政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54483
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51296119      線上人數 : 809
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54483


    題名: 政府支出結構與國家競爭力關係之研究
    The study of relationship between government expenditure structure and national competitiveness
    作者: 古璧瑩
    貢獻者: 黃仁德
    古璧瑩
    關鍵詞: 政府支出
    政府支出結構
    國家競爭力
    Government Expenditure
    Government Expenditure Structure
    National Competitiveness
    日期: 2006
    上傳時間: 2012-10-30 11:09:49 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 1980年代以來，國家競爭力的概念漸受重視，提升國家競爭力成為各國政府主要的施政目標。雖然國家競爭力因具有一定的重要性而被各界所接受，但時至今日仍缺乏對其共通之定義及衡量方法。本文係以目前最具公信力的衡量機構，即瑞士洛桑國際管理學院 (IMD) 與世界經濟論壇 (WEF) 所做的國家競爭力研究報告加以探討。
    本研究以政府活動的內生成長模型為理論基礎，由政府支出面來探討其與國家競爭力的關係及影響國家競爭力的程度。經由具有公信力的國家競爭力評比中，選取具有比較性的國家，研究其支出結構的變動對其競爭力排名是否造成影響。本研究結果，主要發現，一般公共服務及公共秩序支出比重，對國家競爭力的提升有所幫助，但並非具有絕對正向關係；教育支出比重較高，對國家競爭力的提升具有正面效果；保健支出比重及經濟支出比重無法直接影響國家競爭力相關細項指標；政府投入適度的社福支出，對整體社會的穩定有所幫助。並提出可參採建議為，預算支出結構並無各國一體適用的最佳配置，應尋求符合國家整體最大利益的配置方式；參考先進國家預算支出結構，適當調整我國各項職能所占比重；知識經濟時代，宜由增加教育投資，提升國家整體人力素質；今後國家的發展，宜注意各項預算支出對國家競爭力實際可能產生的影響；政府各部門宜重視公共支出如何配合施政目標，以提升政府效率。
    Since the 1980s, the concept of national competitiveness has gradually gained attentions, and how to enhance national competitiveness becomes a major goal for the governments. Although this concept has been widely accepted because of its importance, until today there doesn’t have common definitions and measurements against the competitiveness. This paper is produced by exploration of the reports in regards to the competitiveness of countries of the world which were generated by the most credible unions, the International Institute for Management Development in Switzerland (IMD) and the World Economic Forum (WEF).
    This paper researches, with references to endogenous growth theory, the relationships between the government expenditures and country’s competitiveness. Through the credible comparability assessments, this paper selects major countries to research how the expenditure structures influence the national competitiveness. The important conclusion from this research tells that it’s not always positive correlation between the weighting of government’s general public services expenditure and the improvement of country’s competitiveness, though general public services expenditure is helpful for competitiveness. Education expenditure does positively affect the competitiveness. The weighting of health expenditure and economic affairs expenditure can’t affect relevant competitiveness indicators. Appropriate social welfare from government helps for the stabilization of the society. This research suggests there is no best budget structure fits in with all countries, governments need to assess respective budget allocation approach to maximize the interests for the country. Governments can refer to developed countries for their budget structure in relevant areas to adjust own budget allocation. In the era of knowledge centric economy, governments should lift manpower quality by allocation of more resources in education. In view of country’s development in the future, governments should be aware how budget structure can affect country’s competitiveness. All departments of the government should care how public expenditure can support country’s goals in order to enhance government performance.
    參考文獻: 吳文弘 (2004)，《政府會計－與非營利會計》。台北：自印。
    宋筱珮 (2005)，〈租稅與國家競爭力關聯性之研究〉，高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
    徐仁輝 (2002)，《公共財務管理－公共預算與財務行政》。台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
    徐育珠、黄仁德 (1993)，〈經濟成長、生活素質與公共支出：台灣地區的實證研究〉，《國立政治大學學報》，66，頁73-128。
    莊義雄 (2003)，《財務行政》。台北：三民書局。
    陳春榮 (2005)，〈當代各種預算制度之演進與我國預算制度之比較〉，《今日會計》，98，頁1-8。
    陳慧娟 (2003)，〈政府職能及政事別支出結構之檢討〉，行政院財政改革委員會。
    黄仁德、羅時萬 (2001)，《現代經濟成長理論》。台北：華泰文化事業公司。
    詹中原 (2002)，〈國家競爭力之Who， What and How？〉，《國政評論》，憲政（評）091-093號。
    廖盈琪 (2002)，〈國家競爭力概念與指標分析〉，《科技發展標竿》，2:4，頁19-32。
    謝如媛 (2000)，〈中德政府預算之比較〉，臺灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。
    蘇彩足 (1998)，〈「聚合」或「分歧」？OECD各國政府資源配置之演變趨勢〉，「政府預算的改進」學術研討會，行政院主計處與世新大學主辦，1998年3月6日。
    羅雅惠、高志祥、王淑娟、饒志堅 (2004)，〈政府收支與總體經濟關連性之分析〉，統計專題研究報告，行政院主計處。
    Barro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth, ”Journal of Political Economy, 98:5, pp. S103-S125.
    Cashin, P. (1995), “Government Spending, Tax and Economic Growth,”IMF Staff Papers, 42:2, pp. 237-269.
    Engen, E. M. and J. Skinner (1996), “Taxation and Economic Growth,”National Tax Journal, 49:4, pp. 617-642.
    IMF, Government Financial Statistics Yearbook 1996-2006.
    International Institute for Management Development (2005), IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005.
    International Institute for Management Development (2006), IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2006.
    Kneller, R., M. F. Bleaney, and N. Gemmell (1999), “Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries,” Journal of Public Economics, 74, pp. 171-190.
    Krugman, P. (1994), “Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession,” Foreign Affairs, 73:2, pp. 28-44.
    Lopez-Claros, A. and A. L. Dahl (2006), “The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on the Economic Competitiveness and Social Development of Taiwan,” Global Information Technology Report 2005-2006, World Economic Forum 2006, pp. 107-118.
    Lucas, R. E. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3-42.
    Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
    Romer, P. M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 94:5, pp. 1002-1037.
    Smith, H. D. (1945), The Management of Your Government. New York: McGraw Hill.
    Tanzi, V. and H. H. Zee (1997), “Fiscal Policy and Long-run Growth,” IMF Staff Papers, 44:2, pp. 179-209.
    Uzawa, H. (1965), “Optimal Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth,” International Economic Review, 6:1, pp. 18-31.
    Wagner, A. (1890), Finanzwissenschaft. Leipzig: C. F. Winter.
    World Economic Forum (2006), The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007.
    World Economic Forum (2005), The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006.
    World Economic Forum (2004), The Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005.
    World Economic Forum (1996), The Global Competitiveness Report 1996.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    93921030
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093921030
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2207檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋