| Reference: | 1. 方至民、翁良杰，2004，「制度與制度修正：台灣積體電路產業發展的路徑變遷」，『人文及社會科學集刊』，16(3)：351-388。
2. 王大立，1994，「從交通旅次資料看都會區空間結構—臺中都會區實例分析」，『都市與計劃』，21(1)：63-80。
3. 王大立、劉小蘭，2009，「台灣地區都會發展之空間型態分析」，『都市與計劃』，36(4)：335-360。
4. 王小璘、林沛毅，2004，「以景觀生態學觀點探討棲地模擬模型-以臺中市大坑地區為例」，『設計學報』，9(2)：47-69。
5. 王振寰，1996，『誰統治台灣：轉型中的國家機器與權力結構』，台北：巨流圖書公司。
6. 王福山，2003，「特殊鋼產業策略演化模式之建立─以GMXX公司為例」，國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通所碩士論文：高雄。
7. 白仁德，2009，「福爾摩沙高速公路北部路段建設前後沿線地區人口空間分佈變遷之研究」，『都市與計劃』，36(1)：5-23。
8. 白仁德、岳裕智、林建元，2000，「中山高速公路對台灣西部走廊製造業發展之空間影響」，『都市與計劃』，27(2)：211-232。
9. 何有鋒、陳惠玲，2007，「都市健康住宅評估指標體系之研究」，『建築學報』，60：115-136。
10. 吳若予，1992，『戰後臺灣公營事業之政經分析』，台北：業強出版社。
11. 吳振發，2004，「農地轉用方案之地景生態效益評估」，『經社法制論叢』，33：269-305。
29. 徐斯勤，2001，「新制度主義與當代中國政治研究－理論與應用之間對話的初步觀察」，『政治學報』，32：95-170。
30. 張小飛、薛怡珍、馮豐隆、賴明洲，2001，「以生態規劃法探討惠蓀林場土地利用之適宜性」，『東海學報』，43：93-103。
31. 張莉欣、劉保廷，2006，「以景觀生態學廊道理論探討都市道路生態評估因子之研究-以臺中市西區為應用研究案例」，『造園學報』，1(1)：1-26。
32. 章英華、蔡勇美，1997，「台灣的都市經驗 — 過去、現在與未來初探」。頁523-554，收錄於蔡勇美、章英華編，『台灣的都市社會』，台北：巨流圖書公司。
33. 陳東升，1995，『金權城市：地方派系、財團與台北都會發展的社會學分析』，台北：巨流出版社。
34. 陳順宇，2000，『迴歸分析』，三版，台北：華泰書局。
35. 陳慧屏，2004，「從數字看都市發展」，『大地地理雜誌』，190：4047。
36. 郭瓊瑩，2001，「多向度思維與四維空間規劃-景觀生態學應用發展新思潮」，『造園學報』，7(2)：1-29。
37. 彭懷恩，1997，『認識臺灣－臺灣政治變遷五十年』，台北：風雲論壇出版社。
38. 曾柏興、黃國平，2003，「都市規模與運具發展之關係研究」，〈2003年全國土地管理與開發學術研討會〉，長榮大學。
101. Frenkel, A., 2004, “A Land-Consumption Model Its Application to Israel`s Future Spatial Development,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4): 453-470.
39. 華梅英，2000，「GIS應用於汐止地區人口變遷之研究」，『東南學報』，23：175-188。
40. 馮正民、林楨家，1992，「重大交通建設對區域發展之衝擊分析—以台灣北部區域為例」，『運輸計劃季刊』，21(3)：367-400。
41. 黃書禮、李佳倫、蔡曉瑩，1998，「臺北盆地生態能量流動與土地使用之關係—(1)土地使用能量階層性分析」，『都市與計劃』，25(2)：205-221。
42. 黃書禮、蔡靜如，2000，「臺北盆地土地利用變遷趨勢之研究」，『都市與計劃』，27(1)：1-23。
43. 黃樹仁，2002，『心牢：農地農用意識型態與臺灣城鄉發展』，台北：巨流圖書公司。
44. 馮豐隆、曾睛賢、甘宸宜，2005，「臺灣溪流地景分類與生物指標之建置-以南崁溪、客雅溪、中港溪為例」，『林業研究季刊』，27(3)：25-36。
45. 楊沛儒，2001，「地景生態城市規劃--基隆河流域1980~2000的都市發展、地景變遷及水文效應」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文。
46. 楊蓮福，2005，『人口問題與臺灣政治變遷』，台北：博揚文化。
47. 葉光毅，1988，「高速公路交流道設置前後人口與產業之比較分析」，『運輸計劃季刊』，17(4)：511-531。
48. 葉光毅、黃幹忠、李泳龍，2004，『計畫方法論進階』，台北：新文京開發出版股份有限公司。
102. Frenkel, A. Ashkenazi, M., 2008, “Measuring Urban Sprawl: How Can We Deal With It?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(1): 56-79.
49. 詹士樑，2007，「台北都會區土地使用變遷模式之研究-社經空間型態與土地使用/覆蓋變遷之互動影響分析（II）」，行政院國科會專題計畫成果報告。
50. 詹士樑，2008，「台北都會區土地使用變遷模式之研究-社經空間型態與土地使用/覆蓋變遷之互動影響分析（III）」，行政院國科會專題計畫成果報告。
51. 詹惠敏、陳炤杰，2006，「鳥類多樣化與地景多樣性研究-以屏東五溝村水圳地景為例」，『建築學報』，57：123-141。
52. 鄒克萬，2000，「區域人口分布之時空分析」，『台灣土地科學學報』，1：33-49。
53. 鄒克萬、張耀麟，2004，「都市土地使用變遷空間動態模型之研究」，『地理學報』，35：35-51。
54. 鄒克萬、黃書偉，2007，「都市土地利用變遷對自然環境衝擊之空間影響分析」，『地理學報』，48：1-18。
55. 廖石，1999，「從城鄉觀點探討台灣農村產業發展的課題」，『台灣土地金融季刊』，36(4)：81-97。
56. 劉小蘭、陳維斌，1996，「都市發展過程之研究—以台中市為例」，『都市與計劃』，23(1)：55-74。
57. 劉克智、董安琪，2003，「臺灣都市發展的演進—歷史的回顧與展望」，『人口學刊』，26：1-25。
58. 鄧家駒，2004，『多變量分析』，台北：華泰出版社。
103. Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., and Harrison, A., 2001, “Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S,” The Brookings Institution Survey Series, July: 1-23.
59. 鄧振源，2005，『計畫評估-方法與應用』二版，基隆：海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。
60. 鄭滄濱，2001，「軟體組織提昇人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式」，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理學系碩士論文：台北。
61. 賴宗裕，1999，『都市成長與土地開發管理－理論與實踐』，台北：華泰書局。
62. 賴宗裕，2003，「從成長管理到智慧型成長－理念與運用的發展」，〈第一屆土地研究學術研討會〉，國立臺北大學。
63. 賴宗裕，2008，『成長管理與規劃經濟』，臺北：國立政治大學地政學系。
64. 賴宗裕、徐國城，2004，「蔓延發展對土地利用與公共財政影響之探討」，『公共事務評論』，4(2)：1-20。
65. 賴宗裕、徐國城，2010，「都市空間發展型態變遷之影響因素分析— 台北都會區實例探討（1991至2006年）」，〈第六屆兩岸四地土地學術研討會〉，香港測量師學會。
66. 賴宗裕、陳立夫、徐國城，2007，「建立區域計畫指導新訂或擴大都市計畫機制」，內政部營建署委託研究計畫報告。
67. 賴明洲、薛怡珍，2004，「從地景生態學觀點建構全國校園生物棲地網絡」，『自然保育季刊』，46：6-15。
68. 謝高橋、張清富，1997，「城鄉連結—遷徙人口的特性與適應」。頁259-286，收錄於蔡勇美，、章英華編，『台灣的都市社會』，台北：巨流圖書公司。
104. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., and Freihage, J., 2001, “Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept,” Housing Policy Debate, 12(4): 681-717.
69. 仙台市總合研究機構，1999，『コンパクトシティ創造のための基本方向についての調査研究』，日本仙台市總合研究機構研究報告。
70. 岩崎裕直，2002，「公共交通整備が先導する杜の都（仙台）のまちづくり一コンパクトな都市づくりへの課題と取り組みー」，『交通工學』，第37卷增刊號：43-52。
71. Anas, A., Arnott, R. and Small, K. A., 1998, “Urban Spatial Structure,” Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3): 1426-1464.
72. Alston, L. J., 1996, “Empirical Work in Institutional Economics: an Overview.” pp. 25-30 in Empirical Studies in Institutional Change, edited by Alston, L. J., Eggertsson, T., and North, D. C., New York: Cambridge.
73. Antrop, M., 2000, “Changing Patterns in the Urbanized Countryside of Western Europe”, Landscape Ecology, 15: 257–270.
74. Antrop, M., 2004, “Landscape Change and the Urbanization Process in Europe,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 67: 9–26.
75. Arrow, K. J., 2000, “Increasing Returns: Historiographic Issues and Path Dependence,” History of Economic Thought, 7(2), 171-180.
76. Atkinson, G., and Oleson, T., 1996, “Urban Sprawl as a Path Dependent Process,”Journal of Economic Issues, XXX (2):609-615.
77. Benfield, F. K., Matthew D. R. and Chen, D. D. T., 1999, Once There Were Greenfields: How Urban Sprawl is Undermining America`s Environment, Economy and Social Fabric, Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Defense Council.
78. Benson, J. B. and MacKenzie, M. D., 1995, “Effects of Sensor Spatial Resolution on Landscape Structure Parameters,” Landscape Ecology, 10(2): 113–120.
105. Gardner, S., 2006, “The Impact of Sprawl on the Environment and Human Health.” pp.240-259 in Urban Sprawl：A Comprehensive Reference Guide, edited by Soule, D. C., Greenwood Press.
79. Blumenauer, E., 1998, “The View from the Capital,” Brookings Review, 16 (4): 15-16.
80. Brandt, J., 2000 “The Landscape of Landscape Ecologists,” Landscape Ecology, 15: 181–185.
81. Breheny, M., 1997, “Urban Compaction: Feasible and Acceptable?” Cities, (14)4: 209-217.
82. Brown, D. G., Page, S., Riolo, R., Zellner, M. and Rand, W., 2003, “Path Dependence and the Validation of Agent-Based Spatial Models of Land Use,” International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 19(2): 153-174.
83. Brueckner, J. K., 2000, “Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies,” International Regional Science Review, 23(2): 160-171.
84. Burchell, R. W. and Listokin, D., 1995, Land, Infrastructure, Housing Costs and Fiscal Impacts Associated with Growth: The Literature on the Impacts of Sprawl versus Managed Growth, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
85. Burchell, R. W., 1992, Impact Assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development and Redevelopment Plan, NJ: New Jersey Office of State Planning.
86. Burchell, R. W., Downs, A., McCann, B. and Mukherji, S., 2005, Sprawl Cost — Economic Impacts of Unchecked Development, Washington D.C.: Island Press.
87. Burchell, R. W., Shad, N.A., Listokin, D., Phillips, H., Downs, A., Seskin, S., Davis, J.S., Moore, T., Helton, D. and Gall, M., 1998, The Cost of Sprawl-Revisited. TCRP report 39, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
88. Burgess, P., 1998, Revisiting “Sprawl”: Lessons from the Past, Cleveland, OH: Cleveland State University Press.
106. Gold, T. B., 1986. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
89. Burton, E., 2000, “The Compact City： Just or Just Compact？ A Preliminary Analysis,” Urban Studies, 37(11): 1969-2001.
90. Cortell, A. P., Peterson, S., 2001, “Limiting the Unintended Consequences of Institutional Change,” Comparative Political Studies, 34 (7): 768-799.
91. David, P. A., 1994, “Why are Institutions the ` Carriers of History `? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, organizations and institutions,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2): 205-220.
92. Diamond, H. L. and Noonon, P. F., 1996, Land Use in America, Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
93. Dieleman, F. M., Dijst, M., and Burghouwt, G., 2002, “Urban Form and Travel Behaviour： Micro-level Household Attributes and Residential Context,” Urban Studies, 39(3): 507-527.
94. Dimaggio, P. J., 1991, “Constructing an Organizational Field as Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920-1940.” pp. 267-292 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Powell, P., Dimaggio, P. J., Chicago: Chicago University Press.
95. European Environment Agency, 2006, Urban Sprawl in Europe –The Ignored Challenge, Denmark: European Environment Agency.
96. Ewing, R. H., 1994, “Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of sprawl: A Literature Review,” Environmental and Urban Issues, 21(2): 1-15.
97. Farina, A., 2000, Landscape Ecology in Action, Boston:Kluwer Academic.
98. Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M., 1986, Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley.
107. Goodwin Procter., 2002, “Urban Sprawl and Smart Growth State and Local Governments Adopting "Smart" Solutions to a "Growing" Problem,” Environmental Law Advisory, September: 1-5.
99. Freeman, L., 2001, “The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1): 69-77.
100. Freilich, R. H., 1999, From Sprawl to Smart Growth: Successful Legal, Planning, and Environmental Systems, Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
108. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. W., 1997, “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal？” Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1): 95-106.
109. Greener, I., 2005, “The Potential of Path Dependence in Political Studies,” Politics, 25(1): 62-72.
110. Hadly, C.C., 2000, Urban Sprawl: Indicators, Causes , and Solutions, Prepared for the Bloomington Environmental Commission, available at: http://www.city.bloomington.in.us/planning/ec/reports/sprawl.html.
12. 吳振發、林裕彬，2006，「汐止市土地利用時空間變遷模式」，『都市與計劃』，33(3)：239-268。
111. Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R., 1996, “Political Science and Three New Institutionalism,” Political Studies, 44 (2):936-957.
112. Hasse, J. E. and Lathrop, R. G., 2003, “Land Resource Impact Indicators of Urban Sprawl”, Applied Geography, 23: 159-175.
113. Herold, M. Goldstein, N. C. and Clarke, K. C., 2003, “The Spatiotemporal form of Urban Growth: Measurement, analysis and Modeling,” Remote Sensing of Environment, 86: 286-302.
114. Hess, G. R., Daley, S. S., Derrison, B. K., Lubkin, S. R., McGuinn, R. P., Morin, V. Z., Potter, K. M., Savage, R. E., Shelton, W. G., Snow, C. M., Wrege, B. M., 2001, “Just What is Sprawl, Anyway? ” Carolina Planning, 26(2): 11–26.
115. Hsu, K. C., and Lai, T. Y., 2007, Institutions and Institutional Changes: the Case of Taiwan Non-Urban Land Development System, Paper presented at the 12th Asian Real Estate Society Annual Conference and The 2007 AREUEA International Conference, Macau, China, July9-12 .
116. Hulshoff, R. M., 1995, “Landscape Indices Describing a Dutch Landscape,” Landscape Ecology, 10(2): 101-111.
117. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., and Mieno, H., 1993, “The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method Via Fuzzy integration,” Fuzzy Sets and System, 55: 241-253.
118. Jenks, M., Burton, E., and Williams, K., 1996, The Compact city a sustainable urban form？London: Oxford.
119. Johnson, M. P., 2001, “Environment Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda,” Environment and Planning A, 33(4): 717-735.
120. Kasanko, M., Barredo, J. I., Lavalle, C., McCormick, N., Demicheli, L., Sagris,V.,Brezger, A., 2006, “Are European cities becoming dispersed? A Comparative Analysis of 15 European Urban Areas,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 77: 111-130.
13. 李承嘉，1998，『台灣戰後(1949-1997)土地政策分析』，台北：正揚。
121. Kato, J., 1996, “Institutions and Rationality in Politics: Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists,” British Journal of Political Science, 26(1): 553-582.
122. Kienast, F., 1993, “Analysis of Historic Landscape Patterns with Geographic Information Systems – a Methodological Outline,” Landscape Ecology, 8(2): 103–118.
123. Knaap, G., Talen, E. , Olshansky, R., and Forrest, C., 2001, Government Policy and Urban Sprawl, Report Prepared for Illinois Department of Natural Resources; available at: http://dnr. state.il.us/orep/c2000/balancedgrowth/reports.htm.
124. Knaap, G. J., Song, Y., Ewing, R. and Clifton, K., 2005, “Seeing the Elephant: Multi-Disciplinary Measures of Urban Sprawl,” Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper.
125. Knight, C., 1996, “Economic and Social Issues ,The Compact City a Sustainable Urban Form？” pp. 114-121 in The Compact city a sustainable urban form？ edited by Jenks, M., London: Oxford.
126. Koelble, T. A., 1995, “The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology,” Comparative Politics, 27(2): 231-243.
127. Kolankiewicz, L. and Beck, R., 2001, Weighting Sprawl Factor in Large U.S. Cities, Arlington: NumbersUSA Press.
128. Kuo, W.Y., Ranis, G. and Fei, C.H., 1981, The Taiwan Success Story: Rapid Growth with Improved Distribution in the Republic of China 1952-1979, Boulder: Westview Press.
129. Lee, J. and Tian, L., 1998, “Analyzing Growth － Management Policies with Geographical Information Systems,” Environment and Planning B – Planning and Design, 25(6): 865-879.
130. Lopez, R. and Hynes, H. P., 2003, “Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, Distribution and Trends,” Urban Affairs Reviews, 38(3): 325-355.
14. 李承嘉，1999，「1990年以後台灣土地政策與問題 － 社經結構變遷的觀點」，頁339-377，收錄於殷教授章甫七秩華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會編，『現代地政理論：殷教授章甫七秩華誕祝壽論文集』，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
131. Luck, M. and Wu, J., 2002, “A Gradient Analysis of the Landscape Pattern of Urbanization in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area of USA,” Landscape Ecology, 17: 327-339.
132. Mahoney, J., 2000, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society, 29: 507-548.
133. Martin, R., 2000, “Institutional Approaches in Economic Geography.” pp. 77-94 in A Companion to Economic Geography, edited by Sheppard, E., and Barnes, T.J., Oxford: Blackwell Press.
134. Martinuzzi, S., Gould, W. A., and Gonzalez, O. M. R., 2007, “Land Development, Land Use, and Urban Sprawl in Puerto Rico Integrating Remote Sensing and Population Census Data,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 79: 288-297.
135. Mieszkowski, P. and Mills, E. S., 1993, “The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3): 135-147.
136. Millward, H., Xue, G., 2007, “Local Urban Form Measures Related to Land-Use and Development Period: a Case-Study for Halifax, Nova Scotia,” Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 16(2): 53-72.
137. Nelson, A. C. and Duncan, J. B., 1995, Growth Management Principles and Practices, Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
138. Nelson, A., 1992, “Characterizing Exurbia,” Journal of Planning Literature, 6(4): 350-368.
139. Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy, J. R., 1988, “The Transport Energy Trade-Off: Fuel-Efficient Traffic Versus Fuel-Efficient Cities,” Transportation Research, 22A: 163-174.
140. Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy, J. R., 1989, “Gasoline Consumption and Cities,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(1): 24-37.
15. 李俊霖，2009，「全球氣候變遷下社經代謝作用與土地利用變遷之空間型態：SEMLUC模型之應用」，『都市與計劃』，36(4)：445-472。
141. North, D. C. and Thomas, R. P., 1970, “An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World,” Economic History Review, 23: 1-17.
142. North, D. C., 1981, Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: Norton Press.
143. North, D. C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
144. North, D. C., 1996, “Epilogue: Economic Performance Though Time.” pp. 342-355 in Empirical Studies in Institutional Change, edited by Alston, L. J., Eggertsson, T., and North, D. C., New York: Cambridge.
145. Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, 1992, Strategic Plan for Land Resource Management, Chicago, IL: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission.
146. Pemer, M., 2001, Developing a Sustainable Compact City in Stockholm, Sweden, Thematic Committee, Stockholm City Planning Administration.
147. Pierson, P., 2000, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” the American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251-267.
148. Remmer, K. L., 1997, “Theoretical Decay and Theoretical Development: The Resurgence of Institutional Analysis,” World Politics, 50(1): 34-61.
149. Schiller, T., 2004, “Sprawl: What is in a Name,” Business Review, Fourth Quarter: 26-38.
150. Schneider, A. and Woodcock, C. E., 2008, “Compact, Dispersed, Fragmented, Extensive? A Comparison of Urban Growth in Twenty-five Global Cities using Remotely Sensed Data, Pattern Metric and Census Information,” Urban Studies, 45(3): 659-692.
16. 李英明，2005，『新制度主義與社會資本』，台北：揚智文化。
151. Shinbein, P. J., 1997, “Multimodal Approaches to Land Use Planning,” ITE Journal, March: 26-32.
152. Sierra Club, 1998a, What is Sprawl? http://sierraclub.org/sprwl/report98/html.
153. Sierra Club, 1998b, The Dark Side of the American Dream: The Costs and Consequences of Suburban Sprawl, http:// sierraclub.org/sprawl/report98/html.
154. Smyth, H., 1996, “Running the Gauntlet: A Compact City within a Doughnut of Decay.” pp. 101-113 in The Compact city a sustainable urban form？, edited by Jenks, M., London: Oxford.
155. Song, Y. and Knaap, G. J., 2004, “Measuring Urban Form - Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl?” Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2): 210-224.
156. Soule, D. C., 2006, “Historical Framework: Cities and Their Regions, Suburbanization, and Federal Policies.” pp. 12-25 in Urban Sprawl：A Comprehensive Reference Guide, edited by Soule, D. C., Westport: Greenwood.
157. Southworth, J., Munroe, D., and Nagendra, H., 2004, “Land Cover Change and Landscape Ragmentation—Comparing the Utility of Continuous and Discrete Analyses for a Western Honduras Region,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101: 185–205.
158. Staley, S R., 1999, The Sprawling of America: In Defense of the Dynamic City, Policy Study, No. 251, available at: http://www.rppi.org/ps251.html.
159. Steadman, J. P., 1996, “A Land use, Transport and Energy Model of a Medium-Size,” Information Systems and Processes for Urban Civic Engineering Applications, Rome, Nov: 21-22.
160. Su and DeSalvo, 2008, “The Effect of Transportation Subsidies on Urban Sprawl,” Journal of Regional Science, 48(3): 567-594.
17. 林左裕，2010，『不動產投資管理』四版，台北：智勝文化。
161. Swedberg, R., 1997, “New Economic Sociology: What Has Been Accomplished, What Is Ahead?” Acta Sociologica, 40: 161-182.
162. Thelen, K., 1999, “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 369-404.
163. Tsai, Y. H., 2005, “Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness Versus Sprawl,” Urban Studies, 42(1): 248-275.
164. USHUD, 1999, The State of the Cities 1999: Third Annual Report, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C.
165. Wassmer, R., 2000, Urban Sprawl in U.S. Metropolitan Area: Ways to Measure and a Comparison of the Sacramento Area to Similar Metropolitan Area in California and the U.S., Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper.
166. Weiler, S., 2003, “Pioneers of Rural Sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West,” The Review of Regional Studies, 33(3): 264-283.
167. Williams, D. C., 2000, Urban Sprawl: A Reference Handbook, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
168. Williams, K., Burton, E., and Jenks, M., 1996, “Achieving the Compact City through Intensification: An Acceptable Option? ” pp. 83-100 in The Compact city a sustainable urban form？, edited by Jenks, M., London: Oxford.
169. Wolman, H., Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M., Furdell, K. and Sarzynski, A., 2005, “The Fundamental Challenge in Measuring Sprawl: With Land Should Be Considered?” The Professional Geographer, 57(1): 94-105.
170. Yeh, A. G. O. and Li, X., 2001, “Measurement and Monitoring of Urban Sprawl in a Rapidly Growing Region Using Entropy,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67(1): 83-90.
18. 林裕彬、吳振發、鄧東波，2004，「景觀生態面指數分析汐止地區1990-2001年土地利用空間鑲嵌特徵」，『都市與計劃』，31(3)：239-268。
171. Yenigul, B. S., 2007, The Effects of Local Government Policies on the Urban Sprawl “ANKARA CASE”, Paper presented at ENHR International Conference Sustainable Urban Areas, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, June25-28.
172. Young, D., 1995, Alternatives to Sprawl, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
19. 施鴻志、周士雄，1996，「區域多功能成長中心發展策略之研究—南部區域產業成長中心之發展」，『都市與計劃』，23(1)：75-94。
20. 段承樸，1994，「臺灣戰後經濟」，『人間臺灣政治經濟叢刊第3卷』，台北：人間出版社。
21. 孫思俐，2000，「美國公部門住宅建設制度」，行政院所屬機關出國報告。
22. 孫清山，1997，「戰後台灣都市之成長與體系」。頁63-104，收錄於蔡勇美、章英華編，『台灣的都市社會』，台北：巨流。
23. 徐國城，2006，「緊密都市形態之正負面效益論述－兼論對台灣城鄉空間發展之參考觀點」，『土地問題研究季刊』，5(4)：32-46。
24. 徐國城，2007，「由國土計畫法之立法意涵探詢台灣地區城鄉空間發展之方向」，『土地問題研究季刊』，6(3)：98-111。
25. 徐國城，2010，「都會區空間發展樣貌之探討—發展密度與地景生態指數的整合評估途徑」，『土地經濟年刊』，21：97-124。
26. 徐國城、賴宗裕，2007，「新訂或擴大都市計畫執行機制之變遷沿革與效率檢視」，〈2007年中華民國都市計劃、區域科學、地區發展學會聯合年會暨論文研討會〉，國立成功大學。
27. 徐國城、賴宗裕、李泳龍，2004，「以都市蔓延觀點初探台灣適密都市發展之型態與策略」，〈2004年全國災害危機處理學術研討會〉，長榮大學。
28. 徐國城、賴宗裕、詹士樑，2010，「台北都會區空間蔓延與緊密發展型態趨勢之研究」，『都市與計劃』，37(3)：281-303。 |
