Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52832
|
| Title: | 捷克轉型正義與淨化法之研究
A study of transitional justice and lustration law in the Czech Republic |
| Authors: | 盧丞莘
Lu, Chen Shin |
| Contributors: | 林永芳
盧丞莘
Lu, Chen Shin |
| Keywords: | 捷克轉型正義
淨化法
淨化政策
去共化
中東歐國家轉型正義
轉型正義
Transitional Justice in the Czech
Lustration Law
Lustration
de-communism
Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe
Transitional Justice |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-04-17 09:29:25 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文重要的目的，瞭解捷克轉型正義的特色與淨化法的施行。捷克轉型正義，發生在蘇聯解體、中東歐國家政治、經濟轉型的脈絡下。去共化和處理過去共遺緒問題，是中東歐國家轉型正義的重要任務，淨化法在如此政治環境下產生。捷克的淨化政策，由於國內政治非制度淨化，加上民主選舉過程，導致黑函滿天飛，所造成嚴重的政治問題，因而訂定的立法規範。這樣的背景下，淨化政策是一種特殊、臨時的政策工具。反映出當時轉型政治所面臨的困難，以及共黨政治轉型到民主政治之間，體系轉換的矛盾。此外，淨化政策也代表，當時捷克政治環境危機的解決方式。回到歷史的脈絡下來看，淨化政策是一種人事改革的手段，也是推動整體改革的基礎。解構舊有的權力結構，讓新民主有機會發展。
淨化政策在施行上，仍有許多爭議，包括可能侵害個人政治權力，以及被認為是一種對於共黨的報復手段，但淨化政策最重要的目標，是為建立特殊時期的改革基礎，也沒有具體的資料顯示，淨化政策會造成政治民主發展的傷害，相反的，淨化政策的施行得當，對於新民主的發展是有助益。
The most important purpose of this thesis is to understand the characteristics of the Czech transitional justice and Lustration Law. The Czech, as a Central and Eastern European countries, transitional justice occurred in the Post-Soviet with the political, economic restructuring context. Both "de-communism" and "the dealing with the past" is important task of the Transitional Justice in Central and Eastern European countries, and the Lustration Law implement in this background. Czech Lustration Law is result from wild lustration, because of democratic electoral system, leading to blackmail over the place, caused a serious political problem. Therefore, the legislators decided to make the law. Based on the above, the Lustration Law is a special, temporary policy tool. The situation reflects the challenges of political transition, and the communist political transition to a democratic system, is facing tremendous contradiction. In addition, the Lustration policy also represents a solution choice of the Czech political environment crisis. Lustration policy is a kind of a personnel reform policy, and promotes the overall reform. Destroy the former power structure, so that the new democracy has a chance to develop.
Examining the Lustration policy, there is a lot of controversy. Including it may infringe the personal political right, and it’s considered as retaliation to the former political elite. However, the Lustration policies the most important goal is to establish the basis of a special period of reform. There is no specific evidence to show that Lustration Law will result in damage to the development of political democracy. On the other hand, lustration policy is implemented appropriately; it would be beneficial for the development of new democracy. |
| Reference: | 一、中文專書
仁德厚，1999，《政治學》，台北，三民。
吳 庚，2010，《行政法之理論與實用》，台北，三民。
李英明，2005，《制度主義與社會資本》，台北，志揚。
李惠宗，2006，《憲法要義》，台北，元照。
李邁先，1991，《東歐諸國史》，台北：三民書局。
沈宗靈，2007，《法理學》，台北：五南。
周力行，2008，《捷克史：波西米亞的傳奇》，台北：三民。
洪美蘭，2002，《經濟激進轉型策略-中東歐之經驗與啟示》，台北：翰蘆。
俞寬賜，2002《國際法新論》，台北：國立編譯館。
高永光，2004，〈國家論〉，陳義彥主編，《政治學》，台北：五南。
徐永明主編，2008，《轉型，要不要正義？》，台北，台灣智庫。
黃 默主編，2007，《人權字典》，台北，教育部。
趙敦華，1988，《勞斯的（正義論）解說》，台北，遠流。
鄭曉時、戴 華編，1991，《正義及其相關問題》，台北，中央研究院。
劉清波，1992，《社會主義國家法則》，台北，黎明文化。
蕭全政，2006，《政治與經濟的整合》，高雄：桂冠。
蘇俊雄，1990，《法治政治》，台北：中正。
二、中文譯書
Arendt, Hannah著，蔡佩君譯，2008，《責任與判斷》，台北：左岸。譯自Responsibility and Judgment. 2003.
Buchanan, James著，方世杰譯，1992，《自由‧市場與國家》，台北：五南。
Diamond, Larry. & Marc Plattner著，田弘茂、朱雲漢譯，《新興民主的機遇與挑戰》，台北：張榮發基金會國政策研究中心。
Goldman, Minton著，楊淑娟譯，2001，《中、東歐的革命與變遷：政治、經濟與社會的挑戰》，臺北市：編譯館。
Gustav, Radbruch著，王怡蘋、林宏濤譯，2000，《法學導論》，台北：商周。譯自Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft.
Heywood, Andrew著，楊日青、李培元、林文斌、劉兆隆譯，2001，《政治學新論》，台北：韋伯文化。
Huntington, Samuel P.著，劉軍寧譯，1994，《第三波：二十世紀末的民主化浪潮》，台北：五南。譯自The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. 1991.
Kissinger, Henry著 顧淑馨、林添貴譯，1998，《大外交》，台北：智庫文化。
Lijphard, Arend著，陳坤森譯，1993，《當代民主類型與政治》，台北：桂冠。譯自Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries.Yale University Press. 1984.
Marsh, David& Gerry Stoker著，陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏譯，1998，《政治學方法論》，台北：韋伯。譯自Theory and Methods in Political Science. St.Martin’s Press.1995.
Nordlinge, Eric著，蕭全政譯，1988，《民主國家的自主性》，台北：國民大會憲政研討委員會。
Pogge, Thomas 著，顧肅、劉雪梅譯，2010，《羅爾斯與『正義論』》，台北：五南。
Posner, Richard 著，蘇力譯，2002，《超越法律》，台北：元照。譯自Overcoming law. Harvard: Harvard Press. 1995.
Posner, Richard 著，蘇力譯，2002，《法理學問題》，台北：元照。譯自 The Problem of Jurisprudence. Harvard Press. 1995.
Potter, David. Goldbalt David, Margaret Kiloh, & Paul Lewis著，王謙、李昌麟、林賢治、黃惟饒譯，2000，《民主化的歷程》，台北：韋伯。譯自Democratization. Polity Press. 1997.
Sandel,Michae 著，樂為良，2011，《正義：一場思辨之旅》，台北：雅言文化 Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do.
Sørensen, George 著，李酉潭、陳志瑋譯，2000，《最新民主與民主化》，台北：韋伯。譯自Democracy and Democratization: procesesand prospects in a changing. Westview Press. 1998.
Teitel, Ruti 著，鄭純宜，2001，《變遷中的正義》，台北：商周。譯自Trasitional justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2000.
Tutu, Desmond Milo著，江紅譯，2005，《沒有寬恕就沒有未來》，台北：左岸。譯自No Future without Forgiveness. 1999.
三、中文學位論文
江子楊，2010，《俄羅斯與台灣轉型正義之比較研究》，台北，政治大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文。
姜惠如，2010，《公民社會在捷克民主轉型過程中之角色討論》，台北，東吳大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
黃兆年，2008，《轉型正義在台灣政經發展中的角色定位》，台北，台灣政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
羅立佳，2008，《轉型正義的政治性重探：正義之名下的民主、秩序時間形構》，新竹，國立交通大學文化與社會研究所碩士論文。
四、中文期刊
江宜樺，2007，〈台灣轉型正義及其省思〉，《思想》，5：65－81。
吳乃德，2009，〈服從權威是邪惡的根源？〉，《思與言》，47(3)：1-25。
洪茂雄，1997，〈後共產主義時期捷克的政治發展─民主化與歐洲化〉，《問題與研究》，36(9)：13-25。
胡婉玲，2001，<論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論>，《新世紀智庫論壇》， 16：86-95。
郭艷，2009，〈新興民主政體轉型正義難題〉，《南京工業大學學報》，社會科學版， 8(1)：5-9。
黃宗昊，2010，〈歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構〉，《問題與研究》，49(3)：145-169。
葉浩，2008，〈價值多元是轉型正義理論:一個政治哲學路徑的嘗試〉，《台灣政治學刊》， 12(1)：11－51。
蔡相廷，2010，〈歷史制度主義的興起與研討取向─政治學研究途徑的探討〉，《台北市立教育大學學報》，41(2)：39-76。
嚴震生，2006，〈真相調查委員會與轉型正義〉，《校園》，48(6)：39-43。
五、英文專書
Amadiume,Ifi & Abdullahi A. An-Na`im’ 2000. The Politics of Memory: Truth, Healing and Social Justice. London: Zed Books.
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective
Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.
Everett J.Worthington. 2005. The Power of Forgiveness. MA: Paraclete Press
Hatschikjan, Magarditsch. Dušan Relji and Nenad Šebek. 2005. Disclosing hidden history:Lustration in the Western Balkans. Greece: Center for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe.
Hayner, Priscilla B. 2002. Unspeakable Truths NewYork: Routledge.
Helmick, Raymond G. & Rodney L. Petersen. 2002. Forgiveness and Reconciliation. Pennsylvania:Templeton Foundation Press.
Kritz, Neil J. Edited. 1995. Transitional Justice：How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes Volume I、II、III. Washington DC:United States Institute of Peace.
Lederach, john paul. 2008. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United State Institute of Peace.
Mayer-rieckh, Alexander. & Pablo De Greiff. Edited. 2007. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Nalepa, Monika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York：Cambridge University Press.
Orenstein, Mitchell A. Stephen Bloom, and Nicole Lindstrom. 2008. Transnational
actors in central and east European transitions （Pittsburgh：Pittsburgh University Press）
Paris, Roland. 2004. At War’s End. Cambridge University Press.
Pithar, Petr. 2006. Transformation: he Czech Experience. Prague: the Ministry of Foreign Afairs of the Czech Republic.
Quinn, Joanna R. 2009. Reconciliation(s) : transitional justice in postconflict societies. Montréal : McGill-Queen`s University Press.
Rosenberg, Tina. 1995. The Haunted Land : Facing Europe`s Ghosts After Communism. New York : Random House.
Teitel, Ruti. 2000. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tutu, Desmond Milo. 1999. No Future without Forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.
Wiesenthal, Simon. 1998. The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness. New York: Random House Inc.
Yusuf, Hakeem O. 2010. Transitional justice, Judicial Accountability and the Rule of Law. New York: Routledge.
六、英文專書論文：
Blažek, Petr. 2006.”Transitions to Democracy and the ‘Lustration’ Screening Process.” In Transformation: the Czech Experience, the Ministry of Foreign Afairs of the Czech Republic Prague. pp.173-180.
Gonzalez-Enriquez, Carmen. 2002 "De-communization and Political Justice in Central and Eastern Europe" In The Politics of Memory. Brito, Alexandra Barahona De , Carmen Gonzalez Enriquez ,and Paloma Aguilar Ed. New York: Oxford University. pp.218-247.
Havel, Vaclav. 1992. "The Power of the Powerless." In Open Letters: Selected Writing 1965-1990. New York: Vintage. pp.125-214.
Horne, Cynthia M. & Margaret Levi. 2004. "Does Lustration Promote Trustworthy Governance? An Exploration of the Experience of Central and Eastern Europe" In Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition. Kornai, Janos & Susan Rose-Ackerman. ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.52-74.
Letki, Natalia. 2004. "The Consequences of Lustration for Democratisation: The Experience of East Central Europe." In Past and Present: Consequences for Democratisation. Hatschikjan, Magarditsch & Noack-Aetopulos Corinna ed. Center for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe.
Méndez, Juan E. 2001.“In Defense of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Indiana: University of Notre Dame. Linden, Ronald. 2011. “EU Accession and the Role of International Actors.” In Central and East European politics: from communism to democracy. Wolchik, Sharon L. and Jane L. Curry. Ed. Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 125-139.
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2009. “Czechoslovakia and the Czech and Slovak Republics.” In Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Stan, Lavinia. Ed. New York: Routledge. pp.37-75.
Priban, Jiri. 2007. “Oppressors and Their Victims: The Czech Lustration and Rule of Law.” In Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. Mayer-rieckh, Alexander. & Pablo De Greiff. ed. New York: Social Science Research Council. pp.308-346.
Schwartz, Herman. 1995.“Memorandum from Helsinki Watch and Others to the Constitutional Court of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic in the Matter of the Constitutionality of Act No. 451/1991 (1992)”In Transitional Justice volumeⅢ. Kritz, Neil. ed. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace. pp.335-345.
Stan, Lavinia. 2009. “Introduction: Post-communist transition, justice, and transitional justice” In Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Stan, Lavinia. Ed. New York: Routledge. pp.1-14.
Stan, Lavinia. 2009. “Conclusion: Explaining country differences” In Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Stan, Lavinia. Ed. New York: Routledge. pp.247-270.
Zacek, Pavel. 2004. "The case of Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic." In Past and Present: Consequences for Democratisation. Hatschikjan, Magarditsch & Noack-Aetopulos Corinna ed. Center for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe. pp.9-11.
七、英文期刊
Anderlini, Sanam Naraghi, Camille Pampell Conway and Lisa Kays. 2007. "Transitional Justice and Reconciliation." Inclusive Security, Sustainable Peace: A Toolkit for Advocacy and Action , 4:1-15
Booth, W. James. 2001. “The Unforgotten: Memories of Justice.” American Political Science Review, 95(4): 777-791
Cohen, Stanley. 1995. “State Crimes of Previous Regimes: Knowledge, Accountability, and the Policing of the Past.”Law & Social Inquiry, 20(1): 7-50
David, Roman. 2003. “Lustration Laws in Action: The Motives and Evaluation of Lustration Policy in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989-2001).” Law & Social Inquiry, 28(2): 387-439
David, Roman. 2004. “Transitional Injustice? Criteria for Conformity of Lustration to the Right to Political Expression.” Europe-Asia Studies, 56(6):789-812
David, Roman. & Susanne Y. P. Choi . 2005 “Victims on Transitional Justice: Lessons from the Reparation of Human Rights Abuses in the Czech Republic.” Human Rights Quarterly, 27(2): 392-435
David, Roman. & Susanne Y. P. Choi. 2006.”Forgiveness and Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(3): 339-367
Dimitrijević, Nenad. 2006.“Justice beyond Blame: Moral Justification of (the Idea of) a Truth Commission.” Journal of Conflict Resolutio,. 50( 3): 368-382
Ellis, Mark. 1996. “Purging the past: The Current State of Lustration Laws in the Former Communist Bloc.”Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4) : 181-196
Elster, Jon. 2006.“Redemption for Wrongdoing: The Fate of Collaborators after 1945.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50( 3): 324-338
Esquith, Stephen. 1999. “Toward a Democratic Rule of Law: East and West.” Political Theory, 27( 3): 334-356
Hall, Peter A. & Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism” Political Studie, 44: 936-957
Hanley,Seán. 2005."A Review Article: The Origins of Postcommunist Elites: From the Prague Spring to the Breakup of Czechoslovakia by Gil Eyal " Europe-Asia Studies, 57(2):355-357
Hilde, Paal Sigurd. 1999. “Slovak Nationalism and the Break-Up of Czechoslovakia.” Europe-Asia Studies, 51(4): 647-665
Huyse, Luc. 1995. “ Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past. “Law & Social Inquiry, 20(1): 51-78
Kaminski, Marek M. Monika Nalepa, and Barry O’neill. 2006.“Normative and Strategic Aspects of Transitional Justice.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50( 3): 295-302
Kaminski, Marek M. and Monika Nalepa. 2006.“Judging Transitional Justice: A New Criterion For Evaluating Truth Revelation Procedures.”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50( 3): 383-408.
Killingsworth, Matt. 2010. “Lustration in Poland: Coming to Terms with a Totalitarian Past”,Communist and post-Communist studies, 43:275-284.
Kosař, David. 2008. “Lustration and Lapse of Time: ‘Dealing with the Past’ in the Czech Republic.” European Constitutional Law Review, 4(3): 460-487
Letki, Natalia. 2002. “Lustration and Democratisation in East-Central Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies, 54(4): 529-552
Letki, Natalia. 2004. “Socialization for Participation? Trust, Membership, and Democratization in East-Central Europe.” Political Research Quarterly, 57(4): 665-679
Łoś, Maria. 1995. “Lustration and Truth Claims: Unfinished Revolutions in Central Europe” Law & Social Inquiry, 20(1): 117-161
Nalepa, Monika. 2005. "Lustration and the Survival of Parliamentary Parties." Taiwan Journal of Democracy. 5(2): 45-68
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2004. “Divergent Responses to a Common past: Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Theory and Society, 33(1): 65-115
Posner, Eric. & Adrian Vermeule. 2004. “Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice.” Harvard Law Review. 117(3): 761-825
Shabad, Goldie &Kazimierz M. Slomczynski. 2002. “The Emergence of Career Politicians in Post-Communist Democracies: Poland and the Czech Republic.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27( 3): 333-359
Siegel, Richard. 1998. “Transitional Justice: A Decade of Debate and Experience.” Human Rights Quarterly, 20(2): 431-454
Welsh, Helga. 1996. “Dealing with the Communist past: Central and East European Experiences after 1990.” Europe-Asia Studies, 48(3): 413-428
Williams, Kieran. &Brigid Fowler. 2003. “Explaining Lustration in Easter Europe: A Post-communist politics approach.” Sussex European Institute. Working Paper No:62
Zake, Ieva. 2010. “Politicans Versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in Transitional Latvia” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 26(3):389-412
八、網路資訊
ILOLEX（database of international labour standards ）：〈http://www.ilo.org/ilolex
/english/index.htm〉(2011.11)
“Representation (article 24) - Czech and Slovak Federal Republic - C111 - 1992 ---- Report of the Committee set up to examine the representation made by the Czech and Slovak Confederation of Trade Unions (CS-KOS) under article 24 of the ILO Constitution alleging non-observance by the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic of the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111)”
〈http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/pdconv.pl?host=status01&textbase=iloeng&document=116&chapter=16&query=(Czech+Republic%2CCzechoslovakia)+%40ref&highlight=&querytype=bool&context=0〉(2011.11)
Puddington, Arch. 2011 "Freedomin the World 2011: the Authoritarian Challenge to Democracy" Freedom House’s annual survey of political rights and civil liberties.
〈http://www.freedomhouse.org .〉(2011.12)
Wilke, Christine. 2002. “Politics of Transitional Justice：German Hungarian and Czech Decisions on expost fact Punishment” New school University, In 〈http://www.gdrc.org/ngo/peter-willets.html. 〉(2011.10) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
98263003
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0982630031 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [俄羅斯研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 003101.pdf | 15691Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 3362 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
