competitive ability, increase in the dependence on the compensation contracts could urge top management to link corporate social responsibility and firm’s performance tightly.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    邱慈觀，2011，CSR評鑑方法分析：以DJSI「企業永續性評鑑」為例，中華企
    業倫理教育協進會教研心得分享會(第七次)。
    別蓮蒂與游舒惠，2002，企業贊助公益活動之動機、決策與影響因素，廣告學研
    　　究，第十八集，53-95頁。
    沈中華與張元，2008，企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嘛？－以英國FTSE
    社會責任指數為例，經濟論文，第36卷第3期：39–385頁。
    洪玉舜與王泰昌，2005，績效衡量指標在高主管現金薪酬契約中之相對重要性，
    　　證券市場發展，第17卷第2期：35-100頁。
    祝道松、盧正宗、洪晨桓和楊秀萍，2008，環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影
    　　響，當代會計，第9卷第2期：237-270頁。
    馮燕，2004，企業型基金會公益資源運用個案研究，行政院國家科學委員會專
    題研究計畫成果報告。
    康峰菁，2003，企業社會責任、財務績效與盈餘管理之國際實證研究，國立台北
    大學合作經濟學所博士論文。
    黃姵蓉，2000，環保支出資訊價值攸關性之研究，國立中正大學會計系碩士論文。
    蔡柳卿，2006，相對績效評估與高階主管薪酬：論產業競爭程度之影響，管理評
    論，第25卷第1期：69-94頁。
    蔡柳卿，2007，依會計盈餘時效性設計高階主管薪酬契約：董事會所扮演的角　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
    　　色，會計評論，第44 期：61-94頁。
    張元，2009，企業社會責任與財務績效－台灣的實證研究，社會科學論叢，第3
    卷第1期：57-120頁。
    盛惠煜，1998，工資與經濟成長，勞工行政，第 120 期：21-25頁。
    二、英文文獻
    Ackerman, R. W. and Bauer, R. A. 1976. Corporate social responsiveness. Reston, VA:Reston.
    Adams, J.S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
    experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
    Al-Tuwaijri, S.A., T.E. Christensen, and K.E. Hughes. 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (5-6):447-471.
    Allen, S.G.,R.I., Clark, and A.A., McDermed. 1993. Pension bonding and lifetime jobs. Journal of Human Resources 28(3):118-37.
    Amihud, Y. and B. Lev. 1981. Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics 12: 605–617.
    Anderson, M.C., R.D. Banker, and S. Ravindran.1999. Interrelations between
    components of executives’ compensation and market and accounting based
    performance measures. Working paper. School of management. The university of
    Texas.
    Banker, R. D., and S. m. Datar. 1989. Sensitivity. precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 27(1):21-39.
    Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development, Strategic Management Journal 26:197-218.
    Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, and I. Hasan. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and
    shareholder’s value: an event study analysis. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    Berle, A. and G.C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property, New
    York: MacMillan.
    Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. NewYork
    Harper & Row.
    Bragdon, J. H., and J. A. T. Marlin. 1972. Is pollution profitable? Risk Management 19 (4): 157-169.
    Cable, J. R. and F. R. Fitzroy. 1980. Productive efficiency, incentives and employee participation: Some preliminary results for West Germany, Kyklos Blackwell Publishing,33(1),100-121.
    Carrigan, M. 1997. The great corporate give-away-can marketing do good for the ‘do-gooders’?. European Business Journal 9:40-46
    Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34(4):39-48.
    Carroll, A.B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business Society 38(3):268-295.
    Choi, J.S.,Y.M. Kwak and C. Choe. 2010. Corporate social responsibility and
    corporate financial performance: evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of
    Management 35(3):291-311.
    Clark, J. M. 1916.The changing basis of economic responsibility. Journal of
    Political Economy 24(3):209-229.
    Clinch, G. 1991. Employee compensation and firms’ research and development activity. Journal of Accounting Research 29(Spring):59-78.
    Coff, R.W. 1997. Human assets and managerial dilemmas: coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academy of Management Review 22:374–402.
    Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51(3):371-406.
    Colley, J.E., W.R. Guay and R.E. Verrecchia. 2003. Price versus non-price performance measures in optinal CEO compensation contracts. The Accounting Review. 78(4):957-981.
    Davis, K. 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California
    management Review 2(spring):70-76.
    Dodd, E. M. 1932.For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law
    Review 45(7):1145-1163.
    Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts,evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review 20(1):65-91.
    Dowell, G., S. Hart, and B. Yeung. 2000. Do corporate global environmental
    standards create or destroy market value? Management Science 46(8):1059-1074.
    Elkington, J. 1998. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management 8(1):37–51.
    Epstein, M.J. 2008. Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts, Greenleaf Publishing
    FitzRoy, F. R., and K. Kraft. 1986. Profitability and profit-sharing. The Journal of Industrial Economics 35:113-130.
    FitzRoy, F. R., and K. Kraft. 1987. Cooperation, productivity, and profit sharing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 35:23-35.
    Finkelstein, S. and D.C. Hambrick. 1989. Chief executive-compensation: a study of
    the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management
    Journal 10(2): 121-134.
    Finkelstein, S. and B.K. Boyd. 1998. How much does the CEO matter? the role of
    managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management
    Journal 41:179-199.
    Fogler, H. R., and F. Nutt. 1975. A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal 18 (1): 155-160.
    Frederick,W. C. 1960. The growing concern over business responsibility. California
    Management Review 2:54-61.
    Frederick, W. C. 1978.From SCR1 to SCR2, The maturing of business and society
    thought. Business and Society 33(2):150-164.
    Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston:
    Pitman.
    Grahn, J. L., W. J. Hannaford, and K.J. Laverty. 1988. Corporate philanthropy and marketing strategy: a review and directions for research. AMA Educators Proceedings, Series 53, M. R. Solomon et al., eds, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 67-69.
    Gray, H. 1983. New directions in the investment and control of pension funds.
    Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 (2): 47-77.
    Griffin, J.J. and J.F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business Society 36(1):5-31.
    Hayek, F. 1960. The constitution of liberty. University of Chicago Press, Chichago.
    Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20:986–1014.
    Holmstorm, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10:74-91.
    Holmstorm, B., and P. Milgrom. 1987. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303-328
    Ingham, H. and S.Thompson. 1994. Paying for performance: efficiency wages and mutuality. Managerial and Decision Economics 15(4):279-289.
    Ittner, C.D., R.A. Lambert and D.F. Larcker. 2003. The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and economics 34:89-127.
    Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics(October):305-360.
    Jensen, M.C.1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76:323-339.
    Jensen, M.C. and K.J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-managament incentives, The Journal of Political Economy 98:225-264.
    Jensen, M.C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal
    control systems. Journal of Finance 48:831-880.
    Jones, T.M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review 20(2): 404-437.
    Jones, D., and Takao Kato. 1995. The productivity effects of employee stock-ownership plans and bonuses: evidence from Japanese panel data. The American Economic Review 85(3):391-414.
    Kaplan, S.N. 1994. Top executive rewards and firm performance: a comparison of Japan and the United States. The Journal of Political Economy 102(June):510-546.
    Kruse, D. 1996.Why do firms adopt profit-sharing and employee ownership plans? British Journal of Industrial Relations 34:515-538.
    Levitt, T. 1958,The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review
    36(5):41-50.
    Luo X. and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 70(4):1-18.
    Mahoney, J.T. and J.R. Pandian. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 13:363–380.
    Marx, J. D. 1999. Corporate philanthropy: what is the strategy? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28(2):185-198.
    McGuire, J. W. 1963. Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    McGuire, J. B. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854-872.
    Milliron, J. 2000. Board of director incentive alignment and the design of executive compensation contracts. Working Paper, Chicago Partners, LLC.
    Mitchell, Olivia S. 1982. Fringe benefits and labor mobility. Journal of Human
    Resources 17(2):286-98.
    Morris, S. A. 1997. Environmental pollution and competitive advantage: An exploratory study of U.S. industrial-goods manufacturers. Academy of Management Proceedings 43: 411-415.
    Murphy, K.J. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7:11-42.
    Murphy, K.J. 1999. Exexutive compensation. Working paper. In: Ashenfelter O., Card D. (Eds.), Hanbook of Labor Economics 3. North Holland, Amsterdam.
    Murray, V.V. 1991. Improving corporate donations new strategies for grantmakers and grantseekers, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1st ed.
    Preston, L. E. and Post, J. E. 1975. Private management and public policy: the
    principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Porter, M. E. and M.R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and Society: the link between
    competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business
    review 84(12):78-92.
    Porter, M.E. and M.R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard business review, (January-February):62-77.
    Rebitzer, J. B. and L. J. Taylor. 1995. Efficiency wages and employment rents: the employer-size wage effect in the job market for lawyers. Journal of Labor Economics 13:678-709.
    Peters, R. and M. R. Mullen. 2009. Some evidence of the cumulative effects of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. The Journal of Global Business Issue 3: 1-14.
    Rockness, J., W.P. Schlachter, and H.O. Rockness. 1986. Hazardous waste disposal, corporate disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1: 167-191.
    Ruf, B.M., K. Muralidhar, R.M. Brown, J.J. Janney and K. Paul. 2001. An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 32(2):143-156.
    Russo, M.V., and P. A. Fouts. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 534-559.
    Schwartz, M. S. and Carroll, A. B. 2003. Corporate social responsibility: a
    three-domain approach. Business Ethics 13(4):503.
    Sethi, S. P. 1975. Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytic
    framework. California Management Review 17:58-64.
    Sloan, R. G. 1993. Accounting earnings and top executive compensation, Journal of Accounting and Economics 16(January-July):55-100.
    Sloan, R. G. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review 71(July):289-315.
    Smith, C.W. and R.L. Watts . 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3): 263-292.
    Solomon R. and K. Hansen. 1985. It is good business. New York: Atheneum.
    Sparkes, R.2002. Socially Responsible Investment: A Global Revolution. Chicester:
    John Wiley & Sons.
    Vance, S.C. 1975. Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Management Review 64(8):18-24.
    Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18: 303-319.
    Walton, C. C. 1967. Corporate social responsibilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Watts, R.,J. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5:171–180.
    Werther, Jr. W. B. and D. Chandler. 2005. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility-Stakeholders in a Global Environment,Sage Publications, London, UK.
    Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited, Academy of Management Review 16:691-718.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    99353032
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0993530321
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    032101.pdf2132KbAdobe PDF21762檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋