English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51576610      Online Users : 911
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/53362


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53362


    Title: No Communal and First-Person Errors: A Critique of Brandom’s Objectivity Proof
    無社群與第一人稱錯誤
    Authors: 林從一
    Lin, Chung-I
    Contributors: 政大哲學系
    Keywords: 布蘭登;客觀性;推論語意學;語用語意學
    Brandom;objectivity;inferential semantics;pragmatic semantics
    Date: 2008-09
    Issue Date: 2012-08-21 14:38:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 布藍登的《說明白》(Making It Explicit)主張一種實用主義的語意理論(pragmatic semantics)，他認為他的理論所而臨最大的挑戰，是呈現出他的理論不會違反以下這個客觀性原則：我們的態度所關於的對象是超越我們的態度的。布藍登書中總其成的一章是第八章，在該章中，他直接面對那個挑戰，他試圖證明他的理論不會有以下的後果：(P)［(S)（S宣稱P）→P］（名為「無社羣錯誤條件句」，NO Communal Error Condition）。在本文中，我論證布藍登的論證是失敗的，同時我也將證明「無社羣錯誤條件句」以及布藍登所謂的「無第一人稱錯誤條件句」（No Communal Error Condition, (P) ［（我宣稱P）→P］）在適度且微幅的修正下，將可從他的實用主義的語意理論中導出。
    Brandom recognizes one of the most serious conceptual challenges facing the pragmatic semantics advocated his Making It Explicit is the need to accommodate the objectivity conviction that our attitudes are answering to things that transcend our attitudes. And he meets the challenge head-on by processing a proof in his climactic chapter eight to demonstrate that his account does not force upon itself the undesirable consequence that (p)[(S) (S claims that p)→p], dubbed the No Communal Error Condition. In this paper, Ⅰ shall argue that Brandom`s proof fails, and, moreover, I prove that both the No Communal Error Condition and what Brandom calls No First-Person Error Condition, (p) [(I claim that p)→p]), with minor modifications, will result from his pragmatic account.
    Relation: 國立政治大學哲學學報, 20, 102-122
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML21640View/Open


    View Licence

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback