政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54349

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54349

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113393/144380 (79%)
Visitors : 51233719 Online Users : 895

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Public Finance > Theses > Item 140.119/54349

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54349

Title:	碳排放管制對臺灣工業部門生產效率及汙染減量成本之分析 Analysis of production efficiency and pollution abatement cost of Taiwan`s industrial sector under CO2 regulation
Authors:	蒲嵩杰 Pu, Song Jie
Contributors:	陳香梅蒲嵩杰 Pu, Song Jie
Keywords:	碳排放管制方向性距離函數生產效率汙染減量成本 CO2 regulation directional distance function production efficiency pollution abatement cost
Date:	2011
Issue Date:	2012-10-30 10:46:52 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	全球暖化已成為大多數國家近幾年所關心的議題。雖然臺灣政府於2010年5月所核定的「國家節能減碳總計畫」之中，儘管減量目標及原則業已確立，但未充分探討各別產業的面臨碳排放管制時所造成的影響，因此，臺灣各產業或次部門究竟應承擔多大的減量責任仍是混沌不明。為了更清楚瞭解碳排放管制對於臺灣工業部門之各產業的影響，本文以方向性距離函數，估算工業部門中14個產業367家上市櫃、興櫃和公開發行公司於2005年至2010年，在不同電力消費所產生的CO2之責任歸屬情況下之生產效率及汙染減量成本，以反映各產業於管制下的機會成本，便於鎖定某些產業或公司，來賦予減量責任。結果發現，各產業在實施碳排放管制後的效率水準，會高於未實施碳排放管制時的效率水準，且各產業的平均總汙染減量成本與每噸二氧化碳減量成本相差甚大。而臺灣尚未通過相關法規以規範各產業二氧化碳排放水準，若各產業節能技術或政府相關配套政策未改善，倉促實施碳排放管制，除了對管制對象的產生影響外，也可能間接衝擊未管制對象。政府除了加強輔導各種產業從事節能技術外，也需要適當的公布各產業各公司的各種汙染排放量資訊，以供各界研究碳排放管制或其他汙染排放管制對社會的影響。 Global warming has become the topic of most countries which concerns things in recent years. Government sets up CO2 reduction objectives and principle in “General National Plan for Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction” in 2010, but the plan doesn’t probe effect of CO2 regulation which different industries. Therefore, it is unknown that different industries should be responsible for the abatement of CO2. In order to clearly understand effect of CO2 regulation for Taiwan industrial sector, this paper use directional distance function to estimate production efficiency and pollution abatement cost of 367 public companies in 14 industries in industrial sector from 2005 to 2010, and to reflect different industries’ opportunity cost under CO2 regulation. Production efficiency of different industries after the implementation of CO2 regulation will be higher than before the implementation of CO2 regulation. On the other hand, different industries have a variety of average pollution abatement cost and pollution abatement cost of CO2 per ton. However, Taiwan has not yet adopted the environment laws to set up industrial CO2 emission level, if the government hurriedly implemented CO2 regulation for Taiwan industrial sector, may be indirectly influence other sectors. Hence, the government should not only urge that industries must be engaged in energy-saving technologies, but also announce companies’ various pollution emission information which provides research institutes to analyze effect of social welfare under CO2 regulation.
Reference:	楊浩彥（2000），「臺灣地區與能源使用相關的二氧化碳減量成本估計：多目標規劃分析法之應用」，《人文及社會科學集刊》，12(3)，459-494。李堅明、林幸樺、林師模、黃宗煌、楊晴雯、蘇漢邦（2005），「溫室氣體減量模式、減量情境、減量成本及其影響評估：TAIGEM-III的應用」，《台灣經濟論衡》，3(2)，1-50。李叢禎、蕭之晴、李堅明、曾瓊瑤（2007），「溫室氣體減量之遵循成本與附屬效益」，《台灣經濟政策與預測》，37( 3)，1-30。梁啟源（2007），「我國永續發展之能源價格政策」，《臺灣經濟預測與政策》，37(2)，1-35。黃宗煌、李堅明（2008），「台灣如何因應碳交易市場的來臨？」，《科學人》，71，68-71。經濟部工業局（2008），《經濟部產業溫室氣體減量推動辨公室計畫之「排放權核配制度之研究分包計畫」》，經濟部工業97年度專案計畫期末執行成果報告。經濟部工業局（2009），《產業溫室氣體管理輔導計畫分包之「製造業碳排放核配機制規劃與模擬試行」》，經濟部工業98年度專案計畫期末執行成果報告。經濟部工業局（2010），《產業溫室氣體管理輔導計畫分包之「製造業碳排放核配機制規劃」》，經濟部工業99年度專案計畫期末執行成果報告。吳珮瑛、林宗昱、劉哲良（2010a），「不同國際組織與結盟下之碳排放交易成本有效性的檢視」，《經社法制論叢》，46，41-84。吳珮瑛、林宗昱、劉哲良（2010b），「由APEC區域組織邁入國際社會參與碳排放交易之結果—對台灣的啟示」，《台灣國際研究季刊》，6(1)，143-84。吳珮瑛、陳佳慈、劉哲良（2011），「二氧化碳減量共同技術成本比之建構—一個較佳的政策分析指標」，第十二屆全國實證經濟學論文研討會。李堅明、江佳蓁（2011），「碳排放配額對我國能源密集產業碳曝險評估」，兩岸低碳社會與綠色成長推動策略研討會。行政院(2011)，《未來產業及人力結構調整之研究》，行政院經濟建設委員會。陳香梅、羅德城、羅光達（2011），「台灣未來碳市場供需規模之初探」，兩岸低碳社會與綠色成長推動策略研討會。楊晴雯、周婉玲、黃宗煌（2011），「運輸部門的減量成本：總體經濟成本 vs. McKinesy 成本」，兩岸低碳社會與綠色成長推動策略研討會。 Bryan, Elizabeth, Wisdom Akpalu, Mahmud Yesuf and Claudia Ringler (2008), “Global carbon markets: Are there opportunities for Sub-Saharan Africa?,” IFPRI Discussion Paper. Chung ,Y. H., Rolf Färe and Shawna Grosskopf (1997), “Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach,” Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229-240. Charney, Alberta H. and Marshall J. Vest (2003), Modeling practices and their ability to assess tax expenditure economic impacts, The AUBER Conference, New Orleans. Chien, Chen Fu, Feng Yu Lo and James T. Lin (2003), “Using DEA to measure the relative efficiency of the service center and improve operation efficiency through reorganization,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18, 366-377. Chang, Dong Shang and Fu Chiang Yang (2011), “Assessing the power generation, pollution control and overall efficiencies of municipal solid waste incinerators in Taiwan,” Energy Policy, 39, 651-663. Dyson, R.G., R. Allen, A.S. Camanho, V.V. Podinovski, C.S. Sarrico and E.A. Shale (2001), “Pitfalls and protocols in DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245-259. Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf and C. A. K. Lovell (1985), The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhof Publishing. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell and Carl A. Pasurka Jr. (1989), “Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 90-98. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf and Carl A. Pasurka Jr. (2001), “Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth,” Journal of Regional science, 41, 381-409. Färe, Rolf and Shawna Grosskopf (2004), “Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment,” European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 242-245. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf and F. Hernandex-Sancho (2004), “Environmental performance: An index number approach,” Resource and Energy Economics, 26, 343-352. Färe, Rolf and Shawna Grosskopf (2005), New Directions: Efficiency and Productivity, New York: Springer Science Business Media. Färe, Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf and Carl A. Pasurka Jr. (2007), “Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions,” Energy, 32, 1055-1066. Giannakis, D., T. Jamasb and M. Pollitt (2005), “Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: An application to the UK electricity distribution networks,” Energy Policy, 33, 2256-2271. Guo, Xiao-Dan, Lei Zhu, Ying Fan and Bai-Chen Xie (2011), “Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA,” Energy Policy, 39, 2352-2360. Hailu, Atakelty and Terrence S. Veeman (2000), “Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959-1994：An input distance function approach,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, 251-274. Hailu, Atakelty (2003), “Pollution abatement and productivity performance of regional Canadian pulp and paper industries,” Forest Economics, 9, 2-25. Hu, J.L. and C.H. Kao (2007), “Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies,” Energy Policy, 35, 373-382. Hu, Jin Li, Mon Chi Lio, Fang Yu Yeh and Cheng Hsun Lin (2011), “Environment-adjusted regional energy efficiency in Taiwan,” Applied Energy, 88, 2893-2899. Jarate, Jaraite and Corrado Di Maria (2011), “Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: A case study of power generation in the EU,” Energy Economics, (forthcoming). Korhonen, P.J. and M.J. Syrianen (2003), “Evaluation of cost efficiency in Finnish electricity distribution,” Annals of Operations Research, 121, 105-122. Korhonen, P.J. and M. Luptacik (2004), “Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 437-453. Kashani, H.A. (2005), “Regulation and efficiency: An empirical analysis of the United Kingdom continental shelf petroleum industry,” Energy Policy, 22, 915-925. Kumar, S. (2006), “Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index,” Ecological Economics, 56, 280-293. Luenberger, D., (1992), “Benefit functions and duality,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21, 461-481. Laeven, Luc (1999), “Risk and efficiency in east Asian banks,” World Bank. Liang, Liang, Desheng Wu and Zhongsheng Hua (2004), “MES-DEA modeling for analyzing anti-industrial pollution efficiency and its application in Anhui province of China,” International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 22, 88-98. Liu, C.H., Sue J. Lin and Charles Lewis (2010), “Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis,” Energy Policy, 38, 1049-1058. Maradan, David and Anatoli Vassiliev (2005), “Marginal Costs of Carbon Dioxide Abatement: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Analysis,” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 141, 377-410. Munksgaard, J., L.L. Pade and P. Fristrup (2005), “Efficiency gains in Danish district heating. Is there anything to learn from benchmarking?,” Energy Policy, 33, 1986-1997. Murty, M.N. and Surender Kumar (2002), “Measuring the cost of environmentally sustainable industrial development in India: a distance function approach,” Environment and Development Economics, 7, 467-486. Murty, M.N., Surender Kumar and Mahua Paul (2006), “Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: A case study of the sugar industry in India,” Journal of Environmental Management, 79(1), 1-9. Murty, M.N., Surender Kumar and Kishore K. Dhavala (2007), “Measuring environmental efficiency of industry: A case study of thermal power generation in India,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(1), 31-50. Matsushita, Kyohei and Fumihiro Yamane (2011), “Pollution from the electric power sector in Japan and efficient pollution reduction,” Energy Economics, (forthcoming). Nag, Barnali (2006), “Estimation of carbon baselines for power generation in India: The supply side approach,” Energy Policy, 34, 1399-1410. Nakano, Makiko and Shunsuke Managi (2008), “Regulatory reforms and productivity: An empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry, Energy Policy, 36, 201-209. Oh, Dong-hyun (2010), “A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index,” Energy Economics, 32, 146-157. Oggioni, G., R. Riccardi, R. Toninelli (2011), “Eco-Efficiency of the world cement industry: A data envelopment analysis,” Energy Policy, 39, 2843-2854. Pittman, Russell W. (1983), “Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs,” Economic Journal, 93, 883-391. Pahwa, A., X. Feng and D. Lubkeman (2002), “Performance evaluation of electric distribution utilities based on data envelopment analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17, 400-405. Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J., Ernest Reig-Martinez and Francesc Hernandez-Sancho (2005), “Directional distance functions and environmental regulation,” Resource and Energy Economics, 27, 131-142. Pasurka Jr., C.A. (2006), “Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework,” Energy Economics, 28, 26-43. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan (2005), “An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa,” Energy, 30, 2831-2842. Riccardi, R., G. Oggioni and R. Toninelli (2012), “Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function,” Energy Policy, 44, 140-152. Scheel, Holger (2001), “Undesirable Outputs in Efficiency Valuations,” European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 400-410. Sueyoshi, T. and Mika Goto (2001), “Slack-adjusted DEA for time series analysis: Performance measurement of Japanese electric power generation industry in 1984-1993,” European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 232-259. Seiford, Lawrence M. and Joe Zhu (2002), “Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 16-20. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki and Mika Goto (2012a), “Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry,” European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 668-678. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki and Mika Goto (2012b), “Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries,” Energy Economics, 34, 686-699. Watanabe, Michio and Katsuya Tanaka (2007), “Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: A directional distance function approach,” Energy Policy, 35, 6323-6331. Wooders, Peter and Jean Nolet (2009), “State of the carbon market: How the future market can encourage developing country participation,” International Institute for Sustainable Development. Wang, Qunwei, Qinjun Cui, Dequn Zhou and Sisi Wang (2011), “Marginal abatement costs of carbon dioxide in China：A nonparametric analysis,” Energy Procedia, 5, 2316-2320. Xie, Bai-Chen, Ying Fan and Qian-Qian Qu (2012), “Does generation form influence environmental efficiency performance? An analysis of China’s power system,” Applied Energy, (forthcoming). Yu, Ming Miin, Shih Hsun Hsu, Ching Cheng Chang and Duu Hwa Lee (2008), “Productivity growth of Taiwan’s major domestic airports in the presence of aircraft noise,” Transportation Research Part E, 44, 543-554. Yang, Chih Ching (2009), “Productive efficiency, environmental efficiency and their determinants in farrow-to-finish pig farming in Taiwan,” Livestock Science, 126, 195-205. Zhou, Peng, Kim Leng Poh and Beng Wah Ang (2007), “A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance,” European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 1-9. Zhou, P., B.W. Ang and K.L. Poh (2008), “A Survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies,” European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 1-18. Zhang, Tao (2009), “Frame work of data envelopment analysis - A model to evaluate the environmental efficiency of China’s industrial sectors,” Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 21, 8-13.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學財政研究所 99255007 100
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099255007
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Public Finance] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
500701.pdf	1748Kb	Adobe PDF2	60	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback