政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51660
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51060497      Online Users : 859
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51660


    Title: 透過保健檢視德沃金平等理論
    An inspection of Dworkin’s theory of equality through health
    Authors: 李伊
    Contributors: 吳秀瑾
    林從一
    李伊
    Keywords: 平等主義
    平等
    保健
    egalitarianism
    equality
    health
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2011-10-13 13:56:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 每一個平等理論所要處理的都是不公平。德沃金藉其具原創性的拍賣會與保險市場思想範例以構建平等一概念，其中最可貴者在於其理論擺脫以量定義平等的窠臼。而藉保健檢視德沃金理論後，我認為對人的平等考量與敏於志向、鈍於稟賦兩項原則是非常值得任何平等理論奉為圭臬者；但其理論中仍有未能全身而退、通過保健檢視的部分。至於可取德沃金理論而代之的平等理論，我目前推薦沈恩的能力取徑，因為它從一個動態的面向來考量平等，而這可能比德沃金的理論前提更貼近事實。
    Every egalitarian theory copes with unfairness. R. Dworkin uses his very original auction and insurance market to build the concept of equality without using any concept of being equal in quantity. By the inspection through health to Dworkin’s theory of equality, I found that there are two principles worth adopting in a theory of equality, which are the “equal concern among individuals” and “being ambition sensitive and endowment insensitive.” Others did not pass the inspection through health. As to another theory of equality instead of Dworkin’s, I presently recommend Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which concerns equality from a dynamic aspect of freedom, which might be corresponding more to the fact than the premises of Dworkin’s.
    Reference: 一、 英文
    1. Anderson, Elisabeth, 1999,What is the Point of Equality?, Ethics, Vol. 109, Issue 2, pp287-337
    2. Arneson, Richard J.,2000, Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism, Ethics, Vol. 110, No.2, , pp339-349
    3. Cohen, G. A., 1989, On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, Ethics, Vol.99, No.4, pp.906-944
    4. Daniels, Norman, Just Health, 2008, Cambridge University Press
    5. Daniels, Norman, 1985, Just Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    6. Dworkin, Ronald M., 2000, Sovereign Virtue, Harvard University Press
    7. Dworkin, Ronald, 1981, Equality of Welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.10. No.3, pp.185-246
    8. Frankena, K. William, Ethics, 1963, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
    9. Kymlicka, Will, 2002, Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press
    10. Levy, Neil, 2007, Neuroethics, Cambridge University Press
    11. O’Neil, Martin, What Should Egalitarians Believe? , Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.36, No. 2, Spring 2008, pp.119-156
    12. Parfit, Dereck, Reasons and Persons, 1984, Oxford University Press
    13. Sarah Marchand, Daniel Wikler, Bruce Landesman, Class, Health, and Justice, Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 76, Issue 3, 2002, pp. 449-467
    14. Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom, 2000, Anchor Books, New York
    15. Sen, Amartya, 1996, On the Status of Equality. Political Theory ,24 （3）, pp394-400
    16. Warren, Mary Ann, 1997, Moral Status, Oxford University Press
    17. Online Etymology Dictionary, http://www.etymonline.com/
    18. Cambridge Dictionaries Online, http://dictionary.cambridge.org/
    二、 中文
    1. Allen Buchanan，Dan W.Brock，Norman Daniels，Daniel Wikler著，蕭郁雯 譯，從機會到選擇：遺傳學與正義，2004年08月20日，巨流圖書
    2. Amartya Sen 著，劉楚俊 譯，倫理與經濟，2000年4月初版，聯經出版
    3. 吳秀瑾，2009，德沃金機運平等觀評論：女性主義批評，政治與社會哲學評論，第28期，頁89-138。
    4. 吳秀瑾，2005，依靠與平等：論Kittay愛的勞動，女學學誌，第19期，頁157-183
    5. 王鵬翔, 2008, 「朗諾．德沃金教授其人與思想簡介」， 第一屆雷震民主人權講座，當代思想大師德沃金訪台演講簡介，頁7-11。
    6. 楊士奇，2007，論代間正義：一個羅爾斯式的觀點，政治大學哲學系，博士論文
    7. 孟軻，《孟子》，中國哲學書電子化計畫：http://chinese.dsturgeon.net/index_gb.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學研究所
    96154014
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096154014
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Philosophy] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    http___thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw_cgi-bin_gs32_gsweb2.pdf985KbAdobe PDF2683View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback