English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50933592      Online Users : 974
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/53334


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53334


    Title: 儒學也能推導出現代法治原則嗎？以「道德自主性」為中心的探討
    Can We Deduce the Principle of Rule of Law from Confucianism? An Analysis Based on the Conception of Moral Autonomy
    Authors: 何信全
    Ho, Hsin-chuan
    Contributors: 政大哲學系
    Keywords: 儒學;自由主義;法治原則;道德自主性;普遍性
    Confucianism;Liberalism;Principle of Rule of Law;Moral Autonomy;Universalizability
    Date: 2011-06
    Issue Date: 2012-08-09 14:28:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討儒學傳統在「聖王之治」理想之下的人治格局，是否亦有可能經由新的詮釋，創造性地轉化為現代普遍規則之治的法治思維與論述。本文檢視西方自由主義的法治論證、從洛克立基於人的理性以論法治之下的自由；肇端於盧梭「普遍意志」，經康德轉化而落實為「無條件律令」之道德自主性法治論證；以迄維爾斯祈嚮由理性的自律主體所構成合乎正義原則之法治國家。透過比較分析，本文嘗試從儒家孟子以迄陸象山、王陽明此一心學脈絡，進行普遍法則之治可能資源的挖掘。本文指出，就思想內在理路而言，從孟子性善論、陸象山「心即理」到王陽明「致良知」的道德哲學，在中國歷史脈絡中固然導向德治仁政的人治格局；然而與西方近代自由主義立基於「道德自主性」的法治論證對比分析，其實可以發掘出儒家心學傳統中亦蘊含充沛的「道德自主性」觀念內涵，得以推導出現代法治原則。
    In this paper, I would like to investigate the issue whether it is possible to deduce the principle of rule of law from Confucianism. Admittedly, instead of "rule of law", the ideal state is "rule of sage-king" in traditional China. Nevertheless, the point is whether it is possible to seek the resources for the justifications of rule of law in Confucianism by a new interpretation or so-called `creative transformation`. Through the comparative analyses with the justifications of rule of law in liberalism, such as Lock`s `liberty under the rule of law` based on human reason, the transformation from Rousseau`s `general will` to Kant`s `categorical imperative`, and Rawls`s principles of justice which are analogous to categorical imperative, I indicate we could deduce the principle of rule of law from idealistic Confucianism which originated from Mencius, through Sung-Ming to contemporary neo-Confucianism. As the justifications of rule of universal law, Mencius`s "human nature is good", Lu Hsiang-shan`s "mind is principles" and Wang Yang-ming`s chih liang-chih are all based on the conception of moral autonomy. From this viewpoint, I conclude that it seems possible to deduce the principle of rule of law from Confucianism.
    Relation: 思與言, 49(2), 165-195
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    02588412-201106-201202230012-201202230012-169-199.pdf6929KbAdobe PDF2853View/Open


    View Licence

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback