 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 114105/145137 (79%)
Visitors : 52206584
Online Users : 646
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53329
|
| Title: | 優質學校品質管理指標建構之研究 |
| Authors: | 陳木金;楊念湘 |
| Contributors: | 師資培育中心 |
| Keywords: | 優質學校
品質管理 |
| Date: | 2011-10 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-08-06 16:15:57 (UTC+8) |
| Publisher: | 首府大學 |
| Abstract: | 本研究首先探討優質學校與品質管理之內涵，發展建構一套「優質學校品質管理指標」，內涵包括：1.建立學校全面品質管理的計畫或方案；2.擬定品質管理的標準作業流程；3.建立溝通管道及主動服務機制；4.落實品質管理的回饋評核機制；5.建立以需求與滿意為導向的服務等五個層面，共29項指標。其次，本研究針對指標之信度與效度考驗，抽樣98位臺北市國民中小學學校行政人員（包括校長、主任、組長）為研究對象，結果發現29項指標的決斷值均大於5，顯示本研究之鑑別度佳；抽出5個因素，解釋總變異量為77.12%，顯示本研究之建構效度良好；信度分析的Cronbach’s α係數皆大於 .92，顯示本研究之信度佳。第三，本研究為了進一步瞭解「優質學校品質管理指標」的適切度，再抽取135位臺北市國民中小學學校行政人員為研究對象，進行驗證性因素分析，發現本研究建構之指標在整體適配度、比較適配度、精簡適配度、基本適配度及內在適配度皆良好，表示優質學校品質管理指標的建構效度佳，適合作為推動優質學校經營及建立我國國民中小學優質學校品質管理指標之參考。 |
| Relation: | 教育學術彙刊 (民國一ＯＯ年)，第3輯第2期 第 57~80頁 |
| Description: | The study of constructing quality management indicators in quality school
The main purpose of this study was to investigate quality school and quality management and construct quality management indicators in quality school which consisted of five dimensions: 1.establishing the plans or programs of total quality management in schools, 2.drawing up the standard operation procedure of quality management, 3.establishing the communication channel and the mechanism of initiative service, 4.carrying out the mechanism of quality management which can offer evaluation and feedback, and 5. establishing the services which take the demand and satisfaction as the guidance. Secondly, this study focuses on the reliability and validity of indicators, sampling 98 school administrative personnel of elementary and middle schools in Taipei city (concluding principals, directors, and group leaders). We found that the critical ratio of 29 indicators were greater than 5, and the discriminate of this study was good. We extracted five factors in which the total variance was 77.12%, and the construct validity of this study was good. The Cronbach`s α coefficients of reliability analysis were greater than .92, and the reliability of this study was good. Third, in order to learn more the "quality management indicators in quality school", we sampled 135 school administrative personnel of elementary and middle schools in Taipei city, and conducted the confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, acquired data was analyzed by statistical methods and the main findings were found as follows: 1.The result of critical ratio analysis was good. 2.The result of reliability analysis was good. 3.The inventory had good suitability and fitness of the dimensions and items. Thus, the quality management indicators in quality school constructed by this study were good checklists for the management of quality school and also could serve as the references of establishing the quality management indicators in elementary and middle schools. |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [師資培育中心] 研究報告
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 5-56.pdf | 期刊發展文章 | 422Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1746 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
