English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51112624      Online Users : 856
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/52723
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52723


    Title: 運動休旅車品牌聯盟策略之探討-以聯合分析法分析
    Brand alliance of sport utility vehicle(SUV) by conjoint analysis
    Authors: 丘青鎧
    Chiu, Ching Kai
    Contributors: 李嘉林
    Lee, Chia Lin
    丘青鎧
    Chiu, Ching Kai
    Keywords: 品牌聯盟
    產品屬性
    產品屬性水準
    聯合分析法
    集群分析法
    ERG理論
    EBM模型
    brand alliance
    product attribute
    product attribute level
    conjoint analysis
    cluster analysis
    ERG theory
    EBM model
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2012-04-17 09:09:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 汽車產業早期在台灣一直都屬於重點產業,早從1950年代以前,台灣政府便開始發展汽車產業(陳釧瑤,1997),然而若按照原定計畫,台灣汽車產業早該在1985年以後就邁入國際化以及自有品牌,不過現今大多數的台灣汽車廠商仍處於通路代理商和零組件代工製造階段,為了避免淘汰,本研究認為台灣汽車廠商應著手發展自有品牌,不過因為台灣廠商大多欠缺品牌知名度,謂此本研究認為台灣廠商可採行品牌聯盟策略。然而考量到市場未來趨勢與消費者需求的多元化,本次研究將以強調運動、休閒的SUV休旅車作為本次研究主要探討的車種,並希望能藉由品牌聯盟讓台灣汽車廠商得以自創品牌。
    本次研究貢獻在學術方面有三,其一是產品屬性與產品屬性水準之詮釋、二是研究品牌聯盟議題時,需建立在品牌是否能替代某產品屬性的議題上,三是消費者在從事消費行為時確實會產生退縮或是漸進策略。在管理實務上,本研究所給予的建議有七,其一是品牌知名度高低將會影響消費者做出正確決定,其二是當消費者無法有效處理資訊時,車商品牌的重要性將會提升,其三是低辨識度品牌有動機發展成份品牌,其四是台灣汽車廠商自創品牌確實有其利基市場存在,其五是品牌自創過程中,必須不斷地做自我評估,其六是傳遞正確且為消費者所能承受並理解的正確資訊是價值創造的重要一環,其七是品牌建立本身即是策略規劃。
    Motor industry is one of the most important industry that Taiwan government energetically have developed and invested lots of resources since 1950(陳釧瑤,1997). Indeed, Taiwanese motor firms should have had their own brand and made it internationalized in 1985. However, most of Taiwanese motor firms are still on the stage of OEM or ODM. We regard this condition as a threat that will obstruct the profit growth and weaken the competitiveness of them. Therefore, we consider branding is one of the effective alternatives to strengthen the competitiveness of Taiwanese motor industry.
    Because of the low brand awareness of Taiwanese motor firms, brand alliance may be the best way that can help them to build their private label. Considering the trend of lifestyle in Taiwan, this literature will focus on “brand alliance of sport utility vehicle” and try to find some important attributes that will support them to select their partners and satisfy the consumer needs.
    As a result, this studying has three contributions to academic researcher. First, we redefine the meanings of product attribute and product attribute level that many academics confuse. Second, the consistency between the brand awareness of ingredient firms and product attribute should be considered when motor firms are finding the partners of alliance. Third, we verify either behavioral progression or behavioral depression may happen in purchase process (Alderfer, 1972).
    In practice, we find the fitness between product attributes and partner’s brand awareness will affect the result of brand alliance. The finding implies that ingredient firms which have great brand equity in B2B market may have low equity in B2C market. Second, the weight of car brand will be more important when asymmetric information exists. Third, the ingredient firms which have great equity in B2B market and low awareness in B2C market have the motive to cooperate with private label brand firms. Fourth, there are some niches in Taiwanese SUV market. Fifth, branding can’t success without self-audit. Sixth, delivering the appropriate and correct information to consumers is one of the most important things of value creation. Seventh, strategy is the nature of branding, so it will be very hard to brand without strategic planning.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    (一)機關資訊
    1. 經濟部商業司(2011),公司查詢。
    2. 台灣區車輛工業同業公會(2011),產業概況調查。
    3. 財團法人車輛研究測試中心(2010),產業概況調查。
    (二)報章雜誌
    1. 邱馨儀(2011年1月29日電),裕隆日產汽車榮獲2010年「日產R&D品質賞」。經濟日報即時新聞,。
    (三)中文書籍
    1. Engel、Blackwell與Miniard(2007),消費者行為(第十版)。白滌清譯(原著出版年:2006),華泰文化出版。
    2. Kevin Lane Keller(2008),策略品牌管理。徐世同譯(原著出版年:2008),華泰文化出版。
    3. Kolter,P.與Keller.K.L.(2006),行銷管理學。樓永堅、方世榮合譯(原著出版年:2006),東華書局出版。
    4. Michael Porter(1998),競爭策略。周旭華譯(原著出版年:1980)。天下文化出版。
    5. 林零宏與張魁峯(2006),消費者行為。五南書局出版。
    6. 洪順慶(2006),台灣品牌競爭力。天下雜誌出版。
    7. 周文賢、張欽富(2000),聯合分析在產品設計之運用。華泰文化出版。
    8. 真誠知已(2006),聯合分析的SPSS使用手冊。陳耀茂編審(原著出版年:2001),鼎茂圖書出版。
    9. 黃俊英(2000),行銷研究概論(第三版)。華泰文化出版。
    10. 黃俊英(2000),多變量分析/Multivariate analysis an introduction eng(七版)。中國經濟企業研究所出版。
    11. 劉文良(2005),顧客關係管理思維與技術。碁峰文化出版。 
    12. 張春興(1989),張氏心理學辭典。東華書局出版,頁586。
    13. 龔曙明(2005),應用統計(第二版)。北京清華大學出版,頁10-11。
    14. 中山企管系教授群:Scott Valentine、方至民、李清潭、宋兆賢、范瑞珠、邱燈助、胡國強、翁良杰、 高明瑞、陳心田、張倉榮、張瑞當、葉匡時、曾志弘、黃北豪、黃賀、趙平宜、蔡憲唐、鄭育仁、鄭焜中、劉維琪、鍾昆原、鍾憲瑞等合著(2007),管理學:整合觀點與創新思維/2版。前程文化出版。
    (四)學術論文
    1. 王朝民(1997),休旅車消費行為之研究。國立交通大學管理研究所碩士論文,新竹市。
    2. 王詩晴(2002),影響全球品牌成功推出副品牌之因素的探討-以精品業為例。國立政治大學國際貿易研究所,台北市。
    3. 李青峰(1999),產品涉入、品牌權益與市場特性對品牌評估與選擇之影響。國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文,台南市。
    4. 何蒼崧(2001),品牌聯想形象與消費者特質對品牌延伸評估之影響。私立義守大學管理科學研究所,高雄市。
    5. 宋隆炫(1993),國產自用小轎車之市場區隔、定位與行銷策略研究。大葉工學院事業經營研究所碩士論文,彰化縣。
    6. 林聰琳 (1977),自用轎車購買動機研究。政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,台北市。
    7. 林偉彬(1998),利益區隔與品質知覺在休旅車市場之應用。台灣科技大學管理技術研究所未出版碩士論文,台北市。
    8. 林永權(2003),休旅車消費者決策歷程之研究。國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    9. 沈佳穎(2004),以聯合分析法探討消費者對忠誠方案屬性之偏好。國立政治大學碩士論文,台北市。
    10. 周上富 (2002),國產休旅車消費者購買行為及其市場區隔之研究-以北部地區居民為例。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,新竹市。
    11. 吳志武、曾世風(2005),建構汽車購買決策支援系統-以休旅車為例。國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理,新竹市。
    12. 馬毅志 (1974),小客車買主之消費者行為-決策程序方法。成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文,台南市。
    13. 康登春(1999),休旅車消費者行為特質與潛在市場探討之研究。國立成功大學工業管理研究所,台南市。
    14. 張正杰(2001),汽車消費者購買決策行為之實證研究-以中國大陸廣州市為例。國立東華大學大陸研究所碩士論文,宜蘭縣。
    15. 黃忠榮(1984),自用轎車廠牌形象定位之研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,台北市。
    16. 梁恆德(1996),汽車購買者知覺風險之研究。國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所未出版之碩士論文,台北市。
    17. 莊泰旭(2002),以Kano 模式在汽車市場調查之研究-以中、印汽車業為例。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。
    18. 邱光輝、孫珮珊、陳明怡(2005),知覺產品品質、顧客滿意與顧客忠誠關係之研究-以上海地區東南汽車為例。國立台北大學企業管理研究所/行銷評論,2005 年夏季第2卷,第2期,頁219-238,台北市。
    19. 楊春暉(1996),ERIC資料庫之服務品質研究。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
    20. 楊謹嘉(2005),日本汽車產業跨國策略聯盟的動態演進。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,台北市。
    21. 劉景賢(2001),聯合分析法在廠商決策之應用-以海外進入模式的選擇為例。國立臺灣大學碩士論文,台北市。
    22. 劉旭峰(2005),消費者在採購休旅車選擇因素分析之研究。私立元智大學工業工程與管理學系,桃園縣。
    23. 陳釧瑤(1997),台灣汽車市場產品特性需求分析-以國產自用小客車為例。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所,桃園縣。
    24. 陳嬿伊(1997),價格離散對消費者價格知覺的影響。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,台北市。
    25. 陳仕煥(1997),汽車購買者評估準則及影響因素之研究-以台南地區為例。國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文,台南市。
    26. 陳鑑汶(2002),休旅車消費者購買決策的型態及行銷策略研究。成功大學高階管理碩士,碩士論文,台南市。
    27. 陳世偉(2003),國產汽車消費者購買行為之研究。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,台北市。
    28. 賴稚峰(2004),以M-GSPRT法應用於家庭消費產品需求預測之研究~以休旅車為例。國立交通大學交通運輸研究所,新竹市。
    29. 蕭夙君(2000),消費者之社會階層、家庭生命週期與其汽車產品屬性重視類別之關聯性研究。國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文,新竹市。
    30. 鄭英傑(1982),國產小型轎車決定性屬性與消費者特性之研究。國立成功大學工業管理研究所,台南市。
    31. 鄭超群(1995),國產自用小客車廠牌形象知覺與形象定位之研究-非計量多元尺度法之應用。國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,新竹市。
    二、英文部分
    1. Alderfer, C. P.(1972), Existence, relatedness, and growth. New York: Free Press.
    2. Agarwal, MikeK(1980), “Estimation Demand Functions for Products Characteristics:The Case of Automobiles.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.3, Dec.
    3. Anthony Lowe & Pascal A. Bühler (2010), “Managing brands globally: A cross-cultural study of the BMW brand in Australia and Germany.” Gibaran Journal of Applied Management Vol.3, pp. 1-16.
    4. Brown, J.J., C.D. Light & G.M. Gazda (1987), “ Attitude toward European, Japanese ,and U.S. car.” European Journal of Marketing, Vol.21, pp. 90-100.
    5. Bowersox & Cooper (1992), Strategic marketing channel management. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
    6. Carmone, F.J., Green, P.E. & Jain, A.K. (1978), “Robustness of conjoint analysis: some monte carlo results.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.15, pp. 300-303.
    7. Cavusgil & Knight&Riesenberger(2008), International Business: Strategy, Management, and the New Realities. Prentice Hall.
    8. Dae-Ho Byun(2001), “The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model.” Information & Management, Vol.38, pp. 289-297.
    9. Elsevier(2010), “How co-branding versus brand extensions drive consumers` evaluations of new products: A brand equity approach.” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.39, pp. 1240-1249.
    10. Frank M, Bass & W. Wayne ,Talarzyk (1972), “An attitude model for the study of brand preference.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.9, pp. 93-96.
    11. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.(1975), Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
    12. Green, P.E. & Wind, Y.(1973), Multi-attribute decisions in marketing : a measurement approach. Dryden Press, Hinsdale,IL,
    pp. 39-46.
    13. Green, HP, Tull, DS, Albaum, G.(1988), Research for Marketing Decision(5th ed). Prentice-Hall Inc.
    14. Henry Assael(1987), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action(3rd ed), Boston, MA: Kent Publishing Co.
    15. Hardy, K. G. & Magrath, A. J. (1988), Marketing channel management: Strategic planning and tactics. Illinois: Scott Publishing.
    16. Hahn, Mini, & D.R. Chang (1992), An Extended Framework for AdjustingChannel Strategies in Industrial Markets, The Joural of Bussiness & Industrial Markets, Vol.7(2), pp. 27-35.
    17. Horwitz, E. K. & Young, D. J.(Eds.)(1997), Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    18. John A Howard & Jagdish Sheth(1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    19. Judith Lynne Zaichkowsky (1985), “Measuring the Involvement construct.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, pp. 341-352.
    20. Jun, S.Y., Park, C.W., & Shocker, A.D. (1996), “Composite Branding Alliance: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effect.” Journal of Business Research, Vol.33, pp. 453-466.
    21. Jiawei, H. & Micheline, K.(2001), Data MiningConcepts and Techniques. MorganKaufmann publish, New York.
    22. Ji-Yeon Suh & Se-Bum Park(2009),“Successful Brand Alliance and Its Negative Spillover Effect on a Host Brand: Test of Cognitive Responses.” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.36, pp. 243-247.
    23. Klein, S., Frazier, G. L. & Roth, V. J.(1990), “An Transaction Cost Analysis Model of Channel integration in International Markets”. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.27(2), pp. 196-208.
    24. Lefkoff-Hagius & Mason (1993), “Characteristic,Beneficcal,and Image Attributes in Consumer Judgments of Similarity and Preference,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20, pp. 100-110.
    25. Laroche, M., Kim, C., and Zhou, L. (1996), “Brand Familiarity and Confidence as Determinants of Purchase Intention: an Empirical Test in a Multiple Brand Context.”Journal of Business Research, Vol. 37, pp. 115-120.
    26. Lance Leuthesser, Chiranjeev Kohl, Rajneesh Suri(2002),“2+2=5? a framework for using co- branding to leverage a brand.”Journal of Brand Management,Vol.11, pp. 35-47.
    27. Lee, Chia-Lin(2009),The influence of consumer evaluations on the success of co-branding. Doctoral Thesis of Bielefeld University.
    28. Maslow(1954), Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
    29. Michael B. Mazis, Olli T. Ahtola & R. Eugene Klippel(1975),
    “A Comparison of Four Multi-Attribute Models in the Prediction of Consumer Attitudes.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.41,
    pp. 38-52.
    30. Milton Harris & Artur Raviv(1978), “Some Results on Incentive Contracts with Applications to Education and Employment, Health Insurance, and Law Enforcement”, The American Economic Review,
    Vol.68, pp. 20-30.
    31. Nicosia, F. M.(1966), Consumer Decision Process: Marketing and Advertising Implications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    32. Nelson, Philip(1970),“Advertising as Information.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.82, pp. 729-754.
    33. Nelson, Richard (1994), “The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting.” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3, pp. 47-64.
    34. P. L. Moore, Frank & G. E. Fisher(1967), “Summer shower distribution over the Florida peninsula as deduced from digitized radar data.” J. Appl. Meteor, Vol.6, pp. 309-316.
    35. P. E. Green & V. Srinivasan (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.5, pp. 103-123.
    36. Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski and Deborah J. Maclnnis (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management.” The Journal of Marketing, Vol.50(4), pp. 135-145.
    37. Philip Kotler & Waldemar Pfoertsch(2006), B2B Brand Management. Springer, Berlin.
    38. Rothschild(1979), “Relationship marketing in the not-for-profit sector: an extension and application of the commitment–trust theory.” Journal of Business Research, Vol.58, pp. 806-818.
    39. Rao, A.R. & Ruekert, R.W. (1994), “Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality.” Sloan Management Review, pp. 87-97.
    40. Ruth J.A., Simonin B.L.(1998), “Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effect of Brand Alliance on Consumer Brand Attitudes.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, pp. 30-42.
    41. Simon & Marji(1970), “Influence of Brand Names on attitudes.” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.10, pp.28-30.
    42. Sheth,Newman & Gross(1991), “Why We Buy What We Buy : A Theory of Consumption Values.” Journal of Business Research, Vol.22,
    pp. 159-170.
    43. Stern & El-Ansary (1992), Marketing Channels (4th ed), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    44. Saeed Samiee(1994), “Customer evaluation of products in a global market.” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.25,
    pp. 579-604
    45. Shocker, Allan D, Rajendra K Srivastava,& Robert W Ruekert (1994), “Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management:An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.31(May), pp. 149-158.
    46. Sookyoung Ahn, Heajung Kim, Judith A. Forney(2009), “Co-marketing alliances between heterogeneous industries : Examining perceived match-up effects in product, brand and alliance levels.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol.35, pp. 477-485.
    47. Ted Roselius(1971), “Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods.” The journal of marketing, Vol.35, pp. 55-61.
    48. Alex Wang & Darrel D. Muehling(2010), “The effect of audio-visual and visual-only cues on consumer’s responses to co-branded advertising.” Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol.16,
    pp. 307-324.
    49. Wiseman F.(1971), “Segmentation Analysis on Automobiles Buyers During the New Model Year Transition Period.” The Journal of Marketing, Vol 35, pp. 42-49.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    98355051
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098355051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    505101.pdf3187KbAdobe PDF21955View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback