English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51162774      Online Users : 884
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/54569
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54569


    Title: 企業併購後資訊系統整合成功與否之檢驗
    An examination of the success of post-merger IT integration
    Authors: 林孟賢
    Lin, Meng Hsien
    Contributors: 尚孝純
    Shang, Shari S. C.
    林孟賢
    Lin, Meng Hsien
    Keywords: 併購後
    資訊科技整合
    合併與收購
    衡量指標
    Post-merger
    IT integration
    M&A
    Measurement
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 11:21:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 就一個併購案而言,資訊科技的整合是最重要且複雜的任務之一。過去許多併購的研究著重於技術和組織的議題而忽略了如何去衡量資訊系統整合成功與否,然而現今的研究依舊鮮少著墨於併購後資訊系統整合的績效評估。不同的利害關係人對於併購後資訊系統的成功有所不同,衡量的標準從流程的強化到顧客的滿意度也有所差異。因此,本論文將利害關係人區分為執行長、資訊長、業務經理和顧客四種角色來探討。本研究的目標是欲從策略面和經營面檢驗資訊系統整合的成敗並以一個較廣的衡量方式追蹤資訊系統整合的成效。本研究使用兩階段的實證研究,第一階段以目前相關的文獻和研究發展出初步的衡量指標和研究發現;第二階段藉著訪談多名業界人士進行多個案分析,檢驗第一階段所提出的指標,接著發展出一完整且具備多利害關係人衡量指標的表格,此表格可清楚表現此四利害關係人衡量指標的優先順序。本研究發現,對執行長來說,達到企業綜效和提升市佔率是他的前二衡量指標;對資訊長來說,維持營運的持續性和統整所有資訊科技是他的前二衡量指標;對業務經理來說,維持營運的持續性和整合後資訊系統的彈性是他的前二衡量指標;對於顧客而言,則是營運的持續性和顧客自身資料的正確性。本研究亦發現於設計和規劃資訊系統的整合時,必須特別考量資訊系統的彈性和使用者介面,以提高整體資訊系統整合所帶來的效益。同時,對於企業來說,此時亦是個好契機做企業流程的再造和強化企業自身的競爭力,可以更積極的方式來實現資訊系統整合帶來的價值。希望本研究所提出的衡量指標能提供企業有效且一致的基準去評估併購後資訊系統整合成功與否。
    IT integration is one of the most critical and complex tasks in a merger-and-acquisition (M&A) project. Many studies on M&A have focused on the technological and organizational issues of information technologies (IT) integration but have left out the important base of what to measure for in the success of the integration. Existing research remains sparse in explaining the performance assessment of a post-merger IT integration. The success of post-merger IT integration can be viewed differently by different stakeholders—the CEOs, the CIOs, the business managers, and the customers of the merged companies—and thus standards used vary from process enhancement to customer satisfaction. The objective of this research is to examine the success of post-merger IT integration from both strategic and operational viewpoints and track the integration performance using a wide range of business measures. This study uses a two-phase empirical study. The first phase involves building preliminary indicators and findings by the related literatures and research. In the second phase, we use a multi-case method by interviewing the practitioners to develop a detailed table of stakeholders’ measurements. Finally, the table reveals that the top two measurements for CEOs are achieving synergies and increasing market share; for the CIOs, the top measurements are operational continuity and technology consolidation, for business managers the measurements are operational continuity and the flexibility of an integrated system, while for the customer the measurements are operational continuity and the accuracy of customer information. Moreover, this study also finds the importance of taking flexibility and user interface into consideration while planning and designing IT integration. For an enterprise, IT integration is also a good opportunity to reengineer business processes to enhance competitiveness. It is hoped that the resultant measurements can provide a consistent and useful benchmark for evaluating IT integration success after a business investment in an M&A project.
    Reference: Abma, T. A. (2000). Stakeholder conflict: a case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(2), 199-210.
    Agrawal, A., Ferrer, C., & West, A. (2011). When big acquisitions pay off. McKinsey Quarterly(3), 103-108.
    Agrawal, S. (2010). CIOs Role in a M&A. Retrieved from http://dqindia.ciol.com/content/top_stories/2010/1010111801.asp
    Alaranta, M. (2005). Evaluating Success in Post-Merger IS Integration: A Case Study. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 8(3), 143-150.
    Albayrak, C. A., & Gadatsch, A. (2009). Managing Mergers and Acquisitions or Post-Merger Cookbook for CIOs and IT Management. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management & Evaluation, 1-9.
    Alvarez, E., Dawson, D., & Sen, S. (2007). UTILITY M&A: BETTING ON THE CIO. Public Utilities Fortnightly, 145(3), 33-34.
    Bekier, M. M., & Shelton, M. J. (2002). Keeping your sales force after the merger. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 106-115.
    Bertoncelj, A., & Kovač, D. (2007). An integrated approach for a higher success rate in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business, 25(1), 167-188.
    Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196.
    Bien, M.-L. (2009). INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MERGER AND ACQUISITION. Master of Computing and Information Systems, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio.
    Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439-462.
    Broadbent, M., & Weill, P. (1997). Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructures. Sloan Management Review, 77-92.
    Bruner, R. F. (2004). Applied Mergers & Acquisitions. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Carey, D. (2000 ). Lessons from Master Acquirers: A CEO Roundtable on Making Mergers Succeed. Harvard Business Review, 3, 145-154. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2000/05/a-ceo-roundtable-on-making-mergers-succeed/ar/1
    Carlsson, S., Henningsson, S., Hrastinski, S., & Keller, C. (2011). Socio-technical IS design science research: developing design theory for IS integration management. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 9(1), 109-131.
    Chang, R. A., Curtis, G. A., & Jenk, J. (2002). Keys to the Kingdom: How an Integrated IT Capability Can Increase Your Odds of M&A Success. Accenture, 2-29.
    CIO-magazine. (2006). The State of the CIO 2006: Your Agenda[Electronic Version]. CIO Magazine.
    Cullinan, G., Roux, J.-M. L., & Weddigen, R.-M. (2004). When to walk away from a deal. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 96-104.
    Curtis, G. A., & Chanmugam, R. (2005). Reconcilable differences: IT and post-merger integration. Outlook(2), 81-85.
    Epstein, M. J. (2005). The determinants and evaluation of merger success. Business Horizons, 48(1), 37-46.
    Fee, C. E., & Thomas, S. (2004). Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(3), 423-460.
    Fubini, D., Price, C., & Zollo, M. (2007). Mergers: Leadership, Performance and Corporate Health. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Gadiesh, O., Buchanan, R., Daniell, M., & Ormiston, C. (2002). A CEO`s guide to the new challenge of M&A leadership. Strategy & Leadership 30(3), 11-18.
    Gale, J., & Flinn, R. (2012). Roche Makes $5.7 Billion Offer for Illumina in Hostile Bid. Bloomberg Businessweek, from http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-25/roche-makes-5-7-billion-offer-for-illumina-in-hostile-bid.html
    Giacomazzi, F., Panella, C., Pernici, B., & Sansoni, M. (1997). Information systems integration in mergers and acquisitions: A normative model. Information & Management, 32(6), 289-302.
    Grimble, R., & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55(2), 173-193.
    Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
    Habibbeigi, P. (2009). A Project Management Approach to M&A Deals and their Post-Integration Projects. Unpublished master`s thesis. Umea School of Business.
    Haes, S. D., & Grembergen, W. V. (2005). IT Governance Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms: Achieving IT/Business Alignment in a Major Belgian Financial Group. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Big Island, Hawaii
    Hakanson, L. (1995). Learning through acquisitions: Management and integration of foreign R&D laboratories. International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(1-2), 121-157.
    Harrell, H. W., & Higgins, L. (2002). IS integration: Your most critical M&A challenge? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 13(2), 23-31.
    Hendrickson, J. (2003). Mergers and Acquisitions as a Vehicle to Create Value in Uncertain Times. The Electricity Journal, 16(6), 66-75.
    Homburg, C., & Bucerius, M. (2005). A Marketing Perspective on Mergers and Acquisitions: How Marketing Integration Affects Postmerger Performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 95-113.
    Honore, R. A., & Maheia, M. W. (2003). The secret to a successful RIM merger or acquisition. Information Management Journal, 37(5), 57-63.
    Hyong-ki, P. (2012). SAP to eye M&A opportunity, promote B2B software firms: CEO Hyoung, from http://view.koreaherald.com/kh/view.php?ud=20120508001151
    IBM. (2008). The Enterprise of the Future: Global CEO Study. Retrieved from ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/pm/xb/n/gbe03035usen/GBE03035USEN.PDF
    James, A. D., Georghiou, L., & Metcalfe, J. S. (1998). Integrating technology into merger and acquisition decision making. Technovation, 18(8–9), 563-591.
    Jaspers, F., & van den Ende, J. (2006). The organizational form of vertical relationships: Dimensions of integration. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 819-828.
    Johnson, A. M., & Lederer, A. L. (2005 ). The Effect of Communication Frequency and Channel Richness on the Convergence Between Chief Executive and Chief Information Officers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 227 - 252
    Johnson, M. P. (1989). Compatible information systems a key to merger success. Healthcare Financial Management, 43(6), 56-61.
    Johnston, K. D., & Yetton, P. W. (1996). Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(3), 189-211.
    King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187-200.
    Ko, D., & Fink, D. (2010). Information technology governance: an evaluation of the theory-practice gap. Corporate Governance, 10(5), 662 - 674.
    KPMG, I. (2011a). Banking executive survey: Executives optimistic on recovery, from http://www.kpmginstitutes.com/insights/2011/pdf/banking-business-pulse-report-2011.pdf
    KPMG, I. (2011b). Global manufacturing outlook: Growth while managing volatility, from http://www.kpmg.com/LU/en/IssuesAndInsights/Articlespublications/Documents/growth-while-managing-volatility-survey.pdf
    Kristin, F., Tom, H., & Bill, P. (2007). Where has all the synergy gone? The M&A puzzle. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(5), 29-35.
    Larsen, M. H. (2005). ICT Integration in an M&A Process. PACIS 2005 Proceedings, 20(Brown), 1146-1159.
    Lee, J., Siau, K., & Hong, S. (2003). Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI. Communications of the ACM 46(2), 54-60.
    Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and inhibitors of business-IT alignment. Communications of the AIS, 1(3es), 1-33.
    Manansingh, A. (2010). M&A For the CIO. Retrieved from http://arunmanansingh.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/ma-for-the-cio/
    Mangan, T. (2006). Avoiding the M&A Customer Satisfaction Trap. Retrieved from Destination CRM website: http://www.destinationcrm.com/Articles/Web-Exclusives/Viewpoints/Avoiding-the-M%26A-Customer-Satisfaction-Trap-47726.aspx
    Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (2000). Managing mergers, acquisitions, and alliances: Creating an effective transition structure. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 35-47.
    McCartney, L., & Kelly, J. (1984). Getting away with merger: What looks to investment bankers like a heavenly marriage can be hell in the computer room. Datamation, 30(20), 24.
    McKiernan, P., & Merali, Y. (1995). Integrating information systems after a merger. Long Range Planning, 28(4), 4-62.
    McMahon, C. C., McDonagh, B. P., & Lanser, H. P. (2011). 2011 middle-market M&A outlook. Retrieved from http://www.rwbaird.com/bolimages/Media/PDF/Insights/2011-Middle-Market-MA-Outlook.pdf
    Meckl, R. (2004). Organising and leading M&A projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 455-462.
    Mehta, M., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A Framework for Assessing IT Integration Decision-Making in Mergers and Acquisitions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
    Mehta, M., & Hirschheim, R. (2007). Strategic Alignment In Mergers And Acquisitions: Theorizing IS Integration Decision making. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(3), 143-174.
    Merali, Y., & McKiernan, P. (1993). The strategic positioning of information systems in post-acquisition management. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2(2), 105-124.
    Neely, A. (2002). Business Performance Measurement:Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Palmatier, R. W., Miao, C. F., & Fang, E. (2007). Sales channel integration after mergers and acquisitions: A methodological approach for avoiding common pitfalls. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 589-603.
    Parvinen, P. M. T. (2003). Towards a Governance Perspective to Mergers and Acquisitions. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Helsinki University of Technology. Helsinki. Retrieved from http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2003/isbn9512263815/
    Peterson, R. R., O`Callaghan, R., & Ribbers, P. M. A. (2000). Information technology governance by design: investigating hybrid configurations and integration mechanisms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems Atlanta.
    Picot, G. (2002). Handbook of international mergers and acquisitions preparation, implementation and integration. London: Palgrave.
    Pratt, M. K. (2011). Get Into the M&A Game. Computerworld, 45(10), 16-20.
    Quah, P., & Young, S. (2005). Post-acquisition Management: A Phases Approach for Cross-border M&As. European Management Journal, 23(1), 65-75.
    Reinicke, B. A. (2007). Building a systems level theory of IS integration in mergers and acquisitions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University Indiana.
    Ribbink, D., Riel, A. C. R. V., Liljander, V., & Streukens, S. (2004). Comfort your online customer: quality, trust and loyalty on the internet. Managing Service Quality 14(6), 446-456.
    Robbins, S. S., & Stylianou, A. C. (1999). Post-merger systems integration: the impact on IS capabilities. Information & Management, 36(4), 205-212.
    Sagner, J. S. (2012). M&A failures: Receivables and inventory may be key. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 23(2), 21-25.
    Sarrazin, H., & West, A. (2011). Understanding the Strategic Value of IT in M&A. McKinsey Quarterly, 12(1), 1-6.
    Schmid, A. S., Sánchez, C. M., & Goldberg, S. R. (2012). M&A today: Great challenges, but great opportunities. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 23(2), 3-8.
    Sharma, U. (2007). Post Merger Integration through Business Process Management and Lean Six Sigma. A BPTrends Column. Retrieved from http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/-06-07-COL-BPMandPostMajorIntegration-SharmaSilverstein-fnal.pdf
    Shearer, B. (2004). Avoiding the IT Integration Blues. . Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker`s Journal, 39(11), 10-15.
    Sherman, A. J. (2006). Preventing post-M&A problems. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 17(2), 19-25.
    Shrivastava, P. (1986). Postmerger Integration. Journal of Business Strategy 7(1), 65-76.
    Sikora, M. (2005). Consumers Are a Hot Issue For Merging Businesses. Mergers and Acquisitions, 40(7), 16-18.
    Skrill. (2012). Skrill agrees to buy paysafecard.com Wertkarten AG. Skrill, from http://corporate.skrill.com/2012/06/skrill-agrees-to-buy-paysafecard-com-wertkarten-ag/57477/
    Song, S. I., Kueh, C. C., Rahman, R. A., & Chu, E. Y. (2010). Performance of Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions in Five East Asian Countries. Journal of Economics and Management 4(1), 61-80.
    Stylianou, A. C., Jeffries, C. J., & Robbins, S. S. (1996). Corporate mergers and the problems of IS integration. Information & Management, 31(4), 203-213.
    Thach, L., & Nyman, M. (2001). Leading in limbo land: The role of a leader during merger and acquisition transition. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(4), 146-150.
    Thornton, E., Arndt, M., & Weber, J. (2004). WHY CONSUMERS HATE MERGERS. Business Week, 58-63.
    Turner, F. (2000). Reasons why mergers and acquisitions can fail. Retrieved from Jacksonville Business Journal website: http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville/stories/2000/08/28/smallb2.html
    von Winterfeldt, D. (1992). Expert knowledge and public values in risk management: The role of decision analysis. Westport, CT: Praeger Paperback.
    Weber, Y., & Pliskin, N. (1996). The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture on a firm`s effectiveness. Information & Management, 30(2), 81-90.
    Wijnhoven, F., Spil, T., Stegwee, R., & Fa, R. T. A. (2006). Post-merger IT integration strategies: An IT alignment perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 5-28.
    Zee, H. v. d. (2002). Measuring the value of information technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing.
    Zelinger, S. (2011). Addressing The Lack Of Transparency In Subsidiary Operations. Retrieved from Manufacturing Business Technology website: http://www.mbtmag.com/articles/2011/04/addressing-lack-transparency-subsidiary-operations
    Zviran, M., Glezer, C., & Avni, I. (2006). User satisfaction from commercial web sites: The effect of design and use. Information & Management, 43(2), 157-178.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    99356020
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099356020
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    602001.pdf1425KbAdobe PDF2633View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback