政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54667
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51027262      Online Users : 865
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54667


    Title: 韓國臺灣比較研究 :民主主義發展和媒體之役割
    A comparative study on Korea and Taiwan democratic development and media’s role
    Authors: 崔彰根
    Choi, Chang Geun
    Contributors: 李明
    Lee, Ming
    崔彰根
    Choi, Chang Geun
    Keywords: 民主主義
    媒體
    臺灣(中華民國)
    韓國
    Democratization
    Media
    Taiwan(ROC)
    Korea
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 11:29:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In this thesis, comparative experienced similar historical events the countries in East Asia, Korea and Taiwan. Research focus is democratic development and media’s role in Korea and Taiwan. This research theme is composition of communication studies and political science. Firstly, I reviewed basic concept of media and democracy’s correlation, and media’s role in democratic countries, Secondly, purchased Korea and Taiwan’s democratization process on view of comparative political science. And I followed media’s role on democratization process.
    Research’s basic point of view is comparative study, and also used literature analysis method. The purpose of this study is review Korea and Taiwan’s journey of democratization, and through the past experience what was the role of the media.
    Reference: 1. Adesnik, D. & Kim, S.H. (2008). If at First You don’t Succeed: The puzzle of
    South Korea’s Democratic Transition. Stanford University CDDR Working Paper 83
    2. Bennett, W.L. & Serrin, W. (2005). The Watchdog Role. In G. Overholser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Press (pp. 169-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
    3. Chen, C. J. (1999). Taiwan’s Media in the Democratic Era, Taipei: Government Information Office of Republic of China (Taiwan).
    4. Chen, Edward I-te. 1970. Japanese Colonialism in Korea and Formosa: A Comparison of the Systems of Political Control. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 30:126-58.
    5. Chi, Eun-joo. (2009). Taiwan Independent Problem and Party Politics. Pajoo :
    Nanam.
    6. Cho, Chong-Hyuk. (2002). Red Devils, as a Postmodern Cultural Phenomenon.
    The Grand Narratives of Korean Media. Korean Journal of Communication Studies,
    10 (2).
    7. Choi, C-K. (2005). Law and Justice in Korea: South and North. Seoul Korea: Seoul National University Press.
    8. Choi, Hyeon-cheol. (2001): Capitalist Controls on Mass Media in Korea. Korean Journal of Communication Studies, Special English Edition 2001, pp. 591-608.
    9. Choi, Jang-jip. (1993). Postwar politics in Asia and the Pacific. Seoul : Dong-A Ilbo
    10. Croissant, A. (2004). From transition to defective democracy: Mapping Asian dem-ocratization. Democratization 11 (5), 156-178.
    11. Curran, J. (2005). What democracy requires of the media. In G. Overholser &
    K.H. Dennis, E.E., & Merrill, J.C. (1991). Media Debates: Issues in Mass Comm-unication. New York: Longman.


    12. Chu, Yun-han, Larry Diamond, and Doh-chull Shin (2001). HALTING PROGRESS IN KOREA AND TAIWAN, Journal of Democracy Volume 12, Number 1 January
    2001.
    13. Cumings, Bruce. (1999). Parallax visions: making sense of American-East Asian relations at the end of the century. Durham and London : Duke University Press.
    14. Diamond, Larry (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
    15. Rawnsley, Gary D. (2000). The Media and Popular Protest in Pre-Democratic Taiwan, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 20: 4.
    16. Rawnsley, Gary D. (2001). Critical Security, Democratisation and Television in Taiwan, Aldershot: Ashgate.
    17. Gleysteen, William H. (1999). Massive Entanglement, Marginal Influence: Carter
    and Korea in Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
    18. Hallin, D.C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three model-s of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    19. Huntington, S.P. (1991). The Third Wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
    20. Im, H.B. (2004). Faltering Democratic Consolidation in South Korea. Democratiza-tion. 11 (5), 179-198.
    21. Hart-Landsberg, Martin. (1989). South Korea: Looking at the left. Monthly Review, 41.56-70.
    22. Huang, J. (1996). Cable Cat’s Cradle. Free China Review, 46: 2, 4.
    23. Joo, D-W. (1993). A study on the influence of the press policy upon the transition of the press industry in Korea: from the 1st Republic to the 5th Republic. PhD dissertation of Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
    24. Kang, Jin-suk (2006). A Study on the Mechanism for Discursive Constitution of Meaning and Subject Appeared in Educational Crisis by Korea Mass Media [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Communication and Information, 33.

    25. Kang, Jun-man. (2002). Power Shift : Korean Press History of 117 years. Seoul: Inmul & Sasangsa.
    26. Kang, Jun-man. (1993). Programme Quality and Broadcasting Audience Sovereignty Campaign, Broadcasting Research Summer.
    27. Kang, Myungkoo. (2007). Media Power and the Pedagogic Public Sphere in South Korea. Conference of Creating Culture Contents in the Age of Ubiquitous Media. College of Social Sciences, Seoul National University, November 2007.
    28. Kim, Chin-bong. (2000). Samil undongsa yongu (Research into the history of the March First Movement). Seoul: Kukhak Charyowon.
    29. Kim, D.K. (1996). Audience Movement and Democratization of the Media, Korean Society-Media Research Association (ed.) Modern Society and Mass Communications. Seoul: Hanwool Academy.
    30. Kim, K.T. (1994). Media Audience Movement in Korea, in Korean Press Institute
    (ed.) Media and Audience. Seoul: Korea Press Institute.
    31. Kim, K. et al. (1994). Broadcasting in Korea. Seoul: Nanam.
    32. Kim, O-J. (2005). Media Law. Seoul : Communication Books.
    33. Kim, Seung-Soo. (2002). Rethinking Newspaper Ownership, Control and Media
    Power [in Korean]. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 46 (2), pp. 122.149.
    34. Kim, Seung.Soo. (1995) . The Communication Industries in Korea. Seoul: Nanam.
    35. Kim, Sun Hyuk. (2000).The politics of democratization in Korea: the role of civil society. Pittsburgh. : University of Pittsburgh Press.
    36. LaMay, C. L. (2007). Exporting press freedom: Economic and Editorial Dilemmas
    in International Media Assistance.
    37. Lee, H.S. (1989). Political Communication. Seoul: Theory and Practice.
    38. Lee, Sangmook(2007). Democratic Transition and the Consolidation of Democracy in South Korea, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 3, No.1

    39. Whitehead, Laurence (2007). Taiwan’s Democratization : A Critical Test for the
    International Dimensions Perspective, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 3,
    No.2: 11-32
    40. McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. Thousand Oaks,
    California.: Sage.
    41. Merrill, J.C. (2002). Chaos and order: Sacrificing the individual for the sake of social harmony. In J.B. Atkins (Ed.), The Mission: Journalism, Ethic s and the World. Ames, 100, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
    42. Merrill, J.C. (1977). Existential Journalism. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
    43. Merrill, J.C., & Lowenstein, R. (1979). Media, Messages, and Men. New York: Longman.
    44. Oberdorfer, Don (1997). The Two Koreas : A Contemporary History, New York:
    BASIC BOOKS
    45. Oh, Chang-hun (2005). Korea’s Democratization and Its Implications for Cooperat-ion in the Pacific Region, Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2.
    46. Park, H-S. (2004). Korean Norm and Reality, and the Press Reform in Korea. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy Research, vol.3, no.2, pp.143-171.
    47. Park, Mi. (2002) Ideology and Lived Experience: Revolutionary Movements in South Korea [Online]. (Article based on Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics) Available: http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/research/smg/pdf - Conference/Mi Park - and Lived Experience.com (accessed on 12 April 2003)
    48. Patterson, T. & Seib, P. (2005). Informing the public. In G. Overholser & K.H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Press. (pp. 189-202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    49. Rampal, Kuldip Roy (2011). The Media’s “Public Sphere” for Civil Society in Taiwan’s Democratic Consolidation, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 7, No. 2.

    50. Roy, Denny. (2003). Taiwan : A Political History. Ithaca and London : Cornell University Press.
    51. Schedler, A. (1998). What is Democratic Consolidation?. Journal of Democracy 9 (2). 91- 107.
    52. Shin, Doh Chull (1999). Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea London : Cambridge University Press.
    53. Shin, Do-chull (2008). The Third Wave in East Asia. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 4 (2), 91- 120.
    54. Siebert, F.S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1963). Four Theories of the Press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    55. Taylor, Jay. (2000). The Generalissimo`s Son: Chiang Ching-kuo and the Revolutions in China and Taiwan. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.
    56. Thorson, E. (2005). Mobilizing Citizen Participation. In G. Overholser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), New York: Oxford University Press.
    57. Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M. (2008). The Agenda-Setting Role of the News Media. In M.B. Salwen & D.W. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to commu-nication theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 90-105). New York: Routledge.
    58. Weaver, D.H. & Wilhoit, G.C. (1986). The American Journalist. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    59. Welzel. (2008). Development, freedom and rising happiness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (4), 264–85.
    60. Wood, Alan. (2004). Asian democracy in world history. New York: Routledge.
    61. Youm, K-H. (1996). Press Law in South Korea (1st Ed). Iowa U.S.A.: Iowa State University Press.
    62. Youm, K-H. (1985). Freedom of the press in South Korea, 1945-1983: A sociopolitical and legal perspective. PhD dissertation in Southern Illinois University at Carbondale U.S.A.
    63. Ogasawara, Yoshiyuki (1998). Lee Teng-Hui Administration and Taiwanese Nationalism, (http://www.tufs.ac.jp/ts/personal/ogasawara/paper/epaper1.html.)
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    98461018
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098461018
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[International Master`s Program in International Communication Studies] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    101801.pdf1017KbAdobe PDF2385View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback